3/8 or 7/16 stud vs hyd. or mech roller
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Car: 79 Z28
Engine: 383
Transmission: T-56
3/8 or 7/16 stud vs hyd. or mech roller
Ok... here's the deal. I have a comp cam XR288HR retrofit cam(236-242/.520-.540/100 lsa) which i was going to put into my 383 along with the retrofit hydraulic roller lifters.. which are absurdly expensive at nearly 500 bucks.
Now from a cost/benefit point of view.. I am beginning to have second thoughts, and am considering running a mechanical cam and lifters(which are about half the cost).. but I will have to change my valvesprings. So... is it ok to run my 3/8 stud/roller rockers with a mechanical cam given the increased spring pressure, or should I go to 7/16?? Or can i just slap on a $100 3/8 stud girdle from moroso and call it good?
Questions? Comments? Opinions? Hate?
Now from a cost/benefit point of view.. I am beginning to have second thoughts, and am considering running a mechanical cam and lifters(which are about half the cost).. but I will have to change my valvesprings. So... is it ok to run my 3/8 stud/roller rockers with a mechanical cam given the increased spring pressure, or should I go to 7/16?? Or can i just slap on a $100 3/8 stud girdle from moroso and call it good?
Questions? Comments? Opinions? Hate?
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Car: 79 Z28
Engine: 383
Transmission: T-56
I would run the comp cams 977 valve spring which has a 155# seat pressure at 1.85 install height and a 441 lb./in. spring rate.
The cam I am looking at is a Comp XR274R (274/280-236/242-.564/.570-110) mechanical. Another problem arises though with this.. considering that the 977 springs are only good for 600 max lift, and i would be at 601-608 with my 1.6 rockers. I believe this could be remedied by having an install height of 1.9" with 133# seat pressure, and considering I am running titanium retainers.. I dont believe I would have a problem with valve float.
Also if I do run and install height of 1.9"... that would open the door to the next size cam being the XR280R(242-248/.570-.576(.608-.614 w/ 1.6's)).
The cam I am looking at is a Comp XR274R (274/280-236/242-.564/.570-110) mechanical. Another problem arises though with this.. considering that the 977 springs are only good for 600 max lift, and i would be at 601-608 with my 1.6 rockers. I believe this could be remedied by having an install height of 1.9" with 133# seat pressure, and considering I am running titanium retainers.. I dont believe I would have a problem with valve float.
Also if I do run and install height of 1.9"... that would open the door to the next size cam being the XR280R(242-248/.570-.576(.608-.614 w/ 1.6's)).
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KO1
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
16
Oct 15, 2015 05:00 PM





