TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

what do you think of my nearly stock dyno #'s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-29-2002, 12:06 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
turtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Shiloh, NC
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what do you think of my nearly stock dyno #'s

well i just got back from the dyno today and it looks like i am making great tq, more then some i have seen while searching the site but less then the hp the same people are making.

anyway the car has very limited mods, 80 series flow but some idiot but 2.75 piping over the axle instead of leaving the stock 3in piping. a ported plenum, slp runners lightly worked, k&n's in cut-off air boxes and a slp airfoil. this is a single cat car running an autozone cat.

i made 206.7hp from roughly 4k to 4.6k and 300.9 ft/lbs at 3.1k. what it looks like to me is i am peaking on hp earlier then normal and just hanging there. my tach is way, way off, turns out! so i had him rev the car to 6K which was less then 4.8k on the dyno. didn't matter about a couple rpm though it had already tapped out clearly by looking at the run.

I was happy about being over 190whp in a 230chp car, but what is the %age of drivetrain lose in a 700r4? bone stock of course, not even a shift kit yet.

any opinions? the tq seems to be great better then some i have seen on the site especially for limited mods but the hp is lower at the same time.

Last edited by turtle; 09-29-2002 at 05:48 PM.
Old 09-29-2002, 03:35 PM
  #2  
Member
 
jd13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Clearwater, Florida
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I'm not mistaken the stock torque rating for that year was aroudn 330-340 lbs/ft wasn't it? It definatly seems like you should be putting out more hp, but then again your exhaust is probably choking you.
Old 09-29-2002, 05:47 PM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
turtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Shiloh, NC
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah the tq was 330 for a single cat car in 89, so the tq looks great but the hp flat lined from 4k upto 4.6k then started dropping. the tach was off so bad we only hit about 4700rpm tops, tach was reading 6000.
Old 09-29-2002, 07:44 PM
  #4  
Member
Thread Starter
 
turtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Shiloh, NC
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well i just realized while talking to 1 of the guys that was supposed to be at the dyno day that those numbers are not SAE corrected yet. i'll have to place a call tomorrow and get the correction.

those numbers are raw wheel power completely uncorrected and straight off 2 runs total.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MustangBeater20
TBI
11
10-29-2022 09:20 PM
Kevin91Z
Southern California Area
22
09-19-2022 10:00 AM
1984HO
LTX and LSX
20
03-19-2021 11:59 AM
LT1Formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
20
11-14-2015 12:02 AM
Genopsyde
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
3
10-07-2015 08:35 PM



Quick Reply: what do you think of my nearly stock dyno #'s



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:20 PM.