Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

when did gm put roller cams in 350's?

Old Nov 17, 2002 | 10:49 PM
  #1  
mw66nova's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
when did gm put roller cams in 350's?

i have a 91 350 out of a blazer and i was wondering when gm started putting roller cams in their motors. i know that all i have to do is pull the intake and look down in there, but it's not as easy as that. thanks for the help guys
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2002 | 10:54 PM
  #2  
Mark A Shields's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Not sure about for a Blazer, but 3rd Gens got them in '87.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2002 | 10:54 PM
  #3  
iroc22's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, BC
In truck motors they started installing roller cams in 1996. B, F and Y bodies all had the roller 350's since 1987.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2002 | 10:59 PM
  #4  
mw66nova's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
so mine is a flat tappet? Thank G0D! i don't have the money to put a roller cam in this beast, i want to put a higher lift cam in it but would much rather have the flat tappet price. thanks guys for the info....
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2002 | 11:03 PM
  #5  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Just a little FYI:
Just because there is a roller cam in the engine doesnt mean you have to put one back in there. People do that all the time. You'd just run the flat tappet cam, lifters, pushrods, and timing set.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2002 | 07:41 AM
  #6  
mw66nova's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
really, didn't know that, well, i am doing a complete valvetrain upgrade including springs so i guess it won't matter then, eh?
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2002 | 08:12 AM
  #7  
jimmy_mac's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 518
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma
And on another note, you can find ZZ4 cams all over the place from 50 to 100 dollars. They don't wear like flat tappet cams so they can be re-used and most are low mileage cause they came out of fresh ZZ4s that hot rodders imediately upgraded. The ZZ4 cam would probably be real good for a truck with its short duration and it does have a decent lift. The roller lifters can be found for under a 100 also. But then you would need the spider and right size pushrods also.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2002 | 12:45 PM
  #8  
No4NJunk's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
From: Greenville S.C.
Car: 87 Grand National
Engine: 3.8 SFI Turbo
Transmission: BRF 200R4
Just a little FYI:
Just because there is a roller cam in the engine doesnt mean you have to put one back in there. People do that all the time. You'd just run the flat tappet cam, lifters, pushrods, and timing set.
Not being an *** but are you sure? I thought the lifter bores were different in roller blocks? Flat tappet lifters have to spin to prevent premature wear on both the lifters and cam lobes. I though provisions had to be made to the roller block to allow for this because roller lifters do not spin? I had a friend who had this problem and was chewing up cams.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2002 | 02:04 PM
  #9  
mw66nova's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
well, i am putting an edlebrock performer rpm cam in it with 234* 244* .488 .510 so i am not worried about which cam i am getting, just if i need a roller or hydrolic flat tappet.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2002 | 02:36 PM
  #10  
Jim85IROC's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 9
From: Readsboro, VT
Car: 85 IROC-Z / 88 GTA
Engine: 403 LSx (Pending) / 355 Tuned Port
Transmission: T56 Magnum (Pending) / T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / ?
Originally posted by No4NJunk
Not being an *** but are you sure? I thought the lifter bores were different in roller blocks? Flat tappet lifters have to spin to prevent premature wear on both the lifters and cam lobes. I though provisions had to be made to the roller block to allow for this because roller lifters do not spin? I had a friend who had this problem and was chewing up cams.
Yeah, he's 100% correct. From 87-95, the trucks came with roller blocks and flat tappet cams. The lifter bores were 100% identical. The only differences in the blocks were the extra material in the lifter valley that the lifter-holders bolted to.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jake_92RS
Tech / General Engine
8
Jan 28, 2020 10:37 PM
84z96L31vortec
Tech / General Engine
7
Aug 20, 2017 12:16 AM
camaro71633
Tech / General Engine
39
Sep 1, 2015 10:24 AM
84z96L31vortec
North East Region
1
Aug 10, 2015 08:27 PM
anesthes
Tech / General Engine
5
Aug 8, 2015 09:37 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:11 AM.