When did GM start to put computers in cars?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 1
From: The nation's capital
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
When did GM start to put computers in cars?
I was to say 87 for most GM products outside of the TPI, but enlighten me.
I was looking to my next project, and I want it to be a carb motor, so the least amount of computer controlled garbage, the better.
I've been looking at Caprices specifically, but who knows . . .
I was looking to my next project, and I want it to be a carb motor, so the least amount of computer controlled garbage, the better.
I've been looking at Caprices specifically, but who knows . . .
Im pretty sure that every carbd car since 82 at least had the computer and CC Qjet. My 82 olds did. Every american sold thirdgen did. I know that pickups in 81 didnt, but as far as cars, I think all did past 82.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 2
From: Elgin, IL
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
A long time ago my uncle had told me all cars since 1980 1/2 (effectively 1981 since there weren't any "1/2" models since the 60s) had some form of a computer onboard..
Then again, as above stated, it appears trucks didn't have a computer at all in 1981. Maybe trucks were a year later?
Then again, as above stated, it appears trucks didn't have a computer at all in 1981. Maybe trucks were a year later?
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 3
From: out of my mind; be back in 5 minutes....
Car: 1989 Firebird Formula
Engine: Internal Combustion
Transmission: Completed
Axle/Gears: ones that turn.
Funny thing, neither my 83 nor 84 Camaro's came with ECM's from the factory.
83 had the 2.8, and the 84Z had the LG4.
83 had the 2.8, and the 84Z had the LG4.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,852
Likes: 1
From: Valley of the Sun
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer
They have to be Canadian or export cars then. All 3rd gens sold in the US had to have computers due to gov regs.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 4
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
Originally posted by ME Leigh
They have to be Canadian or export cars then. All 3rd gens sold in the US had to have computers due to gov regs.
They have to be Canadian or export cars then. All 3rd gens sold in the US had to have computers due to gov regs.
But as someone else said, 1982 (maybe 81 for a few) was generally the year the majority of GM cars came with some form of computer (even if they only had a carb).
Trending Topics
I have heard the rumor that SOME Canadian cars didn't come with a computer (when they should) and I always suspected they were "pulled" by someone.
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Originally posted by Glenn91L98GTA
Most Canadian cars had computers too. I have heard the rumor that SOME Canadian cars didn't come with a computer (when they should) and I always suspected they were "pulled" by someone.
Most Canadian cars had computers too. I have heard the rumor that SOME Canadian cars didn't come with a computer (when they should) and I always suspected they were "pulled" by someone.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 4
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
Originally posted by Apeiron
The LG4 in the Canadian thirdgens wasn't computer controlled.
The LG4 in the Canadian thirdgens wasn't computer controlled.
Yes, it was found that some manufacturers DID NOT comply with the required emissions and gave "Export" cars instead of "US Federal Emission" cars. But it was more a "hit or miss". No one model was found to be exclusively "Export". It was more "the majority were US Fed but a number of Export ended up in certain parts of Canada.
However, now for the bad news, just because your car is built "Export" doesn't exempt it from BC emissions testing (if you live in the Lower Mainland of BC). In fact, for a lot of models, the BC emission requirements are LESS than California. They lowered the emission limits on my 1991 GTA below California standards (before I relocated to Kamloops which doesn't have emission testing).
Since 1992 ALL cars brought into Canada MUST meet have minimum US Fed emissions - no more Export cars to fill the gap. That is why in BC, if your car may fail emissions and it was built in 1991 or earlier, you can obtain a "waiver" if you spend a minimum amount (use to be $150) to attempt to bring your car in compliance with the emission standard. If your car was buillt in 1992 or later, you have to spend "what ever it takes" to make it pass.
Thus, if you want to modify your engine, 1991s and earlier are the vehicles to get. You only have to spend the minimum amount to "attempt" to make it pass emissions.
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Not all, no, but certainly the vast majority. The older it is the more likely it is to be non-CCC.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 4
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
Originally posted by Apeiron
Not all, no, but certainly the vast majority. The older it is the more likely it is to be non-CCC.
Not all, no, but certainly the vast majority. The older it is the more likely it is to be non-CCC.
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
But that was back in the day when everyone was used to conventional carbs and nobody understood computers. Now the opposite is true.
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
The primary metering rods are raised and lowered by a solenoid, instead of by vacuum. When the mixture is rich, the rods are lowered, when the mixture is lean, the rods are raised.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post









