MAF vs MAP
MAF vs MAP
Converting my old 1/2 ton to TPI. The plenum is for MAF; wish to use MAP. The Plenum doesn't have the hole or tapped holes to mount the sensor; wondering if I can drill into it for the vac line, and tap holes to mount. Anyone have knowlege of this? I prefer the longer fins of the earlier plenums, and would prefer to keep mine, I've got it polished. Thanks for your input.
Re: MAF vs MAP
To my knowlege the MAF systems had no MAP, the MAP was used only on the later (90-92) Speed density systems. If I can't adapt the plenum, I guess I'll get a later plenum.
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,736
Likes: 14
From: Not in Kansas anymore
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 383 SP EFI/ 4150 TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: QP 9" 3.73
Re: MAF vs MAP
You can use any vac port as a means of supplying a vac signal to a remote mount MAP sensor as the factory did with some installs
Usual recommendation is to keep the vac line as short as poss to reduce response time
Usual recommendation is to keep the vac line as short as poss to reduce response time
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,736
Likes: 14
From: Not in Kansas anymore
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 383 SP EFI/ 4150 TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: QP 9" 3.73
Re: MAF vs MAP
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-...f-165-map.html
Or you rework the MAF harness to use the later '730 MAP ECM
http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~davis/z28/ecm_swap_730/
Trending Topics
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: MAF vs MAP
Yeah is easy to swap maf harness to map and run 730 just need the extra ecm connectors. 730 uses 3, while 165 has 2.
Remote mount the map and it will be fine
Remote mount the map and it will be fine
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BumpaD82
Tech / General Engine
37
Feb 26, 2016 02:57 PM









