Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Would ENGINE be considered a 305 H.O.?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 10, 2013 | 09:06 PM
  #1  
calgutie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 842
Likes: 1
From: Oxnard, CALI
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: 5.0 L (Carbed)
Transmission: 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: Lazy 2 check
Would ENGINE be considered a 305 H.O.?

Alright you guys quick question..I got my 84z28 with a slow LG4 engine in it..and a T5 tranny...FYI Installnig New Ram Clutch and flywheel this upcoming week

Mods to it are.

Hooker 2055 Headers, 3" Straight Pipes, Flowmaster, New distributor, 8.5 MSD Wires, Edelbrock Performer Intake Manifold, Stewart Water Pump, K$N Open Air Element, Rebuilt OEM CC-QUADRAJET, KYB GR-2 All around, Eibach Sportlines All Around, 36mm Sway Bar (front), Wonder Bar, Founders Panhard Rod(Coming in this week)

I know my car has the "peanut" cam...but other than that What do you guys think....305 H.O?????????????w
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2013 | 08:17 AM
  #2  
Atilla the Fun's Avatar
On Probation
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 19
From: Northern Utah
Car: seeking '90.5-'92 'bird hardtop
Engine: several
Transmission: none
Axle/Gears: none
Re: Would ENGINE be considered a 305 H.O.?

L69s had flat-top pistons for 9.5:1 compression. They also came with more aggressive axle ratios. Mustn't get too serious with the cam while you're at 8.6:1. Nothing more than an XE256.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2013 | 05:02 PM
  #3  
calgutie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 842
Likes: 1
From: Oxnard, CALI
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: 5.0 L (Carbed)
Transmission: 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: Lazy 2 check
Re: Would ENGINE be considered a 305 H.O.?

So ur telling that in a staright line a legit H.0 84 z28 stock will beat me?
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2013 | 06:55 PM
  #4  
sofakingdom's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,867
Likes: 2,429
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: Would ENGINE be considered a 305 H.O.?

No it is not.

Yes an actual L69 car, even if bone stock, will drill you so hard you won't know what happened.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2013 | 06:57 PM
  #5  
calgutie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 842
Likes: 1
From: Oxnard, CALI
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: 5.0 L (Carbed)
Transmission: 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: Lazy 2 check
Re: Would ENGINE be considered a 305 H.O.?

hmmm....now u got me thinking about that...Now all i need is to find someone with a H.O 305 to really put my cat to the test....I still honestly think he wouldnt win...The advantage I have to is that mines a 5 speed, so...I really am curious...
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2013 | 07:11 PM
  #6  
sofakingdom's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,867
Likes: 2,429
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: Would ENGINE be considered a 305 H.O.?

Well I'll put it this way:

One of my little brothers bought a 84 LG4 car in about 86 or so. It was an auto, but it had 3.23 gears.

My 83 L69 could start out BEHIND his car at a traffic light, and before I was out of 2nd gear, I could pull out and go around him and get in front.

My car had around 60k on it at the time, and his about 35k if memory serves.

That's where you're starting out from.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 01:33 PM
  #7  
calgutie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 842
Likes: 1
From: Oxnard, CALI
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: 5.0 L (Carbed)
Transmission: 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: Lazy 2 check
Re: Would ENGINE be considered a 305 H.O.?

aww man you guys just tore me awpart..=(.....O well....ill just have fun with this engine uintill it "blows" then drop a 350..=)....will installing some 3.42 gears on the rear make a big difference from my stock open differential? kus I really wanna get it done soon but just not sure if itll make a change?
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 03:41 PM
  #8  
88FormulaF_Bomb's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: nw indiana
Car: 1988 firebird formula 350
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.77
swap your junk heads and you'll smash on any factory 5.0


Posted from Thirdgen.org App for Android
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 03:41 PM
  #9  
calgutie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 842
Likes: 1
From: Oxnard, CALI
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: 5.0 L (Carbed)
Transmission: 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: Lazy 2 check
Re: Would ENGINE be considered a 305 H.O.?

jaja i bet
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2013 | 03:02 PM
  #10  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Originally Posted by 88FormulaF_Bomb
swap your junk heads and you'll smash on any factory 5.0
The heads aren't the problem.

As already noted, it's the compression (due to dished pistons), and small cam.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2013 | 06:36 AM
  #11  
wbstearns's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: O'fallon, IL
Car: 01 s10 blazer and 89 bird
Engine: 383 with mystery cam - maybe
Transmission: t56 hopefully
Axle/Gears: 373 geared posi from 2002 z28
Re: Would ENGINE be considered a 305 H.O.?

Originally Posted by five7kid
The heads aren't the problem.

As already noted, it's the compression (due to dished pistons), and small cam.
But if he were to swaap to a set of 081 heads with 58cc chambers as opposed to 64cc his heads probably have and since they were off swap to a set of shim head gaskets would not that increase his compression ratio may not bring it up to factory h.o. specs but would help and if he swapped to a larger cam he could likely beat a ho 305
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2013 | 06:47 AM
  #12  
JamesC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 19,282
Likes: 103
From: Lawrence, KS
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Re: Would ENGINE be considered a 305 H.O.?

Originally Posted by sofakingdom
No it is not.

Yes an actual L69 car, even if bone stock, will drill you so hard you won't know what happened.
+1.

JamesC
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2013 | 06:51 AM
  #13  
Damon's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 13
From: Philly, PA
Re: Would ENGINE be considered a 305 H.O.?

LG4 and L69 used the exact same heads. Difference in compression is because the LG4 used dished pistons before 1985, where the L69 always used flattops. In 85 the LG4 got the same flattops (and, therefore, the same compression ratio as the L69) but still had the horrible peanut cam.

The exhaust on the LG4 was of the "strangulation" variety, all years (much smaller from the manifolds all the way back to the tailpipes).
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2013 | 06:58 AM
  #14  
JamesC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 19,282
Likes: 103
From: Lawrence, KS
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Re: Would ENGINE be considered a 305 H.O.?

Originally Posted by Damon
The exhaust on the LG4 was of the "strangulation" variety, all years (much smaller from the manifolds all the way back to the tailpipes).


Check out the difference in Y-pipe size, for example.

JamesC
Attached Thumbnails Would ENGINE be considered a 305 H.O.?-picture-1.png  
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2013 | 05:35 PM
  #15  
FNFAL308's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: Spring, TX
Car: 91 Bird
Engine: TPI 350
Transmission: 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 2.77 posi
Re: Would ENGINE be considered a 305 H.O.?

Were the cats bigger also?
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2013 | 07:34 PM
  #16  
Damon's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 13
From: Philly, PA
Re: Would ENGINE be considered a 305 H.O.?

Oh, absolutely. The L69 HO used a 2-3/4" y-pipe, cat and cat-back. The LG4 used 2-1/4" all the way back.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2013 | 07:54 PM
  #17  
JamesC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 19,282
Likes: 103
From: Lawrence, KS
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Re: Would ENGINE be considered a 305 H.O.?

Originally Posted by Damon
Oh, absolutely. The L69 HO used a 2-3/4" y-pipe, cat and cat-back. The LG4 used 2-1/4" all the way back.
Back in the day, I stuck in an after market catback on my LG4. At a later date, the swapped in a complete L69 system only to discover that the L69 intermediate pipe was larger the the LG4's after market piece, which was 2.5.

JamesC
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jhawkeye
Engine Swap
5
May 25, 2022 06:33 PM
Jake_92RS
Tech / General Engine
8
Jan 28, 2020 10:37 PM
I'llrocya
Interior Parts for Sale
3
Feb 2, 2016 11:43 PM
dutch930
Engine Swap
5
Sep 11, 2015 06:58 AM
bradleydeanuhl
DFI and ECM
4
Aug 12, 2015 11:48 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05 AM.