IAC part number changes from year to year - which to use?
IAC part number changes from year to year - which to use?
Ok first off I work for Advance Auto. These listings are what I come up with at work, so it's possible another parts house might show something different.
So on to my question. Does anyone know the difference between these two TPI IAC part numbers. Both are GP Sorensen #'s.
1986 to 1988 lists part # 779-10003.
1989 lists part # 779-10018.
I don't have either in stock to compare them to each other. I'm wondering if it's something as stupid as the connector being different, or something more complicated such as the step counts somehow working differently.
My problem is I have no idea which one to order because my car is such a frankenstein.
I'm running the '89 bin file, but my ECM wiring harness is from an '86. This is of course for my '87 Camaro with the '92 engine block, lol.
So on to my question. Does anyone know the difference between these two TPI IAC part numbers. Both are GP Sorensen #'s.
1986 to 1988 lists part # 779-10003.
1989 lists part # 779-10018.
I don't have either in stock to compare them to each other. I'm wondering if it's something as stupid as the connector being different, or something more complicated such as the step counts somehow working differently.
My problem is I have no idea which one to order because my car is such a frankenstein.
I'm running the '89 bin file, but my ECM wiring harness is from an '86. This is of course for my '87 Camaro with the '92 engine block, lol.
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,341
Likes: 151
From: Cincinnati,Ohio
Car: 1991 BandittII Firebird
Engine: 5.7 HSR
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt
i would think that you would need to use part # 779-10018 because that is what your ECM would expecting.
Originally posted by 91banditt2
i would think that you would need to use part # 779-10018 because that is what your ECM would expecting.
i would think that you would need to use part # 779-10018 because that is what your ECM would expecting.
I was hoping someone knew the answer, but it seems I'll just have to get both in and compare them. I'll keep you guys posted in case anyone else runs into this.
Well I compared both at work today. Physically they are interchangeable. The only noticable difference is the spring. The 86-88 part has a tighter spring on it with more coils. I forgot to take my camera to work to take a side by side picture. When I get around to installing it in the next couple of days I'll take a pic of my old one next to the new one.
Trending Topics
Well I finally got around to installing it, so here is a picture. You can clearly see the 89 unit on the right has a different spring. The car seems a lot more stable when first started, so either the old one was bad, or simply dirty, or perhaps having the 89 valve to go with my 89 PROM actually makes a difference. Anyway I thought you guys would appreciate the picture.
Re: IAC part number changes from year to year - which to use?
Now I am really dazed ....779-10018 .....you work at advance .....this number does not show up when I do a webpage search . How about a gm part number for 89 to 92 IAC housing and valve . thanks again
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 514
Likes: 44
From: New Jersey
Car: 87 Monte Carlo SS
Engine: 89 350TPI Transplant
Transmission: 2004r
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: IAC part number changes from year to year - which to use?
What happened to the pics in post #8?
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,223
Likes: 1,148
From: Il
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: IAC part number changes from year to year - which to use?
T-bodys maybe different but I'm fairly sure the IAC housings that bolt to the bottom of the T-bodys are the same for TPI F-cars. Vets are a bit different on the coolant tubes.
The spring difference could just be a supplier difference.
The spring difference could just be a supplier difference.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992 Trans Am
History / Originality
27
May 10, 2023 07:19 PM










