Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

Iroc vs. '01 Yukon

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 01:39 AM
  #1  
Derrick824's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Iroc vs. '01 Yukon

I'll make this short. There is this young kid driving like he's a badass in his Iroc. He gets next to my Yukon at a stoplight and I had that feeling that he was gonna take off. So the light turns green & I give it half throttle waiting to see what he's gonna do. Sure enough he takes off so I go full throttle too and we were dead even through 1st gear. I went into 2nd & started inching away and by the time I hit 70mph he had fell back to where his front nose was at my drivers door. Then he let off and so did I. I slowed down trying to get him next to me but he wouldn't. At the next stoplight he turned off. I guess he didn't want to take the embarrassment of me laughing in his face. What has the world come to when SUVs are outrunning the "sports cars?"
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 01:43 AM
  #2  
laiky's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 2
320hp vs 215hp and 15 years
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 09:14 AM
  #3  
vwdave's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: miami, florida
320hp???

Its most likely a base model. I think the only one with more than 320 is the 6.0 and the 8.1.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 10:25 AM
  #4  
Derrick824's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Well its certainly not a base model. Its an SLT with all the the power acc., sunroof, 3 rows of leather seats, etc. The biggest motor you can get in the Yukon is the 5.3L rated at 285hp. Only the Suburban gets the 320hp 6.0L. I didn't see the 5.7L TPI badge so I would guess he had the 305 TPI. Aren't those 190hp?
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 10:27 AM
  #5  
vwdave's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: miami, florida
190-215 or so. Depending on year.

My dad has a Avalanche with the 5.3. Nice little setup GM has there.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 10:45 AM
  #6  
25thmustang's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
I believe it, I have driven around in my friends Denali, and even though that has the 6.0, it weighs more and cant be that much faster. Would definately put a hurting on a lot of third gens!
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 01:18 PM
  #7  
nick418's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
yeah well yeah the yukon has more hp... but umm doesnt weight and other things play big role for the IROC.. My friends Z28 92 smoked my moms 5.7 suburban 1999...
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 04:30 PM
  #8  
ThirdGenFire's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
From: El Paso, Texas
Car: 2000 Trans Am and a 85 Iroc-Z
Engine: The Mighty LS1& 305 just beat meTPI
Transmission: 4L60E and 700R4
It also could have been a TBI iroc. Either way good race.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 04:35 PM
  #9  
vwdave's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: miami, florida
Originally posted by nick418
yeah well yeah the yukon has more hp... but umm doesnt weight and other things play big role for the IROC.. My friends Z28 92 smoked my moms 5.7 suburban 1999...
The 5.7 and the 5.3 are two TOTALLY different beasts.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 04:41 PM
  #10  
ThirdGenFire's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
From: El Paso, Texas
Car: 2000 Trans Am and a 85 Iroc-Z
Engine: The Mighty LS1& 305 just beat meTPI
Transmission: 4L60E and 700R4
The 5.7L TBI is not all that great.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 04:45 PM
  #11  
vwdave's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: miami, florida
Originally posted by ThirdGenFire
The 5.7L TBI is not all that great.
While that is true, the 96-99's(I think) came with multiport. It looks like a old fashioned manifold with a TB and injector rails on it.

The 5.3's is a LS1 type engine. The Gen 3 small block. Excellent heads/intake/fuel injection.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 05:20 PM
  #12  
ThirdGenFire's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
From: El Paso, Texas
Car: 2000 Trans Am and a 85 Iroc-Z
Engine: The Mighty LS1& 305 just beat meTPI
Transmission: 4L60E and 700R4
Really??? I thought it was a TBI system? Oh well it still was not as good as the new 5.3 LS1 style motors. Those things can get going.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 08:05 PM
  #13  
thirdgen88's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 4
From: Bonner Springs, KS
Car: 1995 Corvette
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 6 spd Manual
Axle/Gears: Dana 44, 3:45:1
Couldn't you get an IROC with an LG4??
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 10:21 PM
  #14  
laiky's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 2
3rd gens and yukons vary quite a bit in power level. I doubt a 92 5.7 tpi would lose to any yukon, but most were 5.0 tpi or tbi. Besides there are too many other factors, ever put a rebuilt tranny in a car only to have it upshift at 4000 rpm ? How many teenagers can afford or know enough to keep their cars in good tune?

i wouldn't get too cocky.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 11:00 PM
  #15  
vampiroc's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Car: Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Originally posted by thirdgen88
Couldn't you get an IROC with an LG4??
nope, could get a Z28 with LG4, but IROC always meant TPI, upgraded suspension, and should also mean 4 wheel discs (haven't seen a real IROC without them). those "TBI IROCs" where just ripoff dealer options like the "GT appearance package" for V6 stangs, I've never seen or heard of them as a factory deal. it was just dress up for extra money: throw $20 in decals on the car, charge an extra $2000 over the RS base price. most irocs you find are the 190 HP 305, they run 15.8-15.9, lol, I think a 6.0L LQ4 SUV could beat them without a problem
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 11:04 PM
  #16  
vampiroc's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Car: Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Originally posted by Derrick824
Only the Suburban gets the 320hp 6.0L.
nope, Yukon Denali's get 6.0L LQ4s, 325 HP
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2004 | 01:57 AM
  #17  
level's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
From: chicago il
Car: 1987 transam
Engine: 383 /w superram
Transmission: 700r4 /w 2800rpm stall
Originally posted by vampiroc
nope, Yukon Denali's get 6.0L LQ4s, 325 HP
thats it i want a yukon!
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2004 | 02:00 PM
  #18  
AndrewJB's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
Car: Crown Vic PI
Some of those GM truck motors are pretty ballsy. My dad has a 97 Chevy Express with the 5.7 Vortec and towing package. That huge *** van has had its fair share of killings. I beat an old RS camaro Lo3 once, as well as an Olds Aurora up to about 50. H*ll I even punked a STS caddy who was trying his hardest to pass me on the right side from a light
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 01:41 PM
  #19  
IROCBandit's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
we have a 01 sierra c3, for the most part only made one year its a denali truck. 6.0, awd, denali platform/interior...the stats say it will run 16.0 in a quarter, the thing will snap your neck off on a 0-60 though! it would deff run with my iroc for the first 2 gears.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 06:03 PM
  #20  
razor's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 631
Likes: 2
From: Saskatchewan
Car: 1992 GTA
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Originally posted by vampiroc
nope, could get a Z28 with LG4, but IROC always meant TPI, upgraded suspension, and should also mean 4 wheel discs (haven't seen a real IROC without them). those "TBI IROCs" where just ripoff dealer options like the "GT appearance package" for V6 stangs, I've never seen or heard of them as a factory deal. it was just dress up for extra money: throw $20 in decals on the car, charge an extra $2000 over the RS base price. most irocs you find are the 190 HP 305, they run 15.8-15.9, lol, I think a 6.0L LQ4 SUV could beat them without a problem
You COULD get IROC's with LO3 TBI's. Do a search. I have a friend that owned an 88 Iroc with an L03 TBI. And yes it was documented It had the FE2 suspension and rear drum brakes.

Last edited by razor; Jun 15, 2004 at 06:13 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 01:02 AM
  #21  
vampiroc's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Car: Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Originally posted by razor
You COULD get IROC's with LO3 TBI's. Do a search. I have a friend that owned an 88 Iroc with an L03 TBI. And yes it was documented It had the FE2 suspension and rear drum brakes.
no, it's bull**** you ******. yeah let's all do searches and believe non-sensical horsecrap. IROC ALWAYS = 4 wheel disc, upgraded suspension and TPI. TBI "IROC" was a stickercharged dealership ripoff. it was not real and anyone who says their RS with an IROC door badge is an IROC is lying. get a damn clue. you sound like an idiot.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 01:30 AM
  #22  
nick418's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
no, it's bull**** you ******. yeah let's all do searches and believe non-sensical horsecrap. IROC ALWAYS = 4 wheel disc, upgraded suspension and TPI. TBI "IROC" was a stickercharged dealership ripoff. it was not real and anyone who says their RS with an IROC door badge is an IROC is lying. get a damn clue. you sound like an idiot.


take it easy guy, dont have to get all bitchy at him, relax and its just bout cars
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 07:52 AM
  #23  
razor's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 631
Likes: 2
From: Saskatchewan
Car: 1992 GTA
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Here are a few examples:


Refer to the second last paragraph...

QUOTE]Originally posted by Willie
....so if you had a base 89 v6 camaro you could get/it came with a 115mph speedo?

Yes. What I saw pictured came from a 1988-1989 V6 Camaro/RS. It did NOT come in an IROC-Z.


I thought tpi z28s and irocs came w/ the 115 speedo between 87-89 and the 350 iroc could be had w/ a 145?

Fact (1987):
All speedos were all 85-mph units with a V6 and LG4 V8 regardless of model. With a 305 TPI or 350, the 145-mph speedo was used.

Fact (1988-89):
The 115-mph unit replaced the 85-mph speedo in 1988 as the "base" speedo. All V6 Camaros got the 6,000 rpm redline tach. All 1988-1989 305 TBI IROC-Z's got the 115-mph speedo. All 1988-1989 350 Camaros got the 145-mph speedo.

What I cannot guarantee (1988-89): 305 TPI IROC-Zs>> I do not know if these coupes and convertibles came with the 115 or 145-mph. Furthermore, I do not know if G92 had anything to do with the speedo for these years.
[/QUOTE]

https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...t=IROC+TBI+LG4

https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...t=IROC+TBI+LG4


There are a few hundeed more threads at TGO alone on this subject and a few thousand more at google.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 07:59 AM
  #24  
razor's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 631
Likes: 2
From: Saskatchewan
Car: 1992 GTA
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 4.10
I started a new thread on the history board. I thought that seeing as I am ****** I don't know too much You can see what other "*******" have to add to it......https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=246150
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 08:03 AM
  #25  
razor's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 631
Likes: 2
From: Saskatchewan
Car: 1992 GTA
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 4.10
And just for the sake of clarity I checked the word "sensical" . Is it something special because its not listed in Merriam Webster's 2004 edition. Maybe you could show a "******" what it means??????
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 06:25 PM
  #26  
TheGreatJ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
From: Tuscaloosa, AL
Car: 91Z, 91RS, '84 Jimmy
Engine: L98, 355, L98
Transmission: 700R, T56, 700R4
vamp

The LG4 and the L69 4-barrel 305's were both available in the IROC in '85 and '86. The LG4 was also available as the base IROC motor in '87 (the last year of the carbed motor in the 3rd gen.) In '88 and '89 they used the L03 (TBI305) as the base IROC motor. '90-92 are the only years that the IROC (or Z28 in 91/92) only came with TPI.


RPO codes are set at the factory and cannot be changed....not by the dealer, not by an aftermarket conversion company, not by anyone. The parts can be changed, but the factory codes for what was originally put in the car on the assembly line remain the same. It's not a dealer ripoff, it's the way these cars were made. Do some research before you start calling people names.




Also the first letter of a sentence is supposed to be capitalized.

Last edited by TheGreatJ; Jun 16, 2004 at 06:27 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 08:31 PM
  #27  
ThirdGenFire's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
From: El Paso, Texas
Car: 2000 Trans Am and a 85 Iroc-Z
Engine: The Mighty LS1& 305 just beat meTPI
Transmission: 4L60E and 700R4
What he said. I have a friend that used to have a TBI Roc. It was pretty weird seeing him open the hood and have a air cleaner that big looking back at you.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 08:44 PM
  #28  
flrtin1's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 4
From: Western Ky
Car: Z/28..39 Plymouth truck in progress
Engine: S/B
Transmission: Manual
Originally posted by vampiroc
nope, could get a Z28 with LG4, but IROC always meant TPI,
This is out of the 85 camaro dealership book...........so as you can see the LG4 was the standard engine for the IROC in 85

Last edited by flrtin1; Jun 16, 2004 at 08:48 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 08:52 PM
  #29  
nick418's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
vamp ur the moron ******
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 09:14 PM
  #30  
ljnowell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,935
Likes: 0
no, it's bull**** you ******. yeah let's all do searches and believe non-sensical horsecrap. IROC ALWAYS = 4 wheel disc, upgraded suspension and TPI. TBI "IROC" was a stickercharged dealership ripoff. it was not real and anyone who says their RS with an IROC door badge is an IROC is lying. get a damn clue. you sound like an idiot.
What a weenie
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 12:40 PM
  #31  
vampiroc's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Car: Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
ugh, you people are pathetic. lol, yeah carpoint has the 170 HP TBI motor listed as the only engine for irocs too, let's all believe that as well. fine, TPI isn't a "must" but iroc = 4 wheel disc, upgraded suspension, not drum brakes and base suspension. as I said, if it's got that crap, it's just a stickercharged joke option like the GT appearance package for V6 stangs. 91-92 there was no IROC, it was a Z28.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 01:25 PM
  #32  
BigDog99's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: Martinsburg, WV
Car: 82 Camaro & 07 Silverado
Engine: 350 (70 Chevelle)
Transmission: 700R4 - Auto
Originally posted by vampiroc
iroc = 4 wheel disc
Who made you an historian? The IROC I salvaged my trans & rear end from had rear drums. Maybe before you post your opinions you should double-check your facts. Now if you're the type of person that I see in these post I'm willing to bet I'm the next to be called names.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 01:31 PM
  #33  
flrtin1's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 4
From: Western Ky
Car: Z/28..39 Plymouth truck in progress
Engine: S/B
Transmission: Manual
vampiroc
You must be either very young, extremely misinformed or both. You are obviously confusing your very biased opinion with fact. The facts are that IROC's were made with Carb's, TBI and TPI if you want to stick your head in the sand and ignore that fine but don't come here and start throwing names around when people try to educate you with the facts.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 02:27 PM
  #34  
laiky's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 2
i've worked on an 87 IROC TPI car with rear drums, a formula 350 too with drums if that matters to anybody. i have also seen NON tpi irocs
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 07:07 PM
  #35  
ljnowell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,935
Likes: 0
i've worked on an 87 IROC TPI car with rear drums, a formula 350 too with drums if that matters to anybody. i have also seen NON tpi irocs
Doesnt matter what we say, vampiroc obviously knows it all. You have to face the facts, you dont know it all.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 10:15 PM
  #36  
Saigon_Bob's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 0
From: Kissimmee, FL
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 357cid
Transmission: T5 Swap
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 7.5" 3.23 soon to be 3.73
Originally posted by nick418
yeah well yeah the yukon has more hp... but umm doesnt weight and other things play big role for the IROC.. My friends Z28 92 smoked my moms 5.7 suburban 1999...
i lost to a newer suburban on the freeway but it ran outa gears... redlining isnt healthy in the last gear of my trans.... i wish my speedo worked czuz i was passing everyone i came to.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2004 | 08:03 AM
  #37  
nick418's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
91-92 there was no IROC, it was a Z28.



ugh no kidden! Tell me somthing i dont know, IROC Z Camaro 1985- 1990
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2004 | 02:59 PM
  #38  
matt3383's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
From: Gilbert AZ
Car: 2000 Camaro SS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: t-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Yukon

I have a 91 firebird with the 5.7 TPI motor with just about nothing done to it. And for some reason the kids with the rich parents, driving those Yukon Denali's and even better the Escalades seem to be the ones that pull up to the line next to me. Its sad because they always have their girlfriends in the truck with em and they think they are tough Sh%t. I usually let them have the line to see if they will race, then i just blow their doors off. Then at the next light the girlfriend is sitting there laughing at her boyfriend Im sure if someone did some moding to those motors they could get up in speed, but were talking about a aerodynamic car vs. a brick lol. Just my 2cents.

Just saw what someone said about a formula with drum brakes. Mine is a formula and i just had to replace my shoes, if that helps anyone lol.

Last edited by matt3383; Jun 18, 2004 at 03:02 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2004 | 03:59 PM
  #39  
Synapsis's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
From: Tucson - MdFormula350 = Post uberWhore
Car: Sexy
Engine: Stock
Transmission: Slipping
Don't you have to have the G92 option to have 4 wheel discs?

Just a question. I have a G92 90 Iroc... TPI and 4 discs. w00t
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2004 | 09:55 AM
  #40  
Saigon_Bob's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 0
From: Kissimmee, FL
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 357cid
Transmission: T5 Swap
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 7.5" 3.23 soon to be 3.73
Originally posted by Synapsis
Don't you have to have the G92 option to have 4 wheel discs?

Just a question. I have a G92 90 Iroc... TPI and 4 discs. w00t
:hail: i h8 you... i h8 drums they are such a pain to work on... maybe ill find some nice 6pot calipers and big brakes for the front and 4pot for the rear... a lil conversion whould be nice
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dwayne614
Engine Swap
5
Sep 28, 2015 08:33 AM
BAMiller
TPI
4
Sep 14, 2015 06:38 PM
angel2794
Engine Swap
11
Sep 8, 2015 06:22 PM
g.l.mos
Camaros for Sale
0
Aug 22, 2015 12:02 AM
mustangman65_79
Body
3
Aug 11, 2015 03:17 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:34 PM.