Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

Camaro vs CRX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 08:43 AM
  #1  
ll-84camaro-ll's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: Duncansville, PA
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Camaro vs CRX

i know stock these cars suck stock but with the common engine swap they pull around 13's.

a guy wants to race me in his CRX he said they they just put a stock motor in it but i didnt ask him if it was from a crx or if it was a bigger engine but where do you think it would stand against my 305 tpi if its the stock motor?
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 11:18 AM
  #2  
82knightrider's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,492
Likes: 0
From: Arcadia ,Ca
Car: 82 firebird s/e 83 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L 305ci 4b carb.....CFI
Transmission: TH200C....700R4
Dont underestimate a well built CRX.They haul A$* and Ive been smoked by quite a few
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 11:41 AM
  #3  
12secformula's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Binghamton, NY
Car: 94 Z-28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by 82knightrider
Dont underestimate a well built CRX.They haul A$* and Ive been smoked by quite a few
HAHAHHAAHAA, no seriously. hahahahhahaha.

You aren't serious are you? CRX's are not fast. They can be made fast, if you wanna put a turbo or GS-R engine....but they aren't fast if mildly built like most are. If he has a stock engine w/ minor bolt-ons, you should beat him pretty bad.
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 11:57 AM
  #4  
82knightrider's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,492
Likes: 0
From: Arcadia ,Ca
Car: 82 firebird s/e 83 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L 305ci 4b carb.....CFI
Transmission: TH200C....700R4
Originally posted by 12secformula
HAHAHHAAHAA, no seriously. hahahahhahaha.

You aren't serious are you? CRX's are not fast. They can be made fast, if you wanna put a turbo or GS-R engine....but they aren't fast if mildly built like most are. If he has a stock engine w/ minor bolt-ons, you should beat him pretty bad.

Thats what I meant,a modded out CRX hauls A$*.I know stock or even some few minor bolt on CRXs are slower than my LG4

Last edited by 82knightrider; Feb 28, 2005 at 11:59 AM.
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 12:24 PM
  #5  
ll-84camaro-ll's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: Duncansville, PA
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.42
yea i know crx's stock are slower than **** and i know that they can be made fast. im sure that i can beat him if its stock. but a kid i know has a civic hatchback with a gs-r motor in it and its running mid 13's and that basicly the same thing as a crx
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 01:25 PM
  #6  
Mr.W's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: Stock auto
Most of those ricers will call their car stock if it's got an engine swap from another honda or acura. so they could drop in a more powerfull engine and still call it "stock"
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 01:42 PM
  #7  
freestylzz's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 2
From: Toronto CANADA - GM Parts Rep.
Car: 1987 Iroc Z28
Engine: The KING of the 3rd gen TPI's.
Transmission: Beefed up T5
Axle/Gears: Aussie 3.45's
Just race him and if you lose get yourself a real car!
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 01:43 PM
  #8  
stu's Avatar
stu
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Originally posted by Mr.W
Most of those ricers will call their car stock if it's got an engine swap from another honda or acura. so they could drop in a more powerfull engine and still call it "stock"
Listen to this guy cause he actually knows most ricers and can take an accurate census on what most of them do.

Anyway, with a 305 you might be looking at a hard time with any CRX that has anything but a D-series motor in it. Unless that D-series motor is turbo, which will also be bad for you. I ran 15 psi on my motor that was 'stock' so you never know what he means by that.
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 06:45 PM
  #9  
kowboy59's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,153
Likes: 0
From: kissimmee fl
Car: 88 iroc-z z-28
Engine: 383
Transmission: th400
Axle/Gears: 3.42
well its simple, ull beat him unless hes lying to you bout his car. if you dont beat him, get a 350.
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 07:32 PM
  #10  
westman's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
From: Boise, ID
Car: 90 Camaro RS
Engine: 6.3L 383 V8
Transmission: 700R4
Get a 350 anyways #@!$%^&* a 305
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 10:05 PM
  #11  
jocww's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
From: cali
Car: 84z, 65 elcamino
Engine: l69 and a hyped up sbc in the camino
Transmission: t5 m21
Axle/Gears: 373s 411s
u should read my sig
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 10:31 PM
  #12  
mw66nova's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
aaaahhh, build that 305 and go 350/lt-1/ls1 hunting! mines already beat a 99-00ish camaro ss
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 11:19 PM
  #13  
phoenix305's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
From: Clearfield,Utah
Car: 1987 IROC, 1989 IROC
Engine: built 305, stock 305 tpi
Transmission: Corvette 700r4, t-5
Axle/Gears: 4.10 posi, 3.08 posi
Your car is freakin awesome mw66nova!!! You're my role model!!!
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 11:46 PM
  #14  
mw66nova's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
aaawwww shuuuucks maaaan! thaaaanks!



watch out 350 crowd, with my new tranny/converter combo and some traction (coming late march/early april) your gonna see a daily driven 305 go DEEP into the 13's if not touch on some 12's. i got the power, just gotta get her down the track!
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 11:58 PM
  #15  
305q_ta86's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, AB
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx
Engine: Turbo KA24DE
Transmission: 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 4.08 VLSD
Ok, the top model CRX had 108 horsepower. Enough said.
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 12:36 AM
  #16  
stu's Avatar
stu
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Originally posted by 305q_ta86
Ok, the top model CRX had 108 horsepower. Enough said.
They also weigh at least a thousand pounds less than the lightest Camaro. I think that horsepower number is wrong though.
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 01:47 AM
  #17  
FbodTrek's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
Add an H22 to that CRX, and you're toast if he doesn't break somthing. Heck, add an LS motor to it and you're still toast (or an F22...pretty much anything but a D series). NEVER underestimate a Honda...no telling how fast they are, seriously. I ain't speaking form a V6 owners' standpoint, I'm speaking form a Guy who has taken rides in modded Hondas. My Girlfriends H22 Prelude would DEVASTAE a 305 TPI....just boltons, nothing else (phased cams soon, as well as a little device I'm utterly jealous they never made for our cars..the VAFC(AFC in our case) )
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 09:05 AM
  #18  
305q_ta86's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, AB
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx
Engine: Turbo KA24DE
Transmission: 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 4.08 VLSD
Originally posted by stu
They also weigh at least a thousand pounds less than the lightest Camaro. I think that horsepower number is wrong though.
I did a LOT of research because at one time I wanted one. According to my sources, the SI had 108 from the d16a1. (engine code may be wrong though, I cant remember)
Yeah, they're lighter, but one of the reasons I didnt buy one was because the SI I test drove felt slow as heck, and I hated the clutch and the shifter. THey just felt too lo-po for me, and I felt like I was going to break it if I powershifted wrong even once... Jusy my opinion though.
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 09:07 AM
  #19  
urbanhunter44's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 1
From: Brighton, CO
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
Originally posted by mw66nova
aaaahhh, build that 305 and go 350/lt-1/ls1 hunting! mines already beat a 99-00ish camaro ss
If you beat that car, then either you are running 12's, or his car had something SERIOUSLY wrong with it... or maybe he REALLY REALLY sucked at driving.

Those cars CAN and HAVE pulled a 12.9x in their stock form. Don't believe me? fbody.com.

Don't mean to start anything, just wanted to clarify for those who don't know about 4th gens.
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 10:20 AM
  #20  
mw66nova's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
i know how fast those cars are, and i never once implied he was a good driver. non-the-less, my 305 powered 87 sportcoupe beat a 99-00ish SS. my car also has a lot of top end charge (100mph for a 13.7 run). once my car has the proper converter (sitting at the shop now) and a shift kit (sitting at "other" shop) with some slicks (sitting in someones shop, LOL) than there is no reason i shouldn't put down some LOW 13 second passes, which would be well into stock LS1 territory and i haven't spent hardly any cash getting there.

www.cardomain.com/id/mw66nova for specs on build.
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 03:29 PM
  #21  
stu's Avatar
stu
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Originally posted by mw66nova
i know how fast those cars are, and i never once implied he was a good driver. non-the-less, my 305 powered 87 sportcoupe beat a 99-00ish SS. my car also has a lot of top end charge (100mph for a 13.7 run). once my car has the proper converter (sitting at the shop now) and a shift kit (sitting at "other" shop) with some slicks (sitting in someones shop, LOL) than there is no reason i shouldn't put down some LOW 13 second passes, which would be well into stock LS1 territory and i haven't spent hardly any cash getting there.

www.cardomain.com/id/mw66nova for specs on build.
You don't need to run 12's to beat any ole LS-1 just because a few people have run 12.9s.
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 07:36 PM
  #22  
tpivette89's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Car: 2006 Corvette
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
You don't need to run 12's to beat any ole LS-1 just because a few people have run 12.9s
true, but even the bad LS1 drivers trap higher than what his car does. his new mods are only going to help his launch, not add any power. at the track he may dispatch stock or lightly modded ones due to his low 60fts which will produce good E/T. but on the street when the slicks come off, and theres no VHT prepped concrete launch pad, hell be seeing LS1 taillights due to his low trap speed
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 09:19 PM
  #23  
mw66nova's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
heh, good thing i don't street race!
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 11:10 PM
  #24  
Marc 85Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 1
From: MD
Originally posted by 305q_ta86
Ok, the top model CRX had 108 horsepower. Enough said.
That's right, SI model. Torque was even less impressive. Good for high 16s at BEST.

If anyone here is worried about any CRX with the stock engine, turbo or not, you need a reality check. They've become the new 5.0 around here, and there are plenty of examples to pick from. Even at around 2300lbs, they'll need an engine swap just to keep up with most of our cars. There are several B18 T3/T4 cars running around here, and most struggle to keep pace with a stock LS1 car.

Whats the world coming to when a mediocre econo-$hit box gets respect from performance enthusiasts?

I've seen John Deere's haul ***. Should I start respecting them?
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 11:12 PM
  #25  
nick418's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
I've seen John Deere's haul ***. Should I start respecting them?


Old Mar 1, 2005 | 11:12 PM
  #26  
82knightrider's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,492
Likes: 0
From: Arcadia ,Ca
Car: 82 firebird s/e 83 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L 305ci 4b carb.....CFI
Transmission: TH200C....700R4
Originally posted by Marc 85Z28


I've seen John Deere's haul ***. Should I start respecting them?
Hah,!you got any video of that?
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 05:02 AM
  #27  
stu's Avatar
stu
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Originally posted by Marc 85Z28
There are several B18 T3/T4 cars running around here, and most struggle to keep pace with a stock LS1 car.

Sounds like you need to recheck your facts. That's what I was running and never had a problem with any stock LS1 cars.
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 06:42 AM
  #28  
crazy3rdgen's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 0
From: Long Neck, De
Car: 2002 SS
Engine: Ls1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3:42 posi
dude i got a crx si and their light as light can be. IT's fully guted and its just sumtin to mess with at the track. I'm guesen with its 110 hp its somewhere in the 15's so with an easy motor swap yes 13's is very likely. THeir the only fwd car i would race out. Good luck
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 12:04 PM
  #29  
Marc 85Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 1
From: MD
Originally posted by stu
Sounds like you need to recheck your facts. That's what I was running and never had a problem with any stock LS1 cars.
Facts are straight stu. Boosted cars fair better up where you are, but here at sea level, the playing field is more even. LS1's run strong here, and typically trap at least 105. I've seen stockers trap as high as 108. And after barely getting beat by a CRX (blew my launch and never recovered) with the above stated combo, I did my research. Race gas and big boost aside, they need a good bit to run well.

82knightrider - ESPN2 sometimes shows mower racing. After seeing it on TV, I had to watch an event live. It may sound like a joke to you, but these guys take it very seriously...
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 01:27 PM
  #30  
urbanhunter44's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 1
From: Brighton, CO
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
Originally posted by mw66nova
i know how fast those cars are, and i never once implied he was a good driver. non-the-less, my 305 powered 87 sportcoupe beat a 99-00ish SS. my car also has a lot of top end charge (100mph for a 13.7 run). once my car has the proper converter (sitting at the shop now) and a shift kit (sitting at "other" shop) with some slicks (sitting in someones shop, LOL) than there is no reason i shouldn't put down some LOW 13 second passes, which would be well into stock LS1 territory and i haven't spent hardly any cash getting there.

www.cardomain.com/id/mw66nova for specs on build.
True, you could beat an LS1 with your car, not saying you can't, but the driver has to suck. LS1's trap hiiiiigh.

Not trying to start anything, just talking
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 02:53 PM
  #31  
25thmustang's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Stock LS1, old new, LOL just kidding around!

As far as a Civic goes (CRX) they are really hard to seperate these days. They are just like the 5.0 Mustangs, they all look similar, you never know if it runs 16s or 12s. And Im sure as most V8 owners, you guys expect a 16 out of them, when you probably should expect better, in this day and age!

From what I understood weather affects boosted cars more. I dont know about stricktly altitude, but I do know one weekend a guy in a Lightning ran 12.3s, and my car had gone 12.5-12.6s, then another hotter weekend he was going 12.7-12.8, same as me, 12.7-12.8! Im sure altitude affects cars different then just heat and humidity, but then again I am not sure!

Ill leave with what I always leave with, dont underestimate the competition, overestimate them, and be prepared to lose. You go into races like this, and you rarely get disappointed!
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 03:42 PM
  #32  
tpivette89's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Car: 2006 Corvette
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
From what I understood weather affects boosted cars more. I dont know about stricktly altitude
at stu's altitude, N/A cars lose a full second and about 10mph in the quarter. boosted cars only lose half that
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 04:25 PM
  #33  
stu's Avatar
stu
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Originally posted by tpivette89
at stu's altitude, N/A cars lose a full second and about 10mph in the quarter. boosted cars only lose half that
Yep, that's about perfect. That's why I loved to line up against Corvettes. Too bad only a few of them were ever stock.
Old Mar 14, 2005 | 11:27 AM
  #34  
84RIceEater's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
From: Kirkland Washington
Car: 84 Camaro. 90 integra
Engine: LG4, 1.6 (402hp)
Transmission: 700r4, JDM ITR w/ kaaz LSD
same.
Old Mar 14, 2005 | 11:46 PM
  #35  
kairles's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,400
Likes: 0
From: Antelope, CA
Car: 89 IrocZ/17 LS 1LE
Engine: 383/LGX
Transmission: 400/TR-3160
Axle/Gears: 3.08/3.27
back when my car was a LB9 I beat a crx with what they said was a gsr motor with a full exhaust I left him at the line spinning but he did start to catch me but it was to late

I also have a friend who had a crx with an integra ls motor and it was SLOW

you should beat him but if you go from a roll it's in the air

sorry had to post this
Attached Images  
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 12:48 AM
  #36  
stu's Avatar
stu
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
I've never seen that one before.
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 08:40 PM
  #37  
fst2qtrmile's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Cape Cod, MA
Car: 1998 eclipse GSX
Engine: 4G63 2.0
Transmission: 5 speed
this is kinda adead issue here but sorry guys, 305 TBI engines are slow.. My daily driving stock 99 buick century beat one by a car length. This camaro had exhaust, basic clean running tune up, K&N, no cat, MSD. It was my brothers...hahahaha anyways, 305 TBI are just as slow. compare to a crx even witht he D series engine.... 1/4 mile wise i think crx would catch up. Now if we are talking any kind of swap, forget it. B16.B18 K20's or 22.. it dont matter. Few people have a crxs out here. i ran against a CRX in my TA i got now and won by 3 car lengths. It had B18 all motor then he got a turbo and towards the end of same race he started to catch up but still lost. its all about that traction. If that crx doesnt red line it the whole way through 2nd, i think he could take you.
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 08:57 PM
  #38  
FiveSeven's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Port Huron, MI
Car: 1988 Iroc Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Yea, swapped CRXs and Civics can be really fast. My friend just put a B16A in his 89 CRX, all stock JDM motor, only thing it currently has is a 3"(I think) exhaust sytem. Raced my brothers friends LT1 T/A and kept up pretty well, the T/A has gone 14.2. We predict the CRX is in the mid-high 14s with just the swap and exhaust. Hard to get traction in that thing, may be due to the cold weather also, but it pulls good up top, shifting at about 8k! He plans on goin all motor, hoping for high 12s-mid 13s and then throwing a 75-shot on it. Will be pretty crazy, those times sound about right to you stu?
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 09:39 PM
  #39  
fst2qtrmile's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Cape Cod, MA
Car: 1998 eclipse GSX
Engine: 4G63 2.0
Transmission: 5 speed
yeah those B18 rev 9500!!!!!!!!1 but under load in gear they hitting 8200 at shift points with a rebuild. CRAZY !!!!!!!!
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 09:43 PM
  #40  
freestylzz's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 2
From: Toronto CANADA - GM Parts Rep.
Car: 1987 Iroc Z28
Engine: The KING of the 3rd gen TPI's.
Transmission: Beefed up T5
Axle/Gears: Aussie 3.45's
Yes they wynd up nice but really don't have much torque, at least compared to a nicely modded V8.
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 10:18 PM
  #41  
FordGirlGoneBad's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: Rockledge, FL
Car: '87 Z28, '00 T/A M6
Engine: 355, LS1
Transmission: 700R4, M6
Axle/Gears: 4:10 on '87, stock on others
I see there are lots of varying opinions out there so I figured, coming from one who's driven one of those ricers I'd give my $.02.

My ex has a Honda Civic CRX Csi -- it's got a 12-valve engine in it, don't know any specifics, but it was the one and only year (1985)(according to him) that they allowed this type of engine to be imported to the US. He's done some work on it, replacing the suspension and brake system with an Acura's and has been a good customer of Jackson Racing out in California where they've been "2 Fast 2 Furious" 15 or so years before the movie came out...my ex did his car about 13 years ago. Anyway -- I've raced and have easily beaten a Vette -- pulled away from him like he was in park, and he was the one revving and wanting to show his stuff (got beat by a GIRL! ). One of these Csi stock engines with some simple mods and you never know...but I did it, so I saw it with my own eyes.

Those cars are light, take off quick and feel like you're driving a bullet. I'd take him up on it, but I'd be prepared to have to eat a word or two if you've told him "no way." I don't know what he's done to it, but I do know that under the right conditions, with the right "stock" engine it can be done.

Never underestimate a ric*r -- even if you don't like them or are just used to the stickers and chrome posers.

Last edited by FordGirlGoneBad; Mar 15, 2005 at 10:20 PM.
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 10:31 PM
  #42  
jocww's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
From: cali
Car: 84z, 65 elcamino
Engine: l69 and a hyped up sbc in the camino
Transmission: t5 m21
Axle/Gears: 373s 411s
welcom fggb but i doubt that this kid has what your ex had or has. and yes sometimes the stickers are there for their sponsers but thats like 1 in a million
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 10:37 PM
  #43  
FordGirlGoneBad's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: Rockledge, FL
Car: '87 Z28, '00 T/A M6
Engine: 355, LS1
Transmission: 700R4, M6
Axle/Gears: 4:10 on '87, stock on others
Here's some specs I found online re: the CRX "Si" not CSi as I stated before...

Engines: Si: 1.5 liter I4 91 bhp @ 5500 rpm, 93 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm.
Performance: Si: 0-60 in 8.7 seconds, 1/4 mile in 16.2 seconds.

Just to give you some stock stats. (or is that just TMI?)
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 11:58 PM
  #44  
stu's Avatar
stu
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Originally posted by FiveSeven
Will be pretty crazy, those times sound about right to you stu?
Yeah, doesn't sound too bad. That three inch exhaust is WAY too big for N/A though. I wouldn't go over 2.25" myself. I bet it sounds pretty crappy. lol
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 11:26 AM
  #45  
FiveSeven's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Port Huron, MI
Car: 1988 Iroc Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
I actually think it may be around 2.25 or 2.5, there has just been so many people telling that they put 3" exhause on their car lately I may have got mixed up. Because ya know, even people I know with v6 Mustangs need 3" .
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 02:40 PM
  #46  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
on the right CRX, a B16 swap with bolt ons (headers/catback/cam gears, etc) can go mid low 14's. 160hp and 2300lbs can move well... add a 50 shot and can go 12's if conditions are right...

thats what alot of the honda boys are saying over at honda-tech....

know your enemy..... stock h22 in a crx is a beast, yet its considered stock....

a 305tbi will have major problems... it doesnt take much to go low low 15's in a CRX which will run with 305TBI's and some TPI's

anyway, if you go to a 350 block, might as well go 383 since stroker kits are same price as 350 kits for the most part... just alittle more machining. go with more inches and more torque
thats whats best!
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 07:45 PM
  #47  
Gr89RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,912
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach CA
Car: '02 Z06
Engines: Si: 1.5 liter I4 91 bhp @ 5500 rpm, 93 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm.
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 07:54 PM
  #48  
Megaracerx2's Avatar
On Probation
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
From: Randallstown Maryland
Car: 1986 Trans Am
Engine: 305
Transmission: Auto
Originally posted by FordGirlGoneBad


Engines: Si: 1.5 liter I4 91 bhp @ 5500 rpm, 93 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm.
Performance: Si: 0-60 in 8.7 seconds, 1/4 mile in 16.2 seconds.



not too shabby for 91 hp..

but, lets face it, Most hondas will lose to Most 3rd gens...

some hondas will win, some 3rd gens will lose... hold out hope!.lol..

Last edited by Megaracerx2; Mar 16, 2005 at 07:57 PM.
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 09:33 PM
  #49  
84RIceEater's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
From: Kirkland Washington
Car: 84 Camaro. 90 integra
Engine: LG4, 1.6 (402hp)
Transmission: 700r4, JDM ITR w/ kaaz LSD
Just get more performance Mods its fun and why not?
Old Mar 17, 2005 | 12:50 AM
  #50  
stu's Avatar
stu
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Originally posted by Gr89RS
Compare liter sizes and horsepower to domestic econo boxes and the laughter stops.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47 PM.