Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

98 TA and 89 IROC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 23, 2004 | 10:27 PM
  #1  
snowman89's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Car: 1989 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: 5.8L 355
Transmission: T-5 5-speed
98 TA and 89 IROC

I'm not here to say I kicked its ***. LS1 is a damn good motor, hehe. But I'm impressed with my 355, Vette L98 Alum headed, XE268, Stock TPI motor. I was able to take him off the line through 1st, he passed me as I shifted to 2nd and I pulled somewhat with him to 60. Id say he got me by 2-3 car lengths by the end of the quarter. I was surprised my car performed like it did. I'll imagine I could keep up with a stock LT1. It was a fun race!!!!!
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2004 | 10:43 PM
  #2  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,775
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Re: 98 TA and 89 IROC

Originally posted by snowman89
I'm not here to say I kicked its ***. LS1 is a damn good motor, hehe. But I'm impressed with my 355, Vette L98 Alum headed, XE268, Stock TPI motor. I was able to take him off the line through 1st, he passed me as I shifted to 2nd and I pulled somewhat with him to 60. Id say he got me by 2-3 car lengths by the end of the quarter. I was surprised my car performed like it did. I'll imagine I could keep up with a stock LT1. It was a fun race!!!!!
Sounds like you are right on par with LT1 M6 territory. Get rid of that stock TPI and chances are next time you will be on top.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2004 | 10:44 PM
  #3  
nick418's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
hey i believe you, anything can happen. Maybe some ppl are gonna think your BS. But anyways sounded like a good run for the good ol TPI OLDSCHOOL style
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 08:48 AM
  #4  
anymethod's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Hillsborough, NJ & SJU in Philly
Car: 1986 Trans Am
Engine: carb 305 LG4
Transmission: TH700-R4
Good race man. LS1's are damn fast, especially in 3rd gear. They can't mess with the L98's off the line though

~Matt
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 11:20 AM
  #5  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
no reason to call

sounds legit. LS1's can run high 12's to mid 13's depends on car and driver. (not the magazine LOL) Your car with those mods should be high 13's or mid 13's. Mine runs 14 flat with only headers/exhaust and 2800stall. Shocks and springs help too but i also have 2.77 gears. Yours should be atleast be able to outrun mine. Also, from a dig, he probly didnt launch good and L98 torque gives him a run for his money. Our auto trannys have sick first gear. LOL

Sounds legit, congrats!! Just upgrade that TPI restriction and you should be able to hang with them, stock that is.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 11:28 AM
  #6  
THEGENERAL's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by Orr89RocZ
Our auto trannys have sick first gear. LOL
but he has a t5 stick......
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 01:23 PM
  #7  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
but he has a t5 stick......


Awww, man my bad. I missed that one. LOL He Hinted at shifting and I missed that cuz i shift my auto manually. LOL

I just assumed that you had a 700r4 cuz you have a 355 TPI. LOL

You know what they say about assuming things. "Never assume, you make an *** out of U and ME." LOL more like me.

Hows that t-5 holding up to that power?
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 01:43 PM
  #8  
1981z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
i

have herd that if u put a good clutch with a t5 it can hold a l98 power without brakeing
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 02:01 PM
  #9  
Dano 00TA's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
From: Gary, Indiana
Car: 00 Trans Am/89 IROC
Engine: LS1/L98
Transmission: 4L60/700R4
Originally posted by anymethod
They can't mess with the L98's off the line though

~Matt

Why not???
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 03:09 PM
  #10  
Marc 85Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 1
From: MD
Dano 00TA's abbreviated sig:

2000 NHRA Edition T/A
Pewter Metallic
A4 3.23

1989 IROC-Z 5.7 Dual Cat
Auto w/3.27 gears

Why don't you tell us? Stock for stock... Or compare the two with a converter in the L98. There's a LARGE low RPM torque difference.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 02:10 PM
  #11  
anymethod's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Hillsborough, NJ & SJU in Philly
Car: 1986 Trans Am
Engine: carb 305 LG4
Transmission: TH700-R4
I meant the stock ones

~Matt
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 03:14 PM
  #12  
Dano 00TA's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
From: Gary, Indiana
Car: 00 Trans Am/89 IROC
Engine: LS1/L98
Transmission: 4L60/700R4
I meant stock for stock, of course it's not even close now. I g-teched both cars when my TA had about 400 miles on it and was bone stock and it ran 0-60 in 5 seconds flat, the bast my IROC can do is 6 flat. And my TA cut 1.9 short times completly stock with GSC's

The torque difference isn't as much as people make it out to be.....



I gotta admit that stock for stock my IROC "felt" quicker off the line but sotp feel doesn't tell the story. Just like alot of people think that when they uncap their exhaust, the car "feels" slower when it's actually faster.

Last edited by Dano 00TA; Oct 5, 2004 at 03:17 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 03:56 PM
  #13  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
nice comparison. I want to time my car 0-60 with my 2800 stall to see what i can rip off. Maybe this weekend if i can get home. I think low 5.0's shouldnt be a problem. Ls1's do produce better torque curve than L98's and have higher peak I believe cuz usually Ls1's are slightly underated. LOL Its just that the car is heavier than thirdgens.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 04:57 PM
  #14  
anymethod's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Hillsborough, NJ & SJU in Philly
Car: 1986 Trans Am
Engine: carb 305 LG4
Transmission: TH700-R4
Really? Guess I am wrong then... by a lot. Thanks for the info. I don't own a 350 L98, I just heard that they still could take LS1s through 1st.

~Matt
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2004 | 12:51 PM
  #15  
nick418's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
the LS1 will always be Better then the L98, The L98 will always be better then the CF1. LS1 will always be better then the Lt1. The LS2 will always be better then the LS1. Get the point.... Technology gets better
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2004 | 02:34 PM
  #16  
Insaniac198's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: Humble, TX
Car: 1999 Trans Am
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Originally posted by nick418
the LS1 will always be Better then the L98, The L98 will always be better then the CF1. LS1 will always be better then the Lt1. The LS2 will always be better then the LS1. Get the point.... Technology gets better
MTI's C6 only put down 335 rwhp
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2004 | 02:38 PM
  #17  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,775
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Insaniac198
MTI's C6 only put down 335 rwhp
That sounds about right. However, the vette transaxle does not have the same parasitic losses that a standard A4 or T56 tranny does. An LS2 behind an f-body T56 would probably closer to 350rwhp.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2004 | 03:11 PM
  #18  
Marc 85Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 1
From: MD
Originally posted by Dano 00TA
The torque difference isn't as much as people make it out to be.....
Overall torque production no, but the difference shows in where it occurs. The L98 peaks at 2800RPM, and the LS1 peaks at what? 4200? Not only that but peak numbers are higher for the L98, by about 15 ft/lbs. Low end torque is MUCH greater on the TPI, much greater. Compare dynos, engine dynos, and not chassis dynos. Chassis dynos usually aren't capable of reading at low engine RPM. 0-60 times were around 5.8-6.2 seconds for the L98 cars, but 0-30 was usually achieved at 2.1 seconds. One of the quickest out-of-the-hole cars for the day. What is the LS1 capable of?
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2004 | 03:20 PM
  #19  
nick418's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
Originally posted by Insaniac198
MTI's C6 only put down 335 rwhp
so...
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2004 | 05:22 PM
  #20  
pvt num 11's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
From: Wahiawa, Hawai'i
Car: 1989 TTA
Engine: LC2
Transmission: Worn-out 200R4
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt, 3.27's
Romping it from zero to thirty is like, if you blink, you miss it. Unless you spun out. Then it takes awhile...
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2004 | 07:50 PM
  #21  
Dano 00TA's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
From: Gary, Indiana
Car: 00 Trans Am/89 IROC
Engine: LS1/L98
Transmission: 4L60/700R4
Originally posted by Marc 85Z28
Overall torque production no, but the difference shows in where it occurs. The L98 peaks at 2800RPM, and the LS1 peaks at what? 4200? Not only that but peak numbers are higher for the L98, by about 15 ft/lbs. Low end torque is MUCH greater on the TPI, much greater. Compare dynos, engine dynos, and not chassis dynos. Chassis dynos usually aren't capable of reading at low engine RPM. 0-60 times were around 5.8-6.2 seconds for the L98 cars, but 0-30 was usually achieved at 2.1 seconds. One of the quickest out-of-the-hole cars for the day. What is the LS1 capable of?
I had my car dynoed and peak torque was at 4500rpm and you're right, the dyno didn't measure under 3500rpm.

I don't know what the 0-30 time would be with a LS1 but like I previously mentioned 0-60 with my car off the showroom floor was 5 flat and I cut 1.9 short times so I'm sure the 0-30 times would be very close to a L98
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 12:44 PM
  #22  
Insaniac198's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: Humble, TX
Car: 1999 Trans Am
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
That sounds about right. However, the vette transaxle does not have the same parasitic losses that a standard A4 or T56 tranny does. An LS2 behind an f-body T56 would probably closer to 350rwhp.
So the IRS makes it dyno less rwhp?
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 01:03 PM
  #23  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
L98's peak at 3200rpms according to this site tech data.

Also, seen stats of LS1 02 z28 running to 30mph in 2.32 seconds. LT1 vettes are 2.04 so all these cars are dead even off the line to 30. its to 60mph where the power is realized.

Z28 Ls1 about 5.5 seconds as tested
the Lt1 vette was about 5.2 seconds,
and L98s are probly 6 flat

This weekend, i am gonna test out my L98 with 2800 stall to see what it will do 0-60 and 0-30. hopefully if i can make it home

Last edited by Orr89RocZ; Oct 7, 2004 at 01:09 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 02:06 PM
  #24  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,775
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Don't look at peak values. Look at the whole curve. It you put 2 power curves of an L98, LT1 and LS1 side by side you would laugh at the L98. Sure it makes peak torque but only in a short RPM range. The LT1 and LS1 may start out a bit behind but when their peak torque is reached they maintain it for another 3000 rpm or so. Then when they shift, they are right in the meat of the curve everytime, building and maintaing toqrue through each gear up to redline. After 1rst gear the L98 loses power as it reaches redline and goes through the gears. Take away the restricitve nature of stock TPI induction and it becomes a whole new ball game. Stock for stock an LT1 and LS1 will make just as much torque on the dyno as any L98.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2004 | 01:50 AM
  #25  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
dont LT1's torque peak at like 2400 rpm or something real low? That sounds like a good combo. Real broad flat curve too i hear.

Yeah, LS1's have that torque rpm advantage because they also have 2000 more rpms of usuable power range. LOL, L98's are a beast of a motor. And since we are a bit lighter than 4th gens, we should accelerate a tad better. But nothing can match TPI for torque production! Makes more torque than any other intake design i can think of. LOL
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BAMiller
TPI
4
Sep 14, 2015 06:38 PM
angel2794
Engine Swap
11
Sep 8, 2015 06:22 PM
FLAP
Camaros Wanted
0
Sep 2, 2015 09:22 AM
g.l.mos
Camaros for Sale
0
Aug 22, 2015 12:02 AM
mustangman65_79
Body
3
Aug 11, 2015 03:17 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:57 PM.