Z-max, Restore, ect
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: T-5
Z-max, Restore, ect
What is everyone's experience with these types of oil additives, have there been any test that show they really do work? Do any of you use them, and if so, What are your opinions?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Z-max, Restore, ect
Work for what exactly?
Only reason to use anything other than oil in your crankcase is either to clean built up sludge and varnish on a poorly maintained motor or to thicken up the oil so it doesnt burn so much oil while you save up your last few dollars to rebuild the engine. The rest is all snake oil backed up with 500 pages of marketing.
Only reason to use anything other than oil in your crankcase is either to clean built up sludge and varnish on a poorly maintained motor or to thicken up the oil so it doesnt burn so much oil while you save up your last few dollars to rebuild the engine. The rest is all snake oil backed up with 500 pages of marketing.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: T-5
Re: Z-max, Restore, ect
Work for what exactly?
Only reason to use anything other than oil in your crankcase is either to clean built up sludge and varnish on a poorly maintained motor or to thicken up the oil so it doesnt burn so much oil while you save up your last few dollars to rebuild the engine. The rest is all snake oil backed up with 500 pages of marketing.
Only reason to use anything other than oil in your crankcase is either to clean built up sludge and varnish on a poorly maintained motor or to thicken up the oil so it doesnt burn so much oil while you save up your last few dollars to rebuild the engine. The rest is all snake oil backed up with 500 pages of marketing.
Re: Z-max, Restore, ect
http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2001/02/zmax1.shtm
"The agency alleges that enhanced performance claims for the product are unsubstantiated, that tests cited to support performance claims actually demonstrated that motor oil treated with zMax produced more than twice as much bearing corrosion than motor oil alone, and that the three different products - an engine additive, a fuel line additive and a transmission additive - were all actually tinted mineral oil."
"The agency alleges that enhanced performance claims for the product are unsubstantiated, that tests cited to support performance claims actually demonstrated that motor oil treated with zMax produced more than twice as much bearing corrosion than motor oil alone, and that the three different products - an engine additive, a fuel line additive and a transmission additive - were all actually tinted mineral oil."
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: Z-max, Restore, ect
http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2001/02/zmax1.shtm
"The agency alleges that enhanced performance claims for the product are unsubstantiated, that tests cited to support performance claims actually demonstrated that motor oil treated with zMax produced more than twice as much bearing corrosion than motor oil alone, and that the three different products - an engine additive, a fuel line additive and a transmission additive - were all actually tinted mineral oil."
"The agency alleges that enhanced performance claims for the product are unsubstantiated, that tests cited to support performance claims actually demonstrated that motor oil treated with zMax produced more than twice as much bearing corrosion than motor oil alone, and that the three different products - an engine additive, a fuel line additive and a transmission additive - were all actually tinted mineral oil."
hahaha, OUCH !!! Thanks for that info chesterfield!
Trending Topics
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 998
Likes: 1
From: Bedford Tx
Car: 1991 Z28 1LE
Engine: 370CID GenIII
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 4.33 Moser 9inch
Re: Z-max, Restore, ect
yeah one of these days people will realize u cannot fix mechanical problems with chemicals....
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: T-5
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 998
Likes: 1
From: Bedford Tx
Car: 1991 Z28 1LE
Engine: 370CID GenIII
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 4.33 Moser 9inch
Re: Z-max, Restore, ect
thats cause it cleaned out deposits.....im talking bout stuff like engine restore and crap like that. the closest you can come is having a chemical that swells rubber seals to help them seal better and thats just half assed in my opinion...
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: T-5
Re: Z-max, Restore, ect
Thank yall for your input
I dont think I will be Z-maxing my engine any time soon
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,462
Likes: 4
From: N. Illinois
Car: 92 GTA/ 00 TA
Engine: 383/350
Transmission: 700R4/T-56
Re: Z-max, Restore, ect
But isn't seafoam just rebadged diesel fuel?
I tried it once. Did nothing for me.
Many many moons ago I even tried Slick50. I thought it helped until I opened up the engine to find that crap sticking everywhere.
I tried it once. Did nothing for me.
Many many moons ago I even tried Slick50. I thought it helped until I opened up the engine to find that crap sticking everywhere.
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 2
From: British Columbia
Car: 90 IROC 5.7 hardtop
Engine: L98
Transmission: T5 swap
Axle/Gears: Yup -- they still work
Re: Z-max, Restore, ect
the manual calls for regular oil changes. I would just change the oil and use a 5-50 synthetic if you want to help the bearing tolerances abit...
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: T-5
Re: Z-max, Restore, ect
Any specific brand of synthetic better than another? I am concerned about spending the cash on synthetic and then the car developing an oil leak. If that happened, i would end up changing it again....
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 998
Likes: 1
From: Bedford Tx
Car: 1991 Z28 1LE
Engine: 370CID GenIII
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 4.33 Moser 9inch
Re: Z-max, Restore, ect
if ure engine has alot of crud in it helping to plug leaks (which it probably does if its high milage) then the better synthetics are going to cause leaks cause theyl break up the sludge thats helping to plug them. Best synthetics are MOBIL 1 Valvoline Castrol and AMSOIL..... I use Mobil 1 there is a reason the worlds top supercars use it ya know but those others i mentioned are bout just as good....IMO.
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Car: 84 camaro berlinetta
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700 r4
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 394
Likes: 1
From: Huntington, NY
Car: 1983 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: LG4 305ci 4bbl
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt open diff.
Re: Z-max, Restore, ect
the way i see it, if a product has been around for a long time, there's a reason for it. products like marvel mystery oil, engine restorer, seafoam, duralube, etc. have been around for a while. i work in an auto parts store and the old timers always come asking for the mystery oil and they swear by it...same with the engine restorer...you know, that blue stuff that comes in an old school oil can. i've heard bad things about z-max too.
per oil change i use: mobil 1 high mileage 10w-40, engine restorer, and zddplus. never had any issues and engine now runs better than when i used dino oil alone.
per oil change i use: mobil 1 high mileage 10w-40, engine restorer, and zddplus. never had any issues and engine now runs better than when i used dino oil alone.
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 279
Likes: 1
From: Corning, CA
Car: 89' RS
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi
Re: Z-max, Restore, ect
Stuff like marvel and slick 50 etc... Aren't those mainly used for band aids? I know my tranny in my tbird is slipping like a **** but to keep her going long enough for me to get another ride i threw a good chunk of slick50 in her and she's been grabbing a bit better since then, for how long I don't know. I'll be getting my 89' rs this weekend anyways though so I'm okay.
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 394
Likes: 1
From: Huntington, NY
Car: 1983 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: LG4 305ci 4bbl
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt open diff.
Re: Z-max, Restore, ect
as far as marvel goes, i mainly use(d) it for cleaning purposes. i'd dump 1/2 qt. in the day before an oil change and drive around a bit. that way, it cleans out the gunk, but won't cause leaks to form due to it sitting in the engine too long. also, it helps free sticking lifters. for what it is, it works pretty well.
i've never used slick 50, but the engine restorer i use works pretty well. i noticed a difference after i started using it every oil change, after not using it for a while.
this is the stuff i'm talking about: http://www.restoreusa.com/
i've never used slick 50, but the engine restorer i use works pretty well. i noticed a difference after i started using it every oil change, after not using it for a while.
this is the stuff i'm talking about: http://www.restoreusa.com/
On Probation
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 19
From: Northern Utah
Car: seeking '90.5-'92 'bird hardtop
Engine: several
Transmission: none
Axle/Gears: none
Re: Z-max, Restore, ect
I feel like weighing in. I'm a believer in Restore. I'm also a professional automotive machinist, engines are my life. What restore actually does, I can't say. But the results are as advertised. Improved cranking compression, and not just for a few days. I can't prove any other advantages, but it's good stuff to buy when you just dragged home another car you know little about.
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 2
From: Norfolk VA
Car: 85 Camaro IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: open rear, 3.42 gears
Re: Z-max, Restore, ect
i use marvel mystery oil for the simple fact that it smells delicious!!!
jk
but it does smell good though.
i usually pour a quart in every other oil change though.
figure it cant really hurt anything.
the bigger thing to worry about IMO is filtration.
you can have the best oil on the planet, but if crud is not getting filtered out, then you are screwed.
next oil change i am going to try one of those amsoil filters that supposedly get down to the half micron or whatever.
jk
but it does smell good though.
i usually pour a quart in every other oil change though.
figure it cant really hurt anything.
the bigger thing to worry about IMO is filtration.
you can have the best oil on the planet, but if crud is not getting filtered out, then you are screwed.
next oil change i am going to try one of those amsoil filters that supposedly get down to the half micron or whatever.
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 1
From: houston
Car: 83 POS monte carlo 2015 chevy P/U
Engine: 92 5.7 tpi 5.3
Transmission: 700r4 6L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.42 too high
Re: Z-max, Restore, ect
years ago i had a girl friend whose pickup was using oil like mad.
not only did it leak, but it smoked out the tail pipes, bad.
a round trip to work and back for her was about 9 miles, it used 3 or so quarts of oil a day.
you could watch the cylinders firing by the puffs of smoke from the breather tube.
a set of oil non-foulers kelp the plugs clean enough that it didn't start missing too bad for few days between plug cleanings.
i don't remember what it was she bought, all i remember was telling her she wasted the $10.00 on it and laughing about it.
it took her from the 3+ quarts a day to less than a quart a week.
it cleared up at least 80 percent of the tail pipe smoke and 95 percent of the oil leaks. the puffs of smoke from the breather tube were barely noticeable. and the plugs didn't need to be cleaned near as often.
the stuff was bright yellow and in a yellow quart oil can, and it didn't smell bad at all.
about once a month she would dump another quart of that stuff in.
it allowed that motor to live for a few more months until we could afford a new motor.
i never heard the end of it, every time we had a fight, she would bring it up

man im glad i didn't marry her
not only did it leak, but it smoked out the tail pipes, bad.
a round trip to work and back for her was about 9 miles, it used 3 or so quarts of oil a day.
you could watch the cylinders firing by the puffs of smoke from the breather tube.
a set of oil non-foulers kelp the plugs clean enough that it didn't start missing too bad for few days between plug cleanings.
i don't remember what it was she bought, all i remember was telling her she wasted the $10.00 on it and laughing about it.
it took her from the 3+ quarts a day to less than a quart a week.
it cleared up at least 80 percent of the tail pipe smoke and 95 percent of the oil leaks. the puffs of smoke from the breather tube were barely noticeable. and the plugs didn't need to be cleaned near as often.
the stuff was bright yellow and in a yellow quart oil can, and it didn't smell bad at all.
about once a month she would dump another quart of that stuff in.
it allowed that motor to live for a few more months until we could afford a new motor.
i never heard the end of it, every time we had a fight, she would bring it up


man im glad i didn't marry her
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 394
Likes: 1
From: Huntington, NY
Car: 1983 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: LG4 305ci 4bbl
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt open diff.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





makes cents on the tellie they say it soaks into the metal doesnt that make it an acid 
