Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

1999 3.8 Mustang??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 24, 2006 | 03:49 PM
  #1  
a mack6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh & Allentown PA
Car: 1992 Z28 (Heritage Edition)
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Posi
1999 3.8 Mustang??

Just wondering how fast they are... My friend has had one for a long time...but he has no times on it or anything. Its a 5 speed 3.8. Its got a flowmaster catback, CAI, and 3.73's. Its also decked out in GT trim (rear bumper, dual exhaust, hood, wheels). Ive been it in many-a-times and it feels like a pretty quick car. I'm almost positive he would rape my auto LO3 but i wasnt sure. he beats on his car whereas i ***** mine so its always hard to judge...

The only mods that will be on my car when it comes out in the spring will be a catback, open element, and maybe a hi-flo cat.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2006 | 03:58 PM
  #2  
leeperryracing's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Car: cleanest '86 sport coupe around!!
Engine: 355ci twin 66mm turbos on e85
Transmission: built rmvb th400 w/ t-brake
Axle/Gears: 3.23
They are TURDS!
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2006 | 04:13 PM
  #3  
92Forumla's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, Florida
Car: 2017 2.0T Camaro / 1989 IROC
Engine: LTG / L98
Transmission: Tremec TR 3060 / 700R-4
Re: 1999 3.8 Mustang??

Originally posted by a mack6
Just wondering how fast they are... My friend has had one for a long time...but he has no times on it or anything. Its a 5 speed 3.8. Its got a flowmaster catback, CAI, and 3.73's. Its also decked out in GT trim (rear bumper, dual exhaust, hood, wheels). Ive been it in many-a-times and it feels like a pretty quick car. I'm almost positive he would rape my auto LO3 but i wasnt sure. he beats on his car whereas i ***** mine so its always hard to judge...

The only mods that will be on my car when it comes out in the spring will be a catback, open element, and maybe a hi-flo cat.
I think he's got you beat, but im not sure. My friend has one and with the 5-speed it wasnt that bad of a slouch.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2006 | 04:21 PM
  #4  
gatoRS92's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: Hilliard, OH
Car: '92 Camaro RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 open diff
With the small amount of mods to my LO3, I absolutely destroyed a 3.8 Mustang. If you get a catback and open element, you have a decent shot. With those gears he has, make sure you don't do a short race because he probably has the advantage at lower speeds.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2006 | 05:46 PM
  #5  
25thmustang's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Theres a night and day difference between a 94-98 3.8 and a 99-04 3.8. The 99+ cars could be mid to low 15s with good drivers (my friends bone stocker went 15.4 at a crap track) so my guess with his mods is low 15s!
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2006 | 05:52 PM
  #6  
gatoRS92's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: Hilliard, OH
Car: '92 Camaro RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 open diff
Originally posted by 25thmustang
Theres a night and day difference between a 94-98 3.8 and a 99-04 3.8. The 99+ cars could be mid to low 15s with good drivers (my friends bone stocker went 15.4 at a crap track) so my guess with his mods is low 15s!
Ah yes, thank you for pointing this out. I didn't even think about the fact that the 99+ 3.8 was much improved over the previous 3.8s. I believe the V6 Mustang I destroyed with my LO3 was a '96-'98.

I never raced the 99+ 3.8, although I did race an '05 Mustang 4.0 and stayed right with him in a race to about 50.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2006 | 10:46 PM
  #7  
Wind Charger's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: Maine
Car: 1988 GTA TRANS AM, 1986 TRANS AM
Engine: L98, 5.7 TPI reborn, comp cam/heads maybe HSR this spring 5.0 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
I thought they were 4.6's
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2006 | 11:07 PM
  #8  
a mack6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh & Allentown PA
Car: 1992 Z28 (Heritage Edition)
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Posi
Originally posted by Wind Charger
I thought they were 4.6's
The GTs were...I am talking about the base V6 mustang.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2006 | 11:08 PM
  #9  
Wind Charger's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: Maine
Car: 1988 GTA TRANS AM, 1986 TRANS AM
Engine: L98, 5.7 TPI reborn, comp cam/heads maybe HSR this spring 5.0 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
oh yeah, right. My bad
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 07:24 PM
  #10  
redcamaro1989's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: spartanburg, sc
Car: 1989 rs RIP, 96 grand marquis, 92rs
Engine: LO3, 4.6l, L03
Transmission: 700r4, AODE,700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73, 3.08, 2.73
i think you would take him. i test drove a 01 v6 today with exaust and headers and my lo3 would have taken
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 08:19 PM
  #11  
DuffMan's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 202
Likes: 1
From: Temecula, CA
Car: '99 Cobra
Engine: 4.6 DOHC 32V
Transmission: T-45
Axle/Gears: 4.10
I think if you have to worry about a V6 stang, stock or modded, you need to really step-up the power game

Eric
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 11:19 PM
  #12  
Wind Charger's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: Maine
Car: 1988 GTA TRANS AM, 1986 TRANS AM
Engine: L98, 5.7 TPI reborn, comp cam/heads maybe HSR this spring 5.0 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
good point
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 07:26 AM
  #13  
wheelstandin87's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Waldorf,MD
Car: 87, 88 and 89 Iroc-Z
Engine: 305, and 350
Transmission: 700R, and T-5
Axle/Gears: 3:23 POSI
the 99 v6 is only alittle slower than the 97 non pi that i raced and thats kinda sad becuase the non pi had catback and offroad h pipe.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 02:34 PM
  #14  
banditfirebird's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: north carolina
Car: 04 Dodge SRT-4, 91 formula firebird
Engine: 2.4 L4, 305 tbi
Transmission: 5-speed, 700 r4
There slow as heck! we almost beat a 05 V6 in my friends 96 sentra with about 250k miles on it. it only beat us by like a car length. you got it!
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 08:26 PM
  #15  
DuffMan's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 202
Likes: 1
From: Temecula, CA
Car: '99 Cobra
Engine: 4.6 DOHC 32V
Transmission: T-45
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Originally posted by wheelstandin87
the 99 v6 is only alittle slower than the 97 non pi that i raced and thats kinda sad becuase the non pi had catback and offroad h pipe.
You really can't gauge a mustang's performance by the 96-98 cars - its pathetic really. I think it had a head gasket problem from the factory

Oh yea, its just a 2V SOHC, i forgot

Eric
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2006 | 09:32 PM
  #16  
ZQ8Dude's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
99+ V6s are weak, imho they are the best to race, because so many of the owners around here are young/dumb teenagers who think that their exhaust has made them the fastest car around....lol
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
customblackbird
Power Adders
71
Oct 1, 2015 04:30 PM
ndndndnd
Transmissions and Drivetrain
4
Sep 28, 2015 08:00 AM
okfoz
History / Originality
18
Sep 22, 2015 03:37 PM
F-body-fan
History / Originality
27
Sep 17, 2015 12:16 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:28 AM.