99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: semo
Car: 89 iroc z
Engine: 353tpi
Transmission: 700 r4
Axle/Gears: 342
99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
1 the mustang its a 4.6 it has underdrive pullys cold air intake 3rd stage raceing clutch duel exhaust stock gears are 307 disk brakes all around 1/8 mile he ran a 9.195 at 77.29mph thats it on that one and 2 iroc its got 5.7 tune port injection bored 20 over air charger duel exhaust hooker headers 277 gears dist brakes all around msd 6alit ran a 9.322 at 73.64 ive got 373 to put in it but havent put em in yet lol thats about it
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 0
From: Katy TEXAS (West Houston)
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 TBI L03 V8
Transmission: Rebuilt 700R4 W/ Corvette shift kit
Axle/Gears: 2:73 open
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
Hay, wellcome to thirdgen.org (TGO for short). So you have 3.73 gears that aren't installed yet?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 0
From: Katy TEXAS (West Houston)
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 TBI L03 V8
Transmission: Rebuilt 700R4 W/ Corvette shift kit
Axle/Gears: 2:73 open
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
You guys are already "theoreticaly" close. If you install those rear end gears, you wont just beat him, you'll humiliate him (in a friendly way). "theoreticaly".
I cant say I have that much racing experiance, so it's prob better to listen to some of these "Old Guys" (21-26 yr olds that patrol these fourms)
I cant say I have that much racing experiance, so it's prob better to listen to some of these "Old Guys" (21-26 yr olds that patrol these fourms)
Last edited by SKELITOR117; Jul 22, 2011 at 03:43 PM.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: semo
Car: 89 iroc z
Engine: 353tpi
Transmission: 700 r4
Axle/Gears: 342
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
thats goin to be sweet cant wait but im goin ta have to get some tires what i have on there now is bald ive priced some street and strip tires and there high
Supreme Member



Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,266
Likes: 37
From: Canada,Ont
Car: 1987 TransAm Ttop
Engine: 2005 LQ4
Transmission: Ls1 T56
Axle/Gears: 3:54
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
as they sit right now it would be a close race.he will outlaunch you and by about 3rd gear will slowly start to pull away,judging by both your 1/8 track times.his car is much lighter so take not that if you change to 3.73 gears you will hold him off providing you can hook without spinning.but if he does gears and headers aswell with decent tire.it wont be pretty.should make for a fun race either way..line em up and let us know.
are you auto,if so..invest in a good shift kit and stall converter to keep greatly improve that powerband and launch.
are you auto,if so..invest in a good shift kit and stall converter to keep greatly improve that powerband and launch.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 0
From: Katy TEXAS (West Houston)
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 TBI L03 V8
Transmission: Rebuilt 700R4 W/ Corvette shift kit
Axle/Gears: 2:73 open
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
Yup. very true. There are alot of factors in this race. You guys are already close, and considering how terrible the stock rear end gears are, the new 3:73s will make a big difference. Should make for an interesting race. Video tape it if you do it.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 0
From: Katy TEXAS (West Houston)
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 TBI L03 V8
Transmission: Rebuilt 700R4 W/ Corvette shift kit
Axle/Gears: 2:73 open
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
Ah yes. he has the 700R4. Do you have a shift kit?
Supreme Member



Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,266
Likes: 37
From: Canada,Ont
Car: 1987 TransAm Ttop
Engine: 2005 LQ4
Transmission: Ls1 T56
Axle/Gears: 3:54
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
corvette shift kit and a higher stall alone will make a drastic difference plus changing the gears.i hope your not still one leg peg lol.do you manually shift the trans or just leave it in drive?
theres lots of room to improve without even spending any money if you know how to get the best out of the car the way it sits right now that will knock that time down..might not hit a higher trap speed but who cares about mph lol
theres lots of room to improve without even spending any money if you know how to get the best out of the car the way it sits right now that will knock that time down..might not hit a higher trap speed but who cares about mph lol
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 0
From: Katy TEXAS (West Houston)
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 TBI L03 V8
Transmission: Rebuilt 700R4 W/ Corvette shift kit
Axle/Gears: 2:73 open
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
I noticed a big difference in my car when I got the shift kit.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 0
From: Katy TEXAS (West Houston)
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 TBI L03 V8
Transmission: Rebuilt 700R4 W/ Corvette shift kit
Axle/Gears: 2:73 open
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
The parts are only about $250
Supreme Member



Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,266
Likes: 37
From: Canada,Ont
Car: 1987 TransAm Ttop
Engine: 2005 LQ4
Transmission: Ls1 T56
Axle/Gears: 3:54
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
parts are cheap..yes.but labor might not be if the trans is being done at a shop.re/re the trans add the kit.at that sametime its best to have a trans rebuilt and a better stall.wakes the car right up.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 0
From: Katy TEXAS (West Houston)
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 TBI L03 V8
Transmission: Rebuilt 700R4 W/ Corvette shift kit
Axle/Gears: 2:73 open
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
Got mine rebuilt and had the shift kit put in. Got that done for $1700 W/ life time warrenty. Dont let them charge you for any extra labor involving the shift kit, cause there is none. Just tell them you'll pay for the shift kit and no extra labor. They'll take the deal. There is other haggling to be done, but this is just involving the shift kit.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: semo
Car: 89 iroc z
Engine: 353tpi
Transmission: 700 r4
Axle/Gears: 342
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
ya im auto and i can get a shift kit for about 40 dollars or so but ive got em off the line till the 330 ft i leave it in third gear and let it shift on its own its about 4500 when it shifts
Supreme Member

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 1
From: NY sucks
Car: 84' Corvette, 96' Caprice
Engine: LT1, L99
Transmission: T-56, 4L60e
Axle/Gears: 3.07 POSI, 2.93 Open
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
Stock vs stock its a drivers race.... those stangs can run low 14's or run high 14's into the 15's... in the 1/8th he out mph'ed the **** out of you... That tells me he is going to walk you in the 1/4... Those 3.73's will help a lot but more or less will even the playing field... BUT they can also hurt you as well b/c the L98 is not a fan of high rpms so the 3.73's will help launch the car but you might not get much faster... You might but you might not, it's a toss up if the TPI setup is stock.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: semo
Car: 89 iroc z
Engine: 353tpi
Transmission: 700 r4
Axle/Gears: 342
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
lol that y im goin ta try the gears hes kill in me on the mph i think ill have him when i get the gears in it then he will have to work on his lol
Supreme Member

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 1
From: NY sucks
Car: 84' Corvette, 96' Caprice
Engine: LT1, L99
Transmission: T-56, 4L60e
Axle/Gears: 3.07 POSI, 2.93 Open
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
I wouldn't stall ANY MORE than 2400 unless you plan TPI mods to make her flow better at higher rpms.. The TPI is best as low rpms... even 2400 is pushing it as the TPI stops making power at 4500 rpms...
Junior Member

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 67
Likes: 27
From: FL
Car: 1999 Camaro SS
Engine: 440ci LS
Transmission: T56 Magnum
Axle/Gears: Dana S60 w/3.73 gears
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
I went from 2.73 to 3.73 in my Camaro and dropped .360 in the 1/8th and gained 2.24 mph. In the 1/4 I dropped .448 and gained 3.02 mph.
It will be close. Issue is you will have a time hooking with stock rubber. If you could put some drag radials on that would help your chances. Honestly, like other said dont go over 2400 rpm stall. The TPI doesnt need that much.
It will be close. Issue is you will have a time hooking with stock rubber. If you could put some drag radials on that would help your chances. Honestly, like other said dont go over 2400 rpm stall. The TPI doesnt need that much.
Supreme Member



Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,266
Likes: 37
From: Canada,Ont
Car: 1987 TransAm Ttop
Engine: 2005 LQ4
Transmission: Ls1 T56
Axle/Gears: 3:54
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
2400 stall is great for stock tpi l98.but if you plan on doing mods..cam,intake,tb,runners,plenum,heads etc.. i would go 2800 or 3000 stall.I had a 2800 on my stock tpi before my mods were done and it really wasnt bad at all..but i wasnt racing during that period since i was gathering my parts to build the motor.if the trans comes out before u mod the motor..do the stall then and always plan ahead to save $$$.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: semo
Car: 89 iroc z
Engine: 353tpi
Transmission: 700 r4
Axle/Gears: 342
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
i plan on putting a 260 cam in it and it should raise my power band but gears first and if i beat em im goin ta leave it alone till he does something to his he is planing to put 410 gears im worried lol
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 0
From: Katy TEXAS (West Houston)
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 TBI L03 V8
Transmission: Rebuilt 700R4 W/ Corvette shift kit
Axle/Gears: 2:73 open
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
Nice. Those are some good mods and plans. As far as performance, After i get my car in proper working and legal condition, I'm gonna finish redoing the exhaust, headers back to the cat (i just bought a 2 1/2" cat back exhaust kit, so that's takin care of).
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: semo
Car: 89 iroc z
Engine: 353tpi
Transmission: 700 r4
Axle/Gears: 342
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
what happend to it or whatcha doin to it on my exhaust ive got duel with dynomax mufflers they dont sound to bad
Junior Member

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 67
Likes: 27
From: FL
Car: 1999 Camaro SS
Engine: 440ci LS
Transmission: T56 Magnum
Axle/Gears: Dana S60 w/3.73 gears
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
Even if you get a higher stall you dont have to launch at that speed. Flash that puppy at a lower RPM and figure out where the sweet spot is.
Supreme Member

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 1
From: NY sucks
Car: 84' Corvette, 96' Caprice
Engine: LT1, L99
Transmission: T-56, 4L60e
Axle/Gears: 3.07 POSI, 2.93 Open
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
A cam isn't going to help a whole lot of its running the factory TPI setup. The cam will want more air at a higher RPM which the factory TPI won't be able to supply.. If anything it will run worse at higher rpms...
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: semo
Car: 89 iroc z
Engine: 353tpi
Transmission: 700 r4
Axle/Gears: 342
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
needs more air huh what kinda runners and plenum would be good for it what would be good to do first first gears second runners and plenum then cam or whatcha think or what other mods than i have put up there ta do first to my car
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 0
From: Katy TEXAS (West Houston)
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 TBI L03 V8
Transmission: Rebuilt 700R4 W/ Corvette shift kit
Axle/Gears: 2:73 open
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
As for why it is not legal or in working order, it needs new tires. Thats about it.
I dont know much aboat the 350 TPI, so forgive me for anything I say that doesn't make sence. I know a big problem with 3rdgen 5.0 TBIs was air flow restriction. Do you have an aftermarket air cleaner? And what exactly have you done with the exhaust system?
Junior Member

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 67
Likes: 27
From: FL
Car: 1999 Camaro SS
Engine: 440ci LS
Transmission: T56 Magnum
Axle/Gears: Dana S60 w/3.73 gears
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
Without headers a cat back will do him nothing........well, it will make it sound different. lol
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 0
From: Katy TEXAS (West Houston)
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 TBI L03 V8
Transmission: Rebuilt 700R4 W/ Corvette shift kit
Axle/Gears: 2:73 open
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
It needed to be replaced anyway 9the exhaust was severed at the weld conecting it to the muffler body. This has a better muffler, so at least that isn't restrictive anymore. I def am looking to replace/upgrade the whole exhaust system after i get everything else in order.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: semo
Car: 89 iroc z
Engine: 353tpi
Transmission: 700 r4
Axle/Gears: 342
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
ive got k n air cleaners and the exhaust the headers are hooker headers from there are 2 1/2 pipe to the dynomax mufflers and ive got em turned down before the rear end thats itlol
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 0
From: Katy TEXAS (West Houston)
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 TBI L03 V8
Transmission: Rebuilt 700R4 W/ Corvette shift kit
Axle/Gears: 2:73 open
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
Mufflers? You have true dual?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 0
From: Katy TEXAS (West Houston)
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 TBI L03 V8
Transmission: Rebuilt 700R4 W/ Corvette shift kit
Axle/Gears: 2:73 open
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
Two pipes running down the right side to the back or classic symetric duals?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: semo
Car: 89 iroc z
Engine: 353tpi
Transmission: 700 r4
Axle/Gears: 342
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
just straight pipe from the collector to the dynomax mufflers are in the middle and straight pips to the front of the rear end and turned down
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: semo
Car: 89 iroc z
Engine: 353tpi
Transmission: 700 r4
Axle/Gears: 342
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
id like to have some pics on here but not very good at it putting em on here but ill try to get some on here
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: semo
Car: 89 iroc z
Engine: 353tpi
Transmission: 700 r4
Axle/Gears: 342
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
went to the track last night at test and tune ran em again and beat em barly like i say he ran a 9.195 and i ran a 9.103 i changed the gears out to a 342 i thought id be lower but im not o well more mods to do thinking about ac delete and underdrive pully kit and see what that does
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: semo
Car: 89 iroc z
Engine: 353tpi
Transmission: 700 r4
Axle/Gears: 342
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
i havent guted the air box im going to leave it like it is its got k n air cleaners in it it should be getting plenty of air to it
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,540
Likes: 0
From: Norwalk, CA
Car: 91Z28
Engine: 5.7 ls1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
It's still restrictive since I also have kn filters and that itself does almost no difference but when u gut it u demand more when u get a way for it to get air directly.
Junior Member

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 67
Likes: 27
From: FL
Car: 1999 Camaro SS
Engine: 440ci LS
Transmission: T56 Magnum
Axle/Gears: Dana S60 w/3.73 gears
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
Do yourself a favor and get rid of the K&N filter. Also, like said gut your air box. 
Also I have a quick story for you. A friend of mine has a 5-speed convertible IROC. He ran a best of 14.6 with the stock gear and then it blew. He put in 3.73s and ran slower.
Remember, these cars are lower rpm torque engines and dont need quite as much gear. If you had drag radials I would say go with some 3.73s though.
You should run a mid 14 no issue if you are at 9.1-9.2 in the 1/8th.

Also I have a quick story for you. A friend of mine has a 5-speed convertible IROC. He ran a best of 14.6 with the stock gear and then it blew. He put in 3.73s and ran slower.
Remember, these cars are lower rpm torque engines and dont need quite as much gear. If you had drag radials I would say go with some 3.73s though. You should run a mid 14 no issue if you are at 9.1-9.2 in the 1/8th.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 14
From: Northern CT
Car: 1986 Trans am
Engine: 5.3 LM7
Transmission: T56 6 speed
Axle/Gears: Dana 44 w/ 3.55's
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
A cam is most definately going to help, even with the stock TPI. These cars come with peanut cams from the factory. I put a cam in my 305 TPI back in the day...stock it dynoed in at 159 RWHP. Cammed with roller rockers I put down 235 RWHP. I'm almost positive it made power up to around 4900 RPM as well with the stock TPI on it.
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
From: Mountlake Terrace, Wa
Car: 86 Iroc + 83 Firebird
Engine: Iroc 305 TPI, Firebird 305 4bbl
Transmission: 700r4 in both.
Axle/Gears: Iroc 3.27 Firebird 3.23
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
A cam is most definately going to help, even with the stock TPI. These cars come with peanut cams from the factory. I put a cam in my 305 TPI back in the day...stock it dynoed in at 159 RWHP. Cammed with roller rockers I put down 235 RWHP. I'm almost positive it made power up to around 4900 RPM as well with the stock TPI on it.
agreed. it will make a difference. Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: semo
Car: 89 iroc z
Engine: 353tpi
Transmission: 700 r4
Axle/Gears: 342
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
ya thats my next goal its to do im lookin to put a 260 cam in see what that does 1.980@60ft 5.824@330ft 8.505@594ft 9.103@1/8 thats where shes at now
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: semo
Car: 89 iroc z
Engine: 353tpi
Transmission: 700 r4
Axle/Gears: 342
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
now he has a svt programmer kinda worried ive got him so far im down to a 9.0 untill he programs his then he prob will get me
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Aussie 9 Bolt with 3.0 Gears
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
As others have said, TPI's don't need high gear ratios. My TA came stock with 3.0 Gears and its running good times and cutting pretty good 60's. I would go with a máximum of 3.23 gears if i were to ever change. My IROC I used to have (Friend has it now) had a 3.23 gear and had good low end grunt without sacrificing the top end.
Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: manitoba.
Car: 2002 ws6, 2011 sierra 6.2L 6 speed
Engine: ls1
Transmission: M6
Axle/Gears: 3:42's
Re: 99 mustang gt vs 89 iroc-z
most PI 4.6 2v's run mid-low 14's in good conditions. sometimes a glory run of 13.9 but very rare.
a bolt on l98 and a PI 4.6 should be a close race.
a bolt on l98 and a PI 4.6 should be a close race.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 14
From: Northern CT
Car: 1986 Trans am
Engine: 5.3 LM7
Transmission: T56 6 speed
Axle/Gears: Dana 44 w/ 3.55's
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





