Is a 305 hot or not?
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: New York
Car: 1986 Z28
Engine: 305 LG4
Transmission: 700 R4
Is a 305 hot or not?
I just bout a new 1986 camaro z28 305 carbed. I love this car!!! But i want to make it faster!! Is it really worth putting money into the 305 or should i swap it??? I don't need anything crazy fast i just want to get from 0 to 60 a little faster!! Thanx
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Car: Trans Am GTA
Engine: 305
Transmission: Rebuilt 700r4 with stage 3
Happy with mine
I have a TPI 305 in my GTA. They arent very fast stock, but some little mods make a big diff. The person who owned the car before put in a 3:73 rear end. Thats a big difference. Changing the shifting points in the tranny is also a large noticable difference. A vette servo will also help the shifting automatic.
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: Oakville, Ct
Car: 1991Firebird T/A
Engine: 350
Transmission: Modified Viper t-56
Axle/Gears: dana 44, 3.55
cam and some head work on those stock heads will do wonders for 305's 
get a comp cams 2032 cam, or someting close to it (430ish lift, 210ish for duration)
step two, new timing chain
step 3, get the heads redone- new valve job (this alone will help), spend about 200 bucks on porting for the exhuast ports, have the pushrod slots lengthened for the higher lift, and some decent, not crazy valve springs put on...
step4, headers and cat back
step 5, junk that quadrabog and get a holley or soemthing, and a vac. adv distib...
ste6 6, put it togther, and have fun running mid to high 13's

get a comp cams 2032 cam, or someting close to it (430ish lift, 210ish for duration)
step two, new timing chain
step 3, get the heads redone- new valve job (this alone will help), spend about 200 bucks on porting for the exhuast ports, have the pushrod slots lengthened for the higher lift, and some decent, not crazy valve springs put on...
step4, headers and cat back
step 5, junk that quadrabog and get a holley or soemthing, and a vac. adv distib...
ste6 6, put it togther, and have fun running mid to high 13's
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Originally posted by fb305svs
cam and some head work on those stock heads will do wonders for 305's
cam and some head work on those stock heads will do wonders for 305's
get a comp cams 2032 cam, or someting close to it (430ish lift, 210ish for duration)
step two, new timing chain
step 3, get the heads redone- new valve job (this alone will help), spend about 200 bucks on porting for the exhuast ports, have the pushrod slots lengthened for the higher lift, and some decent, not crazy valve springs put on...
step4, headers and cat back
step 5, junk that quadrabog and get a holley or soemthing, and a vac. adv distib...
ste6 6, put it togther, and have fun running mid to high 13's
About $2500 later, you'll have a good-running car.
Last edited by five7kid; Dec 2, 2003 at 03:01 PM.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: New York
Car: 1986 Z28
Engine: 305 LG4
Transmission: 700 R4
I really don't want anything crazy!! I just want something to beat a few r!cers!! I like the idea of the rear and i wanted 2 put a trans go with a tranny cooler in it!! I also want a new cam and a full exhaust. I already have a edlbrock performer intake.. Replace the coil and would that make it half way decent?
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
The weaknesses of that motor are: Single-snorkel air cleaner; exhaust; cam; stock stall speed converter; ignition; heads; gears. In that order. Somewhere in there you need to make sure the carb is properly tuned, including the AV opening (there's a tech article on this board about that). Notice I didn't mention intake manifold. You have to modify at least all of the things I just mentioned before you need to consider an aftermarket intake, and the Performer isn't the right one to consider then (no better than stock).
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: Oakville, Ct
Car: 1991Firebird T/A
Engine: 350
Transmission: Modified Viper t-56
Axle/Gears: dana 44, 3.55
they make a flat tappet version of the 2032 cam... the biggest reason to do the timing chain/etc woud be the ceramic cam gear. besides the point the better chain is a plus 
as for the heads, i ran press in studs. Lengthening the pushrod holes is necesary if you run more than 430 lift, and is not dependant on 1.6 rockers, altho, those would also requier lengthing the holes as well. this was 1.84/1.50 LG4 heads i was running btw.
agreed, carb not a must, but i never had any luck with a qjet...
Traction mods? what are you talking about? i had none what so ever.
i dynoed with stock heads, rebuilt with a valve job, not even any porting, a performer intake, 1 5/8 headers, 3" cat back @ 235rwhp and 272rwtrq....
the car ran mid 13.8@ 103 w/ a 2.0 60' on street tires (formula wheels)
cost was WAYYYYY under 1000 bucks...
steve

as for the heads, i ran press in studs. Lengthening the pushrod holes is necesary if you run more than 430 lift, and is not dependant on 1.6 rockers, altho, those would also requier lengthing the holes as well. this was 1.84/1.50 LG4 heads i was running btw.
agreed, carb not a must, but i never had any luck with a qjet...
Traction mods? what are you talking about? i had none what so ever.
i dynoed with stock heads, rebuilt with a valve job, not even any porting, a performer intake, 1 5/8 headers, 3" cat back @ 235rwhp and 272rwtrq....
the car ran mid 13.8@ 103 w/ a 2.0 60' on street tires (formula wheels)
cost was WAYYYYY under 1000 bucks...
steve
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Take Five7's advice here... he knows what he is talking about better than just about anyone else here at TGO.
(No offence intended to anyone here)
(No offence intended to anyone here)
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Originally posted by fb305svs
Traction mods? what are you talking about? i had none what so ever.
Traction mods? what are you talking about? i had none what so ever.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
From: Dash PT, WA
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: LB9
Transmission: WC T5
When I got my 86z It was pretty much a 350lg4 lol, it was a 350 shortblock and everything else was bolted on from the previous lg4. That being the case it had the q-jet, single snorkel etc. First things I did to the car were get an open element, tune the q-jet and get a flamethrower coil. Just that along with a tune made a HUUUGE difference. Then I did headers, cutout and flowcrapper catback, that made a nice difference as well. It was amazing at what just letting the engine breath would do. Then I got greedy and tore the motor apart, but thats another story lol. Anyways, I know it wasn't a 305 but my point is that you have to get that thing to breath, have you looked at the exh. system on an lg4? Its horrible, tiny and crimped to death, I don't think my daily driver sentra with a 1.6l could breath efficiently through that lol.
edit: oh yea and the q-jet with an open element is awesome, when those massive secondaries open :hail: ...I don't know why the qjet gets such a bad rep, I think people are scared of it.
edit: oh yea and the q-jet with an open element is awesome, when those massive secondaries open :hail: ...I don't know why the qjet gets such a bad rep, I think people are scared of it.
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
From: Indpls IN US
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: Forged 383
Transmission: Pro-built 700R4
A used TPI 350 would be a night and day difference over that engine. If you got another car, some dough, some motivation, and know a couple of knowledgable car guys who can help, pull that 305 out. You'd have to get a new wiring harness and ecm, which would be a pain to install, but there's tons of help to be had here if you ever go through w/ a swap. Don't mess around w/ the 305 though, unless you just can't afford a swap. But like said if you have limited funds, the 305 can still scoot w/ the right mods. I've learned one thing over the last few year, which is kinda of cliche, but save up and do things right once. At least set a goal for your car that you know you'll be happy w/ a couple yrs down the road. Most likely you'll want to continue your quest for hp later on, but hopefully it'll be awhile.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Originally posted by fb305svs
they make a flat tappet version of the 2032 cam...
they make a flat tappet version of the 2032 cam...
cost was WAYYYYY under 1000 bucks...
i would suggest starting with EXTERNAL boltons, and chassis/ drivetrain mods. once you get that stuff done, and you think your as far as you can go then i would put together a mild 350 with vortec heads or maybe basic AFR's if you have the money. A good 350 can be built for about 2000 bucks. In my opinion going through all the trouble and expense of swapping cams and porting heads isn't worth it when for a little more money and time you can get a 350 with good heads and even a roller cam if you find the right core.
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: Oakville, Ct
Car: 1991Firebird T/A
Engine: 350
Transmission: Modified Viper t-56
Axle/Gears: dana 44, 3.55
i ran all the external mods on my 305 car, and quite honestly, i barely pulled a 14.8....
my car was 5 speed, not an autobtw, and it had a posi 342 rear in it.
anyways, i never saw any big diff in perfromance (besides yanking the stock exhaust off) until i put on the rebuilt heads and the cam... even that stuff with the stock manifolds and cat back would make a big difference..
food for thought!
my car was 5 speed, not an autobtw, and it had a posi 342 rear in it.
anyways, i never saw any big diff in perfromance (besides yanking the stock exhaust off) until i put on the rebuilt heads and the cam... even that stuff with the stock manifolds and cat back would make a big difference..
food for thought!
I agree with you, i just think it makes sense to do what you can while getting ready for the new motor. ultimately a fresh 350 is a better choice, because of the increased potential of the motor and the fact that its a new motor, which most 3rd gens are usually about ready for. Its amazing how cheap you can build a healthy 350 for. I think its safe to say its quicker to drop in a new 350 than swap heads and a cam, its not too much more money either.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
If you don't do the "external" things - exhaust, air cleaner - a 350 will not make any more power than the 305 for the same money. Remember, we're talking an LG4 here.
I agree that a cam will make more difference than the externals alone. But, without the externals, the cam will have the same problem as the 350 above.
I agree that a cam will make more difference than the externals alone. But, without the externals, the cam will have the same problem as the 350 above.
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: Oakville, Ct
Car: 1991Firebird T/A
Engine: 350
Transmission: Modified Viper t-56
Axle/Gears: dana 44, 3.55
my thoughts behind doing a swap like the cam first is that you will get some added performance right off the bat, and then even greater from the bolt on external mods 
agreed tho, if you can swing the cash and have the shop to do the swap in, thats the way to go, even if its a more or less stock 350 with a moderate cam in it...

agreed tho, if you can swing the cash and have the shop to do the swap in, thats the way to go, even if its a more or less stock 350 with a moderate cam in it...
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,238
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, Alberta, Republic of Western Canada
Car: 1986 Sport Coupé
Engine: 305-4v
Transmission: 700R4 and TransGo2
Originally posted by five7kid
Notice I didn't mention intake manifold. You have to modify at least all of the things I just mentioned before you need to consider an aftermarket intake, and the Performer isn't the right one to consider then (no better than stock).
Notice I didn't mention intake manifold. You have to modify at least all of the things I just mentioned before you need to consider an aftermarket intake, and the Performer isn't the right one to consider then (no better than stock).
You can, of course, choose another intake and one is limited only by what will fit under the hood, or whether you need the exhaust crossover passage in order to warm the carb sufficiently in the winter.
But the Performer is definitely a step up from the stock intake
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: Oakville, Ct
Car: 1991Firebird T/A
Engine: 350
Transmission: Modified Viper t-56
Axle/Gears: dana 44, 3.55
I would agree its an upgrade if the cam is done... if the cam isn't done, than i would think it might hurt bottom end power... the performe DOES flow better than the stock manifold, but will only be a benifit if the motor can take advantage of it.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 4,211
Likes: 3
From: GO PACK GO
Car: 83Z28 HO
Engine: Magnacharged Dart Little M 408
Transmission: G Force 5 speed
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" w/Detroit Trutrac
Originally posted by Sitting Bull
I disagree with that Tim. It is clear from dyno tests that an Edelbrock Performer intake will add about 20 hp, once the 3" exhaust and 1 5/8" headers are installed.
You can, of course, choose another intake and one is limited only by what will fit under the hood, or whether you need the exhaust crossover passage in order to warm the carb sufficiently in the winter.
But the Performer is definitely a step up from the stock intake
I disagree with that Tim. It is clear from dyno tests that an Edelbrock Performer intake will add about 20 hp, once the 3" exhaust and 1 5/8" headers are installed.
You can, of course, choose another intake and one is limited only by what will fit under the hood, or whether you need the exhaust crossover passage in order to warm the carb sufficiently in the winter.
But the Performer is definitely a step up from the stock intake
Gotta disagree with that too. My Weiand plus made a difference - especially in the mid-upper RPM range...and it's smog legal!!
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
I didn't say the stock manifold was as good as the Action+
.
I do know how much difference the ZZ3 take-off (very similar to the Action+) made on a stock LG4. It wasn't 20 HP, and it's a much better manifold than the Performer. Admittedly, that was before headers.
The original proposition was to put the Performer on and expect a big increase. I'm saying (and I think you all are actually agreeing) that the other mods have to come before the intake change is needed. What I am also saying (that you might not be agreeing with) is the Performer isn't enough better to make it worthwhile. Personally, if I hadn't gotten the sweatheart deal on the GMPP manifold, I would have gasket matched and cleaned up the factory manifold and left it at that (spacer, possibly).
Let's also not forget that different 305s got different manifolds over the years. I am completely familiar with the '86 style that is part of the engine the originator wants to improve. It's not the factory's worst effort by a long shot.
Anywho, there are smart mods to do on an LG4, and expensive not-so-smart mods. As one member has shown, you can get pretty good results with minimal money if you are smart. $600-$700 replacing the carb, manifold & distributor is not a smart start, especially if that's all you do (and so many people seem to think the carb is the first thing they need to replace with something aftermarket).
.I do know how much difference the ZZ3 take-off (very similar to the Action+) made on a stock LG4. It wasn't 20 HP, and it's a much better manifold than the Performer. Admittedly, that was before headers.
The original proposition was to put the Performer on and expect a big increase. I'm saying (and I think you all are actually agreeing) that the other mods have to come before the intake change is needed. What I am also saying (that you might not be agreeing with) is the Performer isn't enough better to make it worthwhile. Personally, if I hadn't gotten the sweatheart deal on the GMPP manifold, I would have gasket matched and cleaned up the factory manifold and left it at that (spacer, possibly).
Let's also not forget that different 305s got different manifolds over the years. I am completely familiar with the '86 style that is part of the engine the originator wants to improve. It's not the factory's worst effort by a long shot.
Anywho, there are smart mods to do on an LG4, and expensive not-so-smart mods. As one member has shown, you can get pretty good results with minimal money if you are smart. $600-$700 replacing the carb, manifold & distributor is not a smart start, especially if that's all you do (and so many people seem to think the carb is the first thing they need to replace with something aftermarket).
Ok im gunna ask this question and I know im gunna get the two answers that made me ask the question, but I want it from people who have experiance in it.
Is the 1.94 valve too big and will it be shrouded by the 305's small bore? I had a very extensive chat with SLP IROC and he posted pics and all this saying that it would be shrouded. I asked why World puts the 1.94 valve in to there 305 Torquer heads. Now, I am still not convinced that the 1.94 will be shrouded as I have never heard of anyone with teh World heads having any problem with the vavles hitting the deck of the block. I really want to have the 1.94 vavles installed. Please someone with experiance give me a strait answer.
Is the 1.94 valve too big and will it be shrouded by the 305's small bore? I had a very extensive chat with SLP IROC and he posted pics and all this saying that it would be shrouded. I asked why World puts the 1.94 valve in to there 305 Torquer heads. Now, I am still not convinced that the 1.94 will be shrouded as I have never heard of anyone with teh World heads having any problem with the vavles hitting the deck of the block. I really want to have the 1.94 vavles installed. Please someone with experiance give me a strait answer.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,238
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, Alberta, Republic of Western Canada
Car: 1986 Sport Coupé
Engine: 305-4v
Transmission: 700R4 and TransGo2
Originally posted by bigals87z28
Ok im gunna ask this question and I know im gunna get the two answers that made me ask the question, but I want it from people who have experiance in it.
Is the 1.94 valve too big and will it be shrouded by the 305's small bore? I had a very extensive chat with SLP IROC and he posted pics and all this saying that it would be shrouded. I asked why World puts the 1.94 valve in to there 305 Torquer heads. Now, I am still not convinced that the 1.94 will be shrouded as I have never heard of anyone with teh World heads having any problem with the vavles hitting the deck of the block. I really want to have the 1.94 vavles installed. Please someone with experiance give me a strait answer.
Ok im gunna ask this question and I know im gunna get the two answers that made me ask the question, but I want it from people who have experiance in it.
Is the 1.94 valve too big and will it be shrouded by the 305's small bore? I had a very extensive chat with SLP IROC and he posted pics and all this saying that it would be shrouded. I asked why World puts the 1.94 valve in to there 305 Torquer heads. Now, I am still not convinced that the 1.94 will be shrouded as I have never heard of anyone with teh World heads having any problem with the vavles hitting the deck of the block. I really want to have the 1.94 vavles installed. Please someone with experiance give me a strait answer.
I've ported and polished my own 305 heads (601 castings) and had 1.94" intake valves installed. It works fine. Other folks on here have done it to their 416 and 081 castings just as successfully.
Here is what you do; lay the head gasket on top of the head and then trace the outline of the cylinder opening onto it with a pencil. Then use your die grinder to open up the outside of the combustion chamber around the intake valve, all the while staying within the circle.
Job done

Follow the link at the end of my sig for a complete how-to including pics
Last edited by Sitting Bull; Dec 4, 2003 at 08:47 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,238
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, Alberta, Republic of Western Canada
Car: 1986 Sport Coupé
Engine: 305-4v
Transmission: 700R4 and TransGo2
Here's a pic of how they look. Notice the unshrounding. The machine shop did the final touches for free. Nice guys.
Here is another tip. Notice how I champfered the edges of the combustion chamber? You can do this easily by taking a little piece of regular old sandpaper and rubbing the edges with you thumb. Doesn't take long at all and guarantees you won't get any preignition from sharp lingering edges creating a hot spot.
By the way, 1.94" valves should be worth an extra 10 hp or so above 4000 rpm, so you are making a smart move
Here is another tip. Notice how I champfered the edges of the combustion chamber? You can do this easily by taking a little piece of regular old sandpaper and rubbing the edges with you thumb. Doesn't take long at all and guarantees you won't get any preignition from sharp lingering edges creating a hot spot.
By the way, 1.94" valves should be worth an extra 10 hp or so above 4000 rpm, so you are making a smart move
Last edited by Sitting Bull; Dec 4, 2003 at 08:55 PM.
Originally posted by bigals87z28
Is the 1.94 valve too big and will it be shrouded by the 305's small bore? I had a very extensive chat with SLP IROC and he posted pics and all this saying that it would be shrouded. I asked why World puts the 1.94 valve in to there 305 Torquer heads. Now, I am still not convinced that the 1.94 will be shrouded as I have never heard of anyone with teh World heads having any problem with the vavles hitting the deck of the block. I really want to have the 1.94 vavles installed. Please someone with experiance give me a strait answer.
Is the 1.94 valve too big and will it be shrouded by the 305's small bore? I had a very extensive chat with SLP IROC and he posted pics and all this saying that it would be shrouded. I asked why World puts the 1.94 valve in to there 305 Torquer heads. Now, I am still not convinced that the 1.94 will be shrouded as I have never heard of anyone with teh World heads having any problem with the vavles hitting the deck of the block. I really want to have the 1.94 vavles installed. Please someone with experiance give me a strait answer.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
db057
TBI
10
Aug 11, 2015 10:11 PM







