subtle diference?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: putnam, CT
Car: 1988 sc camaro, 1986 IROC
Engine: 2.8 v6, 305 tpi (for now)
Transmission: automatic, auto( for now)
subtle diference?
ok i'm a little new to the world of third gens, i know a bit about them but what gets me is, what are the differences between the diferent types of camaro, aside from the names
such as:
ss
rs
z28
iroc
and the iroc-z
just what are they made differently to do ect.
thanks
such as:
ss
rs
z28
iroc
and the iroc-z
just what are they made differently to do ect.
thanks
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 998
Likes: 1
From: Bedford Tx
Car: 1991 Z28 1LE
Engine: 370CID GenIII
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 4.33 Moser 9inch
Re: subtle diference?
There is no SS third gen
The "RS" trim was basically a trim package atop the base sports coupe and featured either V6 or 5.0 V8 power
Z28 was the top performer most years (except the cpl years there were Z28 and IROC seperately offered i.e. 85, 86 and i think 87) Z28s alway have V8s
IROC and IROCZ are the same thing IROC-Z, which was named after the International Race of Champions usually included a TPI V8 (some were carbed) and basicaly suspension upgrades i believe. someone else will probably expand on this...
The "RS" trim was basically a trim package atop the base sports coupe and featured either V6 or 5.0 V8 power
Z28 was the top performer most years (except the cpl years there were Z28 and IROC seperately offered i.e. 85, 86 and i think 87) Z28s alway have V8s
IROC and IROCZ are the same thing IROC-Z, which was named after the International Race of Champions usually included a TPI V8 (some were carbed) and basicaly suspension upgrades i believe. someone else will probably expand on this...
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: putnam, CT
Car: 1988 sc camaro, 1986 IROC
Engine: 2.8 v6, 305 tpi (for now)
Transmission: automatic, auto( for now)
Re: subtle diference?
yeah i never heard of an ss but i wasn't sure if they still did it anyway,
thanks you helped clear some stuff up, anybody feel free to expand on what he said,
i wanted to know because i was offered a choice between a regular camaro or an rs so i wanted to know the difference
thanks you helped clear some stuff up, anybody feel free to expand on what he said,
i wanted to know because i was offered a choice between a regular camaro or an rs so i wanted to know the difference
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 998
Likes: 1
From: Bedford Tx
Car: 1991 Z28 1LE
Engine: 370CID GenIII
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 4.33 Moser 9inch
Re: subtle diference?
Well when they came out with the RS it replaced the just plain old camaro. Imo and im pretty sure most others will agree id take an RS they look way better and it should be newer then the basic camaro......
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 998
Likes: 1
From: Bedford Tx
Car: 1991 Z28 1LE
Engine: 370CID GenIII
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 4.33 Moser 9inch
Re: subtle diference?
not really rs would be best on engines still more then likely unless the normal camaro is a v8 and the rs is a v6, but if both are v8 then stock for stock the RS should be better
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Okay, let's try to clear this up.
Go to the thirdgen.org homepage and look over the Camaro tech data for the various years. They changed stuff too many times over the years to try to make blanket statements.
Go to the thirdgen.org homepage and look over the Camaro tech data for the various years. They changed stuff too many times over the years to try to make blanket statements.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






