Anyone run Naphtha?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Yellowknife, NWT, Canada
Posts: 3,004
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 357
Transmission: TH-350C
Axle/Gears: 3.43
Anyone run Naphtha?
Just wondering if anyone has run Naphtha (camp fuel) in their car. I thought i may give this a go and see how big of a fireball my car can create 
Its about the only fuel i havent tried burning in a engine yet...

Its about the only fuel i havent tried burning in a engine yet...
#2
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
Re: Anyone run Naphtha?
Originally posted by 84z28350
Just wondering if anyone has run Naphtha (camp fuel) in their car. I thought i may give this a go and see how big of a fireball my car can create
Its about the only fuel i havent tried burning in a engine yet...
Just wondering if anyone has run Naphtha (camp fuel) in their car. I thought i may give this a go and see how big of a fireball my car can create

Its about the only fuel i havent tried burning in a engine yet...
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Yellowknife, NWT, Canada
Posts: 3,004
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 357
Transmission: TH-350C
Axle/Gears: 3.43
Ok things i have run in motors so far...
AvGas- Nothing special here just 100+ octane gas, works good
Jet A- Kerosene, meltdown in about 30seconds of running
Jet B- Mix of Naphtha and kerosene, motor ran fine
These have all been tried on a old school land cruiser 4cyl and the JetA killed a mid 80s F150 I6. I run AvGas in the camaro almost on a regular basis.
So with the results of running jetB it leads me to believe i should be fine running camp fuel. But now with only the camaro or the boat i dont really want to test this on either of them...
AvGas- Nothing special here just 100+ octane gas, works good
Jet A- Kerosene, meltdown in about 30seconds of running
Jet B- Mix of Naphtha and kerosene, motor ran fine
These have all been tried on a old school land cruiser 4cyl and the JetA killed a mid 80s F150 I6. I run AvGas in the camaro almost on a regular basis.
So with the results of running jetB it leads me to believe i should be fine running camp fuel. But now with only the camaro or the boat i dont really want to test this on either of them...
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Tigard, Oregon
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 Berlinetta
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
I think it's interesting....
Maybe you could find a 4 stroke lawnmower or something cheap from a garage sale to try it on?
Maybe you could find a 4 stroke lawnmower or something cheap from a garage sale to try it on?
#7
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 21,394
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes
on
14 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Hmmm, let's do the numbers..... gasoline is like $2.75 a gallon, naptha (lighter fluid) is like $1.00 for a 2 oz can..... or, you can buy it as "camp fuel", and every few days or so, empty your local Wal-Mart's shelf of the stuff, and fill your car in the parking lot out of gallon cans..... this sounds like a superior fuel to gasoline..... yeah, I'd be interested in smoking a few more cars to find out how I can spend more money and enjoy more hassle on fuel too..... sign me up ..... for SOMEBODY ELSE'S cars.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ajax, ON
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85Z28 87GTA 91GTA 98SS
Engine: SBC, LS-x
Transmission: T-5, 700-R4, T-56
I've run moon shine in a chainsaw just for something to do. Not good tho, it's alcohol abuse.
#10
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 21,394
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes
on
14 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
That's sort of my point.
Alternate fuels are a good idea when certain conditions are met:
1. Less expensive than the normal fuel (or at least, within a reasonable bound of not being WAY more expensive)
2. More convenient (or at least, within a reasonable bound of not being WAY more inconvenient)
3. Widely available (like, I'm driving down the road and need fuel, so I'm going to pull off right about here and buy some)
4. Safe (nice to be able to transfer and handle large quantities of it without undue risk; a pump and a hose and a fire-supression system are a good idea, open gallon cans and a funnel are not so good)
5. Non-destructive to equipment (need we say more? ask that poor truck maybe?)
6. One might add in today's political climate, a proposed fuel might get "extra credit" if not made from imported oil (unlike naptha... a petroleum derivative)
I'm having trouble seeing how naptha is an improvement in ANY ONE of those areas, over gasoline. Please help me understand. After all, I'm sofakingdom, I can't figure it out.
Alternate fuels are a good idea when certain conditions are met:
1. Less expensive than the normal fuel (or at least, within a reasonable bound of not being WAY more expensive)
2. More convenient (or at least, within a reasonable bound of not being WAY more inconvenient)
3. Widely available (like, I'm driving down the road and need fuel, so I'm going to pull off right about here and buy some)
4. Safe (nice to be able to transfer and handle large quantities of it without undue risk; a pump and a hose and a fire-supression system are a good idea, open gallon cans and a funnel are not so good)
5. Non-destructive to equipment (need we say more? ask that poor truck maybe?)
6. One might add in today's political climate, a proposed fuel might get "extra credit" if not made from imported oil (unlike naptha... a petroleum derivative)
I'm having trouble seeing how naptha is an improvement in ANY ONE of those areas, over gasoline. Please help me understand. After all, I'm sofakingdom, I can't figure it out.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Yellowknife, NWT, Canada
Posts: 3,004
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 357
Transmission: TH-350C
Axle/Gears: 3.43
I wasnt looking for any sort of cheap alternative to gas or a superfuel, just wanted to give it a go and see what happened.
Naphtha = $3/L
Premium = $1.30/L
Naphtha = $3/L
Premium = $1.30/L
#12
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by sofakingdom
That's sort of my point.
Alternate fuels are a good idea when certain conditions are met:
1. Less expensive than the normal fuel (or at least, within a reasonable bound of not being WAY more expensive)
2. More convenient (or at least, within a reasonable bound of not being WAY more inconvenient)
3. Widely available (like, I'm driving down the road and need fuel, so I'm going to pull off right about here and buy some)
4. Safe (nice to be able to transfer and handle large quantities of it without undue risk; a pump and a hose and a fire-supression system are a good idea, open gallon cans and a funnel are not so good)
5. Non-destructive to equipment (need we say more? ask that poor truck maybe?)
6. One might add in today's political climate, a proposed fuel might get "extra credit" if not made from imported oil (unlike naptha... a petroleum derivative)
I'm having trouble seeing how naptha is an improvement in ANY ONE of those areas, over gasoline. Please help me understand. After all, I'm sofakingdom, I can't figure it out.
That's sort of my point.
Alternate fuels are a good idea when certain conditions are met:
1. Less expensive than the normal fuel (or at least, within a reasonable bound of not being WAY more expensive)
2. More convenient (or at least, within a reasonable bound of not being WAY more inconvenient)
3. Widely available (like, I'm driving down the road and need fuel, so I'm going to pull off right about here and buy some)
4. Safe (nice to be able to transfer and handle large quantities of it without undue risk; a pump and a hose and a fire-supression system are a good idea, open gallon cans and a funnel are not so good)
5. Non-destructive to equipment (need we say more? ask that poor truck maybe?)
6. One might add in today's political climate, a proposed fuel might get "extra credit" if not made from imported oil (unlike naptha... a petroleum derivative)
I'm having trouble seeing how naptha is an improvement in ANY ONE of those areas, over gasoline. Please help me understand. After all, I'm sofakingdom, I can't figure it out.
hell why does anyone run avgas in their cars
even nitromethane doesnt' really fit into that market so lets stop people from buying nitromethane
another thing whats wrong with a little curiosity? I personally don't see anything wrong with it so whats so bad about it?
#14
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Re: Anyone run Naphtha?
Originally posted by 84z28350
Just wondering if anyone has run Naphtha (camp fuel) in their car. I thought i may give this a go and see how big of a fireball my car can create
Its about the only fuel i havent tried burning in a engine yet...
Just wondering if anyone has run Naphtha (camp fuel) in their car. I thought i may give this a go and see how big of a fireball my car can create

Its about the only fuel i havent tried burning in a engine yet...
#15
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
dimented, is that a pic of turrets guy as your avatar??
ugh...
84z, how much was the avgas? something you can easily get?
ugh...
84z, how much was the avgas? something you can easily get?
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Yellowknife, NWT, Canada
Posts: 3,004
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 357
Transmission: TH-350C
Axle/Gears: 3.43
I get all my AvGas for free, i got connections with the drivers at the airport 
But i can only get a little bit at a time
Thats why i usually run a mix of 91 and AvGas.
Im sure you could get some from a bulk storage place but i havent gone that route yet.

But i can only get a little bit at a time
Thats why i usually run a mix of 91 and AvGas.Im sure you could get some from a bulk storage place but i havent gone that route yet.
#17
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Originally posted by Sonix
dimented, is that a pic of turrets guy as your avatar??
ugh...
dimented, is that a pic of turrets guy as your avatar??
ugh...
#18
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 8,344
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Ran some race gas in the van playing with it on the dyno. My buddy had a 55 gallon drum laying around from a dirt track car. 112 octane contains LEAD, killed the Bosch O2 sensor in the process. My 312 liked about 40* timing advance on the stuff with NO knock counts and picked up about 20 HP at the wheels and made the very pleasing race gas smell. My signature is on 89 octane. Still have the chip for race gas should I ever want to run it at the track. (Will just have to remember to remove the 02.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fast355
DFI and ECM
14
12-02-2016 06:33 PM
eightsixseven
Tech / General Engine
1
08-14-2015 03:09 PM







