TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

PUZZLED--Removed air cleaners and go slower?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 14, 2005 | 08:43 AM
  #1  
Zap Racing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,079
Likes: 1
From: Houston Texas
Car: 1989 IROC Z-28
Engine: L98 350--modified
Transmission: 700 R4--modified
Axle/Gears: 4:10 Posi
PUZZLED--Removed air cleaners and go slower?

Can somebody splain why, cause I 'm not quite sure I understand. The last time I went to the1/8" mile strip, I removed the air cleaners and the car ran about 2 tenths slower than with them in?



See car mods below
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2005 | 10:47 AM
  #2  
Red Devil's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 0
From: E.B.F. TN
Car: Tree Huggers
Engine: Do Not
Transmission: Appreciate Me.
What were you using for an air filter housing? My first shot would be turbulence of higher temp air ingested, or a combo of both.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2005 | 12:55 PM
  #3  
CRZYTRN-92Z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
From: albuquerque
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: 350 L98 w/ D-1SC
Transmission: POS 700-R4
Removing the cleaner leans out the A/F ratio of the car. If you had enough fuel before and removed the filter it could have caused a leaner condition than you wanted. Just a possibility.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2005 | 01:26 PM
  #4  
Zap Racing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,079
Likes: 1
From: Houston Texas
Car: 1989 IROC Z-28
Engine: L98 350--modified
Transmission: 700 R4--modified
Axle/Gears: 4:10 Posi
My car has the stock (restricted I know!) dual air filter plastic intake system + K+N filters--modified MAF (Bosch).

One other person had the same possible explanation, that with the amount of airflow with the filters in place --at WFO--the amount of gas being dumped at max matches the amount of air coming in.

With the filters removed there is an increase in airflow volume and even thought the Maf sensed that, it was pumping at max, which he said means that possibly a slight increase in fuel pressure at the AFPR, or in the chip programming, would be able to take advantage of the increased air flow and keep the correct air/fuel ratio.

Now, if that is so, I need to figure out if this IS what is happening.

I guess the first and easiest thing to do is check the fuel pressure and try increasing it and see if it runs any better?

Anybody have any other suggestions?

Thanks,
Craig
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2005 | 03:04 PM
  #5  
92blue's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 3
From: Florida
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Yet another 350 TPI
Transmission: Borg Warner 6 spd
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Removing the cleaner leans out the A/F ratio of the car.
Can you explain how that happens if the air filters are upstream of the MAF?

As far as the original question, you can't compare the two setups fairly with only two runs. There are two many variables involved. You need to make several runs with filters, and several without, and compare them to try to reduce variability.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2005 | 03:04 PM
  #6  
kdrolt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 849
Likes: 2
From: MA
Car: 93 GM300 platforms
Engine: LO3, LO5
Transmission: MD8 x2
Anybody have any other suggestions?
Uhh, sucking pre-heated air from the radiator?

You supposedly gained a minor power increase from losing the intake friction of the air filter. But you also pulled pre-heated air into the engine. The loss due to heated air (especially the hot air in the engine bay while you are in the staging lanes, then on the line waiting for the tree) is more than the power gained from the filter delete. You didn't flush the pre-heated air from the engine bay until you were a good distance down the track (when there was enough air speed to flush the hot air). That's one reason why cold air intakes are better at the track.

Hot intake air = less power.

That's my guess.

Last edited by kdrolt; Apr 14, 2005 at 03:09 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2005 | 03:06 PM
  #7  
92blue's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 3
From: Florida
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Yet another 350 TPI
Transmission: Borg Warner 6 spd
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Well, for every 11 degrees that you drop intake air temperature, you pickup between .5 - 1.0 % more hp.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2005 | 09:02 AM
  #8  
Zap Racing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,079
Likes: 1
From: Houston Texas
Car: 1989 IROC Z-28
Engine: L98 350--modified
Transmission: 700 R4--modified
Axle/Gears: 4:10 Posi
Originally posted by kdrolt
Uhh, sucking pre-heated air from the radiator?

You supposedly gained a minor power increase from losing the intake friction of the air filter. But you also pulled pre-heated air into the engine. The loss due to heated air (especially the hot air in the engine bay while you are in the staging lanes, then on the line waiting for the tree) is more than the power gained from the filter delete. You didn't flush the pre-heated air from the engine bay until you were a good distance down the track (when there was enough air speed to flush the hot air). That's one reason why cold air intakes are better at the track.

Hot intake air = less power.

That's my guess.
The air intake source was the same--I did not remove the plastic housing--just the filters and resealed the oem plastic housing, so the air would still be routed past the ambient air temp sensor and through the MAF.

Last edited by Zap Racing; Apr 15, 2005 at 09:09 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2005 | 09:04 AM
  #9  
Zap Racing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,079
Likes: 1
From: Houston Texas
Car: 1989 IROC Z-28
Engine: L98 350--modified
Transmission: 700 R4--modified
Axle/Gears: 4:10 Posi
Originally posted by Red Devil
What were you using for an air filter housing? My first shot would be turbulence of higher temp air ingested, or a combo of both.
The stock OEM dual filter housing--just removed the filters and resealed the system.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2005 | 09:07 AM
  #10  
Zap Racing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,079
Likes: 1
From: Houston Texas
Car: 1989 IROC Z-28
Engine: L98 350--modified
Transmission: 700 R4--modified
Axle/Gears: 4:10 Posi
As well as playing with the fuel pressure, I think I'm gonna hook up my scanner--make a few runs and see if it shows the car leaning out--both with and without the air cleaners in place.

Thanks for all the info--given me a couple things to think about--will post after I have more info!~
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2005 | 09:41 AM
  #11  
Sonar_un's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,201
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Car: '86 T/A
Engine: 350/LT1 Intake
Transmission: 700R4 - Built
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.42
Hey Craig, have you done any chip tuning yet to that car? I know its nowhere near stock.

If you haven't.. PM me, maybe I can burn you a chip that could help you out, plus I can pull some data and see what your car is really doing.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2005 | 10:23 AM
  #12  
Zap Racing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,079
Likes: 1
From: Houston Texas
Car: 1989 IROC Z-28
Engine: L98 350--modified
Transmission: 700 R4--modified
Axle/Gears: 4:10 Posi
Originally posted by Sonar_un
Hey Craig, have you done any chip tuning yet to that car? I know its nowhere near stock.

If you haven't.. PM me, maybe I can burn you a chip that could help you out, plus I can pull some data and see what your car is really doing.
It has an Ed Wright chip right now.

I am supposed to get a Mikeeee chip next weekend, before he sells all his rig to buy a clutch for his car.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2005 | 09:26 PM
  #13  
1bad91Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 5
From: Houston Area
Car: Faster
Engine: Than
Transmission: You!
Hotter air + a "Slighty" leaner condition = just enough to trip the knock sensor.

Knock sensor sends signal to ECM which retards the hell out of the timing.

Power loss.....


Case closed....
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2005 | 09:22 AM
  #14  
Zap Racing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,079
Likes: 1
From: Houston Texas
Car: 1989 IROC Z-28
Engine: L98 350--modified
Transmission: 700 R4--modified
Axle/Gears: 4:10 Posi
Originally posted by 1bad91Z
Hotter air + a "Slighty" leaner condition = just enough to trip the knock sensor.

Knock sensor sends signal to ECM which retards the hell out of the timing.

Power loss.....


Case closed....
Self installed toggle switch that temporally disables knock senser had knock senser off for 2 of the 3 runs.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2005 | 06:34 PM
  #15  
robsgta's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS
Car: 88GTAnotchbac/91 -Z/66 Chevelle
Engine: All strokers
Transmission: Pro built 700r4's
Hey Craig, its been awhile..
Im not sure about the sequence of things.
But it sounds like you are comparing two runs that you made recently to previouse runs you made in the past.
Did you run the these times with and with out filters during the same outing?

Rob
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2005 | 08:02 PM
  #16  
Zap Racing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,079
Likes: 1
From: Houston Texas
Car: 1989 IROC Z-28
Engine: L98 350--modified
Transmission: 700 R4--modified
Axle/Gears: 4:10 Posi
Hey Dude! Where U been?

All runs were in the same 3 hour time span.

2 with
3 without
4 with
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2005 | 08:09 PM
  #17  
robsgta's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS
Car: 88GTAnotchbac/91 -Z/66 Chevelle
Engine: All strokers
Transmission: Pro built 700r4's
I have been working 6 days a week 10 plus hours a day trying to get caught up. (wich will probaly never happen) I was told that we are fixin to back to 5 days a week when we do I'm goin to do some catch'n up with you guys !

Back to trying to decipher your delima.
What kind of filters you running ?
Did your trap MPH increase or decrease or just your time drop?
I was thinking of different possibilities and since no one has said it yet .
I was wondering if you gained some horse power/torque out of the hole enough for it to cause a 2 tenths of traction loss ?
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2005 | 09:40 AM
  #18  
Zap Racing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,079
Likes: 1
From: Houston Texas
Car: 1989 IROC Z-28
Engine: L98 350--modified
Transmission: 700 R4--modified
Axle/Gears: 4:10 Posi
Originally posted by robsgta
I have been working 6 days a week 10 plus hours a day trying to get caught up. (wich will probaly never happen) I was told that we are fixin to back to 5 days a week when we do I'm goin to do some catch'n up with you guys !


I KNOW THE FEELING!

Back to trying to decipher your delima.
What kind of filters you running ?

K+N


Did your trap MPH increase or decrease or just your time drop?

SLIGHTLY--MAYBE 1 MPH--NOT SURE THREW AWAY ALL BUT THE BEST TIME SLIPS LAST WEEK.


I was thinking of different possibilities and since no one has said it yet .

PERSONALLY I STILL THINK THAT SINCE THE FILTERS WERE REMOVED AND INTAKE SYSTEM SEALED UP AS NORMAL--THE AIR SOURCE WOULD HAVE BEEN THE SAME, SO NO MORE OR LESS HOT AIR THAN NORMAL. I THINK THE INJECTERS ARE MAXED AT WFO, BUT STILL COREECT RATIO--WHEN FILTERS ARE REMOVED, INJECTERS ARE MAXED OUT BUT CAN'T KEEP UP WITH ADDITIONAL AIR CAUSING LEAN--NEED TO INCREASE FUEL PRESSURE--HAVE NOT CHECKED THAT YET! GONNA GET MIKE TO DO A CHIP IN THE NEXT WEEK OR 2--HE ALREADY ORDERED CHIP.


I was wondering if you gained some horse power/torque out of the hole enough for it to cause a 2 tenths of traction loss ?

HAD THE NITTOS ON--WAS HOOKING UP VERY GOOD
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2005 | 09:00 PM
  #19  
91GTABird's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: Memphis, Tn
Car: 92' RS
Engine: 357
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 4.10
modded 5.7. It isnt stock. TRACTION sounds like a problem. Try some DR's with and without the filter and i think they will be pretty much the same. Thats why they have bracket racing so you people with consistancy have a better chance then people with 5,000,000,000 horsepower.

My $0.02
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2005 | 08:03 AM
  #20  
Zap Racing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,079
Likes: 1
From: Houston Texas
Car: 1989 IROC Z-28
Engine: L98 350--modified
Transmission: 700 R4--modified
Axle/Gears: 4:10 Posi
See post immediately above

Had the Nittos DR's on--hooking up very good--low 1.8 60 ft times!--which I'm told for a mid 8 sec 1/8 mile car is pretty good?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bubbajones_ya
Cooling
24
Jul 6, 2024 08:32 PM
GeneralIesrussi
Carburetors
6
Jun 20, 2024 07:21 PM
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
Dec 10, 2019 07:07 PM
edoff13
TBI
10
Sep 11, 2015 03:55 AM
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
0
Sep 2, 2015 07:28 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:37 PM.