Cam Question again
well it realy depends on your compresion. i think your 305 would have like 9:1 with 58 cc cambers, by puttin vortec heads on 64 cc chambers u will drop the comp ration prolly half a point. i wouldnt run any think more than 214 @ .050 any thing more would give u "soggy" low rpm performance, however u can mask this with a high stall converter and step gears
We are trying to find set of smaller chamber Vortecs, If we cant then we will probably get the heads shaved a bit and use the smallest head gasket available.
I think we are going to go with 1.6 rockers and a 218 duration cam with .450 lift
I think we are going to go with 1.6 rockers and a 218 duration cam with .450 lift
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
By "smaller chamber Vortecs", I hope you mean shaved L31's, not 305 Vortecs. The 305 version don't flow anywhere near what the L31's do.
The '85 TPI was the "dumb" TPI - you don't want to throw too many curves at it. Perhaps this is a good time to upgade to a later system.
LB9 compression was 9.5:1 with 4-relief flat tops, 58cc chambers, steel shim gasket. Compression isn't much of a factor with regard to the cam and what the TPI will think of it. The cam is the much bigger player.
You sure you want to go Vortec? $425 for heads (okay, probably less if used), another $150 or so for self-aligning rockers and the shaving to get to 58cc, and a whooping $400 for the Vortec TPI base. Still have press-in rocker studs & really poor springs (that .450" lift is w/1.5 rockers, right?. That's .480" w/1.6 rockers - too much for the springs). Or, World S/R Torquer 305's for about $700, use your existing base, will have good springs & screw-in studs. Port 'em if you like (I liked). Will certainly run with the Vortecs if bowl-blended. If treated to the full SA method...
The '85 TPI was the "dumb" TPI - you don't want to throw too many curves at it. Perhaps this is a good time to upgade to a later system.
LB9 compression was 9.5:1 with 4-relief flat tops, 58cc chambers, steel shim gasket. Compression isn't much of a factor with regard to the cam and what the TPI will think of it. The cam is the much bigger player.
You sure you want to go Vortec? $425 for heads (okay, probably less if used), another $150 or so for self-aligning rockers and the shaving to get to 58cc, and a whooping $400 for the Vortec TPI base. Still have press-in rocker studs & really poor springs (that .450" lift is w/1.5 rockers, right?. That's .480" w/1.6 rockers - too much for the springs). Or, World S/R Torquer 305's for about $700, use your existing base, will have good springs & screw-in studs. Port 'em if you like (I liked). Will certainly run with the Vortecs if bowl-blended. If treated to the full SA method...
Last edited by five7kid; Feb 15, 2002 at 10:01 PM.
Trending Topics
Guest
Posts: n/a
While the 85 TPI ecm may be 'dumb', I have seen quite a few quick 85's on the stock ecm. Dont forget CCC cars are stupid too.
The stock cam is already in the 20x/21x range. Dont waste your time with a replacement if you are going to put virtually the same thing in there. I'd suggest a comp cams XE256H-12, its a 212/218 with .449/.456 lift and 112LSA. I'd suggest new valve springs as well.
The stock cam is already in the 20x/21x range. Dont waste your time with a replacement if you are going to put virtually the same thing in there. I'd suggest a comp cams XE256H-12, its a 212/218 with .449/.456 lift and 112LSA. I'd suggest new valve springs as well.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





