Why does a higher octance rating cost more?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,076
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Car: 1982 Trans Am
Engine: LG4
Transmission: 200C
Axle/Gears: 3:73
Why does a higher octance rating cost more?
I've been studying Hydrocarbons for a few weeks in Chemistry class, and my mind wondered what was difference in octane levels. All I know is that it’s C8H18.
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
The "octane" rating of a fuel has little to do with "octane" the hydrocarbon, it's a measurement of how well the fuel resists detonation when compared to pure octane (which supposedly has an octane rating of 100).
The reason that higher octane gas costs more is because people will pay more for it. It used to be that premium gas contained more detergents and additives than regular, but they're pretty much all the same now, except for a few additives to increase octane rating that get added at the pump.
The reason that higher octane gas costs more is because people will pay more for it. It used to be that premium gas contained more detergents and additives than regular, but they're pretty much all the same now, except for a few additives to increase octane rating that get added at the pump.
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,111
Likes: 53
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
I could not agree more. they only reason 93-94 octane gas costs more is because you'll pay the price.
The difference in refining cost is nil.
Its all in the marketing. Just like little cans of miracle octane booster, oil additives, gas savers.
The difference in refining cost is nil.
Its all in the marketing. Just like little cans of miracle octane booster, oil additives, gas savers.
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Car: 1984 Z-28
Engine: L69
Transmission: 700-R4
Originally posted by StealthElephant
So I'm paying 1.75 a gallon for 93 Octane because I'm a sucker? Great....
So I'm paying 1.75 a gallon for 93 Octane because I'm a sucker? Great....
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Shakopee, MN, USA
Car: '88
Engine: 305tpi
Transmission: t-5
Originally posted by F-BIRD'88
I could not agree more. they only reason 93-94 octane gas costs more is because you'll pay the price.
The difference in refining cost is nil.
Its all in the marketing. Just like little cans of miracle octane booster, oil additives, gas savers.
I could not agree more. they only reason 93-94 octane gas costs more is because you'll pay the price.
The difference in refining cost is nil.
Its all in the marketing. Just like little cans of miracle octane booster, oil additives, gas savers.
Motor Trend or one of those car magazines did a study a few years back, and found that on average, octane boosters add between .1 and 1 "points". At anywhere from $3- $10 per bottle, thats a major ripoff imo. Trending Topics
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
If you really want to increase the octane rating of your fuel, add some tetraethyl lead. Of course then you can kiss your oxygen sensor, catalytic converter, brain cells, and the environment goodbye.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by Apeiron
If you really want to increase the octane rating of your fuel, add some tetraethyl lead. Of course then you can kiss your oxygen sensor, catalytic converter, brain cells, and the environment goodbye.
If you really want to increase the octane rating of your fuel, add some tetraethyl lead. Of course then you can kiss your oxygen sensor, catalytic converter, brain cells, and the environment goodbye.
theres also a bunch of other cheaper, easier to obtain chemicals that you can buy and mix into your tank to raise the octane rating...
ya..ya... but where can you get those other additives like the lead or whatever whatever you said, rofl...
w/ lead... can't you run higher compression as well?
i remember my father 30-40 years ago ran 12 compression on his motor... 69 camaro ss he built himself... unfortunantly, i wasn't thought of then,
:'( .. but.. he said he never had problems... but couldn't keep it up cuz no more lead....
what about those "OCTANE BOOSTER!"s.. that they sell at autozone? rofl... i doubt they work.. or that NOS bottle fuel booster thing.. they do ANYTHING at all? or close to nothing, & not worth the trouble?
w/ lead... can't you run higher compression as well?
i remember my father 30-40 years ago ran 12 compression on his motor... 69 camaro ss he built himself... unfortunantly, i wasn't thought of then,
:'( .. but.. he said he never had problems... but couldn't keep it up cuz no more lead....what about those "OCTANE BOOSTER!"s.. that they sell at autozone? rofl... i doubt they work.. or that NOS bottle fuel booster thing.. they do ANYTHING at all? or close to nothing, & not worth the trouble?
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Lead was used both to raise the octane (which was around 104 or so with premium back in the day) and lubricate the valves too. Thats why when leaded gas went away, engines started getting hardened valve seats. They needed hardened valve seats because there was no more lead to lubricate the valves, so they would get eaten away in no time.
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Hawaii
Car: 1987 Chevy V10
Engine: 5.7L
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 4.10
You guys are only paying $1.75 for 93 octane in NJ?! Out here in Cali it's $2.03 - for 87 octane! I guess I'm the sucker. I think it's time to move.
You guys are only paying $1.75 for 93 octane in NJ?! Out here in Cali it's $2.03 - for 87 octane! I guess I'm the sucker. I think it's time to move.
I would be happy to pay that for regular!!! We can't even get over 91 octane and that is like 2.20 or 2.30. Anything more than 91 can only be got at 76 and that is like 4.00 or more PER GALLON. OMG!!!! We are getting screwed here in california. They really have us bent over with our pants down. Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
The only real difference is the additional additaves they put in it to slow the burn and prevent detonation. I think the base might be a higher grade as well. Awhile back I asked my dad, who, among other things, is a chemist, and he wentoff on a little tangent about how it all works. I was just like 'zzzzzzzzz.....' so i dont remember much of what he said. Maybe Ill ask again.
Ouch, almost 3 dollars for premium? Why not jsut run regular ol' unleaded? Im glad its only a dollar sixty something here in NJ. The more I tune my car, the worse the fuel economy is. Im lucky if I can get 16 - 18 mph lateley.
Ouch, almost 3 dollars for premium? Why not jsut run regular ol' unleaded? Im glad its only a dollar sixty something here in NJ. The more I tune my car, the worse the fuel economy is. Im lucky if I can get 16 - 18 mph lateley.
Last edited by dimented24x7; Mar 4, 2004 at 02:08 AM.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by bes217
That is exactly what I was going to say!!! You guys are complaining about paying 1.75 for 93, you ungrateful bastards.
I would be happy to pay that for regular!!! We can't even get over 91 octane and that is like 2.20 or 2.30. Anything more than 91 can only be got at 76 and that is like 4.00 or more PER GALLON. OMG!!!! We are getting screwed here in california. They really have us bent over with our pants down.
That is exactly what I was going to say!!! You guys are complaining about paying 1.75 for 93, you ungrateful bastards.
I would be happy to pay that for regular!!! We can't even get over 91 octane and that is like 2.20 or 2.30. Anything more than 91 can only be got at 76 and that is like 4.00 or more PER GALLON. OMG!!!! We are getting screwed here in california. They really have us bent over with our pants down. lastnights news story... gas prices are "record highs"
thats right.. here in mount pleasant, SC, it hit 1.63 or somthing like that, with it projected to possibly hit 1.80 during the summer..
then again, i go out of mount pleasant to fill the tank and only pay 1.49 a gal.. on avg, its 10 cents cheaper in north charleston... nice drive too.
just like the guys in cali to pull other guys pants down eh?....
is it any wonder why i dont even want to visit the state?!
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
yeah, up here Oregon, things are not much better than in cali, we are in the 1.89 range for 87, and over 2 for 92 (the highest we can get in this stupid, hippie run, evro-**** state) and on top of that, we can't even pump our own gas
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
From: Howard Beach, NYC
Car: 1990 TA
Engine: LB9 305
Transmission: 4L60
Originally posted by StealthElephant
So I'm paying 1.75 a gallon for 93 Octane because I'm a sucker? Great....
So I'm paying 1.75 a gallon for 93 Octane because I'm a sucker? Great....
Originally posted by theno1prince
You guys are only paying $1.75 for 93 octane in NJ?! Out here in Cali it's $2.03 - for 87 octane! I guess I'm the sucker. I think it's time to move.
You guys are only paying $1.75 for 93 octane in NJ?! Out here in Cali it's $2.03 - for 87 octane! I guess I'm the sucker. I think it's time to move.
On the news a while ago they had a story about Jersey raising prices on the NJ Turnpike because they were sick of NYers coming over for the cheap gas. DOn't know if that's true or there were other reasons, but that's what was reported.
Last edited by Goumba T; Mar 4, 2004 at 10:11 AM.
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: north new jersey
Car: 1987 Chevrolet Camaro LT(SOLD)
Someone told me all carbarated engines should use 93 octane. They sai it will burn better with less carbon build up. I have been using 87 without problem. Should i change over because of the carbarator?
Originally posted by F-BIRD'88
I could not agree more. they only reason 93-94 octane gas costs more is because you'll pay the price.
The difference in refining cost is nil.
Its all in the marketing. Just like little cans of miracle octane booster, oil additives, gas savers.
I could not agree more. they only reason 93-94 octane gas costs more is because you'll pay the price.
The difference in refining cost is nil.
Its all in the marketing. Just like little cans of miracle octane booster, oil additives, gas savers.
With premium, I can turn up the boost to 18 psi and there is no detonation.
FWIW....
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by a73camaro
I gotta disagree. I have an '88 Dodge Daytona (turbo 4-banger) and when I run regular gas in it, the engine can only hit about 10 psi boost before it starts to detonate.
With premium, I can turn up the boost to 18 psi and there is no detonation.
FWIW....
I gotta disagree. I have an '88 Dodge Daytona (turbo 4-banger) and when I run regular gas in it, the engine can only hit about 10 psi boost before it starts to detonate.
With premium, I can turn up the boost to 18 psi and there is no detonation.
FWIW....
umm, yes it has higher octane... you just stated a perfect example of a motor to use higher octane gas with...
but that has nothing to do with why they set the price of higher octane gas where it is.
Originally posted by MrDude_1
umm, yes it has higher octane... you just stated a perfect example of a motor to use higher octane gas with...
but that has nothing to do with why they set the price of higher octane gas where it is.
umm, yes it has higher octane... you just stated a perfect example of a motor to use higher octane gas with...
but that has nothing to do with why they set the price of higher octane gas where it is.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
From: Pueblo Co
Car: 1989 C4
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 307
If your car runs fine on lower octaine fuel theres no reason you need higher octaine it doesent benefit the engine one bit. Some newer cars will alter the fuel map and ign timing when you add higher octaine fuel but not on a 3rdgen. Too bad all my stuff needs the extra resistance to detonation, I dont much like having my base timing set at 5* @ 5000ft to keep them from rattling on 85 octaine, rattling too much that is. Just gassed up the truck 10 minutes before they raised the price by 3 cents today. 85 $1.59.99, 87 $1.69.99 and whooohoo 91, $1.79.99. 43 cents of that is tax.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
From: Pueblo Co
Car: 1989 C4
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 307
You Cali guys know how much of that is tax? From what I understand you guys pay alot more tax on fuel because of all the constant mind numbing road construction.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,238
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, Alberta, Republic of Western Canada
Car: 1986 Sport Coupé
Engine: 305-4v
Transmission: 700R4 and TransGo2
Originally posted by DauntlessZ28
Yea, that sucks man. I need 93 or it'll start knocking
Yea, that sucks man. I need 93 or it'll start knocking
In my opinion, you either have the timing advanced too far or your cylinders are carboned up.
You should be able to run 87 octane no sweat.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedLeader289
Tech / General Engine
10
May 28, 2019 01:47 PM
LT1Formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
7
Oct 8, 2015 08:34 PM





