Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Metric or SAE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 12, 2001 | 09:00 PM
  #1  
john fin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: ara,fl,usa
Metric or SAE

Why does half my Transam reqiure metric fasteners and the other half SAE. Did GM have a problem in the mid 80's choosing which one to use?
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2001 | 09:08 PM
  #2  
8Mike9's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,183
Likes: 42
From: Oakdale, Ca
Car: 89 IrocZ
Engine: L98-ish
Transmission: 700R4
LOL!! Mid-80's...better step back about 10 years ...I seem to recall metric fasteners on my '78 Camaro (also none as slow-as-frozen-goo).
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2001 | 09:10 PM
  #3  
Vader's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 19,659
Likes: 310
It was the period of changeover. The holes in the engine case that were common to the old design and drilled and tapped on the Ingersoll automatic lines remained as fractional sizes. This prevented any significant retooling and incompatibility with older cases, heads, and such. Smaller and less expensive parts, like intakes, accessories, brackets, and other components were changed over to metric sizes as soon as there was a redisign or new item released.

You would be very upset if your Dart heads and ARP bolts didn't fit the block because the "new" case was made for metrics.

This is another reason for Torx fasteners, There are no metric or fractional sizes for Torx, just the international standards. While the body of the fastener may have a metric or fractional diamter and corresponding pitch, the heads are the same for both.

------------------
Later,
Vader
------------------
"Let the bodies hit the floor!"
Adobe Acrobat Reader

[This message has been edited by Vader (edited August 12, 2001).]
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2001 | 09:18 PM
  #4  
shaocaholica's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
SAE? Society of Automotive engineers? There is a "society"? How old are these guys =P Are new cars made in the US still incorporating SAE fasteners? If you're gonna have one standard you might as well use metric. It wont hurt anyone if all new cars were all metric becuase every darn garage already has metric tools.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2001 | 09:45 PM
  #5  
AlkyIROC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,268
Likes: 169
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
My 91 truck has a mixture of standard and metric. Even the Hubble telescope has standard and metric. The trouble is where the parts were assembled. The USA still assembled parts with standard fasteners while components that were assembled out of the country (Canada and Mexico being the largest assembled parts suppliers) were already using metric. Until everything was standardized to all metric there can be a real mixture of fasteners. At least were not using british standard sizes.

Depending on the metric size required, most standard tools will still work. Common metric sizes for nuts and bolt heads that don't convert very well are 10, 15 and 18 mm. The sizes in between are either not a common size to use or will have a standard size close enough that it will work.

Even my 91 truck still has standard and metric sizes. There aren't a lot of standard but they're still there.

------------------
Follow my racing progress on Stephen's racing page
and check out the race car

87 IROC-Z SuperPro ET Bracket Race Car
461 naturally aspirated Big Block

Best ET on a time slip: 11.242 altitude corrected to 10.89
Best MPH on a time slip: 121.52 altitude corrected to 125.89
Altitude corrected rear wheel HP: 497.9
Best 60 foot: 1.546

Racing at 3500 feet elevation but most race days it's over 5000 feet density altitude!
Member of the Calgary Drag Racing Association

87 IROC bracket car, 91 454SS daily driver, 95 Homebuilt Harley
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2001 | 09:46 PM
  #6  
Vader's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 19,659
Likes: 310
If I'm correct, the newer generation SBC III engines are all metric. Many of the newer GM engines are all metric, as well. Since the SBC was designed and first produced in 1954, the fasteners in the main components are still all fractional.

Consider your self lucky that you don't have to deal with clutch head bolts and Robertson heads, like some of the '40s and '50s cars and trucks used. Or better yet, the 19/32" heads used on 7/16" bolts. Then again, explain why some Toyotas (Land Cruiser) have a 120.65mm bolt circle for the wheels. I thought they were all "standard" metric sizes. ¿?

------------------
Later,
Vader
------------------
"Let the bodies hit the floor!"
Adobe Acrobat Reader
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2001 | 09:53 PM
  #7  
Vader's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 19,659
Likes: 310
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Stephen 87 IROC:
...At least were not using british standard sizes... </font>
No kidding! Try finding a gauging tool for a BSP fitting. Depending on what part of the country in which they were manufactured, the "standards" change. Look in an engineering manual for exact sizes for some British standards and you'll be lucky if you find an asterisk, let alone any numerals. This is all from a place smaller than Wyoming. And we're whining about having only two systems, both of which actually have some standards.

------------------
Later,
Vader
------------------
"Let the bodies hit the floor!"
Adobe Acrobat Reader
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2001 | 11:18 PM
  #8  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Vader:
Consider your self lucky that you don't have to deal with clutch head bolts and Robertson heads</font>
What's wrong with Robertson heads? I've never seen one stripped yet. Any good Canadian has a dozen Robertson drivers in his toolbox.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AUZ28
Interior
5
Aug 26, 2015 06:08 PM
AUZ28
Interior Parts Wanted
0
Aug 25, 2015 07:29 AM
Project86
Suspension and Chassis
1
Aug 31, 2001 11:35 AM
Kyle F
Car Audio
0
May 3, 2001 12:58 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:21 PM.