TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

AS&M SS runners vs Accel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 09:09 PM
  #1  
Andy 91GTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
From: North Battleford, Saskatchewan, Canada
Car: 91 GTA & 92 GTA & 92 GTA
Engine: 305 TPI & 350 TPI & 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 & 3.23 & 3.23
AS&M SS runners vs Accel

I'm going to be buying intake runners but I don't know which would be more suitable to my car. I like the AS&M semi-siamesed ones but I don't know if it the SS ones are really necessary for my car. I have a 305 TPI auto (mods listed below). I would be adding:

Holley APFR
180* thermostat
ported plenum
3.42 gears
Custom burned chip



Long, long term I'd like to add:
Superram base intake
cam
heads
SLP 1 5/8 headers

The fastest my car will probably be will be 13s (I will be staying N/A). Which runners do you guys think would work best with my combo?

Thanks for the help.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 10:10 PM
  #2  
Abubaca's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 412
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
As far as runners are concerned, I don't think it makes much difference. They're all pretty good and flow just about the same.

I'm pretty sure that TPIS and AS&M use the exact same runners. They are also the only aftermarket runners that are not cast. I think cast looks crappy. I'm not 100% sure though. Well, I'm sure they look crappy, but you know what I mean.

When it comes to the base though, DO NOT go with the Holley manifold. I see you plan to use the accel manifold. Those are pretty good. TPIS says there manifold is without a doubt the highest flowing manifold, but of course....it's theirs, so who knows. Anyone care to chime in on that?
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2003 | 05:05 AM
  #3  
85TPI400's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 475
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, California
This is just my opinion but with what you plan to do, I would get an aftermarket base and not worry about the runners for the time being. I am sure you would be happier with the results. I dont think you have anything to gain by going with a set of the AS&M semi siamesed runners or the accel ones at this time on a stock base. I think they would just hurt your bottom end torque and even perhaps make your car a little slower. Maybe a set of TPIS/ AS&M plain Large tube runners would help you out a litttle, but either way to notice something worthwhile you need to port your base to match them. Since the base would have to come off to port match, why not just swap that now instead? Then when you deceide what cam/heads you are going to use, purchase the runners that would best match the combination at that time.
Just my thoughts!

Last edited by 85TPI400; Sep 3, 2003 at 05:07 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2003 | 08:26 AM
  #4  
bigals87z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,456
Likes: 3
From: Ocean, NJ
Car: Check The Sig
I dont suggest getting runners for your 305 since the stock is pretty good for what your doing. The base is a good idea.. but you could port it out and save youself some money if you want. You dont have any major mods on your car yet and you can hold off till that heads and cam come in. Changing or porting the base will net you better power over all then getting the runners.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2003 | 02:27 PM
  #5  
Andy 91GTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
From: North Battleford, Saskatchewan, Canada
Car: 91 GTA & 92 GTA & 92 GTA
Engine: 305 TPI & 350 TPI & 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 & 3.23 & 3.23
I thought that I'd be a little quicker at the track with aftermarket runners but from what people have been saying I guess its pointless unless I do the manifold as well. Would the AS&M semi-siamesed runners be more suitable for heavily modded 350-396s and regular LTR like Accel, TPIS, etc, be a better choice for 305s? My car used to be my daily driver in the summer but now it is more of a weekend car. I want to keep it very streetable so I won't be doing anything to extreme with heads, cam, etc., when I do change them.

I'm not very mechanically inclined, but I had planned on attempting to change the thermostat, runners, APFR, porting plenum, myself over the winter. I'm not sure if I know enough to swap manifolds but I guess if I do it, I'll have to get check out this board to find out all the in and outs. I'd just buy the Accel base if I do it.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2003 | 02:47 PM
  #6  
bigals87z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,456
Likes: 3
From: Ocean, NJ
Car: Check The Sig
I dont mean to make it sound easy, but to change manifolds is just unbolting and a swap. There are a lot of electrical connections, but you dont have to worry about anything major like clearances as if you were building the bottom end yourself.
People try to stay way from other forms of TPI. A base and runners can put you around $650 when a HSR costs around 500 for what you need, and a modified LT1 is cheaper then that. I think it would be easier for you to get a LT1 or HSR for induction. only problem is emissions... and I dont think there are any in Canada... but maybe that goes by province.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2003 | 03:33 PM
  #7  
Andy 91GTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
From: North Battleford, Saskatchewan, Canada
Car: 91 GTA & 92 GTA & 92 GTA
Engine: 305 TPI & 350 TPI & 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 & 3.23 & 3.23
In Saskatchewan, I don't have to worry about emissions testing so I can do whatever I want to my car. Some places like Ontario and parts of BC they have testing.

I like the appearance of the stock TPI setup so I'm going to stick with parts that will keep it close to stock looking. With HSR, I'd have to cut the hood, not something I want to do, even though it would cost less money.

If I do change the manifold, I'd probably end up with vacuum leaks or something else would go wrong but I'll think about doing it.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2003 | 04:36 PM
  #8  
smithtc's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
In addition to the small mods like AFPR and thermostat (I recommend 160)...do the headers 1st. Very little gain if any will be realized without this modification. I say this because I was running low 9s in the 8th with my 350 car, and went with the Accel intake and runners and ported plenum. No improvement. AFter headers...the power gain is now evident.

If you want to keep the LTR type induction (I do as well for my 350 car), then I recommend the Accel base, and the AS&M Semi siamezed runners. Then your cam/heads will need changing, as well as converter, etc.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2003 | 05:07 PM
  #9  
RMK's Avatar
RMK
Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,337
Likes: 2
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: modded LB9
Transmission: Pro Built 700R4
Wait until you can buy the base and runners at the same time. It's a real PITA taking the runners off once let alone twice to change the manifold 6 months down the line.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2003 | 09:48 PM
  #10  
rockind78's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Originally posted by 85TPI400
I would get an aftermarket base and not worry about the runners for the time being. I am sure you would be happier with the results.
I'll second that. The runners aren't the greatest pieces in the world, but my impression is that the base is much worse.

Off topic a bit, I would recommend AGAINST a 160* thermostat. I think 180 T-stat is probably about perfect for where you are and what you are doing with the car. To quote another very knowledgeable member of this board, "coolant temps under 230F and above 195F and oil temps under 235F and over 215F are fine! and running a 195 deg thermostat tends to allow the coolent to spend more time exchanging heat into the air in the radiator, keep in mind oil works best, and lubracates better while in that 215-235f temp band" (Thanks Grumpyvette, hope you don't mind)

http://www.chevytalk.org/threads/sho...rue#Post415279

Last edited by rockind78; Sep 3, 2003 at 09:58 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2003 | 11:02 PM
  #11  
bigals87z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,456
Likes: 3
From: Ocean, NJ
Car: Check The Sig
i recomend a 170 stat, but if your in a cold place like Canada, maybe 195 should stay with you. 160 will be too cold for you. 195 and i sugest you do the fan switch. Just cause the stat opens at 160,170, 180, etc... doesnt mean your car is gunna be that cool. The fans is what is gunna cool it... but thats for a different board.

If your gunna stay with the LTR set up, then yea, id go with a high flow base, and large flow runners. You might not notice much now, but when that heads and cam come around... you will be happy you got the stuff when ya did.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2003 | 09:11 AM
  #12  
smithtc's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
A knowledgeable post from the previous link:

The thermostat has nothing to do with how hot an engine runs once the thermostat has opened. The thermostat keeps the coolant from circulating until the coolant temp reaches the degrees of the thermostat, then the thermostat opens and allows the coolant to circulate. It makes for a much quicker engine warm up, especially in colder weather. The engine can overheat no matter what thermostat you are using.
If you have cooling problems, one of the last places to look at is the thermostat, unless it is stuck closed. Every case is unique, though...and it all depends on the purpose.

Another knowledgeable post from the previous link:

The thermostat opening and cycling points and/or a balanced or whatever thermostat do not have ANY effect on the capacity to cool or where the engine temperature resides when over the opening/cycling point! So, your efforts in this department will not produce any "cooling" abilities.
Either way, be sure and tune the fans with your new prom.

I'd also ditch the +4 spark plugs in favor of AC Delcos.
I had some...threw them in the trash.

Take it for what it's worth...
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2003 | 11:01 AM
  #13  
Andy 91GTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
From: North Battleford, Saskatchewan, Canada
Car: 91 GTA & 92 GTA & 92 GTA
Engine: 305 TPI & 350 TPI & 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 & 3.23 & 3.23
Originally posted by smithtc


I'd also ditch the +4 spark plugs in favor of AC Delcos.
I had some...threw them in the trash.

Take it for what it's worth...
Someone else told me after I bought them that I shouldn't put them in. I just put them in because I had them for too long so I couldn't return them. The plugs have only about 100 miles on them so I'm probably going to leave them in for awhile.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2003 | 05:09 PM
  #14  
Abubaca's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 412
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
I've heard good things and bad things about the +4's.

I've never heard anything bad about AC Delco's.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2003 | 05:45 PM
  #15  
RyIROC13's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Dot on the map
Car: 1987 IROCZ-28
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700-r4
same here i've always ran delco's I'm about to put in some ac delco rapidfire though, they are platinum plugs,about 4hp they say :lala:
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2003 | 05:58 PM
  #16  
bdiroc's Avatar
Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: amanda ,ohio,usa
Car: 1989 camaro
Engine: 355 tpi
Transmission: 700r
Axle/Gears: 3.50
if you have the peanut cam dont replace the intake or runners.i am speaking from my own experience i have accell intake,runners,vette heads ,headers,full roller rockers and my best time is 14.68 at 92 .the cam is holding my car back so bad its not funny.if you do anything put headers on and converter ,.then save up and do cam , intake and runners at same time also you could change the heads to.I believe that all of the parts I put on my car were a waste of time until i put in a knew cam .becuase the peanut cam wont let me take advantage of the extra air flow.I have a lt1 cam im going to put in sometime ill let you know how much it helped when its done
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2003 | 06:04 PM
  #17  
bigals87z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,456
Likes: 3
From: Ocean, NJ
Car: Check The Sig
the Plat 4's are a gimic plug they really dont give you better spark. You can only get as much electricity and spark to the plug as your coil and electrial system gives out. And then you can only still get one spark. If you want a better spark, get a ignition capacidenc (sp?) box. Regular AC delco's work fine. Unless you had a forced induction car, then stay AC.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 10:18 PM
  #18  
KingsHustleLA's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: charlotte
Car: 1986 Camaro
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 411
Re: AS&M SS runners vs Accel

Is A Fully Ported Factory TPI Base The Same As A Fully Ported Edelbrock Base?

And Which Runners Flow Better The AS&M's Or The Accels? Also Can The Accels Be Further Ported?
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 10:46 PM
  #19  
Abubaca's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 412
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
Re: AS&M SS runners vs Accel

Is A Fully Ported Factory TPI Base The Same As A Fully Ported Edelbrock Base?
My understanding is that a fully ported factory base is close to an edelbrock base right outta the box. Don't quote me on THAT fact, but I DO know that a factory base, ported or not, isn't gonna get close to a ported aftermarket piece. LOTS more material to remove on the aftermarket base.

And Which Runners Flow Better The AS&M's Or The Accels? Also Can The Accels Be Further Ported?
The ASM runners are tubular, and can't be ported. That being said, outta the box I believe they're best, if you can find 'em. Do they even still make 'em??? The Accels (which aren't made anymore), Eddy's and SLPs are all cast, and can all be ported.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 11:06 PM
  #20  
KingsHustleLA's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: charlotte
Car: 1986 Camaro
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 411
Re: AS&M SS runners vs Accel

Originally Posted by Abubaca
My understanding is that a fully ported factory base is close to an edelbrock base right outta the box. Don't quote me on THAT fact, but I DO know that a factory base, ported or not, isn't gonna get close to a ported aftermarket piece. LOTS more material to remove on the aftermarket base.



The ASM runners are tubular, and can't be ported. That being said, outta the box I believe they're best, if you can find 'em. Do they even still make 'em??? The Accels (which aren't made anymore), Eddy's and SLPs are all cast, and can all be ported.

Oh ok so i should just have my Edelbrock Hi-Flo then, I see. My main concern is keeping my set up looking as close to factory as i can that's why i wanted to either find some AS&M runners or some Accel runners. I've heard a lot of good things about the SLP's but in my opinion they kill the TPI's look. A guy who does TPI porting offered to trade me a stage 4 ported factory base for my Edelbrock base but ifmy edelbrock is already close to a fully ported factory TPI base i'd rather just get the edelbrock base ported. Thanks for the info! much appreciated.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2012 | 06:38 AM
  #21  
luvofjah's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 20
From: PNW
Car: 91 Black Formula KR
Engine: 305 TPI R69/G92
Transmission: Astro A5-Pro 5.0-McCleod
Axle/Gears: US Gear 3.42 Eaton True Trac
Re: AS&M SS runners vs Accel

AS&M Still make them... here is my polished set I got in March... They can take a couple of months to make them...

Name:  IMG_9973.jpg
Views: 251
Size:  197.9 KB

I've seen where you can extrude hone (run abrasive paste through ports to enlarge and port) a stock base to flow like an aftermarket one.. but as mentioned, aftermarket are already bigger and allow more porting (cheaper to go 2nd route)....

http://www.extrudehone.com/auto/auto-performance.php

Rafael
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 01:08 AM
  #22  
KingsHustleLA's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: charlotte
Car: 1986 Camaro
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 411
Re: AS&M SS runners vs Accel

Originally Posted by luvofjah
AS&M Still make them... here is my polished set I got in March... They can take a couple of months to make them...



I've seen where you can extrude hone (run abrasive paste through ports to enlarge and port) a stock base to flow like an aftermarket one.. but as mentioned, aftermarket are already bigger and allow more porting (cheaper to go 2nd route)....

http://www.extrudehone.com/auto/auto-performance.php

Rafael




Dammmn! Those are nice..


I See, A Guy Who Specializes In Porting Factory GM TPI Bases Said He Will Do A Stage 4 Port Job Or Basically Port It To Match Up With AS&M Runners And In Return I Just Give Him My Edelbrock Base. I Mean I'm Just Thinking If It's Factory Or Aftermarket If He Ports It To Fit AS&M Runners It Will Be The Same, And If I'm Wrong Please Correct Me LoL


Here's A Video He Made So You Guys Can See His Porting, It Looks Really Legit! Let Me Know What You Guys Think.



Last edited by KingsHustleLA; Dec 6, 2012 at 01:27 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 02:48 AM
  #23  
cuisinartvette's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 27
From: Sanctuary state
Car: 67 ******mobile
Engine: 385 Solid roller
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.11
Re: AS&M SS runners vs Accel

A guy who does TPI porting offered to trade me a stage 4 ported factory base for my Edelbrock base
Thats because the edelbrock is better than what hes offering
Keep the edelbrock.
Ive done stock bases a lot farther than his "stage 4" and the edelbrock offers more potential plain and simple. 300cfm out of a stock ported base like those BS.

Last edited by cuisinartvette; Dec 6, 2012 at 02:51 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 02:55 AM
  #24  
KingsHustleLA's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: charlotte
Car: 1986 Camaro
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 411
Re: AS&M SS runners vs Accel

[QUOTE=cuisinartvette;5439011]Thats because the edelbrock is better than what hes offering
Keep the edelbrock.
Ive done stock bases a lot farther than his "stage 4" and the edelbrock offers more potential plain and simple. 300cfm out of a stock ported base like those BS.[/QUO


Yeah if it sounds too good to be true then most likely it is right? lol thanks for the advise!
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 08:00 AM
  #25  
smithtc's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Re: AS&M SS runners vs Accel

Stage 4 ??? haha!

Accel/Lingenfelter are the best... But I see on this post where I previously recommended some AS&M.

Whatever you can get a hold of these days I suppose.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
28
Oct 24, 2025 02:00 PM
Fanatic1074
Tech / General Engine
45
Oct 3, 2022 05:57 AM
Royal_Z
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
4
Sep 30, 2015 08:45 PM
efiguy
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
Sep 27, 2015 01:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:31 AM.