Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 07:40 AM
  #1  
MaxxMitchell's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 713
Likes: 1
From: shawnee, ks
Car: 87 Firebird
Engine: 5.3 76mm
Transmission: Rossler TH400, PTC converter
Axle/Gears: Strange 12bolt, 3.08s
SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

http://s12.photobucket.com/albums/a2...ractionfun.flv

Granted he put down 415rwhp and is on worn out 325/50/15 MTs, but i like mine the best

An actual street race? He can pull me by about 2 cars from 0-120.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 09:07 AM
  #2  
C.M.Jones's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
From: colorado
Car: 84 Camaro, 90Firebird, 87Transmaro
Engine: custom 5.7, 5.0 , 6.5 Turbo diesel
Transmission: 4spd, auto, auto
Axle/Gears: 2.77 posi
Re: SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

a LS1 IS a SBC
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 12:39 PM
  #3  
8T9 BANDIT's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 0
From: NYTHIRDGEN
Car: 1989 T/A
Engine: PROCHARGED LB9
Transmission: FB BUILT 700r4 2200 stall
Axle/Gears: 10 BOLT EATON 3:73 POSI
Re: SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

Originally Posted by C.M.Jones
a LS1 IS a SBC
technocly its not..
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 02:23 PM
  #4  
Stephen's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

What is the 3rd gen running for exhaust?
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 03:22 PM
  #5  
brodyscamaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
Re: SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

Originally Posted by 8T9 BANDIT
technocly its not..
Technically it is a Generation III SBC.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 03:33 PM
  #6  
CashMunson's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
From: Ravenna, Ohio
Car: 87 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 408 LS
Transmission: LS 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt/3.70 Gears/TAP Girdle
Re: SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

Originally Posted by brodyscamaro
Technically it is a Generation III SBC.
it's a SBC with a slightly different design. it's still a sbc motor.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 04:44 PM
  #7  
SilentNight1647's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Re: SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

It is but it isn't traditionally the LS1 is not a Small Block, technically it is, take your pick either way they are both good mills. Nice burnouts by the way.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 09:19 PM
  #8  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,764
Likes: 562
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Re: SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

Originally Posted by SilentNight1647
It is but it isn't traditionally the LS1 is not a Small Block, technically it is, take your pick either way they are both good mills. Nice burnouts by the way.
It is still a small block. GM has 5 generations of small blocks now. The one we are most familiar with is the Gen I which ran from 1955 all the way to 2000 (for some models). The Gen II ran from 1992 to 2001 (in certain vans, only till '97 for the f-bod), the Gen III (LS1, LQ4, etc) went from 1997 till around 2004, the Gen IV went from 2005 till today and the Gen V is now making its appearance (new ZR1 motor, next version of the LS7). A "big" or "small" block is defined by bore spacing and not cubic inches or external dimensions. Every time GM significantly changes the architecture of a new V8 (oiling, valve angle, and bore spacing) it designates it as a new generation.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 10:55 PM
  #9  
84RIceEater's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
From: Kirkland Washington
Car: 84 Camaro. 90 integra
Engine: LG4, 1.6 (402hp)
Transmission: 700r4, JDM ITR w/ kaaz LSD
Re: SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

i thought anything past 400 is bigblock?
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 11:45 PM
  #10  
Stephen's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

Originally Posted by 84RIceEater
i thought anything past 400 is bigblock?
Small block vs big block has nothing to do with cubic inches. There were 396 big blocks, and 400 small blocks.

It has to do with the architecture and physical size.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2008 | 01:29 AM
  #11  
85Firebird350's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 629
Likes: 1
From: Worcester
Car: 1984 Firebird T/A
Engine: 406sbc
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
Re: SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

I have a 406 small block, bigger than a 396 BBC in cubes but not in bore spacing and stuff like mentioned before.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2008 | 12:02 PM
  #12  
MaxxMitchell's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 713
Likes: 1
From: shawnee, ks
Car: 87 Firebird
Engine: 5.3 76mm
Transmission: Rossler TH400, PTC converter
Axle/Gears: Strange 12bolt, 3.08s
Re: SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

Originally Posted by Stephen
What is the 3rd gen running for exhaust?
Hedman LTs, S extentions, H Pipe, True 2.5" duals to short bullets, no turn downs.

Going stock LT1 catback shortly with a 3" e cutout, and a 3.5" mid pipe with a dual 3" Y to 3.5".
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2008 | 05:13 PM
  #13  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,764
Likes: 562
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Re: SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

Originally Posted by 84RIceEater
i thought anything past 400 is bigblock?
As mentioned there are 400 big blocks and 400 small blocks. You hear the old statement all the time; "A hot rodder knows the difference between a 400 small block and 400 big block". If anyone ever asks you this question the answer is bore spacing. Yes the physical size of small blocks versus big blocks is different but that is not what separates them. Small blocks (of each generation) share the same bore to bore distance (center to center). Likewise for big blocks.

Despite the major differences between the generations I believe all Gen I, II, III and IV small blocks share a 4.4" bore spacing, thus deeming them "small blocks".
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2008 | 09:34 PM
  #14  
Street Lethal's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,536
Likes: 204
From: NYC / Jersey
Car: 1990 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Turbo 305 w/MS2
Transmission: 700R4
Re: SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

Originally Posted by 84RIceEater
i thought anything past 400 is bigblock?
Not at all....

Reply
Old Jan 6, 2008 | 04:13 AM
  #15  
DBLTKE's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 11
From: Aloha, Oregon
Car: '91 Camaro Z28, '85 Camaro Z28
Engine: LB9, LB9
Transmission: T5, 700r4
Axle/Gears: Eaton 3.73 Posi, 3.23 Posi
Re: SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

I was just about to mention the World Products Small block 454. You beat me to it. In fact just last weak I was reading a Car Craft article where they tested the World Products 454 small block against an equally built big block 454. Funny thing was that the small block produced higher peak horsepower and torque, and across a much broader power band.

That 4.4" bore spacing is what limited the LT5. Mercury Marine said they could build GM a more efficient engine if they changed the bore spacing but GM wouldn't allow it due to tradition.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2008 | 10:11 AM
  #16  
brodyscamaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
Re: SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

Originally Posted by 84RIceEater
i thought anything past 400 is bigblock?
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2008 | 04:03 PM
  #17  
mw66nova's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
Re: SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

ah yes, the elusive lsX block, lol! that thing can handle 500+cubes depending on stroke/bore combos.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2008 | 03:33 PM
  #18  
ZONES89RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 0
From: Hou. TX
Car: 86 TA, 91 B4C
Engine: 5.3, 4.8
Transmission: 4L80 4000, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 23.42 10 bolt
Re: SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

Originally Posted by MaxxMitchell
http://s12.photobucket.com/albums/a2...ractionfun.flv

Granted he put down 415rwhp and is on worn out 325/50/15 MTs, but i like mine the best

An actual street race? He can pull me by about 2 cars from 0-120.
I gotta know, does he pull you by 2 cars with you on motor or on spray?
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2008 | 05:05 PM
  #19  
MaxxMitchell's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 713
Likes: 1
From: shawnee, ks
Car: 87 Firebird
Engine: 5.3 76mm
Transmission: Rossler TH400, PTC converter
Axle/Gears: Strange 12bolt, 3.08s
Re: SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

Originally Posted by ZONES89RS
I gotta know, does he pull you by 2 cars with you on motor or on spray?
Motor

Weather got crappy before i could use the bottle with him. He lives like 2 streets down, and ill be installing the bottle on his car this winter. Hes got a built 347 LE2 heads/cam package, Fast 90/90 intake, and went 11.40 @ 118
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2008 | 05:10 PM
  #20  
ZONES89RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 0
From: Hou. TX
Car: 86 TA, 91 B4C
Engine: 5.3, 4.8
Transmission: 4L80 4000, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 23.42 10 bolt
Re: SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

Sweet, i have olmost the same motor as you but i think my heads might be a bit more.


When do you shift? My car falls on its face at 6000 rpm but everyone tells me it might be due to the HEI. I dont have MSD but as i have the same cam and cubes and even compression as you i am trying to compare it to mine.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2008 | 05:25 PM
  #21  
MaxxMitchell's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 713
Likes: 1
From: shawnee, ks
Car: 87 Firebird
Engine: 5.3 76mm
Transmission: Rossler TH400, PTC converter
Axle/Gears: Strange 12bolt, 3.08s
Re: SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

Originally Posted by ZONES89RS
Sweet, i have olmost the same motor as you but i think my heads might be a bit more.


When do you shift? My car falls on its face at 6000 rpm but everyone tells me it might be due to the HEI. I dont have MSD but as i have the same cam and cubes and even compression as you i am trying to compare it to mine.
I have a MSD HEI module/coil, im switching to a digital 6 to retard the timing for spray automaticly instead of me turning it back here shortly. Ive also got a edelcrap 750 on there, that runs lean in power mode even with pretty oversized jetting.

Currently im shifting at 6-6300 where i have the limiter set at 6500, the car picks up strong at 4500 and pulls great untill i shift. Air fuel is a bit lean currently in the high 13's range at WOT, but on bottle it held at 11.5, so the car will pick up pretty decently with a new carb.

What heads are you going to run? The protopline vortecs do decently
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2008 | 12:02 AM
  #22  
ZONES89RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 0
From: Hou. TX
Car: 86 TA, 91 B4C
Engine: 5.3, 4.8
Transmission: 4L80 4000, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 23.42 10 bolt
Re: SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

They are a 292 casting from 1970, they are a over the counter part from GM, they flow like old regular heads till ported, theese are ported WAY out. They were pulling 7000 rpm on a different car with a huge cam, but they were not running HEI.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 09:09 PM
  #23  
88 350 tpi formula's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 3,544
Likes: 19
From: WI,USA
Car: 89 FORMULA 350, 91 Z28 Convertible
Engine: ls1, LB9
Transmission: t56, Auto
Axle/Gears: S60/ 3.73
Re: SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

well they screwed it up them selfs. it should be.....

SBC (I, II)
BBC (can't recall all the little names)


GMB (General Motors Block) since it is now a true corp. block and retains the basic shape and size for all cubes now but "LSX" or "LS_" usually is what we use

SO he is right
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2008 | 03:42 AM
  #24  
ZONES89RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 0
From: Hou. TX
Car: 86 TA, 91 B4C
Engine: 5.3, 4.8
Transmission: 4L80 4000, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 23.42 10 bolt
Re: SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

Originally Posted by 88 350 tpi formula
well they screwed it up them selfs. it should be.....

SBC (I, II)
BBC (can't recall all the little names)


GMB (General Motors Block) since it is now a true corp. block and retains the basic shape and size for all cubes now but "LSX" or "LS_" usually is what we use

SO he is right
Generally it is Gen I, II, III small block, then Big block, i think goes mark III, IV and what not. Not enough parts swap out for a GEN I, II to a GEN III so it makes it easier to know what is what so we all know the LSx has olmost no parts that swap out.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2008 | 09:38 AM
  #25  
TTA 1387's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
From: Diamondhead, MS
Car: 89 20th Ann. TA
Engine: Turbo 3.8 V6
Transmission: 200 4R
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

Originally Posted by 88 350 tpi formula
well they screwed it up them selfs. it should be.....

SBC (I, II)
BBC (can't recall all the little names)


GMB (General Motors Block) since it is now a true corp. block and retains the basic shape and size for all cubes now but "LSX" or "LS_" usually is what we use

SO he is right
Technically it is a Corp Block made by Chevrolet. Just like the 3.8 V6 is a Corp Block made by Buick.

Its a small block chevy. Obviously GM thinks so also or they wouldn't call it Gen I, II, III, IV.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2008 | 10:49 AM
  #26  
jbpnumber03's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Re: SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

your buddy just needs to learn how to do a burnout. Seems like you've got it down...
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2008 | 11:18 PM
  #27  
jay_d's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
From: NORTH EAST GA
Car: 84 z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: one wheel peel
Re: SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

you know why he pulls on u by 2 cars? cause his car hooks up alot better....just from video i can tell that
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 12:08 PM
  #28  
MaxxMitchell's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 713
Likes: 1
From: shawnee, ks
Car: 87 Firebird
Engine: 5.3 76mm
Transmission: Rossler TH400, PTC converter
Axle/Gears: Strange 12bolt, 3.08s
Re: SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

Originally Posted by jay_d
you know why he pulls on u by 2 cars? cause his car hooks up alot better....just from video i can tell that
not really, i can take him by about 1/2 car from a dig when i have the stickies on while he has to lift to make his bite back up, im stuck and gone, and he will come around me at around 70, and pull to about a car between us at about 120-125.

Ran him again last weekend me on those same little street tires, 25 punch he would pull out his 2 cars while i was spinning, then hold until 110-115 then i would start bringing him back in. I jetted the carb as rich as i can go and im still a bit on the lean side, so ive got another one coming.

Now my car is down for a little while, im pulling the stock suspension off finally, and going QA1 adjustable shocks in the rear, and bolting on my lCAs and brackets and TA. Should help out with the street tires more, and the fact i cant squeeze it until mid to top of first on the stickies.

Hes planning on going all out on the suspension stuff this year as well. Wants to do about every chassy add on you can including a front K member. LOL so we'll see.

Me hooking up a bit better:
http://media.putfile.com/oct---mid-nov-

Hawaiianbirdowner - Next day went to the track laid down some 11.3 @118 MPH passes, and later spun a bearing that day
Skinnies car is a 10.80@128mph w/ 1.56 60's
Henry - Might never race him, but its cool, a stock 98 LS1 swapped 79 caprice areocoupe

C6 Z06 owner recently sold the vette, and his 8-9sec LS2 2000 camaro and bought a new viper, is going for 9's on a true street tire, damn rich guy
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 01:28 PM
  #29  
ljnowell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,935
Likes: 0
Re: SBC Vs LS1 burn outs

Originally Posted by TTA 1387
Technically it is a Corp Block made by Chevrolet. Just like the 3.8 V6 is a Corp Block made by Buick.

Its a small block chevy. Obviously GM thinks so also or they wouldn't call it Gen I, II, III, IV.
Following that standard though, there shouldnt be a sbc2 either. It was a corporate engine also.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Exxon Limited
Camaros Wanted
22
Dec 21, 2015 10:36 PM
reiderz iroc
LTX and LSX
7
Aug 13, 2015 04:57 PM
Bradsaundry
TPI
7
Aug 12, 2015 12:34 AM
Exxon Limited
Camaros for Sale
2
Aug 9, 2015 08:13 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:57 PM.