Edelbrock Valve Covers
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
From: Lancaster, CA.
Car: '92 Camaro RS
Engine: 355 TPI
Transmission: Tremec T-56
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt/3.42
Edelbrock Valve Covers
I just purchased a set of Edelbrock Elite Series Valve covers for my 92 RS (V8 TBI)and noticed that the drivers side valve cover only has one hole (front)and my stock one has two (one for oil fill & the other for the PCV). The passenger side valve cover is just like my stock one with one hole. I was wondering if anyone knows where the PCV hose would go in my new valve covers.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,443
Likes: 0
From: College Station, Tex USA
Car: 89rs
Engine: 400Sb
Transmission: Tremec 3550
Well the Pcv should be on the drivers side. I used the passenger side (which has a grommet that needs removing) for the oil fill. But, I think you will find that the driverside is too tall. The + for the alternator used to touch on the VC.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
From: Lancaster, CA.
Car: '92 Camaro RS
Engine: 355 TPI
Transmission: Tremec T-56
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt/3.42
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by jcb999:
Well the Pcv should be on the drivers side. I used the passenger side (which has a grommet that needs removing) for the oil fill. But, I think you will find that the driverside is too tall. The + for the alternator used to touch on the VC.</font>
Well the Pcv should be on the drivers side. I used the passenger side (which has a grommet that needs removing) for the oil fill. But, I think you will find that the driverside is too tall. The + for the alternator used to touch on the VC.</font>
When i bought a set of valve covers from them their was a place on the drivers side for the oil cap, but you had to knock it out with a hammer or something. I dont know if yours are the same ones but Apeiron is right. Thats how i fill mine now.
------------------
'89 firebird formula tpi
custom cold air,gutted maf(just screens),52mm tb,ported plenum,edelbrock runners and base,headers with 3" catback,tb coolant bypass,afpr@44 psi,msd 6a w\blasterII coil,3.73 posi,sf connectors and corvette servo
------------------
'89 firebird formula tpi
custom cold air,gutted maf(just screens),52mm tb,ported plenum,edelbrock runners and base,headers with 3" catback,tb coolant bypass,afpr@44 psi,msd 6a w\blasterII coil,3.73 posi,sf connectors and corvette servo
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: The State of Hockey
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Miniram'd 383, 24X LS1 PCM
Transmission: TH700R4, 4200 stall
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.33:1
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Apeiron:
Get used to pulling the breather or the PCV valve and using a funnel to fill the oil.</font>
Get used to pulling the breather or the PCV valve and using a funnel to fill the oil.</font>
.So heads up
......------------------
1987 GTA L98 MD8
355, TFS Heads, LT4 Hot Cam
My GTA
The Minnesota F-body Club
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
From: Rio Rico, AZ 85648
Car: 1989 IROC-1
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
I have a set of Edelbrock valve covers and that's what I do. I just pop out the PCV and stick a funnel when I need to add oil.
------------------
http://www.gruveb.com/z28
------------------
http://www.gruveb.com/z28
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,443
Likes: 0
From: College Station, Tex USA
Car: 89rs
Engine: 400Sb
Transmission: Tremec 3550
I would not put the PCV on the passenger side. I aways heard, the rotation of the motor makes it work better on the drivers side.
But, i really never understood the logic with that. It seems to me that the rotation would still allow the air to be sucked in just as effective on the drivers side and expelled on the pass side.
When you think about whats happening, the motor is rotating clockwise. The bottom of the crank and rods are swinging to the left (looking at it) and that is where there is the largest volume (in the bottom of the pan), so i would think the passenger side would be the most effective place that the gas would naturally want to be vented.
[This message has been edited by jcb999 (edited October 31, 2001).]
But, i really never understood the logic with that. It seems to me that the rotation would still allow the air to be sucked in just as effective on the drivers side and expelled on the pass side.
When you think about whats happening, the motor is rotating clockwise. The bottom of the crank and rods are swinging to the left (looking at it) and that is where there is the largest volume (in the bottom of the pan), so i would think the passenger side would be the most effective place that the gas would naturally want to be vented.
[This message has been edited by jcb999 (edited October 31, 2001).]
Rotation of the motor has nothing to do with PVC placement. Your motor is supplied fresh air into the passenger side valve cover (on tpi motors) from the TB. The PVC (POSITIVE CRANKCASE VENTILATION) valve then allows engine vacuum to pull contaminated air out of the crank case from the opposite side of the engine. If you put it on the same side as the breather, it would not do any good.
------------------
Mike Metzler (Desert86Roc)[*] Check Out:SpeedWorldMotorplex.com[*] Check Out:Chevrolet F-Body Online Part & Illustration Manual[*] www.MetzlerRacing.com
Best ET @ 1250 ft[*] 15.352 @ 91.215 mph (uncorrected)
------------------
Mike Metzler (Desert86Roc)[*] Check Out:SpeedWorldMotorplex.com[*] Check Out:Chevrolet F-Body Online Part & Illustration Manual[*] www.MetzlerRacing.com
Best ET @ 1250 ft[*] 15.352 @ 91.215 mph (uncorrected)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
Dec 10, 2019 07:07 PM
New2Chevy
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
Sep 28, 2015 12:35 AM
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
0
Sep 2, 2015 07:28 PM





