Mean Mouse vs. Impersonator II

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Mar 10, 2005 | 01:45 PM

jrg77

Thread Starter

Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2003

Posts: 586

Likes: 1

From: Gary, In USA

Car: '85 Camaro

Engine: LG4 305

Transmission: T-5

Mean Mouse vs. Impersonator II

See these articles:

http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles/68999/

http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/te...imp/index.html

What are the real differences here? Which one has a better chance of passing emissions without a weird test only tune?

Are you aware of any better setups that will pass a sniffer?

Thanks,
Jason

Mar 11, 2005 | 08:58 PM

jrg77

Thread Starter

Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2003

Posts: 586

Likes: 1

From: Gary, In USA

Car: '85 Camaro

Engine: LG4 305

Transmission: T-5

ttt

Mar 11, 2005 | 09:47 PM

HalfInchWrench

Supreme Member

Joined: Feb 2005

Posts: 1,054

Likes: 1

From: Ajax, ON

Car: 85Z28 87GTA 91GTA 98SS

Engine: SBC, LS-x

Transmission: T-5, 700-R4, T-56

I didn't read either article but any engine running right should have no problem passing emissions unless it is super radical. I've seen some beasts of engines pass with flying colours.

Mar 20, 2005 | 09:44 PM

jrg77

Thread Starter

Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2003

Posts: 586

Likes: 1

From: Gary, In USA

Car: '85 Camaro

Engine: LG4 305

Transmission: T-5

I think part of what I am trying to determine is if either of these is too radical. Also I am looking to see what could change to make them better (powerful, cheaper, more reliable -pick two)

Jason