Timing, Is this Right?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Timing, Is this Right?
I was plugging some #s into DD2000 with my current setup after the cam swap.
I was adjusting the timing section and -8 gave me considerable more HP. Like 10-20 or so I forget right now, but can I do this? I'm sure my brother will know, as he will set the timing for me, but I was looking to get a faster answer. I thought you were supposed to advance the timing for more HP.
I was adjusting the timing section and -8 gave me considerable more HP. Like 10-20 or so I forget right now, but can I do this? I'm sure my brother will know, as he will set the timing for me, but I was looking to get a faster answer. I thought you were supposed to advance the timing for more HP.
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 1988 Pontiac Firebird, flat black
Engine: Stock 305 LO3
Transmission: Five speed
Outside timing is backwards, meaning that -8 on the bal is +8 on the motor I think. Meaning that you advance it +8 on the reading and it will give you -8 in the motor. Hope this helps.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
OK. On DD2000 it says - is retarded and + is advanced.
Oops, it's showing 9 more HP at -8.
Oops, it's showing 9 more HP at -8.
Last edited by Mark A Shields; Aug 2, 2002 at 10:12 PM.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Originally posted by madmax
9 upper end HP is not worth retarding the cam 8 degrees.
9 upper end HP is not worth retarding the cam 8 degrees.
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,197
Likes: 10
From: Manassas VA
Car: 04 GTO
Engine: LS1
Transmission: M12 T56
I think what you were playing with in DD2000 was cam timing. Thats the phasing of the cam relative to the crank. Advancing the cam opens the valves sooner, reatrding it opens it later. Advancing the cam usually builds more low end. Retarding it makes more power.
Thats what madmax was referring to, and that 8' of cam retard is pretty extreme.
Set ignition timing so it is consistent with best measured performance. You can't predict this value with a computer, or even by listening to other people. TnT is your friend
Thats what madmax was referring to, and that 8' of cam retard is pretty extreme.
Set ignition timing so it is consistent with best measured performance. You can't predict this value with a computer, or even by listening to other people. TnT is your friend
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,238
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, Alberta, Republic of Western Canada
Car: 1986 Sport Coupé
Engine: 305-4v
Transmission: 700R4 and TransGo2
I think that all the cam manufacturers grind their cams so that installing it "straight up" actually results in the cam being 4 degrees advanced.
Why?
To provide some bottom end power without confusing newbies with the reason that they ground it that way.
Why?
To provide some bottom end power without confusing newbies with the reason that they ground it that way.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 404
Likes: 1
From: Evansville, IN USA
Car: '89 GMC Pickup
Engine: 383 SBC Stealth Ram
Transmission: 700R4/VIG 3200
Re: Timing, Is this Right?
Originally posted by Mark A Shields
I was plugging some #s into DD2000 with my current setup after the cam swap.
I was adjusting the timing section and -8 gave me considerable more HP. Like 10-20 or so I forget right now, but can I do this? I'm sure my brother will know, as he will set the timing for me, but I was looking to get a faster answer. I thought you were supposed to advance the timing for more HP.
I was plugging some #s into DD2000 with my current setup after the cam swap.
I was adjusting the timing section and -8 gave me considerable more HP. Like 10-20 or so I forget right now, but can I do this? I'm sure my brother will know, as he will set the timing for me, but I was looking to get a faster answer. I thought you were supposed to advance the timing for more HP.
The cam I'm playing with in DD2000 (CC 8-305-8)will let me go to +/-14 and it makes a drastic difference. I'd never consider more that 4 one way or the other. If I thought the cam was lacking in the higher RPM area I'd retard it some, if I needed more down low I'd advance it some. But... never as far as DD2000 will let you go.
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,111
Likes: 53
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
Yes, you might gain 9+ hp at the peak by retarding the cam
that much from the stock timing but you'll give up too much midrange torque. Resulting in a net loss in performance.
It is best to install the cam as per the manufactures cam card
first, try it, then adjust from there. Usually if you need to actually move the cam by more than 8 degs, u need to select a different cam. Cam manufactures generally "grind in" some advance
in their designs. (4/5 deg) this has been found to result in the best overall torque curve and allows for some timing chain wear.
that much from the stock timing but you'll give up too much midrange torque. Resulting in a net loss in performance.
It is best to install the cam as per the manufactures cam card
first, try it, then adjust from there. Usually if you need to actually move the cam by more than 8 degs, u need to select a different cam. Cam manufactures generally "grind in" some advance
in their designs. (4/5 deg) this has been found to result in the best overall torque curve and allows for some timing chain wear.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





