Only a 15.8
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Car: 88' GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Only a 15.8
Hey guys I got a 88 GTA yesterday with 350/a4 and did a tune up on it, cap rotor wires plugs fuel filter oil change and ran it on the gtech and ended up with a 15.8 at 91 mph, shouldnt it be more in the 14's, I also had a mid 7 sec 0-60 run. What else should I try to get it up to factory specs? Tips would be gladly appreciated!!!!
Thanks,
Mack
Thanks,
Mack
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,964
Likes: 4
From: Norfolk, VA. USA
Car: 86 Trans Am, 88 Formula
Engine: 95LT4, 305TPI
Transmission: T56, T5
Altitude can have an effect on the times. What track and where is it located?
For reference, my 86 Trans Am LG4 305 5 speed ran a 14.94 @ 92mph and my 88 Formula 305TPI Auto ran a 15.2 @ 89mph. I haven't taken the Formula to the track with the 5 speed yet, will take it later this year when it cools down a bit.
For reference, my 86 Trans Am LG4 305 5 speed ran a 14.94 @ 92mph and my 88 Formula 305TPI Auto ran a 15.2 @ 89mph. I haven't taken the Formula to the track with the 5 speed yet, will take it later this year when it cools down a bit.
Re: Only a 15.8
Originally posted by fordasskikr
ran it on the gtech and ended up with a 15.8 at 91 mph
ran it on the gtech and ended up with a 15.8 at 91 mph
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
Car: 1987 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: 5.7 350 TPI - SLP Runners, AFPR, MSD Goodies
Transmission: 700R4 - Shift Kit, Corvette Servo
Axle/Gears: BW 9 bolt, 3.27s
Gtech may be off a little, but I would contribute your runs to altitude.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
Car: 1987 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: 5.7 350 TPI - SLP Runners, AFPR, MSD Goodies
Transmission: 700R4 - Shift Kit, Corvette Servo
Axle/Gears: BW 9 bolt, 3.27s
Re: Re: Only a 15.8
Originally posted by kevinc
Kinda funny that the guys w/ the really "loud" screen names like fordasskikr, vipereater, etc. run times a Honda could kill...just an observation.
Kinda funny that the guys w/ the really "loud" screen names like fordasskikr, vipereater, etc. run times a Honda could kill...just an observation.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Car: 88' GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
I think there is about 100k miles on the car but it's got the digital dash and its kinda flaky so I'm not sure, Im in kansas and not sure of the altitude but it is almost nothing. The screen name just matches my email but dont see why you must talk s***, but every car starts off stock, sorry I'm just a little sharper at picking names than you
Trending Topics
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn NY
Car: 1985 iroc
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: auto
Originally posted by fordasskikr
I think there is about 100k miles on the car but it's got the digital dash and its kinda flaky so I'm not sure, Im in kansas and not sure of the altitude but it is almost nothing. The screen name just matches my email but dont see why you must talk s***, but every car starts off stock, sorry I'm just a little sharper at picking names than you
I think there is about 100k miles on the car but it's got the digital dash and its kinda flaky so I'm not sure, Im in kansas and not sure of the altitude but it is almost nothing. The screen name just matches my email but dont see why you must talk s***, but every car starts off stock, sorry I'm just a little sharper at picking names than you
Originally posted by fordasskikr
The screen name just matches my email but dont see why you must talk s***, but every car starts off stock, sorry I'm just a little sharper at picking names than you
The screen name just matches my email but dont see why you must talk s***, but every car starts off stock, sorry I'm just a little sharper at picking names than you
Running that slow with a "fast" screen name invites razzing, get fast or get used to it.
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
From: Mechanicsburg,Pa usa
Car: 92'Camaro RS
Engine: a loud one
Transmission: bolted to the engine
Its a post, simmer! Just make sure you don't race any Fords that pull up next to yoU!
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn NY
Car: 1985 iroc
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: auto
I've noticed that there are a lot of guys on this site that jump down peoples throats right away! A lot of us are younger and not as knowledgable, thats why we ask questions!
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Waynesville,Ohio
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 2.77
Re: Only a 15.8
Originally posted by fordasskikr
Hey guys I got a 88 GTA yesterday with 350/a4 and did a tune up on it, cap rotor wires plugs fuel filter oil change and ran it on the gtech and ended up with a 15.8 at 91 mph, shouldnt it be more in the 14's, I also had a mid 7 sec 0-60 run. What else should I try to get it up to factory specs? Tips would be gladly appreciated!!!!
Thanks,
Mack
Hey guys I got a 88 GTA yesterday with 350/a4 and did a tune up on it, cap rotor wires plugs fuel filter oil change and ran it on the gtech and ended up with a 15.8 at 91 mph, shouldnt it be more in the 14's, I also had a mid 7 sec 0-60 run. What else should I try to get it up to factory specs? Tips would be gladly appreciated!!!!
Thanks,
Mack
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Car: 88' GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Originally posted by kevinc
Along that line of reasoning, the children w/ the NOS stickers all over their Toyotas are "just a little sharper" at bodywork too.
Running that slow with a "fast" screen name invites razzing, get fast or get used to it.
Along that line of reasoning, the children w/ the NOS stickers all over their Toyotas are "just a little sharper" at bodywork too.
Running that slow with a "fast" screen name invites razzing, get fast or get used to it.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 0
From: E.B.F. TN
Car: Tree Huggers
Engine: Do Not
Transmission: Appreciate Me.
My Taurus is stock and runs better times. :P
Relax, Kev is just razzing, pretend it's the shop and one of the guys is giving you ****. Your relative car to this board is slow, if you frequent many boards of various contextually distinct bases pick a more generic name... otherwise your mates will razz you.
Notwithstanding of course that he made a general observation, not a directed comment.
Relax, Kev is just razzing, pretend it's the shop and one of the guys is giving you ****. Your relative car to this board is slow, if you frequent many boards of various contextually distinct bases pick a more generic name... otherwise your mates will razz you.
Notwithstanding of course that he made a general observation, not a directed comment.
Originally posted by david roush
You must be a Kurt Busch fan............just an observation.
You must be a Kurt Busch fan............just an observation.
(I didn't even know who that was until I looked him up just now. I quit watching NASCAR years ago when it turned into a racing version of pro wrestling.)
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
From: Mechanicsburg,Pa usa
Car: 92'Camaro RS
Engine: a loud one
Transmission: bolted to the engine
This was probably not the first time you've been wrong.
what a bikering post you guys made. who cares what his screen name is. it doesnt matter. its like everyone wants to find something to flame the next about. this guys wants to know about his car he doesnt care what you think of his name. now back to topic. every car runs differently when i searched for what a stock GTA ran it was usually anywhere from a mid 15 down to a high 14. my car has run a 14.8 with the following mods listed in my sig. some guys ran this stock but this can be contributed to many things. altitude as previously mentioned, engines condition, rear gear is also a big factor. go out check your rear gear and go from there. now hopefully i didnt spell anything wrong or anything to start a flame war on me....seems like its that easy.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
From: Lakewood, CO
Car: 1994 Jeep Wrangler
Originally posted by A88GTANotchback
what a bikering post you guys made. who cares what his screen name is. it doesnt matter. its like everyone wants to find something to flame the next about. this guys wants to know about his car he doesnt care what you think of his name. now back to topic. every car runs differently when i searched for what a stock GTA ran it was usually anywhere from a mid 15 down to a high 14. my car has run a 14.8 with the following mods listed in my sig. some guys ran this stock but this can be contributed to many things. altitude as previously mentioned, engines condition, rear gear is also a big factor. go out check your rear gear and go from there. now hopefully i didnt spell anything wrong or anything to start a flame war on me....seems like its that easy.
what a bikering post you guys made. who cares what his screen name is. it doesnt matter. its like everyone wants to find something to flame the next about. this guys wants to know about his car he doesnt care what you think of his name. now back to topic. every car runs differently when i searched for what a stock GTA ran it was usually anywhere from a mid 15 down to a high 14. my car has run a 14.8 with the following mods listed in my sig. some guys ran this stock but this can be contributed to many things. altitude as previously mentioned, engines condition, rear gear is also a big factor. go out check your rear gear and go from there. now hopefully i didnt spell anything wrong or anything to start a flame war on me....seems like its that easy.
wow! GTAs are slow.... hahaha! I just figured i would continue the flame trend.
Cut the guy some slack, this is a tech board, not a place for me to say how much bigger my...... well you get the point Last edited by SMURFN' Z28; Aug 31, 2005 at 03:03 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 3
From: Quebec, Canada
Car: 1988 Pontiac Firebird Formula 350
Engine: 5.7L
Transmission: Automatic 4 speeds
Axle/Gears: 2.77
I have a completely stock 88 GTA, with a 305 TPI, auto trans and 3.27 rear and run a 15.56 in the 1/4... So something is wrong with your GTA
Junior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Kingsmill, Tx
Car: '97 30th SS, '89 IROC-Z
Engine: LT4, LT1
Transmission: T56, 4L60E
the fact that the car has around 100k, so thats alot of miles on an engine and tranny so its not going to run the same times as it did off of the assembly line. change oil, get a tune up, put 91 w/ octane booster, check gears ....you know that ol' stuff. good luck with it!!
Junior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS
Car: 1989 firebird/91 tpi formula
Engine: 327 small block/305 tpi
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: superior axles/3.42's
15.8 seems a bit slow---just ran my 91 formula 305tpi and came through at 15.9 and that was with 95+ degrees outside. What gears do you have. 2:73's are holding me back
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 3
From: Quebec, Canada
Car: 1988 Pontiac Firebird Formula 350
Engine: 5.7L
Transmission: Automatic 4 speeds
Axle/Gears: 2.77
I have 115K on my engine without a rebuild and I did a 15.56 with my 305 TPI...
Maybe you need a good tune-up like I did? Spark plugs, wires, air/fuel filter, cap, rotor, PCV valve etc... Get your injectors rebuild at cruizinperformance or something like that....
Maybe you need a good tune-up like I did? Spark plugs, wires, air/fuel filter, cap, rotor, PCV valve etc... Get your injectors rebuild at cruizinperformance or something like that....
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
From: Newark, Ca, USA
Car: 02 ws-6
Engine: 5.7 liter
Transmission: t56
this is a tech board and not a place to act like children. Leave the immaturaty at the playground. Btw g-tech times are not exactly accurate, best thing to do is to take it to the tracks and see what it does.
Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 431
Likes: 5
From: WPB, FL
Car: '89 Trans Am GTA
Engine: TPI350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: BW 3.27s
Your mph sounds about right. My GTA ran a 14.91 basically stock with a trap speed of 91.4mph. I'd say there's a few things for you to look at:
I think these will help you drop some time off your 1/4mi. Hope this helps, post some new numbers (incl. 60' time and trap speed) once you get to a real track.
- Not sure if your tune-up included checking the timing. Set to 6* BTDC (or more if you want to go beyond stock, just be careful).
- Get a K&N.
- Your rear gears are probably 2.77 or whatever it is, which translates into less torque multiplication (I think that's the right term) at the wheels.
- My friend's G-Tech said his car runs high 14s/low 15s when he basically walks my GTA that now runs 14.21. Go figure.
- Take it to a real track and get some real numbers. And practice getting a good launch before you go there otherwise you'll look like an idiot.
- Are you power-braking? Hold the brake down with your left foot and press the gas up to about 1500 rpm (or however high you can get it without spinning the tires).
- One more thing, just let the tranny shift on it's own.
I think these will help you drop some time off your 1/4mi. Hope this helps, post some new numbers (incl. 60' time and trap speed) once you get to a real track.
Moderator
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 2
From: Schererville , IN
Car: 91 GTA, 91 Formula, 89 TTA
Engine: all 225+ RWHP
Transmission: all OD
Axle/Gears: Always the good ones
U know,
heres a stupid one.
Have u set the timing to spec taking care to follow the proper procedure, ie disconnecting the est wire?
Also have u gone thru the basics, like plugs/wires/fuel filter/air filter/tested fuel pressure/ohm the inejectors
might be wise to do , at least than u would know if it is vehicle related ro driver related
later
Jeremy
heres a stupid one.
Have u set the timing to spec taking care to follow the proper procedure, ie disconnecting the est wire?
Also have u gone thru the basics, like plugs/wires/fuel filter/air filter/tested fuel pressure/ohm the inejectors
might be wise to do , at least than u would know if it is vehicle related ro driver related
later
Jeremy
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,183
Likes: 42
From: Oakdale, Ca
Car: 89 IrocZ
Engine: L98-ish
Transmission: 700R4
Use the GTECH as a tuning aid, i/e make a mod, nore the difefernces. Once you do a few things, then take it to the track and get an idea of GTECH vs Track time...some report GTECH pretty much right on, others report GTECH being high or low in ETs and MPH.
But, good thing about a GTECH is if you use the same road, set it up the same, it will be a good monitoring device for mods you make and tuning you do.
Sorry, it's too early for me to fan any flames this morning. Maybe later.
But, good thing about a GTECH is if you use the same road, set it up the same, it will be a good monitoring device for mods you make and tuning you do.
Sorry, it's too early for me to fan any flames this morning. Maybe later.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L EFI LTR setup
Transmission: T-5 World Class
Even with the Mileage on it ...I don't see it being the reason why . Mine was a 305 5 speed with 3.08's pulled a best of 15.1@ 93mph and it had 227'000km's of hard mileage and the tranny was on it's way out in a bad way .
Just an idea, but maybe it's your start that’s affecting you. When I first got my 5.7 Formula, I wasn't used to the torque. I either gave it to much power and spun em. Or I gave to little gas and didn't do much. It took me a lil while to get used to the increase of torque over my old car.
Just my
Just my
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Car: 1988 Corvette
Engine: 5.7L TPI L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: D36 2:59
You no whats funny is i have a gear ratio of 2.59 in my vette. I'm sure it's in the mid to low 13s too. I think my 700R trans tranforms the 2.59 to like a 3.23 in first gear. Damn know that I'm thinkin about it I have to much gear its got a wild top end though . Wonder how she'll run with some 3.55, I need suspenstion first though? anyway just bord outta my mind and wanted to post something. But yes I think you'll scared that new bee, and he might be trading in that GTA for a honda civic with plastic spinners.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Car: 88' GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
you didnt scare me at all, I just figured their wasn't any point wasting my time arguing. I did get the car runnin quite a bit better by pounding out the cat which must have been plugged. I've been getting around 19 mpg with it which seems pretty good considerin how I drive. You guys must think I just now got something with those round things called wheels but I'm real knowledgable for my age and maybe you guys should try to help instead of discouraging someone like me new to the 3rd gens, because others might buy a honda, they are alot nicer in those forums to newbies.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Car: 88' GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Lol yes I know you did, quite a few of you left me good information and I thank you for that very much instead of trying to be a smart ***. Thanks for the help to the ones who tried to help
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: School:Lima,Ohio
Car: 1989 Formula Ws6
Engine: 305 tpi
Transmission: 5speed
Axle/Gears: 3.23
why would adding 91+ octane booster help?
is there any vin #s or anything to look for to find out what gears are in the back beside the obvious spinning the tire and counting
i heard it was in the back by the spare or something?
is there any vin #s or anything to look for to find out what gears are in the back beside the obvious spinning the tire and counting
i heard it was in the back by the spare or something?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,435
Likes: 1
From: Rockville, Maryland
Car: 1986 Z28 Camaro Gunmetal Gray with
Engine: GM Crate ZZZ HO 350, Edelbrock head
Transmission: Rebuilt 700r4 all TransGo and Beast
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt with 3.73 gears
i know how you feel, i was just recently new to the board and i got flamed too because i was young. dumb thing is i am pretty knowledgeable about this stuff too. i guess alot of the guys dont understand that kids are getting into this stuff these days, and arent like most of the other kids who are ricers. good luck with the car man.
and by the way, everybody suggesting a tune up, read before you post. the first thing he said was that he changed out wires, plugs, cap, rotor, filter, etc.
and by the way, everybody suggesting a tune up, read before you post. the first thing he said was that he changed out wires, plugs, cap, rotor, filter, etc.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (45)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,970
Likes: 1
From: Northern, VA
Car: Pair of 92 Z28s
sig says my time on a basically stock l98...
i knew how to launch my car and it was perfect temp and everything. It was my first run ever on the dragstrip i even redlighted it first and i was amazed by how well i did even being nervous.
honestly its all ur 60' time that shows how you did...people complaining running low 15s with l98s normally have like 2.3-2.5 60' times...launch is all you gotta worry about on an automatic. Let it shift by itself.
My car wasnt abused when i got it at 103k miles i could tell by the owner and just no signs of it. I got lucky in a way and my car has been a blast for me without any real problems.
But anyway...im a kid too, you gotta learn to take half the abuse you get when your new at lets say a job, school, or thirdgen.org
Being a peon at a shop changing oil, your at the bottom of the barrel gotta learn to take the ****.
also side note: ZZ4 86 Z28 have u run ur car at the strip yet?
i knew how to launch my car and it was perfect temp and everything. It was my first run ever on the dragstrip i even redlighted it first and i was amazed by how well i did even being nervous.
honestly its all ur 60' time that shows how you did...people complaining running low 15s with l98s normally have like 2.3-2.5 60' times...launch is all you gotta worry about on an automatic. Let it shift by itself.
My car wasnt abused when i got it at 103k miles i could tell by the owner and just no signs of it. I got lucky in a way and my car has been a blast for me without any real problems.
But anyway...im a kid too, you gotta learn to take half the abuse you get when your new at lets say a job, school, or thirdgen.org
Being a peon at a shop changing oil, your at the bottom of the barrel gotta learn to take the ****.
also side note: ZZ4 86 Z28 have u run ur car at the strip yet?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,435
Likes: 1
From: Rockville, Maryland
Car: 1986 Z28 Camaro Gunmetal Gray with
Engine: GM Crate ZZZ HO 350, Edelbrock head
Transmission: Rebuilt 700r4 all TransGo and Beast
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt with 3.73 gears
hey, sorry to go a little off topic, but steve, are we meeting up anytime. i really want those taillights you got, and if you would be nice enough to show me your airbox mod, i have been wanting to do it, but i cant justify doing it without seeing it beforehand. just pm me or something.
fordasskikr, honestly, how many times have you been to the strip with the car? Alot of times people just go a few times, and think that is as fast as they can go. Believe me, I am guilty of that one myself a while back. Get some sticky tires, and go to the track all year long, and try to get the best times you can out of your car. Improve the 60fts, MPH, shiftpoints, etc. Ill bet that car will go a few tenths, or more faster.
Member
iTrader: (-1)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, MO
Car: 89 Firebird Formula(Totalled), 91 C
Engine: Mild 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 :-(
yea there is another way to find out your gear ratio. lol Pull the cover and count the teeth on the ring and pinion, then divide
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Lafayette, LA
Car: 1990 Firebird
Engine: 3.1 V6 to a 5.7 V8
Transmission: Level 3 Bowtie 700R4
I have seen some G-Techs recalled for bad programing inside I would take it to the track to get some real numbers. Than go from there on better times.
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
again i wouldnt rely on the GTECH
get some more practice..
on the street, ur calculated 1/4mile time will be less cuz no car can launch as well on the street as they can at teh strip. the strip has a prepared surface with rubber and VHT LOL helps ALOT
ur trap speed of 91 is abit low for a stock L98. but again, Gtech could be wrong
u need to get out to a real track and practice alot. you'll get better as u go along. it happens. no one runs their best run their first time....
so go to a real track with some decent weather and see what happens.. then go from there
get some more practice..
on the street, ur calculated 1/4mile time will be less cuz no car can launch as well on the street as they can at teh strip. the strip has a prepared surface with rubber and VHT LOL helps ALOT
ur trap speed of 91 is abit low for a stock L98. but again, Gtech could be wrong
u need to get out to a real track and practice alot. you'll get better as u go along. it happens. no one runs their best run their first time....
so go to a real track with some decent weather and see what happens.. then go from there
Don't gtech your car going up a hill lol
15.8 is ridiculously high times, even for a 305 TPI. I went 14.5@97 MPH with my IROC pretty much as I bought it (bone stock) and then 14.2@100 MPH when I gave it a tune up. 350 TPI and 3.27 9-bolt. It wasn't at all hard to beat LT1s and hold off LS1s until the top end (about 70 MPH) when TPI just stopped breathing. You should be running mid-low 14s with a healthy 350 TPI and 3.27s, 14.6-14.8 with 2.77s. At any rate, give the car a tune up (plugs, cap, rotor, wires, oil), check timing and adjust as necessary, make sure there aren't any leaks (vacuum, exhaust or manifold), take a look at the computer and make sure some smartass hasn't put a hyperjunk chip in lol. Also get good tires and launch it. When you cut a 2.0 60' like I did, you can expect mid-low 14s from your STOCK 350 TPI iroc.
the other thing you can do if all else fails is check the 8th digit on the VIN. If it's not an 8, it's not a 350 and your times would make sense for a 305. I knew more than a few people who thought (and were told they were being sold) a 350 car, when under the hood was a 305 TBI or a 305 TPI (matched the VIN) which made sense for them being so slow. This is also a reason why the 5.0 guys think they are so much faster; a bunch of misinformed, newbies with 305 cars tell the fox they are running it's a 350 TPI and get waxed
15.8 is ridiculously high times, even for a 305 TPI. I went 14.5@97 MPH with my IROC pretty much as I bought it (bone stock) and then 14.2@100 MPH when I gave it a tune up. 350 TPI and 3.27 9-bolt. It wasn't at all hard to beat LT1s and hold off LS1s until the top end (about 70 MPH) when TPI just stopped breathing. You should be running mid-low 14s with a healthy 350 TPI and 3.27s, 14.6-14.8 with 2.77s. At any rate, give the car a tune up (plugs, cap, rotor, wires, oil), check timing and adjust as necessary, make sure there aren't any leaks (vacuum, exhaust or manifold), take a look at the computer and make sure some smartass hasn't put a hyperjunk chip in lol. Also get good tires and launch it. When you cut a 2.0 60' like I did, you can expect mid-low 14s from your STOCK 350 TPI iroc.
the other thing you can do if all else fails is check the 8th digit on the VIN. If it's not an 8, it's not a 350 and your times would make sense for a 305. I knew more than a few people who thought (and were told they were being sold) a 350 car, when under the hood was a 305 TBI or a 305 TPI (matched the VIN) which made sense for them being so slow. This is also a reason why the 5.0 guys think they are so much faster; a bunch of misinformed, newbies with 305 cars tell the fox they are running it's a 350 TPI and get waxed
Last edited by vampiroc; Oct 13, 2005 at 01:23 PM.
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 765
Likes: 1
From: Chico/Antioch California
Car: 1989 iroc Z Hardtop
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
Keep in mind the GTA's were The heaviest 3rd gen made...
That being said i would expect a good running non abused 350 tpi car to be atleast in the 14's.
Double check your cap and wires, maybe somethings crossed or your only running on 7 cyls. Gears most likely need to be addressed 3.27's atleast would be a good idea.
The L98 stock exhaust is horrible, headers high flow cat and 3in piping would be a good idea.
Practice your launch! If you can get off the line without shredding the rubbers that will make a huge improvement in your 1/4 time.
Oh and Mack welcome to TGO and dont worry about the guys talking smack, its pointless to argue with them, and for every little kid on here spittin theres someone with a ton of know how and the willingness to help a stranger, That being said good choice of cars, hopefully it is in fact an L98(not an LB9) and just out of tune for some reason or another...
Good luck
That being said i would expect a good running non abused 350 tpi car to be atleast in the 14's.
Double check your cap and wires, maybe somethings crossed or your only running on 7 cyls. Gears most likely need to be addressed 3.27's atleast would be a good idea.
The L98 stock exhaust is horrible, headers high flow cat and 3in piping would be a good idea.
Practice your launch! If you can get off the line without shredding the rubbers that will make a huge improvement in your 1/4 time.
Oh and Mack welcome to TGO and dont worry about the guys talking smack, its pointless to argue with them, and for every little kid on here spittin theres someone with a ton of know how and the willingness to help a stranger, That being said good choice of cars, hopefully it is in fact an L98(not an LB9) and just out of tune for some reason or another...
Good luck
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 2
From: Elgin, IL
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
lol
Anyways...15.8@91 is pretty mismatched. I ran a 15.5@88 with my stock/cat-back 305 and a 2.2x 60'.
A 91MPH trap should be a mid-high 14 with a good 60'
What were your 60' times....2.5? 2.6?
Anyways...15.8@91 is pretty mismatched. I ran a 15.5@88 with my stock/cat-back 305 and a 2.2x 60'.
A 91MPH trap should be a mid-high 14 with a good 60'
What were your 60' times....2.5? 2.6?
Senior Member


Joined: May 2003
Posts: 804
Likes: 1
From: Thornton, CO
Car: 1987 GTA 350
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4/2400 stall
Axle/Gears: B/W 3:27 posi disc
15.8 is slow. Honestly go to the track and get "real" numbers, GTECH doesn't cut it. You will be doing yourself a favor to learn to run at a track.IMO
Conrad
Conrad
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
damn I used to think stock 5.7 TPIs were *sorta* fast... but they seem to get basically 15.0 seconds on average...
that's only slightly faster than the 4thgen v6...
at least you guys are 3 whole seconds faster than my old v6...
that's only slightly faster than the 4thgen v6...
at least you guys are 3 whole seconds faster than my old v6...
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 383
Likes: 1
From: fond du lac, WI
Car: 1988 trans am GTA
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
somthing is wrong with the car or the g-tech my gta 350 tpi ran it on a g-tech the other day and ran a 15.5 at 92 mph then egine light turned on like min after i ran it and i hardly made it home and it read that i had 163 hp im getting sick of that engine light!!!!!!!!!!! i should pull the engine and just put a carb set up and remove the whole computer!





