running "pig" rich, no MAF codes, what gives?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z Convertible
Engine: 305
Transmission: Art Carr 700-R4
running "pig" rich, no MAF codes, what gives?
Someone's bound to have had this happen, so I hope whoever has finds this thread, here goes. My '89 tuned port started bucking and stumbling about 3 weeks ago. It set the TPS "voltage too high" code. After replacing the TPS and ECM, no improvement. In a "last ditch" effort to address the problem, I put in a remanufactured mass airflow sensor that I got a deal on a couple of years ago. It fixed the problem.....for a week. Last week Tuesday, the symptoms returned, but this time, NO CODES. It had run well for that week, but now, it's back to running like crap. In the "start with cheap, go towards expensive" tradition, I raided my spare parts box. I replaced: (1) the relevant fuses, (2) the MAF power and burnoff relays (I believe), (3) the coolant temp. sensor (it's just as easy to replace as it is to test on a TPI car because of its location), all to no avail. I tested the analog and system grounds (for the sensor) with the dark green signal wire and got 5.0 volts. I tested the red power feed wire from the relay, and got battery voltage. I tested the "D" connector "in run" to see if the burnoff relay was leaking voltage into the system, it was "0 volts" so it checked out OK. Finally, I checked the signal voltage "in run" an it read 4.2 volts AT IDLE!! Yikes. It spiked even higher when I revved the engine. I checked out the fuel system two weeks ago, and it was fine. Could my replacement (refurbished) MAF sensor have crapped out already? It seems unlikely, but the high voltage at idle points to this, and I'm flying blind because I still get no codes. Any input would be appreciated because I really don't want to have to buy another MAF sensor. My paranoid sixth sense says "buy new" but that is a lot of money to drop when not absolutely sure. Thanks for any pointers.
Last edited by Tony89; 05-09-2005 at 02:09 AM.
#2
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: st-hyacinthe,quebec.canada
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: camaro and gmc sierra
Engine: 5.0 l t.p.i,and 4.3 vortec
Transmission: manuel(iroc)automatic(other)
Axle/Gears: 3.45 bw
check your oxygen sensor!
#3
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: E.B.F. TN
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Tree Huggers
Engine: Do Not
Transmission: Appreciate Me.
Seriously doubt it's the MAF. I tend to lean towards leaking injectors or bad CTS for these generally. Have you tested f/p and leakdown time? Inspected the FPR? Have an AFPR? Was the CTS a known good one or one just sitting in your box?
#4
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z Convertible
Engine: 305
Transmission: Art Carr 700-R4
probably not cts
Thanks for the responses. The CTS was a known "good" one. It's brand new. The thing that leads me toward the MAF sensor is the really high voltage reading at idle. 4.2 volts is an acceptable wide-open-throttle number, and both of the grounds and power feed are fine. I changed the original MAF sensor with the reman. unit two weeks ago, and it ran fine for a week. Then, the same symptoms came back. If the injectors were the culprits, the MAF wouldn't read that high. The 4.2 figure goes up as I rev the engine. It's almost as if it catastrophically failed. Its calibration seems to be off by 90% or so. The cherry on top of this whole "crap sundae" is the fact that the car still isn't setting any trouble codes at all. Just to clarify, when I purchased the "new" MAF a couple of years ago, I did it for the specific purpose of removing the screens and gutting the heat sink. I removed the screens, but never removed the heat sink. I then read all the material about how the screens really need to be there, and replaced the intake side screen with a larger mesh. Is it possible that the adhesive that I used to attach the new screen destroyed the hot-wire element? I checked the fuel pressure during the original diagnosis, and it checked out fine. If it had been something "mechanical" like a torn diaphragm, the voltage signal of the MAF would be reading "normal," so I ruled that out.
Last edited by Tony89; 05-09-2005 at 11:25 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post