Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

cam theory question

Old Nov 14, 2005 | 05:59 PM
  #1  
littlekings's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: NE Ohio
Car: Dirt Street Stock oval track 2bbl
Engine: 350 w/dart iron heads and 383 w/world products sportsman II heads
Transmission: saginaw
cam theory question

I was wondering, what is the difference in the cam itself between a solid lifter and a hydraulic lifter. What would happen if you put hyd lifters on a solid lift cam and vice versa?
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2005 | 06:22 PM
  #2  
Air_Adam's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
IIRC, it has something to do with ramp rates... a really 'quick' ramp on the lobe needs solid lifters. I don't know much more though.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2005 | 06:29 PM
  #3  
fireturd350's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 7
From: New Boston, IL, USA
Car: '90 Formula 350
Engine: 383 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt S/S 700-R4 & ACT 9" Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23
Should be ramp profiles. Solid roller can have more aggressive ramps since there is no worry about a plunger collapsing.

Also got to becareful with the gear. Solid rollers sometimes don't come with the proper gear so you need to swap out distributor gears. For the most part now Comp cams and other companies put the regular hydra roller gear on them now.

Now if you're talking about solid tappets and hydra rollers that's different... Solid lifter cams have to have gradual ramps so the lifter doesn't try to grind or slide off the lobe. In that case the roller cam is made from harder metal. One reason why rollers are move expensive than tappets.

Last edited by fireturd350; Nov 14, 2005 at 06:36 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2005 | 10:41 PM
  #4  
dankhound's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 1
From: Bloomingdale,IL
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305 Tbi (L03)
Transmission: 700r4
Solid lifter cams use a specific design to pickup and set the lifter down more gently. For this reason you cant use solid lifters with a hydralic lifter cam. You can however use hydrolic lifters with both style cams.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2005 | 05:36 PM
  #5  
Air_Adam's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Originally posted by dankhound
Solid lifter cams use a specific design to pickup and set the lifter down more gently. For this reason you cant use solid lifters with a hydralic lifter cam. You can however use hydrolic lifters with both style cams.
You sure? That sounds backwards to me...
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2005 | 06:30 PM
  #6  
littlekings's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: NE Ohio
Car: Dirt Street Stock oval track 2bbl
Engine: 350 w/dart iron heads and 383 w/world products sportsman II heads
Transmission: saginaw
Thanks, I wasn't going to try to swap lifters and cam, I was just wondering because I see some hydraulic cams with numbers close to milder solid cams.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 01:52 AM
  #7  
dankhound's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 1
From: Bloomingdale,IL
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305 Tbi (L03)
Transmission: 700r4
You sure? That sounds backwards to me...
I was pretty sure but now youve got me thinking. I checked a bunch of books but couldnt find anything. Maybe somebody else knows definitivly.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 08:14 AM
  #8  
Free Bird's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
From: Dale City, VA
Car: 91 GTA and 85 IROC
Engine: 355
Transmission: gear jammer
Axle/Gears: 4.11
NO, you use solid roller lifters w/ a solid roller cam.

Hydro roller lifters w/ a hydro roller cam.

And flat tappet w/ flat tappet.

The solid roller combo is by far the most expensive way to go. But, as always, it offers the most performance from a camshaft. The ramps are extremely aggresive. Check out comp cams site and look through their tech articles. It shows the profiles of 3 different types of lobes. Solid rollers also require a very heavy spring starting at 450# to 800 or even 900# over the nose. If you use a hydro roller lifter w/ that pressure you will collapse the lifter and run the risk of detroying the lifter all together.

Now if you're talking about solid tappets and hydra rollers that's different... Solid lifter cams have to have gradual ramps so the lifter doesn't try to grind or slide off the lobe. In that case the roller cam is made from harder metal. One reason why rollers are move expensive than tappets.
Furthermore, flat tappet cam lobes (hydro or solid) are tappered ever so slightly so when the motor is running, they literally rotate in the lifter bore. This helps keep the wear and friction down.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 02:17 PM
  #9  
Sonix's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
We're not talking about roller cams whatsoever.

Lets get back to the subject of flat tappet, hydraulic vs solid.

I was wondering the same thing, I thought you would buy solid lifters, and put them on whatever cam you wanted (ie. a hydraulic flat tappet cam), then maybe bump up the spring rate.... but yea, what is the difference in solid vs hydraulic flat tappet cams themselves?
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 02:53 PM
  #10  
sofakingdom's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,918
Likes: 2,448
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Hydraulic cams have a slow ramp, to help seat the oil check valve in the lifter. They typically start actually opening the valve at about .010" of lobe lift.

Solid cams have a larger lash, usually .020" or so, before the slack is all taken up. THey usually have MUCH steeper ramps.

It is not generally possible to put hydraulic lifters on a solid cam, and have it work very well. The check valve won't check properly before the actual lift ramp begins. However, one can put solid lifters on a hyd cam, and sometimes that can be OK. Typically you'd adjust the lash to around .006" - .008" when doing that. One combo I know of that has worked out well in the past like that, was the old Comp 280HE cam in a 396, with solids on it; we just sort of had them laying around, and we could get all the cams we could stand for free (or close to it) anyway, so it didn't matter if it tore up. It worked OK though. It might have run a little harder that way than with hydraulic lifters on it, but we didn't do back-to-back tests, and it didn't get very many miles to where we could guess at long-term reliability. It did not however run as good as a 282S.

In no case that I can see would it be "better" to deliberately do that, than to use the right lifters and cam together.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
beastin91rs
Tech / General Engine
18
Oct 9, 2015 07:38 AM
theurge
TPI
7
Aug 21, 2015 12:46 PM
redmaroz
LTX and LSX
7
Aug 16, 2015 11:40 PM
happyhapka
TPI
3
Aug 15, 2015 04:42 PM
Fronzizzle
Electronics
2
Aug 9, 2015 01:15 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:09 PM.