TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Videos of my IROC vs. a Turbo TA and a 66-67? Stang w/ slicks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-21-2002, 07:32 PM
  #1  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
BuckeyeROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2015 Camaro Z/28 & 2013 Super Bee
Engine: LS7 and 392 HEMI
Videos of my IROC vs. a Turbo TA and a 66-67? Stang w/ slicks

Not my best night at the track last week, but I got a couple cool videos. If you download them and can't see them, download the codec provided and install it, it only takes a minute or so. If my car looks like it stops accelerating after 1st gear vs. the TTA, that is what happens when you shift your auto tranny into 3rd gear from 1st I ended up running a 12.64 vs. the TTA's 13.5. I ran a 12.43 (with my best 60' of 1.710) to the Stang's 13.38 in the other video.

http://www.netgearhead.org/iroc/

Last edited by BuckeyeROC; 10-21-2002 at 07:47 PM.
Old 10-21-2002, 07:58 PM
  #2  
Member

iTrader: (1)
 
slayer2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: kentucky
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: manual/t56
cooollll!!!:hail: :hail:
Old 10-21-2002, 08:35 PM
  #3  
Member

 
iroc4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ottawa,Ontario,Canada
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 (for now)
cool,but the first video is kinda hard to see cause its dark...well the second half of the race anyways lol

Last edited by iroc4ever; 10-21-2002 at 08:37 PM.
Old 10-21-2002, 10:16 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member

 
bigals87z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ocean, NJ
Posts: 4,456
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: Check The Sig
wow, ur car is really nice man... really nice... i wana go with a 383... dam... im savin ur website so i know what to do... that was some hot stuff right there.... ahh only 3+ seconds away!
Old 10-21-2002, 10:24 PM
  #5  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thats a 64.5, 65 or 66 stang in the video. I think its a 65.

Its hard to tell though, because its only visible for a second or two...
Old 10-21-2002, 10:42 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member
 
'87FAKE-IROC-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Damn
Engine: This
Transmission: New Stuff
Buckeye, your car is beautiful. I had never seen it before.
Also, does that Edelbrock strut tower brace fit over the SR?
Old 10-21-2002, 11:25 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member
 
Bort62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am continually Impressed with your setup, Buckeyeroc.

Lookin Good.
Old 10-22-2002, 09:34 AM
  #8  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (3)
 
3.1EyeCandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 3,165
Received 54 Likes on 40 Posts
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60e
that's incredible. Your car has a very nice launch. Congrats on the awesome ride!:hail:
Old 10-22-2002, 09:46 AM
  #9  
Member
 
WS6Formula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: long island
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
it looks to be a 65 stang....no such thing as a 64.5 stang
Old 10-22-2002, 12:16 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member

 
bigals87z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ocean, NJ
Posts: 4,456
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: Check The Sig
yea... there is a 64.5... .just like there is a 69 .5 camaro, they just ran long cause they were doin so dam good in sales.... 1million in a year an half... dam! and thats a edelbrock stb? it looks pretty good....
Old 10-22-2002, 12:18 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member
 
Bort62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no such thing as a 64.5 stang
Not true.
Old 10-22-2002, 12:51 PM
  #12  
Member
 
WS6Formula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: long island
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ok so prove me wrong please. i have never seen any legit info about a 64 1/2 mustang. and any mustang guy i have ever talked to says the samething. Oh just so you all know that i kinda know something, i have 2 66 mustangs and a 69 mach 1, i know just owning the cars doesn't make me know anything.
Old 10-22-2002, 01:04 PM
  #13  
Supreme Member

 
bigals87z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ocean, NJ
Posts: 4,456
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: Check The Sig
http://home.pon.net/hunnicutt/history_64_68.htm happy now? dam u dont have to get all crazed.....

Last edited by bigals87z28; 10-22-2002 at 01:07 PM.
Old 10-22-2002, 01:13 PM
  #14  
Member
 
jd13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Clearwater, Florida
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I love your car Buckeye. It's almost exactly what I want to do with mine. :hail:
I got a question though: Is that a crate engine in there or did you build up an l98?
Old 10-22-2002, 01:21 PM
  #15  
Member
 
RedZ28Chik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Flemington, NJ
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by WS6Formula350
it looks to be a 65 stang....no such thing as a 64.5 stang

Ahem......although i am a chevy girl i happen to know for a fact there is a 64 1/2 mustang and they are hard to come by...i owned a 66 mustang coupe about 3 years ago and i have a friend who happens to own a 64 1/2...oh *** another ford discussion lol
Old 10-22-2002, 02:42 PM
  #16  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by WS6Formula350
Ok so prove me wrong please. i have never seen any legit info about a 64 1/2 mustang. and any mustang guy i have ever talked to says the samething. Oh just so you all know that i kinda know something, i have 2 66 mustangs and a 69 mach 1, i know just owning the cars doesn't make me know anything.
Prove you wrong? Too easy.

The Mustang was first produced in April, 1964. The 14th IIRC. Any Mustang produced before September-ish 1964 is a 64.5. My friend owned one for 5 years that was produced in July 1964. I've restored and worked on more 64.5-66 Mustangs than I care to mention over the past 13 years. 64.5 Mustangs do exist, if you say no, you dont know what the heck you are talking about, and neither does your friend. Do some research. Here's just one example of a parts store (that I frequent) that knows whats up:

http://www.larrysmustang.com/index.php3
Notice they list 64-73 Mustang parts. Check any retailer you want, you'll find 64.5 parts.

Armchair internet experts... still wet behind the ears.
Old 10-22-2002, 02:49 PM
  #17  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
BuckeyeROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2015 Camaro Z/28 & 2013 Super Bee
Engine: LS7 and 392 HEMI
Originally posted by '87FAKE-IROC-Z
Buckeye, your car is beautiful. I had never seen it before.
Also, does that Edelbrock strut tower brace fit over the SR?
I don't have the Ed STB on right now. I think it would fit with a few spacers (maybe 1/8") under the brackets.
Old 10-22-2002, 02:50 PM
  #18  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
BuckeyeROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2015 Camaro Z/28 & 2013 Super Bee
Engine: LS7 and 392 HEMI
Originally posted by jd13
I love your car Buckeye. It's almost exactly what I want to do with mine. :hail:
I got a question though: Is that a crate engine in there or did you build up an l98?
It's an L98 bored .030" with stock crank, rods, and TRW forged pistons.
Old 10-22-2002, 04:31 PM
  #19  
Supreme Member

 
SATURN5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the garage
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 84 SVO
Engine: Volvo headed 2.3T
Transmission: WCT5
Axle/Gears: 8.8" 3.73
Originally posted by WS6Formula350
it looks to be a 65 stang....no such thing as a 64.5 stang
best laugh I've had all day....

Madmax, I believe April 17th, 1964 is the correct date.


Edit: yup..

The Ford Mustang was introduced in 1964. The car was an instant success that set a new record for first year sales. One story describes how a truck driver drove right through a showroom window, staring and enchanted by the car.

The car was the brainchild of Lee Iaococca, who envisioned an inexpensive, sporty car for the masses. On April seventeenth, 1964 Ford unveiled the Mustang Convertible at the New York Worlds Fair. The car was also offered as a hardtop coupe, the fastback was available to the public five months later. ( See our Photo Gallery for some neat pictures.)

During the first five months of production, one could order a factory fresh hardtop equipped with a 170 cubic inch six cylinder engine for less than $2500 (1964). Later, the car could could be purchased with a 200 cubic inch six, or a 289 V8. Specialty Mustangs, such as the "K"-Code or Shelby came with even more powerful V8 engines.

Transmission choices for any 64 1/2 through 1968 Mustang were three speed manual, four speed manual, or automatic with the latter being the most popular. Body styles for the 64 1/2 through 66 Mustangs were identical, except for changes only the purist would argue about.

Last edited by SATURN5; 10-22-2002 at 04:33 PM.
Old 10-22-2002, 04:37 PM
  #20  
Supreme Member

 
bigals87z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ocean, NJ
Posts: 4,456
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: Check The Sig
u know what i didnt know... that John Delauran created the GTO? he made a tepest wit the 389 in it and a 4spd with some suspension mods.... and he took it to work (GM) everyday... he let GM heads drive it... they all loved it... so the GTO was born... then he made that time machine!! he is a cool guy.... time flux capacitors!
Old 10-23-2002, 09:19 AM
  #21  
Member
 
Steve10's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Rockdale, TX USA
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the second video, you can see just how well your car hooks. It doesn't sound like your revving up at the line. Is that right? I haven't got my car to the track yet, but have been practicing my launch with the g-tech. My times are better when I leave the line almost off idle. It seems to transfer the weight better.
Old 10-23-2002, 05:31 PM
  #22  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
BuckeyeROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2015 Camaro Z/28 & 2013 Super Bee
Engine: LS7 and 392 HEMI
Originally posted by Steve10
In the second video, you can see just how well your car hooks. It doesn't sound like your revving up at the line. Is that right? I haven't got my car to the track yet, but have been practicing my launch with the g-tech. My times are better when I leave the line almost off idle. It seems to transfer the weight better.
Yeah, in the 2nd video, I ran a 1.710 60', I was able to floor it off the line. In the 1st video, I eased into the throttle for a 1.74 60' b/c I ran a 1.97 the run before it. I rev to about 1400 rpm on the line and then let it flash on takeoff. I think I might do better using a little higher stall, the car seems to come off the line a bit soft before taking off.
Old 10-23-2002, 07:47 PM
  #23  
Supreme Member
 
89blackGTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Central CA
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89 Black GTA
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by WS6Formula350
it looks to be a 65 stang....no such thing as a 64.5 stang
I just asked my wife if she has heard of a 64.5 mustang and EVEN SHE has. Interesting....

Hey BuckeyeROC, NICE!!! I showed my buddy with a 98 Z28 and all he was wanting to make sure I didnt do that to my car.

Brian
Old 10-23-2002, 11:24 PM
  #24  
Supreme Member

 
bigals87z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ocean, NJ
Posts: 4,456
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: Check The Sig
u do hook like a savage on that... it looks like ur beeing pulled... i doest even look like ur driving... thats a killer car, and i want one!!! ahhhhh man...
Old 10-25-2002, 01:08 AM
  #25  
Junior Member
 
IrocNround's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fairfield, California, USA
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice a&& car Buckeye!! Got a question for ya, I see that your using the TES headers and AFR heads, are your heads the angle, straight, or L98 type plug heads? And do you have a hard time getting the the plugs with the TES headers? Thanks for any info.

Again Buckeye...SWEET ride!!!
Old 10-25-2002, 03:41 PM
  #26  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
BuckeyeROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2015 Camaro Z/28 & 2013 Super Bee
Engine: LS7 and 392 HEMI
Originally posted by IrocNround
Nice a&& car Buckeye!! Got a question for ya, I see that your using the TES headers and AFR heads, are your heads the angle, straight, or L98 type plug heads? And do you have a hard time getting the the plugs with the TES headers? Thanks for any info.

Again Buckeye...SWEET ride!!!
Thanks. I have the straight plugs. It's a bit tight in there, but no problems.
Old 10-25-2002, 09:49 PM
  #27  
Supreme Member
 
'87FAKE-IROC-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Damn
Engine: This
Transmission: New Stuff
for more info,
TES and L98 angle plug 190's here. have to get a few from the bottom, but its not too bad either.
Old 10-26-2002, 09:41 PM
  #28  
Member
 
REDZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Tulsa, Ok.
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice Buckeye!!!
Old 10-27-2002, 01:27 AM
  #29  
Junior Member
 
IrocNround's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fairfield, California, USA
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the info Buckeye & 87Fake. You guys think that JetHot is worth the extra money?
Old 10-27-2002, 11:17 AM
  #30  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
BuckeyeROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2015 Camaro Z/28 & 2013 Super Bee
Engine: LS7 and 392 HEMI
Originally posted by IrocNround
Thanks for the info Buckeye & 87Fake. You guys think that JetHot is worth the extra money?
Absolutely
Old 10-27-2002, 05:45 PM
  #31  
Supreme Member
 
'87FAKE-IROC-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Damn
Engine: This
Transmission: New Stuff
I think anything that can reduce underhood temps and prolong the life of your investment is worth it. How much is the coating?
My TES aren't coated. over 3 of use has turned them into a nice black charcoaled kinda redish in some spots color. they have minor rust, nothing major.
I can't count the number of things I've melted from radiant heat with them, plug wires, wire loom, sensors, etc. Some extra heat protection would've been nice.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
25
09-25-2021 07:55 PM
TexasMaro
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
2
09-15-2015 06:50 PM
ChaseDale3and8
Mid-West Region
12
08-25-2015 06:34 PM
camaro6spd
Theoretical and Street Racing
27
07-05-2002 09:14 AM
ZZ42Fast
Tech / General Engine
2
09-27-2001 12:14 PM



Quick Reply: Videos of my IROC vs. a Turbo TA and a 66-67? Stang w/ slicks



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:31 PM.