Heard some really good excuses for losing last night!
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 1
From: Tucson,AZ,USA
Car: Junk
Engine: Junk with nitrous
Transmission: Junk with gears
Heard some really good excuses for losing last night!1
Alright, this is a funny story. We are sitting at the local cruising spot in tucson, and this stang pulls in sounding kinda mean. He tells everyone he's looking for runs and that his car cant' be beaten by LS1's and the like. So we go race this 60's mustang that claims he ran 12's and wanted to run people, first race from a stop light, we beat him by about 3-4 car lengths, second race from a roll, we keep pulling a car length and more until the mustang misses a shift (it was a converted 5 speed). We are happy with the win and pull back into the cruise spot. We get out to talk to him and the guy acts very suprised asking to look under the hood. First thing out of his mouth:
"My car is detuned, The carburetor is a 650 double pumper instead of my normal 750 double pumper, I have stuff in the car weighing it down, i think my timing is off, I didnt' have my slicks on today"
I **** you not thats what he said word for word over and over again. It was hallarious.
So we ask him again, "so what do you think you run?" and they say "high 12's, but my car is detuned" and we say "well the car you just raced runs 15.1, what happened?"
We offer to race them in a REAL 12 second car (my firebird sitting right next to us) but they decline
hahah what fun. Anyways, we raced them in sleeper89rs 305 carbed 3.73 geared camaro. Good times.
"My car is detuned, The carburetor is a 650 double pumper instead of my normal 750 double pumper, I have stuff in the car weighing it down, i think my timing is off, I didnt' have my slicks on today"
I **** you not thats what he said word for word over and over again. It was hallarious.
So we ask him again, "so what do you think you run?" and they say "high 12's, but my car is detuned" and we say "well the car you just raced runs 15.1, what happened?"
We offer to race them in a REAL 12 second car (my firebird sitting right next to us) but they decline
hahah what fun. Anyways, we raced them in sleeper89rs 305 carbed 3.73 geared camaro. Good times. Supreme Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
From: cali
Car: 84z, 65 elcamino
Engine: l69 and a hyped up sbc in the camino
Transmission: t5 m21
Axle/Gears: 373s 411s
so wat happens if he can walk the walk. i see nice cars all the time and i know they can run 11s but they never race they do talk alot of **** tho.
i ve seen people keep a slip in their car and say if u can touch this lets go..... to the track that is. im like well i respect that but i do see a carless piece of road lets go their like no dice
but yours tops the best my car is detuned thats what all teh ricers say when i ream em up the ***
i ve seen people keep a slip in their car and say if u can touch this lets go..... to the track that is. im like well i respect that but i do see a carless piece of road lets go their like no dice
but yours tops the best my car is detuned thats what all teh ricers say when i ream em up the *** Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
Car: 1991 Z-28
Engine: Can you say stroke?!?!
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Chaulk another one up for the lame *** excuse catagory. If you lost, you lost. Who cares, all it means is you need to "re-tune" your 12 minute car to run better. 
My question though is if his car ran 12's, now it loses to a 15.1 second car, he detuned it to run amost 3 seconds slower? Man, this car MUST have been running like ****. Some of the jokers on Speedway kill me. I also wonder what he would have said if you did actually run using the Firebird. Just freakin kills me.

My question though is if his car ran 12's, now it loses to a 15.1 second car, he detuned it to run amost 3 seconds slower? Man, this car MUST have been running like ****. Some of the jokers on Speedway kill me. I also wonder what he would have said if you did actually run using the Firebird. Just freakin kills me.
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
From: Milan, MI
Car: 1999 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: A4
That just kills me..............and why would someone want to "detune" their car??????? I have never seen someone that wanted to bolt on parts to make it run slower.
tell that guy to buy a civic.
tell that guy to buy a civic.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 1
From: Tucson,AZ,USA
Car: Junk
Engine: Junk with nitrous
Transmission: Junk with gears
Originally posted by CraZ-28
Chaulk another one up for the lame *** excuse catagory. If you lost, you lost. Who cares, all it means is you need to "re-tune" your 12 minute car to run better.
My question though is if his car ran 12's, now it loses to a 15.1 second car, he detuned it to run amost 3 seconds slower? Man, this car MUST have been running like ****. Some of the jokers on Speedway kill me. I also wonder what he would have said if you did actually run using the Firebird. Just freakin kills me.
Chaulk another one up for the lame *** excuse catagory. If you lost, you lost. Who cares, all it means is you need to "re-tune" your 12 minute car to run better.

My question though is if his car ran 12's, now it loses to a 15.1 second car, he detuned it to run amost 3 seconds slower? Man, this car MUST have been running like ****. Some of the jokers on Speedway kill me. I also wonder what he would have said if you did actually run using the Firebird. Just freakin kills me.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 5
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
this is why i have a convertible...... RS........ and motor is painted black.
because if i win... i just whomped you with a convertible RS..
and if i lose....... its just a convertible RS.
i win either way....
:lala:
because if i win... i just whomped you with a convertible RS..
and if i lose....... its just a convertible RS.
i win either way....
:lala:
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
From: Wahiawa, Hawai'i
Car: 1989 TTA
Engine: LC2
Transmission: Worn-out 200R4
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt, 3.27's
Always good to win with an underdog, and it's understandable if you lose, too. Have your cake and eat it too.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 5
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by pvt num 11
Always good to win with an underdog, and it's understandable if you lose, too. Have your cake and eat it too.
Always good to win with an underdog, and it's understandable if you lose, too. Have your cake and eat it too.
yup
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Brougham 2dr Coupe
Engine: 403 Olds v8, bored .030 over
Transmission: 350 T.H. 3A, shift kit
Actually, even a 289 should be running 15s...He was probably one of those "I-THINK-I'm-a-mechanic" guys who hurt more than improve what they work on.
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Brougham 2dr Coupe
Engine: 403 Olds v8, bored .030 over
Transmission: 350 T.H. 3A, shift kit
No kidding- I read of high 15 second times in one of my books. I'll have to track down which one.
Originally posted by Abel Kane
No kidding- I read of high 15 second times in one of my books. I'll have to track down which one.
No kidding- I read of high 15 second times in one of my books. I'll have to track down which one.
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Brougham 2dr Coupe
Engine: 403 Olds v8, bored .030 over
Transmission: 350 T.H. 3A, shift kit
It was a test drive back in the 60s. It was like 15.7 or something. But there's a possibility it was the HO version. The author has a strange way of writing.
Were you talking about 351 C or W?
750 DP on a 289, huh? Hmmm. Slicks? For what? I love the 302 but even it is not exactly a torque monster. And how much did he have in his car? They can only hold what- 900 lbs? Let's see.
Let's say high 12 means 12.8. We'll allow him a bad launch because of not having his slicks.
13.8. Let's give him 900 lbs of extra weight. 14.7. Carb shouldn't have hurt because a 750 sounds too big, but let's chop off a little more. 15.0.
I'm not a mechanic or professional by any means, but guys like him make me more confident.
Were you talking about 351 C or W?
750 DP on a 289, huh? Hmmm. Slicks? For what? I love the 302 but even it is not exactly a torque monster. And how much did he have in his car? They can only hold what- 900 lbs? Let's see.
Let's say high 12 means 12.8. We'll allow him a bad launch because of not having his slicks.
13.8. Let's give him 900 lbs of extra weight. 14.7. Carb shouldn't have hurt because a 750 sounds too big, but let's chop off a little more. 15.0.I'm not a mechanic or professional by any means, but guys like him make me more confident.
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada. (West Coast)
Car: 1988 Camaro IROC
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt posi (non 1le)
Dont wanna take over the topic, But I've got a 351 Cleveland sitting in my garage, its almost stock, xcept its outta a boat. What kinda numbers do these things put out
4V heads, some porting, a good aftermarket intake, and a nice cam should see 450 HP without a problem. 351Cs are torque monsters due to their head design, so reasonably 550 ft. lbs and 450 HP. Throw it in a fox body and run very respectable times
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Brougham 2dr Coupe
Engine: 403 Olds v8, bored .030 over
Transmission: 350 T.H. 3A, shift kit
Yep. But if you take a looks at ON PAPER stats...that could confuse you. Stock, during the 70s...all 3 351s put out almost EXACT numbers ay close to the ame RPM. It's the potential that makes them different. The Windsor is an AMAZING engine, but the Cleveland, from what I have seen, has more performance potential, especially if you're running it in a heavier car as its torque would make it a better choice than the Windsor. The Windsor can have a little bit of torque too, though.
What kind of 5 speed did this guy have? I've never heard of a 5 speed on a Mustang. Ijust realized...Are there ANY 289 Mustangs that run 12s?
What kind of 5 speed did this guy have? I've never heard of a 5 speed on a Mustang. Ijust realized...Are there ANY 289 Mustangs that run 12s?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





