67 Firebird vs. 90 Trans Am vs. 68 Mustang
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: north texas
Car: 1990 Trans Am
Engine: LB9 305...350 or 383 coming soon
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.42
67 Firebird vs. 90 Trans Am vs. 68 Mustang
There are two kids at my school who are interested in racing and here's what they got:
1967 Firebird w/ 327 Chevy, Hedman Headers, Flowmasters, no cats, and a 4 spd manual
I dont know too much about the mustang but this guy is extremely talented with mechanical stuff and cars. Right now he has the fiberglass body kit from Gone In 60 Seconds on it. He just swapped from a 3 speed to a 5 speed linked to an I6. Not sure of displacement but i think it's pretty beastly. From the way it sounds I'm sure he has headers and mufflers only.
Coming soon are SLP headers, custom tuned chip, and whatever else I can find cheap. Right now my cars all stock but what would it take for me to run with these guys?
1967 Firebird w/ 327 Chevy, Hedman Headers, Flowmasters, no cats, and a 4 spd manual
I dont know too much about the mustang but this guy is extremely talented with mechanical stuff and cars. Right now he has the fiberglass body kit from Gone In 60 Seconds on it. He just swapped from a 3 speed to a 5 speed linked to an I6. Not sure of displacement but i think it's pretty beastly. From the way it sounds I'm sure he has headers and mufflers only.
Coming soon are SLP headers, custom tuned chip, and whatever else I can find cheap. Right now my cars all stock but what would it take for me to run with these guys?
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 1
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
I think the firebird will blow you away,, you might either run online with the stang or get your *** kicked.. The peanut cam and the auto are holding you back.. then your displacement isn;t helping either.
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: north texas
Car: 1990 Trans Am
Engine: LB9 305...350 or 383 coming soon
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.42
After bolt ons like intake, runners, headers, catback, chip, where do you think I would stand? And after that what about different rear gears, torque converter, pot and polish heads and camshaft?
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 1
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
your not an Iroc so the cai will definitely help, the camshaft will help you the most.. runners I really wouldn't bother with.. Headers help too..
I would need more specs on the stang but it would definitely help with the firebird.. Most likely the 68' bird will be you biggest problem cause it can rev to hell and back and its a v8. The stang you should get pretty hard off the line, but without and idea on how much power he is pushing I have no clue. Remeber they weigh as much as a foxbody.
I would need more specs on the stang but it would definitely help with the firebird.. Most likely the 68' bird will be you biggest problem cause it can rev to hell and back and its a v8. The stang you should get pretty hard off the line, but without and idea on how much power he is pushing I have no clue. Remeber they weigh as much as a foxbody.
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
From: Clearfield,Utah
Car: 1987 IROC, 1989 IROC
Engine: built 305, stock 305 tpi
Transmission: Corvette 700r4, t-5
Axle/Gears: 4.10 posi, 3.08 posi
so the mustang is a I6? if so i think you got him but i think the firebird will blow you out of the water.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 1
From: Brighton, CO
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
Originally Posted by Mcdamit
your not an Iroc so the cai will definitely help, the camshaft will help you the most.. runners I really wouldn't bother with.. Headers help too..
I would need more specs on the stang but it would definitely help with the firebird.. Most likely the 68' bird will be you biggest problem cause it can rev to hell and back and its a v8. The stang you should get pretty hard off the line, but without and idea on how much power he is pushing I have no clue. Remeber they weigh as much as a foxbody.
I would need more specs on the stang but it would definitely help with the firebird.. Most likely the 68' bird will be you biggest problem cause it can rev to hell and back and its a v8. The stang you should get pretty hard off the line, but without and idea on how much power he is pushing I have no clue. Remeber they weigh as much as a foxbody.
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 1
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
Originally Posted by urbanhunter44
Being an IROC has nothing to do with his intake. All TPI engines (and some V6s) had the over the radiator snorkel.
I thought firebirds had an airbox?
I know the procedures are very different when installing cold air.

----------
Originally Posted by Nate86
Haha... those I6 Mustangs are a joke. You'll take him no problem.
with 190hp?
edit oh **** your right i thought they had 260hp... just make sure its a 6ixer
Last edited by Mcdamit; Apr 24, 2006 at 11:52 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Car: 1992 Firebird
Engine: 3.1L V6
Transmission: 5 Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Peg Leg
Nope, not a V6, they were a I6. Im not exactly sure when they started putting in the V6, but the I6 was in the 1967-1969 Firebird/Camaro/Mustangs fgor the base model for sure.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 1
From: Pensacola, FL
Car: 1999 Saturn SL2
Engine: 4 cylinder
Transmission: 4-speed automatic
Originally Posted by Mcdamit
I thought firebirds had an airbox?
I know the procedures are very different when installing cold air.

----------
with 190hp?
edit oh **** your right i thought they had 260hp... just make sure its a 6ixer
I know the procedures are very different when installing cold air.

----------
with 190hp?
edit oh **** your right i thought they had 260hp... just make sure its a 6ixer
Net, on the other hand, used full exhaust and all accessories, 77°F and 32% humidity.
There's quite a difference between the two, sometimes increasing horsepower up to 25% from gross to net. There's no way to really convert gross to net, since different testing methods were used on almost every engine, but we can conclude that those engines actually made a lot less power if we were to use the net rating system in effect today.
The '68 Mustang had the option of a 115 HP I6 or a 120 HP I6. I'd guess that neither of them probably make over 100 HP based on the net rating system (completely stock that is). I can't say how much room for improvement there is by doing mods--I don't like Mustangs and I don't have any form of a six cylinder engine--but I can't imagine mods will make a huge difference.
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: north texas
Car: 1990 Trans Am
Engine: LB9 305...350 or 383 coming soon
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.42
I wish I could tell you more about the mustang but I just don't know anything else about. Except that the kid has a 427 sitting in his garage
. He doesnt want to put it in because of gas prices. Needless to say I would be screwed... But I also know that he completely rebuilt the I6 with his dad. The whole family are just mechanical geniuses. I thought the bird would stomp me but wasnt sure about the stang. thanks for everyones input!
. He doesnt want to put it in because of gas prices. Needless to say I would be screwed... But I also know that he completely rebuilt the I6 with his dad. The whole family are just mechanical geniuses. I thought the bird would stomp me but wasnt sure about the stang. thanks for everyones input! Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, Florida
Car: 1992 Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.7 LT1
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.23's
I got a friend at school with a 68' stang I6. Things slow as hell, Im sure a suburban can beat it. I think you should beat those cars as well, I think you have a weight advantage on the bird. And unless the motor is rebuilt Im sure its a POS by now.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 1
From: Brighton, CO
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
Originally Posted by Mcdamit
I thought firebirds had an airbox?

----------
Originally Posted by cheese_kake
I got a friend at school with a 68' stang I6. Things slow as hell, Im sure a suburban can beat it. I think you should beat those cars as well, I think you have a weight advantage on the bird. And unless the motor is rebuilt Im sure its a POS by now.
Last edited by urbanhunter44; Apr 24, 2006 at 10:02 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, Florida
Car: 1992 Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.7 LT1
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.23's
Originally Posted by urbanhunter44
I misunderstood your first post, my mistake, you were correct 
----------
Don't rag on suburbans.. my mom's '98 can move out


----------
Don't rag on suburbans.. my mom's '98 can move out

Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: th350
Originally Posted by cheese_kake
I got a friend at school with a 68' stang I6. Things slow as hell, Im sure a suburban can beat it. I think you should beat those cars as well, I think you have a weight advantage on the bird. And unless the motor is rebuilt Im sure its a POS by now.
Well since the 67 firebird never came with the 327, i would geaus that it was rebuilt when it was put in.
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Car: 1974 Chevrolet Pro Street Pickup
Engine: Built 454
Transmission: T-400
Axle/Gears: 4.10 soon to be 3.08
Originally Posted by Necro
Well since the 67 firebird never came with the 327, i would geaus that it was rebuilt when it was put in.
Maybe he was just generalizing. The 326 was a great motor as well, and not too uncommon.
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, Florida
Car: 1992 Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.7 LT1
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.23's
Originally Posted by mrpopo573
326 CI
Maybe he was just generalizing. The 326 was a great motor as well, and not too uncommon.
Maybe he was just generalizing. The 326 was a great motor as well, and not too uncommon.
. I used to have a 65 Le Mans 326ci. Decent motor, not too bad. But I later put in a 389. But even if it is a true 327 chevy motor that doesnt mean it was rebuilt. I know alot of people just find junked cars or any motor they can find for a quick fix for their joe dirt cars, around here at least I see it alot. Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 1
From: Pensacola, FL
Car: 1999 Saturn SL2
Engine: 4 cylinder
Transmission: 4-speed automatic
Yeah, he said a Chevy 327. I don't know why anyone would ruin an extremely rare and classic car by dropping a non-original engine in it like that. I hope he meant the Poncho 326. Those things were pretty badass just like the Chevy 327.
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Car: 1989 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Posi
The Mustang will be TOTAL annihilation unless something wierd is going on with it. If they are as bad as the 60s Camaro I6 motors (0-60 in 14 seconds), he probably won't have reached the 1/8th mark by the time you guys are finished. It will be "football field"-lengths, I tell you.
As for the Firebird, regardless of 326 or 327, if he can hook at all, I think you're in trouble there. If he had an auto it would be your victory, but with the 4 speed, I think he's got you. It could be close though. 60s smallblocks for the most part are pretty weak compared to modern smallblocks, even an LB9. The HP numbers are a lot higher, but they were using gross ratings and not net ratings, which makes a pretty decent difference.
As for the Firebird, regardless of 326 or 327, if he can hook at all, I think you're in trouble there. If he had an auto it would be your victory, but with the 4 speed, I think he's got you. It could be close though. 60s smallblocks for the most part are pretty weak compared to modern smallblocks, even an LB9. The HP numbers are a lot higher, but they were using gross ratings and not net ratings, which makes a pretty decent difference.
Last edited by 80smetalfan; Apr 26, 2006 at 03:43 PM.
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: buffalo
Car: 85 camaro
Engine: 327
Transmission: 350, 6200 stall, w/ brake
Axle/Gears: soon to be strange 5.14
if its an old stock, tired 327, you've got him. but a 327 in good tune is a fast small block,and can make alot of RPM.
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, Florida
Car: 1992 Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.7 LT1
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.23's
Originally Posted by bitchin85camaro
if its an old stock, tired 327, you've got him. but a 327 in good tune is a fast small block,and can make alot of RPM.
But, I think there is a good chance you will beat him.
Also the ability to rev high doesn't mean that it's going to win you a race anyways, especially on the street where a good launch is everything(lower power bands). High revving engines such as autocrossers are built to sustain high engine speeds so their exit speed on turns will still be in the higher rpms where the engine is built to produce the power, among other things. Sorry kind of off topic.
Have fun taking them down.
Last edited by Inwo; Apr 29, 2006 at 01:55 PM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: th350
Originally Posted by Nate86
Yeah, he said a Chevy 327. I don't know why anyone would ruin an extremely rare and classic car by dropping a non-original engine in it like that. I hope he meant the Poncho 326. Those things were pretty badass just like the Chevy 327.
Just cause the car might not have the original engine in it dosent mean the car is ruined. Personaly if i had an original 326 firebird i would take the motor out to put a built small block in it, so i could save the stock 326 incase i ever sold the car to get more money for it.
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: north texas
Car: 1990 Trans Am
Engine: LB9 305...350 or 383 coming soon
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.42
new addition
Alright, I'v got another car that needs to be thrown into the mix. This kid just got a 1981 Camaro Z28, completely stock. I asked him what kind of motor it had and he said" I dont know , i think a V6..." I didnt belive him beacause its a Z28. He seriously didnt know the difference between the two... What chances have I got with it?
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, Florida
Car: 1992 Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.7 LT1
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.23's
If its a Z28 it was a 350, low compression but made 190hp, good torque tho. If it was a four speed it might be decent, but you should take him as long as your car is in good tune and you can drive.
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
From: Goldsboro, NC
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI L98
Originally Posted by longhorn450
Alright, I'v got another car that needs to be thrown into the mix. This kid just got a 1981 Camaro Z28, completely stock. I asked him what kind of motor it had and he said" I dont know , i think a V6..." I didnt belive him beacause its a Z28. He seriously didnt know the difference between the two... What chances have I got with it?
a good one if you tell him the gas is the pedal on the left. sounds like he wouldnt know the difference.
You should be able to get him tho.
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, Florida
Car: 1992 Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.7 LT1
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.23's
Ya, I didnt realize that his Formula was an auto till just now, if his Z is in good tune it will be a good race. Oh ya anomaly great avatar "NEXT THING YOU KNOW YOUR LIVING IN A VAN DOWN BY THE RIVER"
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, Florida
Car: 1992 Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.7 LT1
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.23's
HAHA, yes I too thought this was very strange and at first I thought someone had cracked my account password. But if you read below it, it says that it was last updated by INWO , a MODERATOR, they have the ability to add to a persons post. They do this so that if someone basically just re-iterates what was already perviously said, they will add it to the original post, to add to continuity and flow of a thread, instead of having 30 posts that all basically say the same thing.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 1
From: Pensacola, FL
Car: 1999 Saturn SL2
Engine: 4 cylinder
Transmission: 4-speed automatic
Originally Posted by Necro
Just cause the car might not have the original engine in it dosent mean the car is ruined. Personaly if i had an original 326 firebird i would take the motor out to put a built small block in it, so i could save the stock 326 incase i ever sold the car to get more money for it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992 Trans Am
History / Originality
27
May 10, 2023 07:19 PM
colton_carlson
Firebirds for Sale
7
Mar 8, 2019 12:21 PM
1992 Trans Am
Exterior Parts for Sale
5
Apr 4, 2016 12:50 PM





