Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

350 TPI refresh and upgrade thoughts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2022 | 10:28 AM
  #1  
TPiroc89's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 6
Likes: 1
From: Kansas
Car: IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
350 TPI refresh and upgrade thoughts

Hello all! Long time reader, first time posting. I apologize in advance for beating a dead horse so to speak. I’ve recently been collecting opinions and parts to rebuild/upgrade my 89 iroc with 350TPI. I’ve settled on what I think will be a pretty good combination of parts for its intended use, which is weekend driver and auto cross racing. I doubt I’d be lucky enough to find out someone built this exact engine but I’d love some HP/TQ estimates if anyone has that info available. So here goes…

355, 10:1 or so for 91 pump gas
AFR 180 heads #0919
Comp Cams XR269HR
1.6 rockers
AS&M runners
extrude honed oem intake and plenum
24lb injectors
larger throttle body if needed
1-5/8” headers, no cats
custom tune when assembly is complete.

I’d love to hear anyones results if they have desktop dyno or built something similar.
I’d also like to thank you all for the wealth of knowledge I’ve already collected from here!!!
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2022 | 10:53 AM
  #2  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: 350 TPI refresh and upgrade thoughts

Basically did that build on a stock bottom end 350 L98. Lt4 hotcam clone, dyno don shorties. Ran ok, honestly expected abit more out of it. But it did seem to have a lot of blowby/crankcase pressure so idk. Made 272 whp 350’s wtq. Good solid street build. Fairly easy to tune, idle good, was quiet with magnaflow exhaust

ran that cam or something very close on a rebuilt stock L98, with longtubes and dual 2.25 exhaust. Made 227 whp, cant remember the torque, in the 300’s. Not bad i guess for stock head stock tpi

Last edited by Orr89RocZ; Jan 10, 2022 at 01:23 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2022 | 01:07 PM
  #3  
BOOT77's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 514
Likes: 62
From: Michigan
Re: 350 TPI refresh and upgrade thoughts

If I hadn't saved $$$ on the TPI parts that I have, then I'd suggest to use that money to go to another intake style/setup. Stealthram would be my choice if I wanted to change the least.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2022 | 02:11 PM
  #4  
TPiroc89's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 6
Likes: 1
From: Kansas
Car: IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: 350 TPI refresh and upgrade thoughts

Thanks for the replies!
It doesn’t take much research to find out the short runner systems do offer some benefits and everyone seems to prefer them over the long runner setups. I like the appearance of the TPI and the auto cross courses I have locally are small enough that the low RPM, broad torque the TPI offers has been beneficial. I won’t be drag racing and the closest high speed road race track is 4 hours away so high RPM runs will be few and far between.
I did however choose the larger, better flowing AFR heads over the TFS-175 just in case I do change to a stealth or mini ram in the future.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2022 | 03:42 PM
  #5  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: 350 TPI refresh and upgrade thoughts

Doing it all over again i may have gone with the 195’s for that build. If you have the budget, the First TPI systems and those heads imo would be superior and give even better gains down the road with a short runner intake if you ever decide to change out
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2022 | 07:46 AM
  #6  
TPiroc89's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 6
Likes: 1
From: Kansas
Car: IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: 350 TPI refresh and upgrade thoughts

I looked into the 195’s while doing some research. There’s no doubt they flow better and would leave room for future upgrades. That can be a good and a bad thing! Lol. I don’t need to leave the door open to spending more money on it in the future. I’m just trying get the best match of components and hope for good results.
The AS&M runners flow 260cfm and the AFR-180’s flow 260cfm @ .500 lift. The gentleman I spoke to about extrude honing my base and plenum seemed confident they could get my intake to flow 260cfm as well.
I was advised by someone I trust to switch to the smaller Comp Cam XR264HR with 1.6 rockers which would be…
.520/.528
212/218
lca-214
On paper it it appears to be a good combination. However, good planning doesn’t always mean good results… 🤞
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2022 | 07:55 AM
  #7  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: 350 TPI refresh and upgrade thoughts

The intake despite the flow numbers usually always drags down the head flow. Sometimes not a lot sometimes a fair amount. Def want less restriction in the intake, and thats why i feel the 195’s are a better investment overall. I dont think they are much different in price and certainly arent too big a head for a 350.

id leave the cam alone, i wouldnt go any smaller. In fact contrary to what most would think, i feel tpi needs more cam than you’d think to make up for long runners. Need more duration time to fill cyl since air has to move thru such a long runner tract
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2022 | 09:53 AM
  #8  
Abubaca's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 411
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
Re: 350 TPI refresh and upgrade thoughts

With a lot of personal experience with the long tube TPI, and various versions for ported and aftermarket components, my feeling is that you definitely need to pick a priority. Looks or performance. I love the long tubes, but I was never happy with the amount of time and effort vs. performance that I was able to see. If you like the looks of the FIRST system, it's a no brainer. Personally I DO NOT. I think it looks too big, and almost silly. But that's just an appearance opinion. It's proven to be a performer, and if you like the looks, then that's the way I'd go if I were you.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2022 | 11:42 AM
  #9  
TPiroc89's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 6
Likes: 1
From: Kansas
Car: IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: 350 TPI refresh and upgrade thoughts

I know that the long tubes are not going to provide the BEST possible performance. I’m okay with sacrificing some of the performance to keep the car looking “date correct”. The FIRST injection sounds like a great system and has some impressive numbers. It’s just not the system I wanted for the car.

I’m sure tons of people will be shaking their heads in disgust with me but I based all my parts selection off of the maximum flow I could get from my AS&M runners and extrude honed oem intake and plenum.
That number came to 260cfm and that, at least on paper, seems like enough to make for a decent performing car when mated with well matched heads, cam, etc… It is after all just a weekend driver and auto cross car, not a drag car.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2022 | 09:05 PM
  #10  
TPiroc89's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 6
Likes: 1
From: Kansas
Car: IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: 350 TPI refresh and upgrade thoughts

Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ
The intake despite the flow numbers usually always drags down the head flow. Sometimes not a lot sometimes a fair amount. Def want less restriction in the intake, and thats why i feel the 195’s are a better investment overall. I dont think they are much different in price and certainly arent too big a head for a 350.

id leave the cam alone, i wouldnt go any smaller. In fact contrary to what most would think, i feel tpi needs more cam than you’d think to make up for long runners. Need more duration time to fill cyl since air has to move thru such a long runner tract
I am confused by how much variation there is in performance results with a TPI engine. I have had numerous individuals say that they perform best with small cam and small heads to maximize airflow “velocity”.
Some report very disappointing results after extensive mods and others are claiming amazing results with what appears to be a more “mild” build. Are all these various results a product of poorly matched components maybe? I even had one individual say that it’s a total waste to change from factory heads on a TPI car because the original heads flowed more than the TPI could provide. Some may hate the TPI for one reason or another. I like it and still think that when modified properly and paired with the right components it will perform very well.
Now I just have to find those components!!!!!
Thanks again to all for the input!
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2022 | 11:28 AM
  #11  
ploegi's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 28
From: Adrian, Mi, USA
Car: 1988 Pontiac Firebird Formula
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: 350 TPI refresh and upgrade thoughts

Originally Posted by TPiroc89
I am confused by how much variation there is in performance results with a TPI engine. I have had numerous individuals say that they perform best with small cam and small heads to maximize airflow “velocity”.
Some report very disappointing results after extensive mods and others are claiming amazing results with what appears to be a more “mild” build. Are all these various results a product of poorly matched components maybe? I even had one individual say that it’s a total waste to change from factory heads on a TPI car because the original heads flowed more than the TPI could provide. Some may hate the TPI for one reason or another. I like it and still think that when modified properly and paired with the right components it will perform very well.
Now I just have to find those components!!!!!
Thanks again to all for the input!
I would expect that those that built their engines, and were disappointed, were either expecting to much for what they used, had mis-matched parts, or a combination of the two. I only did minor mods to my Firebird, and I LOVED driving that car. My health just got the point that I couldn't get out of it any more.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2022 | 12:07 PM
  #12  
TPiroc89's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 6
Likes: 1
From: Kansas
Car: IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: 350 TPI refresh and upgrade thoughts

I’ve enjoyed driving my Z for over 26 years now and hoping for 26 more! 🤞
I love the way the TPI feels. I’ve had faster cars but still enjoy my TPI. My dream would be 400hp and around 475lb of tq. and a 6 speed conversion if/when my 700r4 breaks.
I am a realist and would be really happy if I made it to 350hp and 425lb of tq. and with my luck the trans will outlive me…
Appreciate any suggestions as long as it involves keeping my long tube setup with my AS&M runners.
Thanks again for all the replies, I’ve enjoyed the input!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
91 zeee
Engine Swap
11
Mar 12, 2011 07:28 PM
FUNIROC
Tech / General Engine
5
Jan 14, 2009 09:18 PM
flaming-ford
TPI
4
Oct 6, 2007 10:04 PM
SinthetikIroc
Tech / General Engine
8
Dec 2, 2002 02:22 AM
Jstcrzyengh
TPI
8
Oct 2, 2002 10:53 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:32 AM.