TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

MAF is broken, replace or switch to SD?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 29, 2005 | 03:42 PM
  #1  
80Sierra's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: Alberta, Canada
Car: 80 GMC K35
Engine: TPI 355
Transmission: NV4500
Axle/Gears: 4.10
MAF is broken, replace or switch to SD?

Hey guys!

I've got a bit of a decision on my hands here.

I've got a mild 355 in my 3/4 ton 4x4 truck, with a stock TPI intake on it. Its got a 165 ECM right now, and a custom chip for my engine in it. However, my MAF doesn't appear to be working correctly, so I'm trying to decide if I should get an aftermarket MAF, or if I should get myself a 730 ECM, and go speed density.

I've done some basic prom work for my TBI truck, but I'm trying to decide if I'd even be able to get my truck to run at all on the stock speed density prom, lol
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2005 | 04:10 PM
  #2  
firebirdjosh's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 1
From: Worcester, MA
Car: 86 T/A
Engine: HSR 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.77 posi
Depends how fast you need the car back. If you have time to shop around then you can convert to SD for dirt cheap. I have an extra chip for my 305 to change from MAF to SD if you need one (just change the fuel tables and you're ready to rock). If you want to change to SD down the road, get a used MAF and sell it for what you paid for it. Everyone is going to tell you how this subject has been beaten to death so do a quick search and you'll find alot of threads with pinouts of the ECM and conversion tables.

Also, a stock 730 chip for a 350 in your truck will not work in your car that came with a 165 ecm. The VSS input is different (atleast it changed in the F-bodies, I assume all the 165 and 730 ECMs work the same).
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2005 | 08:17 PM
  #3  
80Sierra's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: Alberta, Canada
Car: 80 GMC K35
Engine: TPI 355
Transmission: NV4500
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Ah, thats right... I dunno how I'd change the VSS out. I'm running an SM465 in my truck, other than one of those costly inline VSS, I'm not sure how else I'd go about providing a speed input. At the moment, its getting it's 2k ppm signal from the back of the speedometer.

I'm in no rush to get the truck running at the moment, cause I am still in the midst of building it, lol

Last edited by 80Sierra; Oct 29, 2005 at 08:20 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2005 | 09:16 PM
  #4  
Jay's Avatar
Jay
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
From: Newington, CT
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: 5.7 RamJet
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Dana44 4.10
If you can do the PROM stuff, then it's pretty easy. Just use the existing VSS setup you have now and change the flag from magnetic to optical, then the SD will run off the 2000 PPM input.

I'm using a converted SD in my IROC, and have and MAF harness that I am converting now to go in the K10 next spring.

I have a few '730 ECMs that I have grabbed for cheap.. look on ebay for ones from non F body cars and you can find deals. Or even local people parting out Corsicas or Berettas.. anything with the '730 will work.
Aside from that, you'll have to either wire in a resistor or replace the knock sensor, and add in the MAP stuff.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2005 | 12:39 AM
  #5  
80Sierra's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: Alberta, Canada
Car: 80 GMC K35
Engine: TPI 355
Transmission: NV4500
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Have you got a spare 5.7 ECM lying around I could possibly buy from you? Also, are all MAP sensors the same between TPI and TBI?

I can infact do some mild PROM burning (getting BLMs right by adjusting the volumetric efficiency tables, and spark curve etc) so I'm glad to hear I can adjust the newer ECM to run off the 2k ppm signal

What resistance is needed to use the MAF knock sensor with the 730? I just laid down over 100 bucks Canadian on a brand new AC Delco 5.7 knock sensor, and I'd hate to have to get a new one, lol

So far, from what I've learned in here, I do believe I am going to do the speed density conversion. It sounds far cheaper than buying a new aftermarket MAF, and would eliminate the headache of trying to figure out the air box ducting, just put a good ol' paper cone filter on the throttle body (I don't believe in K&N filters, let way too much stuff through, esspecially if you don't remember to maintain them religiously)

One last question -- I am putting Hydro boost into my truck, so I no longer need the big vac line for the old vac booster. What size / thread pattern is that nipple so I can buy a plug for it instead?
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2005 | 01:15 AM
  #6  
firebirdjosh's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 1
From: Worcester, MA
Car: 86 T/A
Engine: HSR 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.77 posi
Also, cavalier's had the 730 ECM for a while as well. 91-93 or something around those years.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2005 | 05:19 AM
  #7  
Jay's Avatar
Jay
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
From: Newington, CT
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: 5.7 RamJet
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Dana44 4.10
The '730 ECM ESC circuit is looking for a 3.9K ohm resistance in the
knock sensor and the '165 KS is 100.0K ohm. You can put a resistor
(From Radio Shack, et al.) to bias the 100.0K ohm KS so that it appears
to the ECM as 3.9K ohm. The resistor should be between 3.8K and 4.2K
ohms, and connect between the Knock Sensor wire of the ECM (GF9) and
Ground.


If you are using the ESC connector on the firewall to bring
the KS signal in, you will have to jumper pins "C" and "E"
on the ESC harness plug. While you are building the jumper,
you can add the resistor between the jumper and pin "D"
(making it a 3-prong jumper) and your '165 KS will be properly
biased for use in the '730 ECM
taken from - http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~davis/z28/ecm_swap_730/

as for spare ECM, they are one of those thing i tend to not like parting with
They are easy enough to find though. You only need the right PROM, any 730 ECM will work. It's basically the early 90s V6 GM cars with MPI, I know the on in my IROC is from a Buick something or other.

The other thing you would have to change is the VATS flag, that will need to be turned off.

As for the MAP sensor, I am not sure. I seem to recall reading on here that they do interchange both being 1 BAR, but I can't say for sure.

As for the nipple, just pull it out and head to the local hardware / plumbing supply store to compare.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2005 | 09:21 AM
  #8  
Vader's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 19,660
Likes: 311
Correct. All GM 1 BAR MAP sensors have the same output scale.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2005 | 03:14 PM
  #9  
Grim Reaper's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 5
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
Just to play "devil's advocate", other than the MAF, was there anything else wrong? If not, then you may wish to stay with the MAF system. You have to admit the "fix" for the MAF system is simple enough.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2005 | 05:00 PM
  #10  
80Sierra's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: Alberta, Canada
Car: 80 GMC K35
Engine: TPI 355
Transmission: NV4500
Axle/Gears: 4.10
I dunno if there is anything else wrong with it, very well could be. As I think I mentioned, this truck is still in the re-construction stage, and I have not driven it.

I am fairly confident that the MAF is no good, but that is not the only reason for wanting to swap.

First and foremost is that I do not want to have to make some sort of cheesy looking, or restrictive air ducting for the MAF, I'd far rather run a paper cone filter on the throttle body.

Second is that I can eliminate a few relays by going to speed density. I have all of my TPI's wiring out of the truck at the moment, and plan on totally rebuilding the power / relay harness, so that I've got all of my modules, relays, and other components that used to be under the firewall behind my glove box on my airbox. Also, gives me an opportunity to eliminate a lot of extra wiring that would otherwise go into the engine compartment, and replace the relays with modern bosch style relays to match up with the rest of the truck.

Third, of course, is the expense of a new MAF.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2005 | 05:40 PM
  #11  
firebirdjosh's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 1
From: Worcester, MA
Car: 86 T/A
Engine: HSR 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.77 posi
Originally posted by 80Sierra

First and foremost is that I do not want to have to make some sort of cheesy looking, or restrictive air ducting for the MAF, I'd far rather run a paper cone filter on the throttle body.
That alone is a huge debate. 3" diameter ducting is hardly restrictive, and a cone filter taking in cool air is going to give better results than one sucking in hot air from the engine bay.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2005 | 05:45 PM
  #12  
Jay's Avatar
Jay
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
From: Newington, CT
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: 5.7 RamJet
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Dana44 4.10
i have seen the firebird ducting used, flipped upside down. I am not sure what I am going to do for my setup yet since I had planned on using dual batteries.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2005 | 08:37 PM
  #13  
80Sierra's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: Alberta, Canada
Car: 80 GMC K35
Engine: TPI 355
Transmission: NV4500
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Originally posted by firebirdjosh
That alone is a huge debate. 3" diameter ducting is hardly restrictive, and a cone filter taking in cool air is going to give better results than one sucking in hot air from the engine bay.
Exactly what I mean

I can have a nice looking ducting from a firebird, but I am told its real restrictive ducting. Or, I can use some cheesy looking air ducting.

Really, as far as I am concerned, the amount of power gained by a cold air intake is really isn't worth it for a truck that isn't built for racing

Last edited by 80Sierra; Oct 30, 2005 at 08:43 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
specialized
TPI
27
Jun 18, 2022 09:26 AM
89GTAOz
Tech / General Engine
13
May 16, 2020 09:31 AM
Logan Bryant
TPI
10
Aug 27, 2015 11:52 AM
NBrehm
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 25, 2015 11:49 PM
Fronzizzle
Electronics
2
Aug 9, 2015 01:15 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:08 AM.