proportioning valve ???
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hialeah/Mia.
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 350 tbi l98,
Engine: 5.7 tbi
Transmission: t5
proportioning valve ???
In about two or three weeks i am going to swap my 10 bolt open for a 9 bolt posi disc rear.
I was woundering what will happen if i dont change the proportioning valve and just leave the stock drum valve.
Yesturday i went to a place that they only sell f-body parts, and asked for a proportioning valve for the swap i want to do and they told me that i would need to get a 82-84 proportioning valve that came of a car with disc. Becouse the threads on the newer cars were different.
Can anyone give me some advice, or help me with this little problem i have. -Eric
I was woundering what will happen if i dont change the proportioning valve and just leave the stock drum valve.
Yesturday i went to a place that they only sell f-body parts, and asked for a proportioning valve for the swap i want to do and they told me that i would need to get a 82-84 proportioning valve that came of a car with disc. Becouse the threads on the newer cars were different.
Can anyone give me some advice, or help me with this little problem i have. -Eric
#2
If you don't change the valve, the rear brakes either come in too hard or too soft, I don't recall which but, it don't work proper.
for the aggrivation of having to bleed brakes, might as well do it right the first time, you know what I mean.
for the aggrivation of having to bleed brakes, might as well do it right the first time, you know what I mean.
#3
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
You need to avoid the pre-'84 valves because they have SAE fittings. You need metric fittings.
#4
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by savage_racing
If you don't change the valve, the rear brakes either come in too hard or too soft, I don't recall which but, it don't work proper.
for the aggrivation of having to bleed brakes, might as well do it right the first time, you know what I mean.
If you don't change the valve, the rear brakes either come in too hard or too soft, I don't recall which but, it don't work proper.
for the aggrivation of having to bleed brakes, might as well do it right the first time, you know what I mean.
wrong.
it works fine.
its not ideal, but it does work good and is far better then stock.
if you do decide to change them, you need a 85-92 4 wheel disc valve.. the earlier ones have a diffrent thread then your 90.
#5
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hialeah/Mia.
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 350 tbi l98,
Engine: 5.7 tbi
Transmission: t5
So you are telling me that if i stay with the stock proportioning valve it will work?
Any ways the drums really dont do too much work.
-Eric
Any ways the drums really dont do too much work.
-Eric
#6
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by 90tbi305
So you are telling me that if i stay with the stock proportioning valve it will work?
Any ways the drums really dont do too much work.
-Eric
So you are telling me that if i stay with the stock proportioning valve it will work?
Any ways the drums really dont do too much work.
-Eric
yes they stop better then the stock drums.
however, they wont stop as fast as they potentially could with a diffrent prop valve. how much of a diff vs the stock Disc/Disc valve? not much. how much vs a aftermarket adjustible... more then enough to justify the cost and time of installation.. in my opinion.
what i would do (or i should say, what i did do) is drive with the stock disc/drum prop valve, and on your next full brake service, put in a new aftermarket wilwood valve. also when you do that, its a good time to put in new flex lines, stainless or factory replacement, doesnt matter.
#7
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grand Island, NY
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1990 Formula
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: WC T5
I got a new prop valve for my 90 formula for my LS1 front/rear disk swap. The GM PART # 10164112 Late 89 to 92 valve 1.5M .
cost me about $65 shipped New.
cost me about $65 shipped New.
Trending Topics
#8
Originally posted by MrDude_1
wrong.
it works fine.
its not ideal, but it does work good and is far better then stock.
if you do decide to change them, you need a 85-92 4 wheel disc valve.. the earlier ones have a diffrent thread then your 90.
wrong.
it works fine.
its not ideal, but it does work good and is far better then stock.
if you do decide to change them, you need a 85-92 4 wheel disc valve.. the earlier ones have a diffrent thread then your 90.
Now hang on, I'm not here to **** and moan but how can you tell me I'm wrong. the only thing you've done is said that yes it comes in a little harder/better. All you have done is eliminate where I was confused.
Don't say I'm blatently wrong when you are clarifing my comment. That's just plain rude and ignorant.
#9
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by savage_racing
Now hang on, I'm not here to **** and moan but how can you tell me I'm wrong. the only thing you've done is said that yes it comes in a little harder/better. All you have done is eliminate where I was confused.
Don't say I'm blatently wrong when you are clarifing my comment. That's just plain rude and ignorant.
Now hang on, I'm not here to **** and moan but how can you tell me I'm wrong. the only thing you've done is said that yes it comes in a little harder/better. All you have done is eliminate where I was confused.
Don't say I'm blatently wrong when you are clarifing my comment. That's just plain rude and ignorant.
Originally posted by savage_racing
If you don't change the valve....... it don't work proper.
If you don't change the valve....... it don't work proper.
they work properly. fine. correctly. safely. however you want to phrase it.
so, i said:
wrong. it works fine.
doesnt seem rude or arrogent to me. it works properly
i apologize if it came off as rude, i was just correcting that last statement.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
355tpipickup
Tech / General Engine
9
09-13-2015 11:35 PM