Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Z-28 Intake manifold

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 1, 2004 | 09:41 PM
  #1  
KnightWarrior's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Nor Cal
Car: 1985 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 305 V-8 4BBL (H) Supercharged
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi
Z-28 Intake manifold

Hello everyone, I recently rebuilt my 85 Z-28's 305 and replaced the stock intake with an Edelbrock Performer. The original stock manifold had a part number 14057053 on it and looked like a dual-plane design as well. I just wondered if this was the standard LG4 intake or if my car was unique. It doesn't seem to have the bottom-end off-idle grunt it used to with the new Edelbrock. Any suggestions?
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2004 | 09:51 PM
  #2  
Air_Adam's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
If its aluminum, its the stock LG4/L69 intake manifold. Nothing really unique or special about it.

I'm not surprised your Ede intake has a little less kick than the stocker. The stock manifold is designed for low end torque. The edelbrock is more for top end, and sacrifices a little low end to get it.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2004 | 09:56 PM
  #3  
KnightWarrior's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Nor Cal
Car: 1985 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 305 V-8 4BBL (H) Supercharged
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi
Yep it is aluminum. So I guess it is nothing special. I hope headers will help the Edelbrock intake work better. I'm saving up for some SLP smog-legal coated ones or Edelbrocks. Just a matter of time. Thanks for the info.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2004 | 10:15 PM
  #4  
Air_Adam's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Headers will help. Just keep in mind, you haven't "lost" any low end, it hasn't gone anywhere, it just seems like it because you have more in the upper rpm range now.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2004 | 12:12 AM
  #5  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
I'm a little surprised to hear that. The Performer isn't anything special for high RPMs, either. When I went from the stock LG4 intake to the GMPP q-jet intake (which is capable of higher RPMs than the Performer or stock intake) while the LG4 was still mostly stock, it didn't lose a bit down low.

Did you set the timing to the same place? A few degrees retarded from where it was before will make a difference. You might try advancing it a few degrees more, anyway, and see what it does.

Last edited by five7kid; Sep 2, 2004 at 12:17 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2004 | 01:01 AM
  #6  
Air_Adam's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Hmm, didn't notice it was just a Performer. I thought he said Perf RPM.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2004 | 07:43 PM
  #7  
KnightWarrior's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Nor Cal
Car: 1985 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 305 V-8 4BBL (H) Supercharged
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi
My edelbrock is a 3701 EGR smog legal Performer that claims to have good throttle response frm off idle all the way to 5500 rpm. I'm just wondering if it is any better than the stock one.
The car runs good, but I thought it was more responsive before. Maybe the timing is too modest now and needs a little advance.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2004 | 11:35 PM
  #8  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
If you had asked before doing it if that Edelbrock would be "worth it", the answer undoubtedly would have been "no".

The typical LG4 base timing call-out is zero degrees. The typical LG4 is pretty happy with 4-6 degrees advanced base timing.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2004 | 11:40 PM
  #9  
KnightWarrior's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Nor Cal
Car: 1985 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 305 V-8 4BBL (H) Supercharged
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi
I'll have to stop by the shop tomorrow and see if he'll bump up the timing a bit. It is a real drag to spend several grand and have the car run worse han before. :-(
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2004 | 06:37 AM
  #10  
phess11's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 966
Likes: 2
From: NE Ohio
Car: 83 Z28
Engine: 305 (LG4)
Transmission: THM700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.23 non-LS
Hate to get off the subject but if the LG4 "likes" 4-6 degrees over 0 degrees advance , and mine sure does, why didn't GM set it there? Is there an emissions difference, or is it that at 0 degrees you can use lower octane?

phil
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2004 | 11:30 AM
  #11  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Cars are tuned at the factory for emissions, not performance.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2004 | 02:46 PM
  #12  
FastZ28*84's Avatar
Junior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: Annville,PA
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 72 350 .030 over
Transmission: 89 WC T-5
Sorry to hijack this thread but I am interested in the GMPP Q-jet intake Five7kid speaks of. Do you have a part number?
Did it affect hood clearance?
Will my L69 air cleaner still fit?

Thanks
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2004 | 02:55 PM
  #13  
RB83L69's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
This is probably the one he's talking about.

http://www.paceparts.com/index.asp?P...D&ProdID=22352

I'm running one in my L69 car right now with the stock air cleaner. It altered the hood clearance slightly but still fits.

It is far better than the Performer as far as performance. The runners are larger and straighter, and the plenum is taller. They're not as big as the Perf RPM, I'd guess about halfway between the Perf and Perf RPM, just from laying them all out on the floor next to each other.

It supports all emissions features. Whether it's "50-state smog legal" (or even 49-state) I couldn't begin to guess. I know my car passes easily with it installed; but whether it's "legal", as in, does it have a CARB EO #, I have no clue.

Of course, I didn't pay anywhere near that much for it; and you probably wouldn't have to either. People who buy the ZZ4 and replace the intake, have these for sale in basically new condition, all the time.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2004 | 06:00 PM
  #14  
KnightWarrior's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Nor Cal
Car: 1985 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 305 V-8 4BBL (H) Supercharged
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi
I got my timing adjusted today with 6 degrees of advance and boy, what a difference! It moves out again! Feels like a Z-28 again! Thanks for all the help!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
Dec 10, 2019 07:07 PM
86CamaroDan
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
Sep 29, 2015 10:08 PM
Blue419
Tech / General Engine
3
Sep 10, 2015 01:03 PM
BOOT77
TPI
3
Sep 5, 2015 03:55 PM
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
0
Sep 2, 2015 07:28 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:05 PM.