Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

305 rebuild.. lt1 cam?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 7, 2010 | 02:44 PM
  #1  
camaroman9191's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
305 rebuild.. lt1 cam?

Hi all, im rebuildin my 305 out of my 1991 camaro z28. It's an f code with dual cats. I really want to put a new cam in my car that will give it more power and a little better lopey idle. I've seenalot of people say alot about the lt1 cam and such and at the risk of sounding realllyyyy stupid.. What engine does the lt1 cam come out of? what kind of benefits am i looking at if i used that cam (hp and tq, also driveability) and what kind of prices? Obviously it comes out of an LT1 engine but what size and years was it made?
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2010 | 06:44 PM
  #2  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Lopey idle and TPI don't mix.

But, LT1 cam and TPI will be fine.

The "better" LT1 cams are from Vettes or f-bodies. The B-body LT1's will have a better cam than your LB9, but not much.

Vettes '92-'96, f-bodies '93-'97.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2010 | 07:07 PM
  #3  
Damon's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 13
From: Philly, PA
Re: 305 rebuild.. lt1 cam?

Agreed with above.

A Vette or F-body LT1 cam is very similar in specs to an L98 350 TPI cam, but with more lift. And it's a good match for a stock or mildly modified TPI.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2010 | 07:52 PM
  #4  
Fast355's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,408
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: 305 rebuild.. lt1 cam?

Originally Posted by five7kid
Lopey idle and TPI don't mix.

But, LT1 cam and TPI will be fine.

The "better" LT1 cams are from Vettes or f-bodies. The B-body LT1's will have a better cam than your LB9, but not much.

Vettes '92-'96, f-bodies '93-'97.
The B-Car/Vortec Truck stick is milder than a SD LB9 cam. The F/Y LT1 cam is a very slight upgrade. The PRODUCTION LT4 cam is an even better choice.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2010 | 08:48 PM
  #5  
BASSETT IROC 85's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Heart of Dixie
Car: 1987 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 7.5 inch 342
Re: 305 rebuild.. lt1 cam?

Check into a GM hot cam. There are few good aftermarket cams that do well with TPI.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2010 | 12:50 PM
  #6  
camaroman9191's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Re: 305 rebuild.. lt1 cam?

Ok.. granted lope and tpi dont get along, like water and hot oil. What kind of power/ benefits would i get if i switched out my LB9 cam to an LT1 or an LT4 cam?? and if i did do a lt1 or lt4 cam, do i have to do any cylinder head work such as valves or valve springs?

Last edited by camaroman9191; Feb 8, 2010 at 01:15 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2010 | 04:16 PM
  #7  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Fast, thanks for the correction on the B-body LT1 cam. I spoke from memory without looking it up, obviously my memory had some faulty bits.

camaroman, what exhaust do you have on the car? If it's the stock single cat, don't bother doing anything until you replace the entire exhaust system.

When you do any cam other than stock, figure on needing to upgrade the valve springs. With the LT4 cam (not Hot Cam), you don't need to do machining on the heads for adequate valve travel. But, if the engine is apart, it's a good time to do it, anyway.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 10:52 AM
  #8  
camaroman9191's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Re: 305 rebuild.. lt1 cam?

My car has factory exhaust manifolds, and im not sure of the exhaust off the headers but its not smaller than 2 1/2", it is a dual cat car but they will be gone before i put the engine back in. After the cats it is 3" all the way back to the muffler which is a flowmaster series 80 with dual exhaust. (3" inlet, 2 1/2" dual outlets) Also it has an adj. fuel press. regulator. I am having a chip burned by pcm for less as well specifically for the engine baecause its cheaper than a stock replacement. How much would I be looking at for a stock LT4 cam with stock lifters price wise?? and what kind of gains would i be looking at? I want to break 300hp.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 10:41 AM
  #9  
86LG4Bird's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 0
From: Bright, IN
Car: '86 Bird, 96 ImpalaSS, 98 C1500XCab
Engine: LG4, LT1, L31
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Tors, 4.88 spool, 3.73 Eaton
Re: 305 rebuild.. lt1 cam?

Very few people on these "small car" boards know much about the B-body LT1 cam and its capability.......I do.
Even in a lighter car like an F-body, unless it has sufficient gearing and stall, it will ET better and put out within 5 peak hp of the F-body LT1 cam.
What some don't realize is that the I/E events of the B-cam result in a LSA of 111 degrees, at face value quite a bit different from the F-cam. BUT.....the actual overlap area is identical to that of the F-cam, which means it breathes just as well in the mid and low rpms. The F-cam has duration added to the exh opening and int closing sides of the lobes, giving it that 115-116 LSA number, and does little more than shift the tq and hp peaks a couple hundred rpm higher and gaining that little bit of peak hp. The bigger difference you see in factory ratings is the result of vehicle intake and exhaust system differences more than the cam.
The stock LT1 in my Impala with nothing more than 1.6 rockers and better valvesprings dyno'd 309 rwhp STD and ran 12.3's @ 107+ mph in a a 3900 lb car. Very few stock LT1 F-body's do any better, even at lighter weight.

Last edited by 86LG4Bird; Feb 10, 2010 at 10:44 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jake_92RS
Tech / General Engine
8
Jan 28, 2020 10:37 PM
midge54
LTX and LSX
21
Dec 27, 2019 04:14 PM
Orr89RocZ
Power Adders
206
Apr 25, 2016 08:28 AM
beastin91rs
Tech / General Engine
18
Oct 9, 2015 07:38 AM
theurge
TPI
7
Aug 21, 2015 12:46 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:58 PM.