Will these valvesprings work with the LT4 hot cam??
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 7
From: LONDON, KY
Car: Camaro
Engine: Carbed L98
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Will these valvesprings work with the LT4 hot cam??
Just as the subject says.
Will they work ok with stock L98 heads. Maybe with screw-in studs. Or would they be ok with the stock studs.
Comp Conical Valvesprings
Thanks.
Oh yeah, I will be using 1.5 RR's. The hot cam I think has a max lift of .492 with 1.5's if im correct.
Will they work ok with stock L98 heads. Maybe with screw-in studs. Or would they be ok with the stock studs.
Comp Conical Valvesprings
Thanks.
Oh yeah, I will be using 1.5 RR's. The hot cam I think has a max lift of .492 with 1.5's if im correct.
find out what spring specs the cam requires and buy a set from comp or lunati to match the specs. if you're going to or considering screw in studs it'd be foolish not to machine the spring seats bigger. i'd stay away from the conical springs, just seems like a way around doing the job the right way. same goes for using pull out studs, there's no real reason not to use screw in studs.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
The lift would be .492 w/1.5:1 rockers. But, they always recommend 1.6:1 with it, making the lift .525 ( http://www.sdpc2000.com/cart.asp?act...d=989&pid=1087 ).
Last edited by five7kid; Jan 23, 2004 at 10:41 AM.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 7
From: LONDON, KY
Car: Camaro
Engine: Carbed L98
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by ede
find out what spring specs the cam requires and buy a set from comp or lunati to match the specs. if you're going to or considering screw in studs it'd be foolish not to machine the spring seats bigger. i'd stay away from the conical springs, just seems like a way around doing the job the right way. same goes for using pull out studs, there's no real reason not to use screw in studs.
find out what spring specs the cam requires and buy a set from comp or lunati to match the specs. if you're going to or considering screw in studs it'd be foolish not to machine the spring seats bigger. i'd stay away from the conical springs, just seems like a way around doing the job the right way. same goes for using pull out studs, there's no real reason not to use screw in studs.
Do you think the spring rate would be ok with the cam lift?
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 7
From: LONDON, KY
Car: Camaro
Engine: Carbed L98
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by five7kid
The lift would be .492 w/1.5:1 rockers. But, they always recommend 1.6:1 with it, making the lift .525 ( http://www.sdpc2000.com/cart.asp?act...d=989&pid=1087 ).
The lift would be .492 w/1.5:1 rockers. But, they always recommend 1.6:1 with it, making the lift .525 ( http://www.sdpc2000.com/cart.asp?act...d=989&pid=1087 ).
Thanks, thats what I thought.

I figured that the LT4 Hotcam would work good with the L98 heads with using the .492 lift and a stock bottom end. Of course I am running a carb and not a TPI.
Last edited by bluegrassz; Jan 23, 2004 at 10:50 AM.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
There are also non-shoulder screw-in studs available.
I don't think I'd do that kind of work with the heads on the car, though.
I don't think I'd do that kind of work with the heads on the car, though.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 7
From: LONDON, KY
Car: Camaro
Engine: Carbed L98
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Yeah, the non sholder studs were the ones I was going to use.
The key to taping the heads while on the motor is using grease on the drill and the tap. Also placing towels or rags in the right places help. I think someone posted a article on it here at thirdgen.
The key to taping the heads while on the motor is using grease on the drill and the tap. Also placing towels or rags in the right places help. I think someone posted a article on it here at thirdgen.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 7
From: LONDON, KY
Car: Camaro
Engine: Carbed L98
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73
I thought it over, and think I will just run the stock bottom end and heads this season.
Car craft has a buildup of the GM 350 HO motor. It has vortec heads and is running the Lt4 Hot cam with 1.6 rr's. They are getting 401 HP and 428 TQ.
Im thinking of doing this to the L98 long block. Should be somewhat close to those numbers. The L98 will have more compression than the HO motor.
What do you guys think?
Car craft has a buildup of the GM 350 HO motor. It has vortec heads and is running the Lt4 Hot cam with 1.6 rr's. They are getting 401 HP and 428 TQ.
Im thinking of doing this to the L98 long block. Should be somewhat close to those numbers. The L98 will have more compression than the HO motor.
What do you guys think?
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 784
Likes: 1
From: New Mexico
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28 5.7 G92
Engine: L98 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Posi G80
Yess do it, I am glad to see that someone else is going to use 1.5 rockers, besides the vortec heads flow best around .5 lift anyway. I have 1.5 aluminum RR with my vortec heads and hot cam and it runs like a beast!! I am using comp 981-16 sprins and have had no problems, it still revs up to 6000+ easy.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1988iroc350tpi
Tech / General Engine
8
Aug 14, 2015 07:52 PM










