TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

which do you think is smarter and more cost effective?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 5, 2010 | 01:59 PM
  #1  
Copchaser's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento Ca
Car: 86 Trans am, 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 355 Sbc, nothin yet
Transmission: 700r4- both
which do you think is smarter and more cost effective?

So I am looking into buying a tpi baseplate that excepts early style heads (currently running the SD Vortec TPI base), and I plan on having some port work done. I don't want to have to add aluminum to the intake to hog it out, but I do want some decent sized ports created. My question is as follows: should I buy an Accel, Edelbrock or TPIS base and port from there or can I get the same results from a used factory intake?
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2010 | 02:33 PM
  #2  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,066
From: Salina, KS
Re: which do you think is smarter and more cost effective?

The Accel is a reboxed Edelbrock. The TPIS is the Edelbrock intake with a different name on it, and some porting. So you've got your choice between the Edelbrock, or a ported Edelbrock. I've got an Edelbrock laying here, and the ports are almost identical to the stock intake I've got laying next to it. It's not very impressive.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2010 | 05:56 PM
  #3  
Copchaser's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento Ca
Car: 86 Trans am, 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 355 Sbc, nothin yet
Transmission: 700r4- both
Re: which do you think is smarter and more cost effective?

Do u feel there is enough material on the factory intake do a decent amount of porting to it. Don't mind goin aftermarket, but once again, I'm lookin at overall cost. Thanks
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2010 | 07:32 PM
  #4  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,066
From: Salina, KS
Re: which do you think is smarter and more cost effective?

They're about twice as much meat to the Edelbrock, which allows for more porting then the stock intake. The stock intake is pretty thin, there isn't much aluminum there to work with.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2010 | 12:00 AM
  #5  
Tony89GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 2
From: Prince George, BC, Canada
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 5.7L Supercharged
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.70
Re: which do you think is smarter and more cost effective?

Look for a used Accel intake they have the biggest ports of all them.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2010 | 09:47 AM
  #6  
Copchaser's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento Ca
Car: 86 Trans am, 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 355 Sbc, nothin yet
Transmission: 700r4- both
Re: which do you think is smarter and more cost effective?

Thanks for your input. is there anyone else who may be able to chime in on the subject?

Last edited by Copchaser; Oct 14, 2010 at 08:24 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2010 | 11:20 AM
  #7  
Copchaser's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento Ca
Car: 86 Trans am, 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 355 Sbc, nothin yet
Transmission: 700r4- both
Re: which do you think is smarter and more cost effective?

bump
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2010 | 11:51 AM
  #8  
Drac0nic's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 17
Re: which do you think is smarter and more cost effective?

My production base ported out to 1.75" MRG-146 gaskets no problem. That being said you're not going to find any runners larger than that. Another thing I'm not sure of (measurements would be required and I don't have an aftermarket base here) is if they increased the area of the runners at other spots than the runner inlets. It would be harder to perceive and not as easy to detect. That being said the only reason I'd get an aftermarket base is if it were for the Vortecs and I wouldn't pay what SD wants for one. $400-500 puts you well into the territory of a Pro Flow or a converted Vic. Jr. Buy some runners to match and all of a sudden you're a lot closer to a Pro Flow. Just saying.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2010 | 11:52 AM
  #9  
VincentZ28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 5
From: San Antonio TX
Car: 1990 G92 IROC Z Miniram
Engine: 388cu 6.4 Liters
Transmission: G-Force T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Gears
Re: which do you think is smarter and more cost effective?

If you can, find a real Accel manifold that has the name Accel on it. If not, then use an Edelbrock manifold. You're going to have to do some major port work to it for it to flow at least 290cfm to 315cfm. Other wise you will never get the most power out of your combo. Since you live in California, the Super Ram is the best choice. If you want to run a Miniram, you need to buy the EGR kit from TPIS. Whatever you do don't use the Vortec Manifold. It's a stock port manifold to fit Vortec Heads. Its a waste of time and money to port one.

Last edited by VincentZ28; Oct 15, 2010 at 11:55 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2010 | 11:52 PM
  #10  
Copchaser's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento Ca
Car: 86 Trans am, 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 355 Sbc, nothin yet
Transmission: 700r4- both
Re: which do you think is smarter and more cost effective?

Originally Posted by VincentZ28
Whatever you do don't use the Vortec Manifold. It's a stock port manifold to fit Vortec Heads. Its a waste of time and money to port one.
Yeah i found that out the hard way. Thats why Im looking to go back to earlier style heads. Like I said, I want a good amount of porting done, Im gonna run 200cc heads. Im hoping a good port on a factory manifold will get me in the ballpark of some good airflow to make those heads happy.

I see your also running a TPIS Big Mouth with an extruded hone done to it. Could you please define what that means?
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2010 | 12:47 PM
  #11  
1989GTATransAm's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,859
Likes: 14
From: Cypress, California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
Re: which do you think is smarter and more cost effective?

"Look for a used Accel intake they have the biggest ports of all them."

....and a better design.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TinnMann2
Canadian Region
16
Jun 18, 2017 05:10 PM
jovibuilt
Exterior Parts Wanted
3
Oct 18, 2015 08:12 PM
SRKLEGIN
Interior Parts Wanted
5
Oct 12, 2015 07:28 AM
TheCardinal
Exterior Parts for Sale
4
Oct 1, 2015 07:40 PM
Damon
Tech / General Engine
8
Sep 26, 2015 04:29 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 PM.