Old Chevy Performance vs New Chevy Performance (IROC-Z vs Cobalt SS)
Thread Starter
Moderator




Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 70
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 427 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt / 3.73 TrueTrac
Old Chevy Performance vs New Chevy Performance (IROC-Z vs Cobalt SS)

IROC-Z = L98, Hooker 2055's/Ypipe, stock catback, 80 series muffler, 2.77 Posi rear.

Cobalt SS = Supercharged 2.0 Ecotec (stock).
Race from a dig: We didn't bother, we all know what the outcome would have been.
Race from 30 mph: Got a nice hard downshift into first, yanked him, shifted into second, and he didn't gain anything. Got him by a little more than half a car.
Thruway race: I knew I was in trouble. The Cobalt SS's put close to 220 to the wheels, trap at around 97 mph, and make power all the way to 6500 rpm.
Race from 40 mph: Crappy low downshift into second, he yanked me right away. Race ended with me at his door.
Race from 45 mph: Same result, but I did a little better.
Race from 55 mph: Got a nice downshift into my powerband, yanked him by about a foot, and it stood that way all the way to 90 mph.
Over all I'm very pleased. TPI + Thruway racing = no no. But my car held its own. Hearing the comment "Holy sh*t, your car sounds mean as f*ck" was a nice ending to the night.
Now am I happy I have 2.77's when it comes to thruway racing? Or would it still be better to have 3.27's?
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: Streamwood, IL
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: TPI 5.7 L
Transmission: 4L60 w/Vigilante 2,400 Stall
Axle/Gears: Girdled 10 bolt/3.23's
You'd still be happier with the 3.27's. Second gear would benefit greatly from more axle gear. Launching might take some getting use to.
I had a go with a SC'd Cobalt SS a couple weeks back. From a dig, I raped him. From a roll, several cars. He said his best time at our tractionless local track was a 14.8 @ 98.
I had a go with a SC'd Cobalt SS a couple weeks back. From a dig, I raped him. From a roll, several cars. He said his best time at our tractionless local track was a 14.8 @ 98.
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Depew, NY
Car: 85 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
those things are not to be messed wiht, many upgrades available including intense stage5 which is rought 275hp and trq.
congrats on the win against a rare seen stock one.
congrats on the win against a rare seen stock one.
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Monterrey MEX
Car: Camaro IROC-Z 1987
Engine: 454 BIG BLOCK
Transmission: TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 gears Posi trac
i used to have a 2.73 gears on my roc and now with 3.42 gears got a lot better in response to 1/4 and street racing
obviously it dnt run as it use to on hwy
obviously it dnt run as it use to on hwy
Thread Starter
Moderator




Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 70
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 427 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt / 3.73 TrueTrac
Originally Posted by stu
Stage 5 is only 50 more hp? LOL, that's pathetic. 

I've only read about the GM kits. A GM stage 2 will take the Cobalt into the 13's.
Last edited by IROCThe5.7L; Jul 20, 2006 at 12:40 PM.
Trending Topics
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
From: Hammond IN
Car: 1989 RS convertible
Engine: 305 TBI LO3
Transmission: TH-700-R4
Axle/Gears: stock axles 3.73 LSD
i have 3.73's and i could rape most stock N/A cars from a dig but from like 55 i doubt it. lol. good race though
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,757
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally Posted by stu
On a factory boosted car, 75 hp increase should be stage 1.
For a turbo car I would agree but that would be a lot to ask for a supercharged 4 cylinder. The new turbo ecotecs come out soon in place of the SC ones and you should see monster numbers from those.
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: Streamwood, IL
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: TPI 5.7 L
Transmission: 4L60 w/Vigilante 2,400 Stall
Axle/Gears: Girdled 10 bolt/3.23's
Originally Posted by ShiftyCapone
For a turbo car I would agree but that would be a lot to ask for a supercharged 4 cylinder. The new turbo ecotecs come out soon in place of the SC ones and you should see monster numbers from those.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 1
From: Brighton, CO
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
To answer the original question, lower gears (numerically higher) help EVERYWHERE in the powerband. It's a total myth that "they'll slow you down on the highway" and "they're only good for the 1/4." You would have pulled him better on the highway with better gears. If you're upgrading, I'd recommend at least 3.42s, they'll give you decent MPG still and it won't take the TPI out of it's powerband.
The only thing that limits a lower geared car on the highway is that the top speed becomes RPM limited.
The only thing that limits a lower geared car on the highway is that the top speed becomes RPM limited.
Thread Starter
Moderator




Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 70
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 427 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt / 3.73 TrueTrac
Originally Posted by vampiroc
"Stage HSR" your IROC and you won't need to worry about that 4800 RPM wall that keeps your from pulling top end
You know, I've actually read a few times a stock L98 is not really going to see a big benefit with a HSR. Modded of course it will though.
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Car: ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42
2.77's are not too bad cause the L98 makes a lotta torque, and plus you got a crazy 3.06 first gear ratio to get you out of the hole. Id get 3.4x gears, with some traction though...wait i already did.
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina!
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 406 sbc with Trick Flow heads, Hook
Transmission: Pro built 700R4
Axle/Gears: waiting on a new rear!!!!
opps
Last edited by lilbowilson; Jul 23, 2006 at 07:35 PM.
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina!
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 406 sbc with Trick Flow heads, Hook
Transmission: Pro built 700R4
Axle/Gears: waiting on a new rear!!!!
Originally Posted by IROCThe5.7L
You know, I've actually read a few times a stock L98 is not really going to see a big benefit with a HSR. Modded of course it will though.
On my 327 it reacted like a ray of sunshine with a stock 305 tune put in by my 950 commander. My iroc just leaves my 95 Firebird formula LT1 in the dust, they both have stock gears.
Originally Posted by IROCThe5.7L
You know, I've actually read a few times a stock L98 is not really going to see a big benefit with a HSR. Modded of course it will though.
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, OH, USA
Car: '91 Z28, '13 Civic EX-L
Engine: 355 LT1, 1.8 I4
Transmission: T56, 5spd auto
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.42(as long as no breaky)
Originally Posted by vampiroc
Read from who? I had one it made a world of difference. TPI isn't good for crap, on any engine. It provides support for larger upgrades which I did later. Don't listen to the other guy ^, if you're putting an HSR on anything smaller than a 350 you are an idiot.
Supreme Member

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Car: 2006 Corvette
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
the stock heads and cam are more of a restriction than the TPI intake. the completed TPI assembly actually flows more air than the stock intake ports on the heads do. then theres that wimpy cam...
all in all the HSR is a better intake that a TPI setup, but youre not going to gain anything just from swapping intakes as long as the stock heads/cam are in place
all in all the HSR is a better intake that a TPI setup, but youre not going to gain anything just from swapping intakes as long as the stock heads/cam are in place
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1Aauto
Sponsored Vendors
6
Sep 13, 2017 12:58 PM
1Aauto
Sponsored Vendors
0
Sep 2, 2015 01:35 PM






