Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Retro fit hydraulic roller

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 8, 2008 | 10:48 AM
  #1  
skinny z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,917
Likes: 884
From: 53.0907° N, 113.4695° W
Retro fit hydraulic roller

I'm upgrading to a hydraulic roller after wasting half a set of OEM flat lifters (and possibly ruining my engine).
I like the spec of the XR270HR. 1.6 Pro Magnum rockers and Comp Bee Hive springs are already in use so they'll remain.
Does anyone have specific experience with selecting pushrods for a retro fit? Comp offers a 7.29" and a 7.3" length. I'd like to know in advance rather than assemble and measure because of the time invloved with shipping etc.
The combination isn't too exotic so I imagine there's a standard somewhere.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2008 | 11:05 AM
  #2  
not one's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: kennedale,texas
Car: 1984 camaro
Engine: weezing 305
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: 7.5 3.23 mini spooled
Re: Retro fit hydraulic roller

get a pushrod length tool.if you know what that is if not its a tool used to measure the length of the pushrods.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 07:44 AM
  #3  
skinny z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,917
Likes: 884
From: 53.0907° N, 113.4695° W
Re: Retro fit hydraulic roller

Originally Posted by not one
get a pushrod length tool.if you know what that is if not its a tool used to measure the length of the pushrods.

My point is that I'd like to order the cam. lifters and push rods at the same time. It's a little difficult to measure pushrod length without the cam and lifters installed in the engine.
That's why I've asked if anyone has assembled this combination before and has a ready answer.
It'll be a Comp cams XR270HR with Comp rollers.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 09:05 AM
  #4  
85gulstrandTA's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: Antelope Valley, Ca...So.Cal.
Car: was 85 TA, 91 TA both sold
Engine: was 406, now 305 tpi
Transmission: 85 had700r4,350..91 had t5
Axle/Gears: 323,373,342
Re: Retro fit hydraulic roller

When you measure, make sure to use a solid lifter.
See if you can oder both and return one.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 09:09 AM
  #5  
skinny z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,917
Likes: 884
From: 53.0907° N, 113.4695° W
Re: Retro fit hydraulic roller

I made a measuring lifter using 2 empty hydraulic lifters assembled together. Works great.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 09:53 AM
  #6  
Sonix's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: Retro fit hydraulic roller

7.2" is the norm for a hydraulic roller. It's common though, so a local speed shop should stock them. I bought a length checker for $12 locally, then ordered my "custom length" pushrods right after that, for $80 or so
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2008 | 09:12 PM
  #7  
skinny z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,917
Likes: 884
From: 53.0907° N, 113.4695° W
Re: Retro fit hydraulic roller

A couple of more questions on the upgrade.
As far as camshaft end play is concerned. What are the most practical and especially reliable ways of establishing and controling endplay in a retrofit?
Are thrust bearings behind the cam gear a necessity?
I like the idea of the Cloyes Quick Button timing cover and the Hex Adjust timing set with the thrust bearing. I just don't know if I really need it.
Any experiences?
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 07:02 AM
  #8  
anesthes's Avatar
TGO Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,089
Likes: 125
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Re: Retro fit hydraulic roller

Originally Posted by skinny z
A couple of more questions on the upgrade.
As far as camshaft end play is concerned. What are the most practical and especially reliable ways of establishing and controling endplay in a retrofit?
Are thrust bearings behind the cam gear a necessity?
I like the idea of the Cloyes Quick Button timing cover and the Hex Adjust timing set with the thrust bearing. I just don't know if I really need it.
Any experiences?
Ever notice how these threads die right about when someone asks a useful tech question?

Yet, "which flowmaster for me? lololol" always gets 30 replies..

Search is becoming useless on this forum. What happened to all the guys
from 10 years ago???

-- Joe
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 09:55 AM
  #9  
Atilla the Fun's Avatar
On Probation
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 19
From: Northern Utah
Car: seeking '90.5-'92 'bird hardtop
Engine: several
Transmission: none
Axle/Gears: none
Re: Retro fit hydraulic roller

When that happens, these people are free to PM me, and a few do.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 10:00 AM
  #10  
chesterfield's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
From: California
Car: Pontiac
Re: Retro fit hydraulic roller

Originally Posted by Atilla the Fun
When that happens, these people are free to PM me, and a few do.
Thanks for the invite. When (if) I get some cash for my project I'll be looking for some advice. Stick around, it may be years.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 10:24 AM
  #11  
radical82's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: Madison, SD
Car: '82 Camaro
Engine: 383
Transmission: TKO 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 31 spline 9" with 4.56:1
Re: Retro fit hydraulic roller

I've never bothered with the Hex-A-Just, though I do like the two piece covers so I can change the offset bushing if I want to later.... Thrust bearings with a button IMO should be a necessity, along with a very careful session degreeing in the cam and making sure my pushrod length is correct to keep the rocker arm where it belongs on the valve tip.... I too hate waiting for the pushrods to show up in the Big Brown Truck, but knowing the valve train geometry is correct is well worth the wait.... Just too many variables in ehe engine, deck height, cylinder head thickness, casting shift in the block itself to trust to luck in getting the pushrods right based on somebody else's setup.....

I see a bunch of folks have gone with the beehive springs instead of maching the spring pocket for bigger springs....Curious how they work out after some miles---anybody checked their spring pressure after a few thousand miles compared to the spring pressure when the heads were assembled????
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 10:30 AM
  #12  
Atilla the Fun's Avatar
On Probation
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 19
From: Northern Utah
Car: seeking '90.5-'92 'bird hardtop
Engine: several
Transmission: none
Axle/Gears: none
Re: Retro fit hydraulic roller

radical, this thread died 16 months ago, which is why neither anesthes nor I posted any technical info in our responses.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 10:36 AM
  #13  
radical82's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: Madison, SD
Car: '82 Camaro
Engine: 383
Transmission: TKO 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 31 spline 9" with 4.56:1
Re: Retro fit hydraulic roller

Originally Posted by Atilla the Fun
radical, this thread died 16 months ago, which is why neither anesthes nor I posted any technical info in our responses.
Guess I didn't look back that far, only saw your post about threads going dead when no one replies to technical issues.....chances are someone could be interested anyway...or maybe even respond to my question about the beehive springs??????
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 10:45 AM
  #14  
Atilla the Fun's Avatar
On Probation
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 19
From: Northern Utah
Car: seeking '90.5-'92 'bird hardtop
Engine: several
Transmission: none
Axle/Gears: none
Re: Retro fit hydraulic roller

oh. good points. okay, I've installed several dozen sets of beehives in my customers' engines, they hold up better than traditional springs when installed on traditional cams, but put them on lobes like COMP's XFI lobes, they need replaced after 2 years of daily driving. Ultra-agressive lobes will kill normal springs in 6 months of daily driving.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 10:49 AM
  #15  
radical82's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: Madison, SD
Car: '82 Camaro
Engine: 383
Transmission: TKO 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 31 spline 9" with 4.56:1
Re: Retro fit hydraulic roller

Thanks for the info!!! Being the geezer that I am, I still run the mechanical rollers and haven't yet stepped up to a hydraulic roller..../Everyone I talk to about the hydraulic rollers say they don't work well above 6500????? I would suppose the inherent pump up charachteristic of any hydraulic lifter would be the limiting factor?????
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 10:53 AM
  #16  
Atilla the Fun's Avatar
On Probation
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 19
From: Northern Utah
Car: seeking '90.5-'92 'bird hardtop
Engine: several
Transmission: none
Axle/Gears: none
Re: Retro fit hydraulic roller

These days the LSx engines and some SB Fords are doing 7200 rpm just fine with HR, but not SBCs. You can run COMP 26918-16s on solid roller cams, as long as your valve lift doesn't exceed .600". You might find a few hundred more rpm, but no promises.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 10:58 AM
  #17  
radical82's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: Madison, SD
Car: '82 Camaro
Engine: 383
Transmission: TKO 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 31 spline 9" with 4.56:1
Re: Retro fit hydraulic roller

Hmmmm. Looks like I'd better stick with my old fashioned mechanical rollers..... Not going racing this time other then maybe a few track days or perhaps a bit of grude racing on Sat. nights at the drag strip..... but I do like to have a very aggresive street beast of an engine, seems the hydraulic rollers with the limited rpm's and valve lift probably won't fit the bill.....??????
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 11:03 AM
  #18  
Atilla the Fun's Avatar
On Probation
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 19
From: Northern Utah
Car: seeking '90.5-'92 'bird hardtop
Engine: several
Transmission: none
Axle/Gears: none
Re: Retro fit hydraulic roller

Sure, you can get .630"-lift solid rollers, but the XFIs are helping guys get past .550", and compared to the .450" of the '90s, that's really good.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 11:11 AM
  #19  
radical82's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: Madison, SD
Car: '82 Camaro
Engine: 383
Transmission: TKO 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 31 spline 9" with 4.56:1
Re: Retro fit hydraulic roller

Ok, good to know!

Maybe someday I'll step up to the newer stuff, but I still like my high compression, hi-lift, high winding skinny blocks (both Chevy's and Ford's). I will have to admit that I looked long and hard at one of the new LS engines long and hard before settling on another sbc.... Hard to get away from a known setup, I guess....or maybe just too set in my ways to try some new technology?????



Thanks for the input, Atilla. Always good to hear what others are doing and the results they get with different setups....
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 01:29 PM
  #20  
anesthes's Avatar
TGO Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,089
Likes: 125
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Re: Retro fit hydraulic roller

Originally Posted by radical82
Hmmmm. Looks like I'd better stick with my old fashioned mechanical rollers.....
Can't beat 'em for performance. But the noise, and maint is a bit much.. I was like 99% there and bailed at the last minute.

I don't rev though.

-- Joe
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 06:08 PM
  #21  
vetteoz's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,736
Likes: 14
From: Not in Kansas anymore
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 383 SP EFI/ 4150 TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: QP 9" 3.73
Re: Retro fit hydraulic roller

Originally Posted by Atilla the Fun
These days the LSx engines and some SB Fords are doing 7200 rpm just fine with HR, but not SBCs.

The stock LS7 lifters ( not the Caddy racing ones ) are supposed to be good for 7K and about the only thing from a LSX that will retro fit into earlier engines
Cheap also
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/NAL-12499225/

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c4-g...7-lifters.html
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 07:10 PM
  #22  
radical82's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: Madison, SD
Car: '82 Camaro
Engine: 383
Transmission: TKO 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 31 spline 9" with 4.56:1
Re: Retro fit hydraulic roller

I always run good polylocks and a stud girdle...Keeps them fairly well adjusted... Heck, after all these years running them, what would I do on Sunday afternoon if I didn't have valves to adjust??????
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 09:07 PM
  #23  
skinny z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,917
Likes: 884
From: 53.0907° N, 113.4695° W
Re: Retro fit hydraulic roller

For the record gentlemen, ( and it's my old thread resurrected much to my surprise), the bee hives appears to be doing yoeman's duty on my little 350. Probably 40 000 miles on the latest reassembly. 100 1/4 mile passes all solidly in the 12's (documented). In addition to that I've logged many road trips that measure into the thousands of miles. The latest being a 5000 mile epic towing a u-haul from Toronto to Edmonton.
What I can't say is how the springs measure up scientifically. Although it still pulls to 6500 rpm without hesitation I haven't measured spring pressures since the latest assembly. I will say that the engine is coming out and going into the latest chassis I've cobbled together. That should give an opportunity to freshen things up and examine a few of the high wear items.
If there's any interest, I'll post the results
As far as push rod length and camshaft endplay goes: I followed conventional wisdom, ordered my parts and verified that they would work. So far so good.

Last edited by skinny z; Oct 8, 2009 at 09:18 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 09:25 PM
  #24  
radical82's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: Madison, SD
Car: '82 Camaro
Engine: 383
Transmission: TKO 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 31 spline 9" with 4.56:1
Re: Retro fit hydraulic roller

Thanks for the comeback, Skinny!!!!! I would be curious to know how much the springs have lost if you should have the opportunity to check them! Also be interested to know how the rockers look after all those miles.... Oh yeah, what's the lift on the cam??? I'm too lazy to go look it up myself!!!!



Dave
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2009 | 08:49 AM
  #25  
skinny z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,917
Likes: 884
From: 53.0907° N, 113.4695° W
Re: Retro fit hydraulic roller

With the 1.6 rockers the cam measures .535/.544.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
junkcltr
Tech / General Engine
6
Aug 2, 2019 11:12 PM
blackroc68
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
9
Sep 1, 2015 08:01 PM
gixxer92
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
Sep 1, 2015 04:32 PM
ChaseDale3and8
Mid-West Region
12
Aug 25, 2015 06:34 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:37 AM.