Camshaft and vacuum
Camshaft and vacuum
I've been looking at some cams to go with my heads that I bought and are getting ported, and this one looks good from Comp Cams:
230/236 .510/.520 110 LSA
I'd be using Crane Gold 1.6 Roller Rockers (.544/.554) and would have them grind it on a 112 LSA. My question is for guys that have run this or similar cams in 350s, at a 1000rpm idle would the vacuum be sufficient for brakes/accessories?
230/236 .510/.520 110 LSA
I'd be using Crane Gold 1.6 Roller Rockers (.544/.554) and would have them grind it on a 112 LSA. My question is for guys that have run this or similar cams in 350s, at a 1000rpm idle would the vacuum be sufficient for brakes/accessories?
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,403
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: Camshaft and vacuum
Originally posted by Camaroz29
My question is for guys that have run this or similar cams in 350s, at a 1000rpm idle would the vacuum be sufficient for brakes/accessories?
My question is for guys that have run this or similar cams in 350s, at a 1000rpm idle would the vacuum be sufficient for brakes/accessories?
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,821
Likes: 2,406
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
I ran that exact cam for some years in a 400 (XR282HR) with 1.6 rockers (Comp 1100 series), except with the stock 110 degree centerline. It idled at 800 RPM, and the power brakes and the A/C and cruise all worked fine. No vacuum canister. Made great power.
If you don't already own the rockers, I'd suggest getting something else that's not aluminum. Either the Comp 1300 or even the 1100 series if you REALLY want the best like I did, or Crower. Aluminum ones have a bad habit of just up and breaking in street use. It's not a question of "if", but rather "when". They might go 10,000 miles, 20,000, maybe even 30,000; not too many people go much farther than that before they start to break. But steel ones will last basically forever.
If you don't already own the rockers, I'd suggest getting something else that's not aluminum. Either the Comp 1300 or even the 1100 series if you REALLY want the best like I did, or Crower. Aluminum ones have a bad habit of just up and breaking in street use. It's not a question of "if", but rather "when". They might go 10,000 miles, 20,000, maybe even 30,000; not too many people go much farther than that before they start to break. But steel ones will last basically forever.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 5
From: San Antonio TX
Car: 1990 G92 IROC Z Miniram
Engine: 388cu 6.4 Liters
Transmission: G-Force T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Gears
Originally posted by Camaroz29
I've been looking at some cams to go with my heads that I bought and are getting ported, and this one looks good from Comp Cams:
230/236 .510/.520 110 LSA
I'd be using Crane Gold 1.6 Roller Rockers (.544/.554) and would have them grind it on a 112 LSA. My question is for guys that have run this or similar cams in 350s, at a 1000rpm idle would the vacuum be sufficient for brakes/accessories?
I've been looking at some cams to go with my heads that I bought and are getting ported, and this one looks good from Comp Cams:
230/236 .510/.520 110 LSA
I'd be using Crane Gold 1.6 Roller Rockers (.544/.554) and would have them grind it on a 112 LSA. My question is for guys that have run this or similar cams in 350s, at a 1000rpm idle would the vacuum be sufficient for brakes/accessories?
Originally posted by sofakingdom
I ran that exact cam for some years in a 400 (XR282HR) with 1.6 rockers (Comp 1100 series), except with the stock 110 degree centerline. It idled at 800 RPM, and the power brakes and the A/C and cruise all worked fine. No vacuum canister. Made great power.
I ran that exact cam for some years in a 400 (XR282HR) with 1.6 rockers (Comp 1100 series), except with the stock 110 degree centerline. It idled at 800 RPM, and the power brakes and the A/C and cruise all worked fine. No vacuum canister. Made great power.
Originally posted by sofakingdom
If you don't already own the rockers, I'd suggest getting something else that's not aluminum. Either the Comp 1300 or even the 1100 series if you REALLY want the best like I did, or Crower. Aluminum ones have a bad habit of just up and breaking in street use. It's not a question of "if", but rather "when". They might go 10,000 miles, 20,000, maybe even 30,000; not too many people go much farther than that before they start to break. But steel ones will last basically forever.
If you don't already own the rockers, I'd suggest getting something else that's not aluminum. Either the Comp 1300 or even the 1100 series if you REALLY want the best like I did, or Crower. Aluminum ones have a bad habit of just up and breaking in street use. It's not a question of "if", but rather "when". They might go 10,000 miles, 20,000, maybe even 30,000; not too many people go much farther than that before they start to break. But steel ones will last basically forever.
Thanks for the input, it seems like the answers will always vary though. I've also seen some people say that the CC306 made plenty of vacuum while others said it didn't. Thanks for the heads up on the rockers too, I thought that Comp didn't make very good roller rockers?
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Sorry to hijack the thread, but I have a similar cam (230/236* and .490/.490 with 110lsa XE274)
How would this cam work in a 350 with around 9.5:1 CR, as far as vacuum and PB are concerned at an 800-ish idle?
How would this cam work in a 350 with around 9.5:1 CR, as far as vacuum and PB are concerned at an 800-ish idle?
Trending Topics
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,821
Likes: 2,406
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
People say all sorts of things about everything. It's been real popular here lately to bash Comp for some reason. I don't know why. Their stuff is decent enough, within the limits of what it actually is, underneath the label; for example, a cast-iron roller core is risky, no matter whose box it comes out of; and aluminum rockers are prone to fatigue, same as any other aluminum part, no matter whose name is on it. The thing still is what it is.
Comp's aluminum rockers are as good as anyone's in my limited experience. Which is to say, they're aluminum, with all the properties both good and bad that go with that. Their steel ones, and Crower's, are the best you can get IMO, without stepping up to a shaft setup.
I had the XE274 in the same motor for a while, before the XR282; I liked it alot too. It ran like a bat outa hell. The XR282 ran better though. It seemed like ALOT more cam, in spite of the specs looking very similar. The XE274 will give better street manners than the XR282, rather alot actually, in the case of mine. But I think 9.5:1 is borderline too low. It might have a kind of soggy bottom end.
How much vacuum a cam makes is dramatically a function of tuning. Some of use are a WHOLE LOT BETTER at that than others; I'd like to think I'm better at it than most, but who knows. Therefore, no matter how well or poorly it worked for me, you may either be totally unable to duplicate my results, or it'll work about the same for you, or maybe you'll kick my butt. It's all up to you.
Comp's aluminum rockers are as good as anyone's in my limited experience. Which is to say, they're aluminum, with all the properties both good and bad that go with that. Their steel ones, and Crower's, are the best you can get IMO, without stepping up to a shaft setup.
I had the XE274 in the same motor for a while, before the XR282; I liked it alot too. It ran like a bat outa hell. The XR282 ran better though. It seemed like ALOT more cam, in spite of the specs looking very similar. The XE274 will give better street manners than the XR282, rather alot actually, in the case of mine. But I think 9.5:1 is borderline too low. It might have a kind of soggy bottom end.
How much vacuum a cam makes is dramatically a function of tuning. Some of use are a WHOLE LOT BETTER at that than others; I'd like to think I'm better at it than most, but who knows. Therefore, no matter how well or poorly it worked for me, you may either be totally unable to duplicate my results, or it'll work about the same for you, or maybe you'll kick my butt. It's all up to you.
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,192
Likes: 19
From: Cary, North Carolina
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: Carbed 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Originally posted by sofakingdom
How much vacuum a cam makes is dramatically a function of tuning.
How much vacuum a cam makes is dramatically a function of tuning.
I figured tuning would play an important role, I just wonder if having SD instead of MAF will hurt my chances. My friend told me that anything 230 degrees and higher (intake duration) gets tough to tune with SD. I should start some email correspondence with pcmforless I suppose.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
From: Pueblo Co
Car: 1989 C4
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 307
Originally posted by Camaroz29
I figured tuning would play an important role, I just wonder if having SD instead of MAF will hurt my chances. My friend told me that anything 230 degrees and higher (intake duration) gets tough to tune with SD. I should start some email correspondence with pcmforless I suppose.
I figured tuning would play an important role, I just wonder if having SD instead of MAF will hurt my chances. My friend told me that anything 230 degrees and higher (intake duration) gets tough to tune with SD. I should start some email correspondence with pcmforless I suppose.
People like to bash comp cams because all we hear is how a lobe or two got wiped. I had one go flat before. There cams are just so popular it seems when 1 out of a 100,000 goes flat the news spreads, especially over the net. ISKY is the way to go
I'm personally much happier with ISKY products but that has nothing to do with the topic. TGO Supporter
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 2
From: Gambrills, Md
Car: clapped out 84Z
Engine: 355 efi roller
Transmission: tremec TKO
I'm running it now, 13" of vacuum at 800rpm idle with a stick, brakes work fine. It will all come down to your combo and tuning. Might want to consider a 112 or 113 LSA as suggested above to play it safe.
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,403
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Oops, missed the part that he had a T-56. With an auto, the vacuum at idle would be too low in gear with this cam for power brakes, with a stick, it maybe good though.
Originally posted by madmax
I have a 280 XFI (230/238) and its more to the radical side for a 350, but not bad. You wont need 1000 idle though, I think around 850 is fine, below that it gets a little unhappy.
I dont know what my idle vacuum is, but the brakes work ok.
I have a 280 XFI (230/238) and its more to the radical side for a 350, but not bad. You wont need 1000 idle though, I think around 850 is fine, below that it gets a little unhappy.
I dont know what my idle vacuum is, but the brakes work ok.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Guess I'll reply in both places 
Probably pretty aggressive. 230/236@ .050, 280/288 @ adv. (I think comp uses .006 for adv), .576, .571 lift, 113.0 LSA. Thats off the box. I dont know if the info in the box listed the timing events, but in any case I have that information somewhere. I checked it for myself as well so I can post that too.
Summit racing also has that general info, if their website is working. Was down yesterday. Look up cams, comp cams, 350 small block, etc., and isolate 113LSA cams and that should get you close. All the XFI's are 113LSA or at least they have been since they came out.

Probably pretty aggressive. 230/236@ .050, 280/288 @ adv. (I think comp uses .006 for adv), .576, .571 lift, 113.0 LSA. Thats off the box. I dont know if the info in the box listed the timing events, but in any case I have that information somewhere. I checked it for myself as well so I can post that too.
Summit racing also has that general info, if their website is working. Was down yesterday. Look up cams, comp cams, 350 small block, etc., and isolate 113LSA cams and that should get you close. All the XFI's are 113LSA or at least they have been since they came out.
Originally posted by madmax
Guess I'll reply in both places
Probably pretty aggressive. 230/236@ .050, 280/288 @ adv. (I think comp uses .006 for adv), .576, .571 lift, 113.0 LSA. Thats off the box. I dont know if the info in the box listed the timing events, but in any case I have that information somewhere. I checked it for myself as well so I can post that too.
Summit racing also has that general info, if their website is working. Was down yesterday. Look up cams, comp cams, 350 small block, etc., and isolate 113LSA cams and that should get you close. All the XFI's are 113LSA or at least they have been since they came out.
Guess I'll reply in both places

Probably pretty aggressive. 230/236@ .050, 280/288 @ adv. (I think comp uses .006 for adv), .576, .571 lift, 113.0 LSA. Thats off the box. I dont know if the info in the box listed the timing events, but in any case I have that information somewhere. I checked it for myself as well so I can post that too.
Summit racing also has that general info, if their website is working. Was down yesterday. Look up cams, comp cams, 350 small block, etc., and isolate 113LSA cams and that should get you close. All the XFI's are 113LSA or at least they have been since they came out.
Originally posted by madmax
No, used what was on the AFR's but they may not have been stock. Double spring with damper. I think the guy that set them up said they were 130 on the seat, 340 open.
Checked the vacuum today, 8psi at idle (850rpm).
No, used what was on the AFR's but they may not have been stock. Double spring with damper. I think the guy that set them up said they were 130 on the seat, 340 open.
Checked the vacuum today, 8psi at idle (850rpm).
Originally posted by madmax
They seem to work fine. Dont ask me.
Car was cold, I dont know if a nice warm idle affects it any. Maybe tomorrow I will check that, going to be toying around with it again.
They seem to work fine. Dont ask me.
Car was cold, I dont know if a nice warm idle affects it any. Maybe tomorrow I will check that, going to be toying around with it again.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 2
From: Gambrills, Md
Car: clapped out 84Z
Engine: 355 efi roller
Transmission: tremec TKO
Originally posted by madmax
Checked the vacuum today, 8psi at idle (850rpm).
Checked the vacuum today, 8psi at idle (850rpm).
Need to work on the tune, b/c there is a lot more in there if tweaked correctly.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Ok, 8 in then (vacuum), no pressure in there obviously. Its running 11 warmed up. Obviously the car isnt happy cold.
WOT its pretty close, its the idle and part throttle stuff that still needs work, neverending battle right there.
WOT its pretty close, its the idle and part throttle stuff that still needs work, neverending battle right there.
Last edited by madmax; Mar 5, 2006 at 08:39 PM.
Originally Posted by sofakingdom
I ran that exact cam for some years in a 400 (XR282HR) with 1.6 rockers (Comp 1100 series), except with the stock 110 degree centerline. It idled at 800 RPM, and the power brakes and the A/C and cruise all worked fine. No vacuum canister. Made great power.
If you don't already own the rockers, I'd suggest getting something else that's not aluminum. Either the Comp 1300 or even the 1100 series if you REALLY want the best like I did, or Crower. Aluminum ones have a bad habit of just up and breaking in street use. It's not a question of "if", but rather "when". They might go 10,000 miles, 20,000, maybe even 30,000; not too many people go much farther than that before they start to break. But steel ones will last basically forever.
If you don't already own the rockers, I'd suggest getting something else that's not aluminum. Either the Comp 1300 or even the 1100 series if you REALLY want the best like I did, or Crower. Aluminum ones have a bad habit of just up and breaking in street use. It's not a question of "if", but rather "when". They might go 10,000 miles, 20,000, maybe even 30,000; not too many people go much farther than that before they start to break. But steel ones will last basically forever.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pac J
Tech / General Engine
3
May 17, 2020 10:44 AM
HoosierinWA
Tech / General Engine
5
Oct 7, 2015 10:15 AM









