bad quarter mile times?
bad quarter mile times?
i have a 91 camaro 350 slp runners, ported pleneum and and edlebrock base i went to the track yesterday and my best run was a 15.2 =( and i deas why its so slow?
rt .108
60 2.424
330 6.495
1/8 9.840
mph 8th 73.45
1000 12.742
1/4 15.204
mph 91.56
rt .108
60 2.424
330 6.495
1/8 9.840
mph 8th 73.45
1000 12.742
1/4 15.204
mph 91.56
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, Ohio
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: L98 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.70
Re: bad quarter mile times?
Well, for one, your 60 ft time is extremely high, even for a third-gen. throw a set of drag radials on and cut that down below 2.0 and youshould see a nice improvement on ET. Also, if all you have done is the intake and not gotten rid of the stock exhaust manifolds you're really holding yourself back there.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,984
Likes: 37
From: North Central Indiana
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 383
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44 IRS
Re: bad quarter mile times?
well your 60foot time does suck, but a 91mph trap speed is only good for a high 14 or so. The intake mods aren't gaining you anything without a full exhaust, headers and cat back with high flow cat. Some of these cars are factory freaks, but most I've seen are only good for low 15s to high 14s at best in stock form. Get a better exhaust on it and see what happens then. What gears does the car have?
Re: bad quarter mile times?
Nope, not even close.
JFWIW - my car was by no means a freak. Pretty much stock save for K&N's and a TB - I went 14.4 @ 97 MPH with a 2.26 60' foot. (dry-rotted street radials)
Something is up, before I would spend another dime on performance parts - I would make certain everything is good. Leak down test, verify base timing, check the FP w/ a good gauge to make sure it has plenty of fuel delivery, read the plugs after a pass, etc, etc.
Where are you located? What track did you race at? I'm curious to see the elevation and the DA for the date & time you ran.
Just my $0.10
JFWIW - my car was by no means a freak. Pretty much stock save for K&N's and a TB - I went 14.4 @ 97 MPH with a 2.26 60' foot. (dry-rotted street radials)
Something is up, before I would spend another dime on performance parts - I would make certain everything is good. Leak down test, verify base timing, check the FP w/ a good gauge to make sure it has plenty of fuel delivery, read the plugs after a pass, etc, etc.
Where are you located? What track did you race at? I'm curious to see the elevation and the DA for the date & time you ran.
Just my $0.10
Re: bad quarter mile times?
i checked base timing and it was good i am hoping i just have some piston slap setting off my knock sensor 150,000 miles on the engine i have to check my fuel pressure
i ran at fontana speed way in cali it was about 90 degrees out
i ran at fontana speed way in cali it was about 90 degrees out
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 0
From: Cincinatti OH
Car: 1991 L03 700r4 RS
Engine: 1987 WS6 Trans AM Lb2
Transmission: Th350 red neck Performance 3k stall
Axle/Gears: 95 Mustang 8.8 built with 3.73s
Re: bad quarter mile times?
That's bad, like real bad. Did you have about 600 extra pounds of weight in the car? Seriously the slowest 350 car I ever saw run was an 89 Formula, it went 14.7's and when I pulled the tune it was pathetic, it barely had 30 degrees of timing and the curve was lazy as could be. A quick prom swap fixed him up. I think you have something wrong, like a plugged up converter, low fuel pressure, or a knock sensor itself going bad. I've never heard of "a little piston slap" setting off the knock sensor so bad as to slow one down like that.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post







