Can I replace the passenger side valve cover hose with a breather?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 1
From: Worcester, MA
Car: 86 T/A
Engine: HSR 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.77 posi
Can I replace the passenger side valve cover hose with a breather?
I'm having a hell of a time getting all the replacement hoses and whatnot to fit right since I got new valve covers so I was considering just getting a breather. It'll clean up the look of the engine bay too. Has anyone done this without any change in performance at all?
Supreme Member

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 4
From: Bonner Springs, KS
Car: 1995 Corvette
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 6 spd Manual
Axle/Gears: Dana 44, 3:45:1
The only problem with doing that on a MAF system is the possibility for unmetered air to enter the intake (that hose that runs to the throttle body is how the system meters the fresh air for the PCV system). Whether it makes much of a difference or not I couldn't tell you (never had a MAF system), but thats the theory. Probably be best to hook it back to where it was.
Supreme Member

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 4
From: Bonner Springs, KS
Car: 1995 Corvette
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 6 spd Manual
Axle/Gears: Dana 44, 3:45:1
If you're converting to SD, no problem, I did it on my brothers LT1 intake conversion. The purpose of the hose (or whatever takes its place) is to supply the fresh air for the PCV system. As long as it does that, then it serves its purpose correctly.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 3,968
Likes: 1
From: Macedonia ,OH
Car: Formula
Engine: 6.0 LSX
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt 3:27
I put a breather on mine and left the hole open on the TB. Nothing gets sucked in on that nipple that I know of.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 1
From: Worcester, MA
Car: 86 T/A
Engine: HSR 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.77 posi
Originally posted by Mkos1980
I put a breather on mine and left the hole open on the TB. Nothing gets sucked in on that nipple that I know of.
I put a breather on mine and left the hole open on the TB. Nothing gets sucked in on that nipple that I know of.
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Originally posted by Mkos1980
I put a breather on mine and left the hole open on the TB. Nothing gets sucked in on that nipple that I know of.
I put a breather on mine and left the hole open on the TB. Nothing gets sucked in on that nipple that I know of.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 3,968
Likes: 1
From: Macedonia ,OH
Car: Formula
Engine: 6.0 LSX
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt 3:27
Put your finger there. It doesnt suck anything. What if you had a hose to the valve cover? Going to be sucking in oil and air like the PVC system is? That would equal out eachother. If you think about it on our cars and other cars, what kind of air is the PVC sucking in? unfiltered... The tube you are talking about is accually suppose to be fresh Air going INTO the valve cover.
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 3
From: Browns Town
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4)
Engine: 406 Hyd Roller 236/242
Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 2.4K stall
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break
The PCV can be a "closed system", meaning that fresh air is taken from a port in front of the TB (after the air cleaner assy) and introduced into one side of the motor. The other side comes out of the valve cover and into the connection on the throttle body "behind" the throttle blades.
In an "open" system, you can have a breather on one side valve cover and then connect the other side to the port behind the throttle blades.
Of course in both instances you need to have a PCV valve in the circuit to meter the amount of air that moves. I don't believe there is a benifit to either system, but to me using the built in air cleaner would insure that you have a fresh filter every once in a while where the push in breathers tend to stay installed for a lifetime.
In an "open" system, you can have a breather on one side valve cover and then connect the other side to the port behind the throttle blades.
Of course in both instances you need to have a PCV valve in the circuit to meter the amount of air that moves. I don't believe there is a benifit to either system, but to me using the built in air cleaner would insure that you have a fresh filter every once in a while where the push in breathers tend to stay installed for a lifetime.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NBrehm
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 25, 2015 11:49 PM





