Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Combo opinons??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 3, 2008 | 10:39 PM
  #1  
slaman37's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Car: Current project is 70 Monte Carlo
Engine: 350 TPI (SD)
Transmission: 200-4R
Axle/Gears: 3:73, 12 bolt Limited Slip
Combo opinons??

Hey guys,
I'm building a 70 Monte Carlo and putting a TPI unit on my 350. Backing it with a 700R4 (27 spline) with a stock stall and have a 12 bolt 3.73:1 Posi. I came here because ThirdGen seems to have some of the best info for the TPI system... And wanted some opinons if this will be a good daily driver combo and still have enough to have some fun. I'm not looking for a 11's or 12's, already went that route with this car before. Just looking to have a nice driver that can hold its own and still get respectable gas milage.

That being said. Heres some of the parts:



Cam: Erson TQ-20: Hydraulic flat tappet
214 int/exh @ .050
292 advertised,
.449 lift int/exh
111 lsa
Power band: 2000 to 4750 rpm per man. website
Heads are Iron GM 441 Casting with 2.02/1.60 S.S. valves, screwin studs & Guide plates, was gasket matched to a Team G Manifold so I'll be gasket matching the TPI Manifold as well.

TPI unit is a 89 unit and converting to Speed Density, 730 ECM

24lb injectors

Disty is from a 91 TBI RS as well as the Belt drive system

Hooker Compition Long Tube Headers and full 2-1/4 exhaust with "turbo" mufflers.

Questions:

With that cam do I really need a performance chip? or burn my own, Obvisouly, I have to get the VATS deleted as well as the EGR, CCP, and AIR. Any sugustions?

Will I need a small stall converter?

Are the 3:73's too much? The car weighs around 3600 lbs. It's unlikely this car will see the track very often. Just the street. Oh and the suspension just got all redone with Poly bushings, 2" lowering springs and 33" ladder bars...

Comments, sugustions or am I just ???

Thanks,
Steve
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2008 | 09:47 AM
  #2  
RED86Z28's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
From: Savannah GA
Car: 1986 IROC
Engine: 355" TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Combo opinons??

Is that cam designed to be used with fuel injection or carb?
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2008 | 10:01 AM
  #3  
Sonix's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: Combo opinons??

That's an old carb cam. Toss it, it's wrong for your application.
1970 Monte, 3600lbs? You sure? I thought it's heavier then that, those cars are MASSIVE. Didn't they have the longest hood of any production car?
Kinda makes it a non TGO question then doesn't it?

I don't think you'll be able to gasket match the TPI intake to your heads, if they were opened up to match a Team G. Also, those heads and TPI are a bad match.
If you're planning on using a stock TPI intake, then that's a very very bad match to the heads.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2008 | 10:07 AM
  #4  
SteelTownMadDog's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: Port Colborne, ON CA
Re: Combo opinons??

Originally Posted by RED86Z28
Is that cam designed to be used with fuel injection or carb?
Doesn't look like it with the 111 LSA.

I would go with a CompCam 260XFI H13 cam. Similar specs but more aggressive ramps, and 113 LSA.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 12:57 AM
  #5  
slaman37's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Car: Current project is 70 Monte Carlo
Engine: 350 TPI (SD)
Transmission: 200-4R
Axle/Gears: 3:73, 12 bolt Limited Slip
Re: Combo opinons??

1970 Monte, 3600lbs? You sure? I thought it's heavier then that, those cars are MASSIVE. Didn't they have the longest hood of any production car?
It maybe between 3800 and 4000 lbs but I don't think any heavier than that. And yes it does hold the distinction of having the longest hood.... 6-feet...


I don't think you'll be able to gasket match the TPI intake to your heads, if they were opened up to match a Team G. Also, those heads and TPI are a bad match.
If you're planning on using a stock TPI intake, then that's a very very bad match to the heads.
The heads were gasket matched to the Mr. Gasket intake gaskets... I would think the intake could be opened up some to make it close...

Then the heads can you tell me why they are a bad match. I know they are 76cc heads but the are a decent flowing head and the have the 2.02/1.60 valves... Granted I was useing the heads with the Team G street Ram intake and a rather large solid flat tappet cam...(.496/.502 lift, 236/240 @ .050) I know that cam is totaly wrong for this appl.

But 111 lsa on the old school Erson would cause too many problems? What would I expect?

As I said I'm not making a race car just a nice driver... That I can still have fun with and enjoy... On a budget...

Last edited by slaman37; Jun 5, 2008 at 01:37 AM. Reason: Brain dead...
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 03:34 PM
  #6  
Sonix's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: Combo opinons??

Those are large big flowing heads, good for that big cam that you used to use, and high RPM use.
They flow poorly at low lift, and have poor velocity. They don't have good mixing qualities for low RPM use. The TPI intake (stock) is best for high velocity small ports low RPM use (exactly the opposite of those heads). The ports on the intake (TPI) are quite small. I wish you the best, but don't hold your breath. Keep in mind that intake is a post 1987, and the heads are pre, so the center two bolt holes will need to be elongated.

That cams duration is small enough that the LSA probably won't be a big deal, but it will still be "tricky" to tune with injection. It won't want to work well. It's also an old school grind (hence the dirt cheap price you paid for it eh?). Slow lazy ramp rates, etc.

I think if you use an aftermarket TPI intake (stealth ram or the like), and a compxe262h-14 would be a better combo IMHO.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 07:03 PM
  #7  
slaman37's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Car: Current project is 70 Monte Carlo
Engine: 350 TPI (SD)
Transmission: 200-4R
Axle/Gears: 3:73, 12 bolt Limited Slip
Re: Combo opinons??

Originally Posted by Sonix
Those are large big flowing heads, good for that big cam that you used to use, and high RPM use.
They flow poorly at low lift, and have poor velocity. They don't have good mixing qualities for low RPM use. The TPI intake (stock) is best for high velocity small ports low RPM use (exactly the opposite of those heads). The ports on the intake (TPI) are quite small. I wish you the best, but don't hold your breath. Keep in mind that intake is a post 1987, and the heads are pre, so the center two bolt holes will need to be elongated.

That cams duration is small enough that the LSA probably won't be a big deal, but it will still be "tricky" to tune with injection. It won't want to work well. It's also an old school grind (hence the dirt cheap price you paid for it eh?). Slow lazy ramp rates, etc.

I think if you use an aftermarket TPI intake (stealth ram or the like), and a compxe262h-14 would be a better combo IMHO.
Thanks I was curios as to why the 441 heads would not be good. They worked great with the big cam... The small cam was the one that used to be in it years ago, Only ran it about 6 months, that I had put away wrapped up and coated in oil. So I thought I could use it.

Sounds like most of my parts are totally wrong for my plans, so I may have to go to one of my back-up plans... Just get a new GM Performance Parts long block... and put the TPI on it (Good/Bad?), I think these come with the Vortc style heads, or I can test my fab skills and get a LS1 or "Vortec" (5.3L LS style truck) engine from the junkyard and fit into it.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 11:02 PM
  #8  
not one's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: kennedale,texas
Car: 1984 camaro
Engine: weezing 305
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: 7.5 3.23 mini spooled
Re: Combo opinons??

what long block are you going to use?
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2008 | 12:14 AM
  #9  
slaman37's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Car: Current project is 70 Monte Carlo
Engine: 350 TPI (SD)
Transmission: 200-4R
Axle/Gears: 3:73, 12 bolt Limited Slip
Re: Combo opinons??

Looks like I would have to go to the 350HO from GMPP. or find a 350 TPI or maybe even a LT1 in a junk yard...
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 03:11 PM
  #10  
slaman37's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Car: Current project is 70 Monte Carlo
Engine: 350 TPI (SD)
Transmission: 200-4R
Axle/Gears: 3:73, 12 bolt Limited Slip
Re: Combo opinons??

Here's a new question on my orginal set-up. Instead of going with a S-D setup would a MAF setup work better? Thanks in advance.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
28
Oct 24, 2025 02:00 PM
InfernalVortex
Electronics
10
Apr 20, 2021 11:31 AM
norcalz28
Northern California
26
Dec 7, 2016 12:49 PM
roysatikas
Transmissions and Drivetrain
0
Sep 22, 2015 08:15 PM
z28guy134
Engine Swap
1
Sep 1, 2015 11:50 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 AM.