Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

88 trans am gta vs. 93 5.0 foxbody

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 11, 2006 | 11:54 PM
  #1  
88trans_am_gta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: illinois
Car: '88 gta
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
88 trans am gta vs. 93 5.0 foxbody

i just recently bought a gta and already got a race lined up against a friend with a 5.0. ive kinda got a lot riding on this race, so im just wondering who ya guys think would take it.

ive got a 350 tpi, with edelbrock tes headers, aluminum pulleys, high perf. runners and around 94,000 miles. im not sure if the gears in the rear end are 3.08 or 3.23 since the guy i bought the car from wasnt sure. its got the stock 700r4 trans.

he's got a 5.0 with bbk headers, a bigger fuel rail, flowmaster cat-back and muffler, ram-air intake.

thanks in advance.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 12:21 AM
  #2  
brodyscamaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
i say he will prolly get you...
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 12:23 AM
  #3  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
it will be a closer race.... if he's a stick that is... stick should have the advantage with better gearin...so if he could drive, i bet he might slightly pull on you from a dig.

from a roll it will be closer.

guy i know took a bone stock lx to 13.9s.... he drives the crap outta that car!! never heard a L98 go faster than 14.3 but i think thats cuz its an auto.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 12:32 AM
  #4  
88trans_am_gta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: illinois
Car: '88 gta
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
yea, he's got a auto. and it more than likely will be from a standstill. ive given thought to putting in a jet stage 1 chip, but idk. havent heard much about them though. thanks guys.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 12:34 AM
  #5  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
i'd save your money and wouldnt buy that chip.

if he's an auto, you should beat him good
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 12:42 AM
  #6  
88trans_am_gta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: illinois
Car: '88 gta
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
awesome. just saved some money torwards a new throttle body there.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 02:15 AM
  #7  
1991CamaroRslow's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 0
From: Cincinatti OH
Car: 1991 L03 700r4 RS
Engine: 1987 WS6 Trans AM Lb2
Transmission: Th350 red neck Performance 3k stall
Axle/Gears: 95 Mustang 8.8 built with 3.73s
I wouldn't waste your money on a throttle body either, if you want something that'll make a difference get a new base (Edelbrock, Accel, or the best of all a Holley Stealth Ram if you don't need to pass emmisions). Drop the Tstat to a 180 and wire the fans up to a switch, and follow the rest of the free mods listed in the tech articles. This should put you on par, or ahead of him.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 12:15 PM
  #8  
vwdave's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: miami, florida
A great mod is putting a new Torque converter in. I paid $100 for a rebuilt corvette converter that supposedly stalls at 2500 (mine is 2200.) Car takes off hard now...when it hooks.

You can also bump the timing to maybe 6*. Depending on what octane you run. I was able to run 89 with 6* with .5* of timing retard under heavy load in the hot florida summer with the AC on. But every car is different.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 12:43 PM
  #9  
1991CamaroRslow's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 0
From: Cincinatti OH
Car: 1991 L03 700r4 RS
Engine: 1987 WS6 Trans AM Lb2
Transmission: Th350 red neck Performance 3k stall
Axle/Gears: 95 Mustang 8.8 built with 3.73s
The vette stall, or a 95 up 2wd 4.3 S10 stall are both the same and are a great upgrade.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 02:51 PM
  #10  
Demon355's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 4
From: Toronto, Ont
Yes I suggest the stall as your next mod as well...

TB don't do much unless you make 500+...
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 03:17 PM
  #11  
rocluvr0013's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 765
Likes: 1
From: Chico/Antioch California
Car: 1989 iroc Z Hardtop
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
+1

Your throttle body is not a restriction yet. So you will gain VERY little if at all.

The intake manifold itself is much more of a restriction at this point.


If his 5.0 is an auto you SHOULD smoke him. My fully optioned iroc run circles around my friends 5.0's...
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 03:22 PM
  #12  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
stock timing is 6 degrees base.....i run 10 now and think it might actually be slowing me down. i'm gonna mess around with it sometime whenever i get the rear end back together


i would say save ur money and put it into the trans by puttin in a shift kit and converter. biggest bang for the buck ever. u'll go from 1.9x 60s and low 14's to 1.7-1.8x 60s and 13.7-13.8s.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 04:02 PM
  #13  
mustbeatmopar's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: boone grove
Car: 1991 pontiac GTA, and a1992 pontiac firebird
Engine: 5.7 l98, and a 3.1 for now
Transmission: 700-r4s
Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ
never heard a L98 go faster than 14.3 but i think thats cuz its an auto.
You've never heard of an L98 go faster than 14.3? thats funny, cause mine went 14.25, with some slip, and I have a huge, heavy, sub box, probably could get just inside the 13's with it out. My car is stock, and it runs faster than 14.3...
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 04:34 PM
  #14  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
decent! good time man. i felt these cars with drag radials bone stock are capable of low low 14's with full stock 1200rpm brake stall LOL
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 05:03 PM
  #15  
1991CamaroRslow's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 0
From: Cincinatti OH
Car: 1991 L03 700r4 RS
Engine: 1987 WS6 Trans AM Lb2
Transmission: Th350 red neck Performance 3k stall
Axle/Gears: 95 Mustang 8.8 built with 3.73s
My bolt on 87 350 TPI with the smaller cam did a 13.8 on ET Streets. That was with long tube headers, duals, gutted stock air box, and misc bolt ons (MSD box, K&N filters and such). That was with right at 200,000 on the ticker. Biggest mod done was a TH350 with a 3000rpm stall.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 09:15 PM
  #16  
vwdave's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: miami, florida
Originally Posted by 1991CamaroRslow
The vette stall, or a 95 up 2wd 4.3 S10 stall are both the same and are a great upgrade.
I am pretty sure they are not the same. I've had both and the corvette converter feels ALOT looser. Plus I gained ~200rpm stall speed.

And is it 6* stock? I might be at 8* then. It has been a year since the car was taken apart.

Another good/free mod is gutting the air boxes. Just cut the bottoms out of the biotch. Every little bit counts. You can also port your plenum. TPIS does this for $100.

The biggest problem I encountered was valve float. Over 3500 my car had nothing. I swapped in a set of Comp 981 springs and LT4 retainers. They are a great upgrade and they are very cheap. ($90 for both.)
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 09:53 PM
  #17  
Pumpin306's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Car: 91 firebird
Engine: 3.1
Transmission: stock auto
Axle/Gears: stock
is it a coupe or a gt??? cause if its a GT.. i think you would take him... hes an auto, if hes got the stock rear end, its only a 2:73 gear... the only 5.0's that were the quickest in bone stock form were the 87-88 models due to the fact that they had speed density... the 89-93's had mass air and the 93's had about 10 less hp and didnt have forged internals.. but i say that you could most likely take him
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 04:49 AM
  #18  
1991CamaroRslow's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 0
From: Cincinatti OH
Car: 1991 L03 700r4 RS
Engine: 1987 WS6 Trans AM Lb2
Transmission: Th350 red neck Performance 3k stall
Axle/Gears: 95 Mustang 8.8 built with 3.73s
I swapped in a set of Elgin cheapo 110 seat pressure springs, HUGE help but my springs had around 200,000 on them so they were WAAAAAAY overdue. Don't pay a dime to get your plenum ported, get a die grinder (electric or air) and some carbide bits and do it yourself, my plenum was my first adventure with porting and I did it with a dremel tool, tackled the lower intake with an air grinder at a friends house (there's big gains to be made in the lower intake). Now for a question, I've heard that the early 5.0's had forged internals but I've also heard they have hypereutectic internals, which is correct? The limiter for the 5.0's doesn't seem to be the rods or pistons, but rather the block but that's a different discussion, I'm just wanting to know what's up with the pistons, rods, and crank. If you mod your car for this race you should post up what you do to it, and if you do race please don't forget to fill us in on the results. Once again good luck!
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 05:06 AM
  #19  
Pumpin306's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Car: 91 firebird
Engine: 3.1
Transmission: stock auto
Axle/Gears: stock
the 93-95 5.0's were hypereutectic. i know that 85-92's were forged... but im not too sure of what was before those years
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 05:34 AM
  #20  
rocluvr0013's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 765
Likes: 1
From: Chico/Antioch California
Car: 1989 iroc Z Hardtop
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
Originally Posted by Pumpin306
the 93-95 5.0's were hypereutectic. i know that 85-92's were forged... but im not too sure of what was before those years
Interesting ill hafta pick up a late 80 point and find some boost...

Reply
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 12:08 PM
  #21  
25thmustang's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
pre 93 were forged, 93 were hypers (actually didnt hurt the car at all, and could still handle the same power you throw at the block) and the rating for 93 was less because Ford changed how they rated the cars. The 93s made the exact same power as the 87-92 cars.

An auto and stock gears are his biggest crutch, so you should take him easily! Also autos could have 2.73, 3.08 or even 3.27 gears stock... to let you guys know!
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 01:59 PM
  #22  
88trans_am_gta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: illinois
Car: '88 gta
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
awesome guys, thanks for all the replys. he's got 3.73 or 3.75 gears in the back. i cant remember the exact number as of right now, but i could find out in a lil while.

whatever they are though, until he hits fourth gear, you hear the engine high revving, but nothins happening. and yea, its a 5.0 gt automatic.

and yea, yesterday i was reading through the boards and saw that a new throttle body would be pointless for right now.

thanks again guys.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 04:28 PM
  #23  
88trans_am_gta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: illinois
Car: '88 gta
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
take that back, their 3.25 gears in his car.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 09:30 PM
  #24  
1989GTATransAm's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,859
Likes: 14
From: Cypress, California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
Your 1988GTA should have the Borg Warner nine bolt rear end with 3.27 gears if it has the factory read end in it.

Last edited by 1989GTATransAm; Oct 17, 2006 at 08:48 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2006 | 07:19 PM
  #25  
25thmustang's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally Posted by 88trans_am_gta
take that back, their 3.25 gears in his car.
They couldnt get 3.25s, maybe 3.27s or 3.55s?
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2006 | 05:13 PM
  #26  
88trans_am_gta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: illinois
Car: '88 gta
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
sorry, im a putz. they are 3.27 gears in his car.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 10:26 PM
  #27  
88trans_am_gta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: illinois
Car: '88 gta
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
Re: 88 trans am gta vs. 93 5.0 foxbody

well, i finally got a chance to race the kid. it took a while, lol.
the first run we went from 50 to 100. i pulled ahead from the start and started putting distance between us. the second one was from 45 to 75 because we started coming into town. he pulled ahead for a second, but i managed to come back and pass him and held his nose at the beginning of my door.
next time we're going from a dig.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2007 | 01:15 AM
  #28  
subliminal's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
From: Port St Lucie, FL
Re: 88 trans am gta vs. 93 5.0 foxbody

Roll racing is for pansies.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2007 | 01:28 AM
  #29  
2tonedmaro89's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
From: oviedo, FL
Car: '91 RS
Engine: 5.0L gross *** tbi
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: 88 trans am gta vs. 93 5.0 foxbody

if you take him from a role your gonna kill him from a light or watever if you hook
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2007 | 06:11 AM
  #30  
25thmustang's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: 88 trans am gta vs. 93 5.0 foxbody

Originally Posted by subliminal
Roll racing is for pansies.
I kind of agree, but racing from a dig in a 14 second automatic car is not that much better if you ask me.

If you won from a roll you will win from a dig.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2007 | 03:31 PM
  #31  
88trans_am_gta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: illinois
Car: '88 gta
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
Re: 88 trans am gta vs. 93 5.0 foxbody

well, unfortunatly we were kinda on a highway so its damn near impossible to go from a stop with traffic behind ya.
im probably going to take the car to the track. id at least like to know the 1/4 time for it.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
colton_carlson
Firebirds for Sale
7
Mar 8, 2019 12:21 PM
The_Phoenix
Interior Parts for Sale
12
Feb 4, 2016 07:10 AM
Exxon Limited
Camaros Wanted
22
Dec 21, 2015 10:36 PM
gta power
Exhaust
1
Aug 13, 2015 06:15 AM
Exxon Limited
Camaros for Sale
2
Aug 9, 2015 08:13 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:51 PM.