Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

What Cam for 89 Camaro 5.7 TPI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 13, 2018 | 01:35 PM
  #1  
Gunreaper's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
What Cam for 89 Camaro 5.7 TPI

I am looking for a nice cam for a 89 Camaro 5.7 tpi. I want to keep stock heads. I have to have my timing chain replaced so the guy told me to go ahead and get a cam.

so I plan on replacing timing chain, cam and seals. Also probably go ahead and replace valve spring and whatever else may pop up. I seen a lot saying the crane 2032 cam. (What actual part#)
and is their other cams that's would work good with stock tpi 89 camaro?
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2018 | 07:59 PM
  #2  
dmccain's Avatar
Supreme Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,553
Likes: 806
From: South Ms
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: What Cam for 89 Camaro 5.7 TPI

2032 isn't much better than your stock#049 gm cam that year. 268 cam is what I would look at.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2018 | 08:05 PM
  #3  
Gunreaper's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Re: What Cam for 89 Camaro 5.7 TPI

What about valve springs set, lifters, rocker arms? Should I replace them and what part#s?
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2018 | 10:31 PM
  #4  
dmccain's Avatar
Supreme Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,553
Likes: 806
From: South Ms
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: What Cam for 89 Camaro 5.7 TPI

1.5rr are fine.1.6rr may give you just a lil more lift.. Stock lifters should be fine. I'd definitely look at Alex spring kits but I'm sure there a lot more somebody else could chime in and suggest. Look at Summit, Jegs, and Northern auto parts and comp cams are always good to talk to for matching up spring and retainer kits to their cams.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2018 | 12:34 PM
  #5  
Abubaca's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 411
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
Re: What Cam for 89 Camaro 5.7 TPI

Nothing wrong with the 2032. ...that being said, I had great success with the stock zz4 cam. Just upgraded springs. Other than that no change....well...I had headers too, but I consider that mod a separate mod. Had a mild lope, ran great, didn't even retune for a year or two, AND passed NC emissions back when that was still required.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2018 | 01:38 PM
  #6  
Gunreaper's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Re: What Cam for 89 Camaro 5.7 TPI

Originally Posted by Abubaca
Nothing wrong with the 2032. ...that being said, I had great success with the stock zz4 cam. Just upgraded springs. Other than that no change....well...I had headers too, but I consider that mod a separate mod. Had a mild lope, ran great, didn't even retune for a year or two, AND passed NC emissions back when that was still required.
is the part# crane cam 270-104224? I assume 2032 is the grind# .

what springs, lifters, rockers? Part#
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2018 | 11:16 PM
  #7  
abray1's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 3
From: Malvern, Arkansas
Car: 90 IROC 2-92 Zs blk vert & prpl
Engine: stealth ram brodix track 1 ful port
Transmission: 700r4 4l80e
Axle/Gears: iroc 375 lokr 92 Z 277 pos vert 327
Re: What Cam for 89 Camaro 5.7 TPI

I went through college with a 89 350 iroc with a true roller timing chain ZZ4 cam and Edelbrock headers and that car still got the same gas mileage and ran awesome even with 2.77 gears. I found an aluminum drive shaft for it fairly early and a better radiator but that was a great daily driver.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2018 | 06:39 AM
  #8  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: What Cam for 89 Camaro 5.7 TPI

I did one with a comp xtreme energy grind that was 218/224 i believe. Required tuning and had machine shop set up the heads for it. But ran good, sounded good. Torquey but didnt make big power on stock tpi. The air flow isnt there to take advantage of a cam
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2018 | 07:31 PM
  #9  
Fast355's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,404
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: What Cam for 89 Camaro 5.7 TPI

Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ
I did one with a comp xtreme energy grind that was 218/224 i believe. Required tuning and had machine shop set up the heads for it. But ran good, sounded good. Torquey but didnt make big power on stock tpi. The air flow isnt there to take advantage of a cam
I setup a stock TPI on a 10:1 355 with a LT4 Hotcam and Dart 180cc heads. Seems to have plenty of airflow to me. Lots of torque and makes power past 5,500 rpm. Nets the best ETs shifting the TH400 manually about 6,200.

My old G-van had a 350 with ported vortecs and a factory LT4 cam with 1.6 rockers. Pulled hard all the way to 6,000 rpm as well.

Stock TPI setup breathes better than most will give it credit for.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2018 | 06:29 AM
  #10  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: What Cam for 89 Camaro 5.7 TPI

Originally Posted by Fast355
I setup a stock TPI on a 10:1 355 with a LT4 Hotcam and Dart 180cc heads. Seems to have plenty of airflow to me. Lots of torque and makes power past 5,500 rpm. Nets the best ETs shifting the TH400 manually about 6,200.

My old G-van had a 350 with ported vortecs and a factory LT4 cam with 1.6 rockers. Pulled hard all the way to 6,000 rpm as well.

Stock TPI setup breathes better than most will give it credit for.
your results always seem way higher or way different than everyone elses.

Stock tpi stock L98 iron heads with that 218/224 cam did only 226 whp and done by 4500.
I ran aftermarket tpi on afr 180’s with lt4 hotcam and it was done before 5000. Just starting to nose over at 4700.

Pulled hard to 6000 or whatever doesnt mean anything. Any combo will give that illusion. Does it actually make power there? How far is hp down from peak power by 5500? 6000? Probably more than you think. I have dyno sheets to validate my claims


Reply
Old Oct 17, 2018 | 09:34 AM
  #11  
Fast355's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,404
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: What Cam for 89 Camaro 5.7 TPI

Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ


your results always seem way higher or way different than everyone elses.

Stock tpi stock L98 iron heads with that 218/224 cam did only 226 whp and done by 4500.
I ran aftermarket tpi on afr 180’s with lt4 hotcam and it was done before 5000. Just starting to nose over at 4700.

Pulled hard to 6000 or whatever doesnt mean anything. Any combo will give that illusion. Does it actually make power there? How far is hp down from peak power by 5500? 6000? Probably more than you think. I have dyno sheets to validate my claims












I have the sheets and time slips to validate mine over the years too. At 6,200 rpm the LT4 Hotcam/Dart 180 engine was less than 20 HP down from the peak at 5,100 rpm. The 350 TPI I had in my G-van went 14.1 @ 101 mph in the 1/4 mile in a 5,300 lbs brick with a stock stalled 700r4 and 3.08 gears. That is ALOT more than 220 RWHP. I made about 300 RWHP and about 370 RWTQ with stock runners, ported upper plenum, ported edelbrock vortec base, stock 46mm throttle body, ported 906 heads, factory LT4 cam and 1.6:1 rocker with Thorley Tri-Y headers for a G-van and dual 2.5" exhaust with a X-pipe.

The 383 in my signature did 360 RWHP and 380 RWTQ and went 13.8 @ 102 with a slipping transmission.

Also just FYI, it really does not matter what the power curve looks like if the car responds better to shifting at higher rpm. ETs & MPH at the track do not lie. I was merely stating a FACT that the 1987 Firebird that I setup and has run down the track with a 10:1 350, LT4 Hotcam, Dart 180s, stock TPI, shorty headers, dual 2.5" exhaust, backed to a 2,800 rpm stalled TH400 and 2.73 gears runs the best times shifting at 6,200 rpm. Car runs 7.80s @ 88-90 mph quite consistantly in the 1/8 on a 1.7-1.8s 60' time leaving at idle on drag radials. The car has a 2,800 rpm converter in it, but the owner is afraid to leave harder than idle with the weak 7.5" rear still under the car.

Also worth mentioning my low 8.75:1 compression 1-ton 350 TBI with a LT4 cam, 1.6 rockers, stock TPI, tri-y headers and exhaust ran best in that old G-van shifting at 5,200-5,300 rpm. Power peaked about 4,800 rpm with the TBI swirl ports and TPI but power was table top flat from 4,500-5,500 rpm. It also ran a 15.3 @ 92 mph in the 1/4 in a 5,300 lbs G-van. I never lost to a LS based truck engine at that time (2006ish) either. Go figure!

Last edited by Fast355; Oct 17, 2018 at 10:04 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2018 | 10:26 AM
  #12  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: What Cam for 89 Camaro 5.7 TPI

Also just FYI, it really does not matter what the power curve looks like if the car responds better to shifting at higher rpm.
well by physics if it was making more average power in that rpm band then it will go quicker/faster.

Just saying it seems strange to me, doesnt seem to jive with things i have seen but it is what it is
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2018 | 02:46 PM
  #13  
dmccain's Avatar
Supreme Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,553
Likes: 806
From: South Ms
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: What Cam for 89 Camaro 5.7 TPI

Every Stock TPI I've ever drive pretty much quit pulling around 5000rpm.A friend of mines 5.0 5spd TPI Camaro i drove once seemed to maybe pull a lil more rpm but not much over 5500 if that. They were designed strictly for making power in the lower powerband. Would have been great truck engines.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2018 | 05:26 PM
  #14  
Fast355's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,404
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: What Cam for 89 Camaro 5.7 TPI

I know I will get flamed for posting these but here are some dyno runs I found on TPIs on the internet that also all seem to support them holding power until well above 4,500 rpm. If you cannot take my word for it, maybe this will explain what I have seen in a graphical form.

Seems the factory exhaust puts a choke hold on the Vettes more than the intake manifold. With 1 3/4" primary headers and a decent exhaust they are seeing gains of 40-50 RWHP @ 5,000 rpm.

1985 Corvette with ported heads, 1.6 rockers and 1 3/4" long tubes


This is a 1989 LB9 IrocZ with the peanut cam and stock exhaust manifolds. Power curve is flat enough that I would experiment shifting in the 5,200-5,300 rpm range at the track.


This is a 1989 Corvette with long tubes and descreened maf along with a few other parts.




This is a L98 cammed G92 305 5spd. This TPI was not even starting to fall off yet at 5,300 rpm.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2018 | 09:12 PM
  #15  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: What Cam for 89 Camaro 5.7 TPI

Those results are basically what i see...
the 85 vette peaks at 4400-4500 like most tpi’s seem to. Its well nosing by 4800-5000. To me thats not pulling to 5+ But i may shift it 4800-5000 to see what happens

305 makes sense as its less cubes

the 89 vette does seem to hang on better to 5000 but by 5200+ i bet it really falls

my tpi stuff has been somewhat similar.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2018 | 08:04 AM
  #16  
Fast355's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,404
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: What Cam for 89 Camaro 5.7 TPI

Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ
Those results are basically what i see...
the 85 vette peaks at 4400-4500 like most tpi’s seem to. Its well nosing by 4800-5000. To me thats not pulling to 5+ But i may shift it 4800-5000 to see what happens

305 makes sense as its less cubes

the 89 vette does seem to hang on better to 5000 but by 5200+ i bet it really falls

my tpi stuff has been somewhat similar.
The biggest cam in those is 202/207 @ .050. The cam itself is falling off by those RPM. I bet you could put a single plane intake and a 750 cfm carb on it and the stock cam would fall on its face by 5,200 rpm. The 85 Vette is about the worst case example. It is nothing more than a smog 350 with flat top pistons and a 305 HO cam. The 76cc heads on it flow worse than most 305 heads.
Even the Hotcam with its 218/228 @ .050 duration using 1.6:1 roller rockers only peaks at ~5,600 rpm with a single plane intake.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2018 | 08:12 AM
  #17  
Fast355's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,404
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: What Cam for 89 Camaro 5.7 TPI

To me what the L31 '395 Marine cam aka Ramjet/HT383 cam did in my Express van is falling off. It was floating the valves but it still hit a wall before 5,000 rpm even with good springs. With good springs I still shifted it at 5,200 rpm for best acceleration. This setup dropped 25 RWHP in 200 rpm!

Reply
Old Oct 18, 2018 | 08:17 AM
  #18  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: What Cam for 89 Camaro 5.7 TPI

The biggest cam in those is 202/207 @ .050. The cam itself is falling off by those RPM. I bet you could put a single plane intake and a 750 cfm carb on it and the stock cam would fall on its face by 5,200
correct lol i kinda did that with a stealth ram, peaked by 4900-5000 and was goin downhill by 5200. I shifted 5300-5400.
That was a full bolt on 160k mile L98. Lean still made 254 whp. The cam only L98 was brand new rebuild and only made 226. Bolt on intake is more bang for buck than a cam swap on a stock L98 imo

Lt1 with heads and lt4 hotcam we tuned recently made 355 whp at 5800-6000 with strong curve to 6500 i believe. The cam has that rpm range but a tpi long runner is not supportive of that kinda rpm. “Tuned” port is for 4000’s rpm. But usually overcamming will allow hp to flatline and carry to higher rpms but not peak there. That cam in the tpi car was relatively flat to 4750-4800, peak was 4500, falling after 5000 but only graph I saved was 4750 pull
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2018 | 08:26 AM
  #19  
Fast355's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,404
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: What Cam for 89 Camaro 5.7 TPI

Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ

correct lol i kinda did that with a stealth ram, peaked by 4900-5000 and was goin downhill by 5200. I shifted 5300-5400.
That was a full bolt on 160k mile L98. Lean still made 254 whp. The cam only L98 was brand new rebuild and only made 226. Bolt on intake is more bang for buck than a cam swap on a stock L98 imo

Lt1 with heads and lt4 hotcam we tuned recently made 355 whp at 5800-6000 with strong curve to 6500 i believe. The cam has that rpm range but a tpi long runner is not supportive of that kinda rpm. “Tuned” port is for 4000’s rpm. But usually overcamming will allow hp to flatline and carry to higher rpms but not peak there. That cam in the tpi car was relatively flat to 4750-4800, peak was 4500, falling after 5000 but only graph I saved was 4750 pull
The Hotcam/180cc Dart head car I recently tuned peaked about 5,000 rpm and was table top flat in HP from 4,700-6,000 rpm. It was within 10 HP of peak from 4,700-6,000 rpm with the stock TPI intake, base was port matched and the upper intake had the EGR dams ground out. EGR was also deleted. LT4 Hotcam that was degreed in at 5* total advance (drop in is 3* advance).
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2018 | 08:32 AM
  #20  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: What Cam for 89 Camaro 5.7 TPI

Yeah that just seems very surprising to me but it is what it is.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2018 | 07:07 PM
  #21  
zraffz's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,402
Likes: 3
From: Sussex County, NJ
Car: 1994 Z28
Engine: 355 LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: What Cam for 89 Camaro 5.7 TPI

Another Fast355 thread that defies what everybody else has experienced.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Stekman
Tech / General Engine
3
Mar 16, 2004 01:31 PM
5SIZ
TPI
7
Sep 18, 2002 10:46 AM
un4givin89
Tech / General Engine
18
May 1, 2002 11:14 AM
james_fearn
TPI
6
Apr 18, 2001 02:58 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:25 PM.