Internally balanced vs. externally balanced
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 Iroc z
Engine: 305 tpi
Transmission: t-5
Axle/Gears: 3.45 borg warner
Internally balanced vs. externally balanced
I am purchacing an 383 rotating assembly kit from eagle and am not sure whether i want it internally or externally balanced. I know i eventually want the assembly internally balanced, but i also know factory balances aren't the best. Should i just buy an internally balanced kit and have it rebalanced or will the kit be balanced well enough to start with? And if i do buy the kit internally balanced, what else to i need to buy? i know flexplate, harmonic balancer, and dampener are names that have come up in my research that i need to buy. If so, what types of the above do i need (number of teeth, degree range, ect.)?
#2
Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Estes Park, Co.
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 88 Trans Am
Engine: 355 c.i.
Transmission: 5 spd.
Axle/Gears: 3:42s
Re: Internally balanced vs. externally balanced
Just get yourself the internally balanced kit and you're good to go. You won't have to do anything later that way. And yes you will need a harmonic balancer and a flexplate or flywheel if you have manual tranny
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 Iroc z
Engine: 305 tpi
Transmission: t-5
Axle/Gears: 3.45 borg warner
Re: Internally balanced vs. externally balanced
Now ive seen all of the parts ranging from $60 to $300. I think the harmonic balancer was either iron or steel. How do I choose? Also what parts do i need exactly if i have a manual shift? I know you said balancer and flywheel, but do i need a dampener?
#5
Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Estes Park, Co.
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 88 Trans Am
Engine: 355 c.i.
Transmission: 5 spd.
Axle/Gears: 3:42s
Re: Internally balanced vs. externally balanced
A dampener is the same as a harmonic balancer. You will need the flywheel clutch disc and pressure plate throw out bearing and pilot bearing all of which can be bought as a kit minus the flywheel of course. If you're putting together a 383 be sure you get a good balancer for it. As far as choosing parts for your engine ask questions. Ask the people at Summit or wherever you are buying you crank kit. Ask a lot of questions, if they don't have answers stay away from that vendor.
#7
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: California
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Pontiac
Re: Internally balanced vs. externally balanced
Its especially difficult when harmonic damper manufacturers refer to their product as "balancers".
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bright, IN
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 Bird, 96 ImpalaSS, 98 C1500XCab
Engine: LG4, LT1, L31
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Tors, 4.88 spool, 3.73 Eaton
Re: Internally balanced vs. externally balanced
......and the other thing that rubs me wrong when this damper thing is discussed: calling it a "dampener"! To dampen is to "make wet" ; to damp is to quell vibration. D)
#9
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
8 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: Internally balanced vs. externally balanced
"Dampen" is also to "dull, deaden or depress", so "dampener" is also correct.
#10
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bright, IN
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 Bird, 96 ImpalaSS, 98 C1500XCab
Engine: LG4, LT1, L31
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Tors, 4.88 spool, 3.73 Eaton
Re: Internally balanced vs. externally balanced
I KNOW It's a shame when even the authors of the dictionaries cave in to the illiterates, just like putting "ain't" in there. It used to be that Eastern Kentucky had no influence over the English language
#11
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
8 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: Internally balanced vs. externally balanced
Yeah, what were they thinking in the 1600s when that usage originated? I bet they had no idea the irritation it would cause.
#12
Member
Re: Internally balanced vs. externally balanced
When you have a spring/mas system, you say, "What is the dampening ratio?" Not, "What is the damperer ratio?" Dampener is the correct term.
#13
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bright, IN
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 Bird, 96 ImpalaSS, 98 C1500XCab
Engine: LG4, LT1, L31
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Tors, 4.88 spool, 3.73 Eaton
Re: Internally balanced vs. externally balanced
#14
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: California
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Pontiac
Re: Internally balanced vs. externally balanced
I disagree:
---Main Entry:
damp·er
Pronunciation:
\ˈdam-pər\
Function:
noun
Date:
1707
2: a device that damps: as b: a small felted block to stop the vibration of a piano string ----
Seeing as how a damper is a device that stops the harmonic vibrations of a crankshaft, it is the correct term.
---Main Entry:
damp·er
Pronunciation:
\ˈdam-pər\
Function:
noun
Date:
1707
2: a device that damps: as b: a small felted block to stop the vibration of a piano string ----
Seeing as how a damper is a device that stops the harmonic vibrations of a crankshaft, it is the correct term.
#15
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1988 Firebird, 2000 GTP
Engine: 327
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9" posi, 4.11
Re: Internally balanced vs. externally balanced
COUGH... go back to the library.
Personally, I don't think what kind of dampener you get matters as long as everything is correctly balanced. I suppose it might make a difference if you are going to be doing some higher RPMs, but for anything that would be mostly street driven I don't see how it could be a big issue.
The flywheel will make a difference as far as internal or external balanced. There will be a weight added to the flywheel for external balanced and no weight on an internally balanced. Other than that I think you will want to go with a 153 tooth, with a 12.78" diameter I believe. If you go with the 168 your diameter will jump up to 14.xx and you will need to get the accompanying starter for the larger flywheel. If you are using a starter after 1986 you will want the 153 tooth. Pre 86 and you can go with the 168.
From what I can tell 1 piece rear main seals are usually externally balanced unless it's a 2 piece that has been converted over. So you can look at it as an aspect of deciding based on your block I suppose. If it's a 2 piece main block, you can go with the internally balanced crank and not have to buy the extra conversion parts.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong on all that, otherwise that's the way I'm going to remember it.
Personally, I don't think what kind of dampener you get matters as long as everything is correctly balanced. I suppose it might make a difference if you are going to be doing some higher RPMs, but for anything that would be mostly street driven I don't see how it could be a big issue.
The flywheel will make a difference as far as internal or external balanced. There will be a weight added to the flywheel for external balanced and no weight on an internally balanced. Other than that I think you will want to go with a 153 tooth, with a 12.78" diameter I believe. If you go with the 168 your diameter will jump up to 14.xx and you will need to get the accompanying starter for the larger flywheel. If you are using a starter after 1986 you will want the 153 tooth. Pre 86 and you can go with the 168.
From what I can tell 1 piece rear main seals are usually externally balanced unless it's a 2 piece that has been converted over. So you can look at it as an aspect of deciding based on your block I suppose. If it's a 2 piece main block, you can go with the internally balanced crank and not have to buy the extra conversion parts.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong on all that, otherwise that's the way I'm going to remember it.
#16
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Yes, it does make a difference which one you use. The factory 400, 3.75" stroke crank, used a weighted damper and flexplate/flywheel, aka "external" balancing. The aftermarket came up with internal 3.75" stroke crankshafts, and if you get one of those cranks, you do not want to used a weighted damper.
The one-piece rear main seal cranks (here we go, explaining this again) needed a weight on the flexplate/flywheel to replace a counterweight that was cast into the 2-piece rear main seal cranks external to the rear main seal. That is not the same as the 3.75" stroke crank "external balance" weight on the flexplate/flywheel (the "externally" balanced SBC 400's had that counterweight cast into the crank as well). They are different things, so whether you get a one- or two-piece rear main seal stroker crank, you need to know whether it was made to be internally or externally balanced, and use the right harmonic damper and flexplate/flywheel.
Personally, to answer the originator's original question, I would get an internally balanced kit that was balanced.
The one-piece rear main seal cranks (here we go, explaining this again) needed a weight on the flexplate/flywheel to replace a counterweight that was cast into the 2-piece rear main seal cranks external to the rear main seal. That is not the same as the 3.75" stroke crank "external balance" weight on the flexplate/flywheel (the "externally" balanced SBC 400's had that counterweight cast into the crank as well). They are different things, so whether you get a one- or two-piece rear main seal stroker crank, you need to know whether it was made to be internally or externally balanced, and use the right harmonic damper and flexplate/flywheel.
Personally, to answer the originator's original question, I would get an internally balanced kit that was balanced.
#17
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 Iroc z
Engine: 305 tpi
Transmission: t-5
Axle/Gears: 3.45 borg warner
Re: Internally balanced vs. externally balanced
So if i have a one piece rear main block, am buying and internally balanced rotating assembly, and having a machine shop custom grind a camshaft, all i should buy is a nuetral balanced harmonic dampener and a 153 tooth flywheel? Did i understand this correctly? and thank you again for your time and patience. Just know you are helping a new car enthusiast become a bit more educated.
#18
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
8 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: Internally balanced vs. externally balanced
You'd need a neutral balanced dampener like the one used on any stock SBC except the 400, and a stock-balanced flywheel like the one used stock on any 1-pc RMS SBC.
#19
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 Iroc z
Engine: 305 tpi
Transmission: t-5
Axle/Gears: 3.45 borg warner
Re: Internally balanced vs. externally balanced
Do you know if the flywheel has 153 or 168 teeth?
#22
2011 Norwood Gathering
ThirdGen Camaro Rep
ThirdGen Camaro Rep
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: MICH.
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 2:77
Re: Internally balanced vs. externally balanced
When i purchased my eagle internally balanced 1pc rms rotating assembly they told me i could use the factory 305/350 dampener but i would need to purchase a neutral balanced flex plate/flyeheel.But it sounds like you guys are saying that you can use the factory 1 pc rms flex plate????
#23
Supreme Member
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Not in Kansas anymore
Posts: 7,732
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
11 Posts
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 383 SP EFI/ 4150 TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: QP 9" 3.73
Re: Internally balanced vs. externally balanced
Internal balance is just that ,internally balanced so anything bolted on the outside is neutral.You would need a neutral balance (2 pce sealstyle ) flywheel.
1 pce seal engines are neutral balance at front , same as all SBC except 400 BUT external balance at rear.That is why the 1 pce seal flywheel/flexplates have a weight on them.
Problem is the two cranks have different bolt patterns for the flywheel so you would need a 1pc rms flywheel neutral balanced .
Last edited by vetteoz; 09-10-2008 at 08:42 AM.
#24
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Don't call 1-piece rear main seal cranks "external balance at the rear", because that just confuses the issue.
And, a "neutral balanced" 1-piece rear main seal flexplate will have a weight on it.
#25
Supreme Member
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Not in Kansas anymore
Posts: 7,732
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
11 Posts
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 383 SP EFI/ 4150 TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: QP 9" 3.73
Re: Internally balanced vs. externally balanced
You may be correct from an engineering perpective but the automotive industry considers the crank as part of the internal structure regardless of whether it is actually internal to the block..
GM as well as all the flywheel / flexplate makers refer to 1pce RMS engines as EXTERNAL balance
and the 2 pce RMS as INTERNAL .
The crank is considered internal and anything that bolts to it external.
From GM Parts catalog
Small Block Chevy Flywheel Part Numbers
Part # DIA. Teeth Comments
3991469 14" 168 two-piece seal, internal balanced
10105832 14" 168 86up, 1pce rear seal, ext. balance
14085720 12.75" 153 Lightweight nodular iron, two-piece seal, int balance
14088646 12.75" 153 86-up, Lightweight nodular iron, 1pce rear seal, ext balance
14088648 14" 168 86-up, 1pce rear seal, ext. balance
14088650 12.75" 153 86-up, 1pce rear seal, ext balance
Small Block Chevy Flexplate Part Numbers
Part # DIA. Teeth Comments
471529 12.75" 153 Two-piece seal blocks, int balance
471598 14" 168 Two-piece seal blocks, internal balance
10128412 12.75" 153 86-up, one-piece rear seal ext. balance
10128413 14" 168 86-up, one-piece seal, HD, ext bal
10128414 14" 168 86-96, one-piece rear seal, ext. balance
14088761 14" 168 89-up 350 HO, one-piece rear seal, ext. bal.
14088765 12.75" 153 86-up, one-piece rear seal, ext. bal.
14088767 14" 168 89-up 350 HO, one-piece rear seal, HD, ext. bal
.[/QUOTE]And, a "neutral balanced" 1-piece rear main seal flexplate will have a weight on it.[/QUOTE]
A flywheel that is " neutral " balanced will sit at any position when mounted on a spindle whereas a one with a weight will rotate the weight to the bottom. The weighted flywheel only becomes “ neutral “ when bolted to the rotating assembly
#27
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
8 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: Internally balanced vs. externally balanced
Yup... suppose you were to build an externally balanced 383 in a 1 piece RMS block. Then you'd have to choose between an "externally balanced" flywheel, and an "externally balanced" flywheel.
I'm convinced GM must have hired Ford engineers.
I'm convinced GM must have hired Ford engineers.
#28
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 Iroc z
Engine: 305 tpi
Transmission: t-5
Axle/Gears: 3.45 borg warner
Re: Internally balanced vs. externally balanced
So does that mean i cant build an internally balanced 1 piece RMS 383?
#29
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
8 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: Internally balanced vs. externally balanced
Depends what you mean by "internally balance". You can balance the whole rotating assembly any way you want, if you've got the right parts and/or you want to spend the money.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
monte87cortez
Transmissions and Drivetrain
2
09-26-2015 08:10 PM
10128413, balance, balanced, difference, external, externally, externaly, flexplate, flywheel, gm, internal, internally, motor, neutral, sbc