You think you know how to pass emmissions, PLEASE HELP ME!
Thread Starter
Senior Member




Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 801
Likes: 91
From: Northwest Chicago Suburbs
Car: 1991 Camaro Z-28 (Durango R/T)
Engine: 383 L98 W/ HSR
Transmission: 700R4 Tuned Shift 2600 Stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10Bolt Posi W/ Al Cover, Disks
You think you know how to pass emmissions, PLEASE HELP ME!
Hey all,
Time for emmissions again, and of course first attempt failed. hydrocarbons are nearly tripple the limit and co is still just over the limit. I have cats new o2 sensor as of last season, and last time i had to take emmissions i just had to do the alchahol in the tank trik to get by. I've set my timing to 0 with the plug undone.
Few things i cant remember and couldnt find a clear answer to by searching is what fuel pressure are you supposed to use, i have an afpr, and also i heard loweroctane fuel burns faster, and more completely than higher octane fuel, so which should i be using for the test.
Any other suggestions are greatly appriciated. Also if any other information is required please ask, i will post promptly.
thanks a lot everyone!
Eli
Raptere
PS: This is my first failure this round and i get three, before i get an underhood inspection, the problem with that is that i have a stealth ram and no egr, i have heard of people passing with this set up but i cant allow that underhood inspection or i will have some reall issues.
Time for emmissions again, and of course first attempt failed. hydrocarbons are nearly tripple the limit and co is still just over the limit. I have cats new o2 sensor as of last season, and last time i had to take emmissions i just had to do the alchahol in the tank trik to get by. I've set my timing to 0 with the plug undone.
Few things i cant remember and couldnt find a clear answer to by searching is what fuel pressure are you supposed to use, i have an afpr, and also i heard loweroctane fuel burns faster, and more completely than higher octane fuel, so which should i be using for the test.
Any other suggestions are greatly appriciated. Also if any other information is required please ask, i will post promptly.
thanks a lot everyone!
Eli
Raptere
PS: This is my first failure this round and i get three, before i get an underhood inspection, the problem with that is that i have a stealth ram and no egr, i have heard of people passing with this set up but i cant allow that underhood inspection or i will have some reall issues.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (21)
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,075
Likes: 1
Car: 04 Silverado
Engine: 4.8
Transmission: auto
That's a battle. Move here to Santa Fe NM and we have zero emmisions testing. I wish I could help you ouy but I am ignorant to emmisions and all that good stuff. Have a wonderful Christmas.
PS- there is one sure fire way to pass , pass the person some bux's under the table
PS- there is one sure fire way to pass , pass the person some bux's under the table
Thread Starter
Senior Member




Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 801
Likes: 91
From: Northwest Chicago Suburbs
Car: 1991 Camaro Z-28 (Durango R/T)
Engine: 383 L98 W/ HSR
Transmission: 700R4 Tuned Shift 2600 Stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10Bolt Posi W/ Al Cover, Disks
i almost wish i could, but even that wouldnt work your car gets entered into the coputer and it does the whole test for the most part with out the worker telling the computer weather it passes or not, darn computers.
So anyone out there willing to meet the challange, never figured it out last time either and would really like to find out what is wrong.
So anyone out there willing to meet the challange, never figured it out last time either and would really like to find out what is wrong.
Member



Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 474
Likes: 15
From: Washington State
Car: '84 Berlinetta
Engine: ZZ4
Transmission: BTOD stage 3
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi disc
As far as the gas, yes the lower the octane, the more comlete the burn. If a tune-up (plugs, wires, cap and rotor) didn't help, and your hydrocarbons are still too high, you might have a oil burning problem. You can try running a heavier weight oil for the test (say 10-40 if you run 5-30, or 20-50 if you run 10-30), that might slow the consumption rate, but other than that, just hae the car fully warmed up with the lowest octane gas possable before you take the test. If all else fails, a Jefferson is never wrong
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 5
From: San Antonio TX
Car: 1990 G92 IROC Z Miniram
Engine: 388cu 6.4 Liters
Transmission: G-Force T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Gears
Originally posted by raptere
I've set my timing to 0 with the plug undone.
I've set my timing to 0 with the plug undone.
Try setting the timing to 6* burn a chip for the present combo.
Last edited by VincentZ28; Dec 25, 2005 at 12:11 PM.
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: shreveport louisiana
Car: 87 z with 89 everything, cam, jet chip, full exhaust, yellow with green flames
Engine: 5.7 tpi, 89 l98
Transmission: 89 700-r4 w/ b$m shift kit
hate to say it
from cali, the land of all that is choking and restricted, comes the advice of pain-- get an egr and a good chip, find if your burning oil, check fuel pressure and air filters, and make sure the car is warm when you run it. all ive got to offer, but usually works back home, and if you have an oil problem try some ring seal or just heavy oil
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 1
From: houston
Car: 83 POS monte carlo 2015 chevy P/U
Engine: 92 5.7 tpi 5.3
Transmission: 700r4 6L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.42 too high
the numbers would help as far as what to look for.
list them something like this,
............. limit .......... actual
Nox,....... 895............ 755 ........... pass
Co.......... 0.85........... 1.32 .......... fail
Hc...........188............. 245 .......... fail
O2.......... N/A............. 2.1
list them something like this,
............. limit .......... actual
Nox,....... 895............ 755 ........... pass
Co.......... 0.85........... 1.32 .......... fail
Hc...........188............. 245 .......... fail
O2.......... N/A............. 2.1
Last edited by DENN_SHAH; Dec 25, 2005 at 10:30 PM.
Trending Topics
EGR's biggest purpose is to trim back on NOX emissions. not saying that adding an egr wouldn't help, but I don't think that it's the big problem. If your HC emissions were just a little over the limit, then the lower-octane or alcohol tricks and all the little tuning could make a difference, but with the levels around triple what they should be, you've got a misfire.
please post what the CO emissions were (or all the levels, for that matter), with that you can tell if it was a lean misfire or a rich misfire. Either way, a lot of unburned fuel is slipping through the engine and out the tailpipe. witht the info that you've provided, you could have a cylinder not firing correctly, or possibly the computer is making the mix so lean or rich that you're getting misfires that way (come to think of it, maybe the lack of an EGR is screwing up the sensor readings).
anyways, good luck.
~Erik~
PS. The clean-air department that your shop sends the emission data to gets a lot more data than the computer tells the technician doing the test. it's a REALLY bad idea to try to ge the guy to clean-pipe the car (run the test on another car)
please post what the CO emissions were (or all the levels, for that matter), with that you can tell if it was a lean misfire or a rich misfire. Either way, a lot of unburned fuel is slipping through the engine and out the tailpipe. witht the info that you've provided, you could have a cylinder not firing correctly, or possibly the computer is making the mix so lean or rich that you're getting misfires that way (come to think of it, maybe the lack of an EGR is screwing up the sensor readings).
anyways, good luck.
~Erik~
PS. The clean-air department that your shop sends the emission data to gets a lot more data than the computer tells the technician doing the test. it's a REALLY bad idea to try to ge the guy to clean-pipe the car (run the test on another car)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, AB
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx
Engine: Turbo KA24DE
Transmission: 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 4.08 VLSD
I've always heard it's a better idea to run higher octane fuel. A guy I used to know alwaysj put race fuel in his truck before taking emissions. and he passed prety easy. How old are your cats? If they're getting on in years, those may be worth replacing..
And I'm sorry, but I just have to. Coolant is spelled coolant. You may want to change that in your sig.
And I'm sorry, but I just have to. Coolant is spelled coolant. You may want to change that in your sig.
Thread Starter
Senior Member




Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 801
Likes: 91
From: Northwest Chicago Suburbs
Car: 1991 Camaro Z-28 (Durango R/T)
Engine: 383 L98 W/ HSR
Transmission: 700R4 Tuned Shift 2600 Stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10Bolt Posi W/ Al Cover, Disks
sry for taking so long getting back to you guys , dont worry bout the spelling thing lol I do take the dyno test here in IL. Here are the results:
HC(GPM) reading:2.41 Standard: .80 FAIL
CO(GPM) reading: 16.3 Standard: 15.0 FAIL
CO2 (GPM) Reading: 391.0 Standard: na
NOx (GPM) Reading: 4.70 Standard: na
Would it be helpfull if i could scan and post the whole sheet with the graphs and everything?
As for the cats i think they should be fine, but is it possible if there is some other problem that they could be blown again since the last time i replaced them last two years. And i still havnt heard any suggestions for FUEL PRESSURE if someone could just leave a pressure i could try id greatly appriciate it.
And yea still seems to be a little contriversy as to which fuel to be using?
HC(GPM) reading:2.41 Standard: .80 FAIL
CO(GPM) reading: 16.3 Standard: 15.0 FAIL
CO2 (GPM) Reading: 391.0 Standard: na
NOx (GPM) Reading: 4.70 Standard: na
Would it be helpfull if i could scan and post the whole sheet with the graphs and everything?
As for the cats i think they should be fine, but is it possible if there is some other problem that they could be blown again since the last time i replaced them last two years. And i still havnt heard any suggestions for FUEL PRESSURE if someone could just leave a pressure i could try id greatly appriciate it.
And yea still seems to be a little contriversy as to which fuel to be using?
Thread Starter
Senior Member




Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 801
Likes: 91
From: Northwest Chicago Suburbs
Car: 1991 Camaro Z-28 (Durango R/T)
Engine: 383 L98 W/ HSR
Transmission: 700R4 Tuned Shift 2600 Stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10Bolt Posi W/ Al Cover, Disks
few more updates not sure how it effects anything though.
I reset my fuel pressure to about 39psi without vacume, and also realized i had messed around with my tps sensor. I went ahead and set that to .70 which is the bottom of the range i found was suggested for speed density TPIs.
I must say the exhaust smeels better, yet the engine still shakes a bit at most rpm ranges. I really am unsure what this part means but i took my digital temperature gun and checked my header primary temps some were reading about 300*f and some were about 350-400*f. Could this mean i have some cylinders running lean or others running rich. and also could that account for the span of temperatures, and engine shaking, because the cylinders with the leaner combustion would be producing a stronger combustion right?
Hope, somehting in that helped.
Thanks a lot and keep up the great help,
Eli
Raptere
I reset my fuel pressure to about 39psi without vacume, and also realized i had messed around with my tps sensor. I went ahead and set that to .70 which is the bottom of the range i found was suggested for speed density TPIs.
I must say the exhaust smeels better, yet the engine still shakes a bit at most rpm ranges. I really am unsure what this part means but i took my digital temperature gun and checked my header primary temps some were reading about 300*f and some were about 350-400*f. Could this mean i have some cylinders running lean or others running rich. and also could that account for the span of temperatures, and engine shaking, because the cylinders with the leaner combustion would be producing a stronger combustion right?
Hope, somehting in that helped.
Thanks a lot and keep up the great help,
Eli
Raptere
TGO Supporter
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
From: Colchester, CT
Car: 1987 Iroc, 1987 MCSS TPI
Engine: 5.7L
Transmission: 700R4 in both
Car is rich, quite possibly dripping/leaking injectors. Look at sheet on using CO to diagnose. You have no left over oxygen or it would be CO2. HC & CO are high, too much fuel.
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, AB
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx
Engine: Turbo KA24DE
Transmission: 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 4.08 VLSD
Yeah. I agree, too rich. Does it smoke black when you rev it at all? Maybe call the dealership and see what the stock fuel pressure is. I wanna say 110, but that's right off the top of my head.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,133
Likes: 4
From: Houston, Texas
Car: 88' IROCZ
Engine: 388 TPI Motown 350 Race block
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.77
Originally posted by 305q_ta86
Yeah. I agree, too rich. Does it smoke black when you rev it at all? Maybe call the dealership and see what the stock fuel pressure is. I wanna say 110, but that's right off the top of my head.
Yeah. I agree, too rich. Does it smoke black when you rev it at all? Maybe call the dealership and see what the stock fuel pressure is. I wanna say 110, but that's right off the top of my head.
Here's a link to Bosch Oxygen Sensor FAQs and questions
Oxygen Sensor
Go to this question: Q. What will damage my oxygen sensor?
At the end of the answer there'a link to pictures of damaged sensors and the cause.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
darwinprice
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
17
Oct 11, 2015 11:51 PM





