Beat by a Neon SRT-4
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,764
Likes: 562
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Re: Muscle cars of the sixties! Dogs!???
Originally posted by FbodTrek
They were some of the fastest production cars ever made: Superbee, Roadrunner, Shelbys, Caliente comet, Catalina, Hemis', Boss 302, SS 396 Chevelle....the list goes on and on. Theses cars weighed 3 times what the Neon , eclipse, Subaru did. The Road runner came from the factory making 13 second passes, as did the Shelby. Catalina ran high 13's......... THAT is muscle! Go to Musclecarclub. com and look at the list, the late fifties to the sixties was THE era for muscle. I can put a few turbos on a 2000 pound car and make it do 9's, or I could own a classic-that just keeps increasing in value and is one of the sexiest cars in history. Lets see you pick up women in your 9 second civic, I bet I get WAYYYY hotter ones in my Chevelle.......
They were some of the fastest production cars ever made: Superbee, Roadrunner, Shelbys, Caliente comet, Catalina, Hemis', Boss 302, SS 396 Chevelle....the list goes on and on. Theses cars weighed 3 times what the Neon , eclipse, Subaru did. The Road runner came from the factory making 13 second passes, as did the Shelby. Catalina ran high 13's......... THAT is muscle! Go to Musclecarclub. com and look at the list, the late fifties to the sixties was THE era for muscle. I can put a few turbos on a 2000 pound car and make it do 9's, or I could own a classic-that just keeps increasing in value and is one of the sexiest cars in history. Lets see you pick up women in your 9 second civic, I bet I get WAYYYY hotter ones in my Chevelle.......
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
I wouldn't have to build it....
It's a production car. And a little foot note, the SS 454 ran low 12's, roadrunner was actually running in the low 12's as well. The point is, no matter how fast the Neon is, It just doesn't turn heads like a musclecar. If two cars fly by me One is The neon, the other a 69 Roadrunner, I ain't even gonnna GLANCE at the Neon! It'll be junk in 20 years, the Roadrunner will be in a Museum (Along with the 69 CAmaro!!!!!!!!!)
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Re: I wouldn't have to build it....
Originally posted by FbodTrek
It's a production car. And a little foot note, the SS 454 ran low 12's, roadrunner was actually running in the low 12's as well. The point is, no matter how fast the Neon is, It just doesn't turn heads like a musclecar. If two cars fly by me One is The neon, the other a 69 Roadrunner, I ain't even gonnna GLANCE at the Neon! It'll be junk in 20 years, the Roadrunner will be in a Museum (Along with the 69 CAmaro!!!!!!!!!)
It's a production car. And a little foot note, the SS 454 ran low 12's, roadrunner was actually running in the low 12's as well. The point is, no matter how fast the Neon is, It just doesn't turn heads like a musclecar. If two cars fly by me One is The neon, the other a 69 Roadrunner, I ain't even gonnna GLANCE at the Neon! It'll be junk in 20 years, the Roadrunner will be in a Museum (Along with the 69 CAmaro!!!!!!!!!)
lol you still don't get it do you? You're comparing apples to oranges....OF COURSE people would look at the roadrunner or any other muscle car for that matter...
That's NOT the point of this thread...never was.
Fact is that lowly Neon is faster than most cars GM and Ford make
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
From: Diamondhead, MS
Car: 89 20th Ann. TA
Engine: Turbo 3.8 V6
Transmission: 200 4R
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: I wouldn't have to build it....
Originally posted by FbodTrek
It's a production car. And a little foot note, the SS 454 ran low 12's, roadrunner was actually running in the low 12's as well. The point is, no matter how fast the Neon is, It just doesn't turn heads like a musclecar. If two cars fly by me One is The neon, the other a 69 Roadrunner, I ain't even gonnna GLANCE at the Neon! It'll be junk in 20 years, the Roadrunner will be in a Museum (Along with the 69 CAmaro!!!!!!!!!)
It's a production car. And a little foot note, the SS 454 ran low 12's, roadrunner was actually running in the low 12's as well. The point is, no matter how fast the Neon is, It just doesn't turn heads like a musclecar. If two cars fly by me One is The neon, the other a 69 Roadrunner, I ain't even gonnna GLANCE at the Neon! It'll be junk in 20 years, the Roadrunner will be in a Museum (Along with the 69 CAmaro!!!!!!!!!)
Sure you can make them go into the 12's with relative ease, but they didn't come that way from the factory. Just like my TTA. For $50, I was running in the 12's. That doesn't mean it came that way from the factory.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 1
From: Western NY
Car: 2007 Saturn Sky Redline
Engine: 2.0 turbo
Transmission: m5
Axle/Gears: 3.91 LSD
COPOs don't count as "showroom" as they were never on any showroom floor
Also, we're drifting off topic here guys. Discuss appearance on the Appearance and Detailing board. Keep the discussion thirdgen related.
Also, we're drifting off topic here guys. Discuss appearance on the Appearance and Detailing board. Keep the discussion thirdgen related.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by Inwo
COPOs don't count as "showroom" as they were never on any showroom floor
Also, we're drifting off topic here guys. Discuss appearance on the Appearance and Detailing board. Keep the discussion thirdgen related.
COPOs don't count as "showroom" as they were never on any showroom floor
Also, we're drifting off topic here guys. Discuss appearance on the Appearance and Detailing board. Keep the discussion thirdgen related.

How's that?


Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Re: Muscle cars of the sixties! Dogs!???
Originally posted by FbodTrek
They were some of the fastest production cars ever made: Superbee, Roadrunner, Shelbys, Caliente comet, Catalina, Hemis', Boss 302, SS 396 Chevelle....the list goes on and on. Theses cars weighed 3 times what the Neon , eclipse, Subaru did. The Road runner came from the factory making 13 second passes, as did the Shelby. Catalina ran high 13's......... THAT is muscle! Go to Musclecarclub. com and look at the list, the late fifties to the sixties was THE era for muscle. I can put a few turbos on a 2000 pound car and make it do 9's, or I could own a classic-that just keeps increasing in value and is one of the sexiest cars in history. Lets see you pick up women in your 9 second civic, I bet I get WAYYYY hotter ones in my Chevelle.......
They were some of the fastest production cars ever made: Superbee, Roadrunner, Shelbys, Caliente comet, Catalina, Hemis', Boss 302, SS 396 Chevelle....the list goes on and on. Theses cars weighed 3 times what the Neon , eclipse, Subaru did. The Road runner came from the factory making 13 second passes, as did the Shelby. Catalina ran high 13's......... THAT is muscle! Go to Musclecarclub. com and look at the list, the late fifties to the sixties was THE era for muscle. I can put a few turbos on a 2000 pound car and make it do 9's, or I could own a classic-that just keeps increasing in value and is one of the sexiest cars in history. Lets see you pick up women in your 9 second civic, I bet I get WAYYYY hotter ones in my Chevelle.......
just wanted to say
read your PM's
and I don't build/buy a car to impress others
I'm secure enough about myself to buy something I want
I don't care what others think
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
From: Diamondhead, MS
Car: 89 20th Ann. TA
Engine: Turbo 3.8 V6
Transmission: 200 4R
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Originally posted by fly89gta
Ok, the SRT Neon is faster than most thirdgens
How's that?

Ok, the SRT Neon is faster than most thirdgens

How's that?


But third gens look better
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
Originally posted by fly89gta
Ok, the SRT Neon is faster than most thirdgens
How's that?

Ok, the SRT Neon is faster than most thirdgens

How's that?


Tim
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
From: North --RI
Car: 92 caddy PIMP
Engine: 4.8
Transmission: i dunno
Im gonna totally agree with trek. A neon is no comparison to 60s-70s factory muscle AND muscle of today. Yes it may be decent. But like he said put a few turbos on our cars and theyre into 9s..
Nate
Nate
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
From: North --RI
Car: 92 caddy PIMP
Engine: 4.8
Transmission: i dunno
Ummm I didnt see anyone dissing the STI. Id love to have an STI over ANY 3rd gen. The facts you mention+its speed is awesome. I have yet to see anyone on this board call the new STI a ***** car. Cuz frankly it isnt. Its a respectable car. That pulls 13s from factory. I dont think the Neon deserves as much credit as the wrx cuz well Neons dont have a reputation for being fast. The wrx does. Plus it looks a hellavalot better!..
Nate
Nate
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by TRAXION
How's that? Actually, that's great. Someone finally spoke the truth. Too many people diss the newer cars because they are just 'neons' or just 'subarus'. These cars are faster than a stock thirdgen ... and they do it with ABS, multiple airbags, awesome crash ratings ... and even AWD (subaru). If you are a true car lover you can see performance where it really is. I hate r1ced-out hondas, tiburons, etc. But, when a company does get it right and makes a fast production compact car (SRT4, WRX, etc) you have to give props and respect ... or else you're just being closed minded. My IROC runs mid 11's. But, guess what? I've already considered parting it out or selling it as a whole in order to buy a WRX STi. Why? Because it has 4 doors (great for baby seats), Front and side airbags, an awesome crash rating, AWD (you can drive in the snow), and it is 300hp stock. The WRX STi would crush any thirdgen in the stoplight races. AWD allows it to do that if the driver of the car is a good driver. Dump the clutch at 5k on an STi and any thirdgen will just see their bumper (on the street). Don't get me wrong - my IROC kicks ***. But, even though it pulls 1.6's at the track ... it is useless on the street. I can floor it and shift into third with the speedo registering 90mph but with my car only going like 2mph - rofl. RWD cars just cannot plant huge power on the street. It's just a fact. Who cares if my car is fast at the strip. In a stoplight race from a stop I would lose depending on how far up in the mph we are racing. An STi will kick *** and do it with AWD, great safety, family appeal, HUGE 4-piston brakes, a heavy duty 6 speed, a turbo, and a suspension that puts stock IROCs to shame. This thing is EASY to get into the 12's and 11's aren't far away.
Tim
How's that? Actually, that's great. Someone finally spoke the truth. Too many people diss the newer cars because they are just 'neons' or just 'subarus'. These cars are faster than a stock thirdgen ... and they do it with ABS, multiple airbags, awesome crash ratings ... and even AWD (subaru). If you are a true car lover you can see performance where it really is. I hate r1ced-out hondas, tiburons, etc. But, when a company does get it right and makes a fast production compact car (SRT4, WRX, etc) you have to give props and respect ... or else you're just being closed minded. My IROC runs mid 11's. But, guess what? I've already considered parting it out or selling it as a whole in order to buy a WRX STi. Why? Because it has 4 doors (great for baby seats), Front and side airbags, an awesome crash rating, AWD (you can drive in the snow), and it is 300hp stock. The WRX STi would crush any thirdgen in the stoplight races. AWD allows it to do that if the driver of the car is a good driver. Dump the clutch at 5k on an STi and any thirdgen will just see their bumper (on the street). Don't get me wrong - my IROC kicks ***. But, even though it pulls 1.6's at the track ... it is useless on the street. I can floor it and shift into third with the speedo registering 90mph but with my car only going like 2mph - rofl. RWD cars just cannot plant huge power on the street. It's just a fact. Who cares if my car is fast at the strip. In a stoplight race from a stop I would lose depending on how far up in the mph we are racing. An STi will kick *** and do it with AWD, great safety, family appeal, HUGE 4-piston brakes, a heavy duty 6 speed, a turbo, and a suspension that puts stock IROCs to shame. This thing is EASY to get into the 12's and 11's aren't far away.
Tim
Originally posted by TRAXION
Dump the clutch at 5k on an STi and any thirdgen will just see their bumper (on the street). Don't get me wrong - my IROC kicks ***. But, even though it pulls 1.6's at the track ... it is useless on the street. I can floor it and shift into third with the speedo registering 90mph but with my car only going like 2mph - rofl. RWD cars just cannot plant huge power on the street. It's just a fact. Who cares if my car is fast at the strip. In a stoplight race from a stop I would lose depending on how far up in the mph we are racing.
Tim
Dump the clutch at 5k on an STi and any thirdgen will just see their bumper (on the street). Don't get me wrong - my IROC kicks ***. But, even though it pulls 1.6's at the track ... it is useless on the street. I can floor it and shift into third with the speedo registering 90mph but with my car only going like 2mph - rofl. RWD cars just cannot plant huge power on the street. It's just a fact. Who cares if my car is fast at the strip. In a stoplight race from a stop I would lose depending on how far up in the mph we are racing.
Tim
I've run a new STi with a decent driver. I lost because of the launch. After I hit second gear I regained some of his lead. At 100 he had me by a car length. A car with more power would have no trouble taking a stock or mildly modded one after AWD loses its advantage (after 1st gear usually). Although non-thirdgen, I've seen several bolt-on LS1 cars on DRs lay the smack down after 1st gear on well driven STi's.Your car runs great at the track, but doesn't on the street. That's common, but I've seen high powered 10 second RWD cars pull the tires on the street laying waste to 11 second AWD cars. Your BFG's aren't cutting it on the street.
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
From: Milan, MI
Car: 1999 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: A4
Ummm I didnt see anyone dissing the STI. Id love to have an STI over ANY 3rd gen. The facts you mention+its speed is awesome. I have yet to see anyone on this board call the new STI a ***** car. Cuz frankly it isnt. Its a respectable car. That pulls 13s from factory. I dont think the Neon deserves as much credit as the wrx cuz well Neons dont have a reputation for being fast. The wrx does. Plus it looks a hellavalot better!..
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by Jgolden314
ddn69- I am not trying to argue, but when you say a wrx has a rep for being fast, or course it does. An IMPREZA, does not. a WRX is a package for the impreza, so when you say a neon does not have a rep for being fast you are right, but an SRT4 DOES have a rep for being fast. Get what I am saying?
ddn69- I am not trying to argue, but when you say a wrx has a rep for being fast, or course it does. An IMPREZA, does not. a WRX is a package for the impreza, so when you say a neon does not have a rep for being fast you are right, but an SRT4 DOES have a rep for being fast. Get what I am saying?

Last edited by fly89gta; Jan 13, 2004 at 01:34 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
From: Warwick,RI
Car: 88 IROC-Z/00 GTP/05 VUE Redline
Engine: LB9 305/3800 SC/3.5 SOHC V-TEC
Transmission: A4/A4/A5
Originally posted by Marc 85Z28
"Any thirdgen" or any stock thirdgen?
I've run a new STi with a decent driver. I lost because of the launch. After I hit second gear I regained some of his lead. At 100 he had me by a car length. A car with more power would have no trouble taking a stock or mildly modded one after AWD loses its advantage (after 1st gear usually). Although non-thirdgen, I've seen several bolt-on LS1 cars on DRs lay the smack down after 1st gear on well driven STi's.
Your car runs great at the track, but doesn't on the street. That's common, but I've seen high powered 10 second RWD cars pull the tires on the street laying waste to 11 second AWD cars. Your BFG's aren't cutting it on the street.
"Any thirdgen" or any stock thirdgen?
I've run a new STi with a decent driver. I lost because of the launch. After I hit second gear I regained some of his lead. At 100 he had me by a car length. A car with more power would have no trouble taking a stock or mildly modded one after AWD loses its advantage (after 1st gear usually). Although non-thirdgen, I've seen several bolt-on LS1 cars on DRs lay the smack down after 1st gear on well driven STi's.Your car runs great at the track, but doesn't on the street. That's common, but I've seen high powered 10 second RWD cars pull the tires on the street laying waste to 11 second AWD cars. Your BFG's aren't cutting it on the street.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 1
From: Western NY
Car: 2007 Saturn Sky Redline
Engine: 2.0 turbo
Transmission: m5
Axle/Gears: 3.91 LSD
Originally posted by TRAXION
How's that? Actually, that's great. Someone finally spoke the truth. Too many people diss the newer cars because they are just 'neons' or just 'subarus'. These cars are faster than a stock thirdgen ... and they do it with ABS, multiple airbags, awesome crash ratings ... and even AWD (subaru). If you are a true car lover you can see performance where it really is. I hate r1ced-out hondas, tiburons, etc. But, when a company does get it right and makes a fast production compact car (SRT4, WRX, etc) you have to give props and respect ... or else you're just being closed minded. My IROC runs mid 11's. But, guess what? I've already considered parting it out or selling it as a whole in order to buy a WRX STi. Why? Because it has 4 doors (great for baby seats), Front and side airbags, an awesome crash rating, AWD (you can drive in the snow), and it is 300hp stock. The WRX STi would crush any thirdgen in the stoplight races. AWD allows it to do that if the driver of the car is a good driver. Dump the clutch at 5k on an STi and any thirdgen will just see their bumper (on the street). Don't get me wrong - my IROC kicks ***. But, even though it pulls 1.6's at the track ... it is useless on the street. I can floor it and shift into third with the speedo registering 90mph but with my car only going like 2mph - rofl. RWD cars just cannot plant huge power on the street. It's just a fact. Who cares if my car is fast at the strip. In a stoplight race from a stop I would lose depending on how far up in the mph we are racing. An STi will kick *** and do it with AWD, great safety, family appeal, HUGE 4-piston brakes, a heavy duty 6 speed, a turbo, and a suspension that puts stock IROCs to shame. This thing is EASY to get into the 12's and 11's aren't far away.
Tim
How's that? Actually, that's great. Someone finally spoke the truth. Too many people diss the newer cars because they are just 'neons' or just 'subarus'. These cars are faster than a stock thirdgen ... and they do it with ABS, multiple airbags, awesome crash ratings ... and even AWD (subaru). If you are a true car lover you can see performance where it really is. I hate r1ced-out hondas, tiburons, etc. But, when a company does get it right and makes a fast production compact car (SRT4, WRX, etc) you have to give props and respect ... or else you're just being closed minded. My IROC runs mid 11's. But, guess what? I've already considered parting it out or selling it as a whole in order to buy a WRX STi. Why? Because it has 4 doors (great for baby seats), Front and side airbags, an awesome crash rating, AWD (you can drive in the snow), and it is 300hp stock. The WRX STi would crush any thirdgen in the stoplight races. AWD allows it to do that if the driver of the car is a good driver. Dump the clutch at 5k on an STi and any thirdgen will just see their bumper (on the street). Don't get me wrong - my IROC kicks ***. But, even though it pulls 1.6's at the track ... it is useless on the street. I can floor it and shift into third with the speedo registering 90mph but with my car only going like 2mph - rofl. RWD cars just cannot plant huge power on the street. It's just a fact. Who cares if my car is fast at the strip. In a stoplight race from a stop I would lose depending on how far up in the mph we are racing. An STi will kick *** and do it with AWD, great safety, family appeal, HUGE 4-piston brakes, a heavy duty 6 speed, a turbo, and a suspension that puts stock IROCs to shame. This thing is EASY to get into the 12's and 11's aren't far away.
Tim
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post







