700 R4 to 5-speed, whats the trick?
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Car: 2001 NBM Z-28, 1987 Camaro
Engine: LS1, LS1
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: stock and stock
700 R4 to 5-speed, whats the trick?
I'm wanting to do a conversion, what's the trick to doing one? Is it really hard or easy??? Give me some advice, thanks...
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
From: I said that when I was sober...ish
Car: 1985 Mustang GT
Engine: hamsters
Transmission: a hamster wheel
Depends on your mechanical abilty and access to tools. Its not very hard, it probably took me 12 hours total of actual work. I also took the engine out to do it wich I think made it easier.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Car: 2001 NBM Z-28, 1987 Camaro
Engine: LS1, LS1
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: stock and stock
tried allready but there isn't anything out there for a 5-speed conversion for a third gen camaro. Everything is for a 6-speed and they are different, same concept though. Just thought someone could give me a link to a site on doing the swap.
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
From: I said that when I was sober...ish
Car: 1985 Mustang GT
Engine: hamsters
Transmission: a hamster wheel
Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
From: bryan, tx
Car: 92 rs camaro
Engine: 305 lo3
Transmission: WC t-5
theres a link in the tech articals, and a step by step instruction page on the tech articals at www.fbodymotorsports.com
Trending Topics
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
From: Eastpointe Michigan
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: mini-rammed 350
Transmission: WC T-5
I just did this swap,IMHO,the hardest part was getting the 700R4 out....
Maybe I got lucky...for once
If you have any questions,I might be able to help,contact me
Later
Steve
Maybe I got lucky...for once
If you have any questions,I might be able to help,contact me
Later
Steve
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,522
Likes: 92
From: Aridzona
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
The "trick" to ANY conversion is that if you want your car to be like a factory five speed car, do everything exactly like a factory five speed car. The absolute "trick" is to have a donor car from which you can remove everything that your automatic car doesn't have and copy anything that can't be unbolted and installed in yours. That actually applies to any swap, whether transmission, EFI or whatever.
Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
From: bryan, tx
Car: 92 rs camaro
Engine: 305 lo3
Transmission: WC t-5
i about to do this swap as well, to my understanding you have to be careful with drilling the hole for the master cylinder so it will line up with the pedal and not put the pushrod in a bind, those of you who have done this swap, do you have any measurements from maybe the bolts on the booster or any other reference points to where the hole needs to be?
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,522
Likes: 92
From: Aridzona
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
Originally posted by 92rsbowtie
i about to do this swap as well, to my understanding you have to be careful with drilling the hole for the master cylinder so it will line up with the pedal and not put the pushrod in a bind, those of you who have done this swap, do you have any measurements from maybe the bolts on the booster or any other reference points to where the hole needs to be?
i about to do this swap as well, to my understanding you have to be careful with drilling the hole for the master cylinder so it will line up with the pedal and not put the pushrod in a bind, those of you who have done this swap, do you have any measurements from maybe the bolts on the booster or any other reference points to where the hole needs to be?
The end of the upper pushrod sits in a pocket in the piston in the master cylinder. Kind of like the slave piston sits in the clutch fork. It (master cyl.) can be off a few degrees with no ill effect.
The 3rd gen clutch pedal assy. has two rods that hang down and have holes in line with where the 2 mounting holes go in the firewall. You can hang pedals & use those for reference. Also, the gasket on a stock used master works as a template.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,964
Likes: 4
From: Norfolk, VA. USA
Car: 86 Trans Am, 88 Formula
Engine: 95LT4, 305TPI
Transmission: T56, T5
Originally posted by Brock's91RS
I just did this swap,IMHO,the hardest part was getting the 700R4 out....
Maybe I got lucky...for once
If you have any questions,I might be able to help,contact me
Later
Steve
I just did this swap,IMHO,the hardest part was getting the 700R4 out....
Maybe I got lucky...for once
If you have any questions,I might be able to help,contact me
Later
Steve
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
From: Pueblo Co
Car: 1989 C4
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 307
Having a donor car at hand or close by is the best way to go as long as there is no chance for someone else to be grabbing parts from it. JMD hit it right on. A totaly stealth install is the only way to go on either a T-5 ot T-56. I had quite a few different transmissions installed in my bird all of them appeared factory and functiond like they came from the factory with the car. My next and final conversion will be a T-56, if you plan on an engine that will make a fair amount of power I'd suggest you use the best component choice possible.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,964
Likes: 4
From: Norfolk, VA. USA
Car: 86 Trans Am, 88 Formula
Engine: 95LT4, 305TPI
Transmission: T56, T5
btw, auto cars have the connector up above the drivers side kick panel for the Clutch Pedal Safety switch. You would never know my car was an auto unless you pulled off the rubber boot over the shifter hole and saw the ugly hole I cut.
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
From: West Texas
Car: '82 Camaro
Engine: 305
Transmission: wc T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi
Looking around in any topic on this website that mentions T5's will give lots of information. Two of us did this same swap, very common, three months ago using a parts car and got advice from people here--everything lined up factory smooth the first time. We were a little perturbed about putting the hydraulics into an '82, a non-hydraulic car, but used a template off the parts car and a little encouragement from this website and now it looks absolutely factory original; plus it's a '91 WC T5, a step up in strength over what was available in '82.
The interchangability of this car is amazing--every bolt and little interior screw we needed from the '91 parts car went into the '82. The front end of the torque arm is stamped into a W shape in cross section and the W reversed itself some time in '84, I believe, but our '82 torque arm mated with the '91 torque arm mount on the tranny perfectly. We couldn't find a new torque arm mount, the rubber piece. We decided not to hook up the clutch switch so it'll start in gear like an older car--just a matter of taste--and it took a while to figure out how to get the electronic speedometer sending unit replaced with a mechanical one but the answer was simple: just pull the electronic one out and plug in a mechanical one.
If you like driving stick, don't be afraid of this swap. It changed my car from a Suzie Secretary automatic 305 to a really fun car to drive, especially with the 3.73's that were already in the car.
Those 3.73's will probably be changed to 3.23's some time this winter.
The interchangability of this car is amazing--every bolt and little interior screw we needed from the '91 parts car went into the '82. The front end of the torque arm is stamped into a W shape in cross section and the W reversed itself some time in '84, I believe, but our '82 torque arm mated with the '91 torque arm mount on the tranny perfectly. We couldn't find a new torque arm mount, the rubber piece. We decided not to hook up the clutch switch so it'll start in gear like an older car--just a matter of taste--and it took a while to figure out how to get the electronic speedometer sending unit replaced with a mechanical one but the answer was simple: just pull the electronic one out and plug in a mechanical one.
If you like driving stick, don't be afraid of this swap. It changed my car from a Suzie Secretary automatic 305 to a really fun car to drive, especially with the 3.73's that were already in the car.
Those 3.73's will probably be changed to 3.23's some time this winter.
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,522
Likes: 92
From: Aridzona
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
Originally posted by rbjones
The interchangability of this car is amazing--every bolt and little interior screw we needed from the '91 parts car went into the '82. The front end of the torque arm is stamped into a W shape in cross section and the W reversed itself some time in '84, I believe, but our '82 torque arm mated with the '91 torque arm mount on the tranny perfectly.
Those 3.73's will probably be changed to 3.23's some time this winter.
The interchangability of this car is amazing--every bolt and little interior screw we needed from the '91 parts car went into the '82. The front end of the torque arm is stamped into a W shape in cross section and the W reversed itself some time in '84, I believe, but our '82 torque arm mated with the '91 torque arm mount on the tranny perfectly.
Those 3.73's will probably be changed to 3.23's some time this winter.
Were not the 82 torque arms (behind a TH200) shorter than the 83-92 tq arms? Did it just slide that much further into the bushing?
Don't do it!
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
From: West Texas
Car: '82 Camaro
Engine: 305
Transmission: wc T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi
Well, no--we took the torque arm out of the '91 parts car figuring the '82 wouldn't work because of the W stamping but, trying both the '91 and the '82, the '82 worked best. To get the speedometer cable into the T5 without interference we had to cut about a 3/4" square out of the tip of the torque arm. I'd like to find a new rubber piece for that mount, by the way--the original is OK but a little spongy.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,964
Likes: 4
From: Norfolk, VA. USA
Car: 86 Trans Am, 88 Formula
Engine: 95LT4, 305TPI
Transmission: T56, T5
Originally posted by rbjones
Well, no--we took the torque arm out of the '91 parts car figuring the '82 wouldn't work because of the W stamping but, trying both the '91 and the '82, the '82 worked best. To get the speedometer cable into the T5 without interference we had to cut about a 3/4" square out of the tip of the torque arm. I'd like to find a new rubber piece for that mount, by the way--the original is OK but a little spongy.
Well, no--we took the torque arm out of the '91 parts car figuring the '82 wouldn't work because of the W stamping but, trying both the '91 and the '82, the '82 worked best. To get the speedometer cable into the T5 without interference we had to cut about a 3/4" square out of the tip of the torque arm. I'd like to find a new rubber piece for that mount, by the way--the original is OK but a little spongy.
I couldn't find a stock one at Advance Auto.
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
From: West Texas
Car: '82 Camaro
Engine: 305
Transmission: wc T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi
Thanks, Zepher--is that a hard plastic bushing or a rubber one? JMD has me thinking I should get back under there and measure stuff--he said "Don't do it!" Because the rest of the rear end has the hard plastic bushings throughout and the interior is out, getting ready for a roll bar, I get a lot of road noise, hard to tell if any of it shouldn't be there. The car has about 2,000 miles in the last couple of months, probably time for a close inspection of everything under there.
Originally posted by jmd
Were not the 82 torque arms (behind a TH200) shorter than the 83-92 tq arms? Did it just slide that much further into the bushing?
Don't do it!
Were not the 82 torque arms (behind a TH200) shorter than the 83-92 tq arms? Did it just slide that much further into the bushing?
Don't do it!
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,522
Likes: 92
From: Aridzona
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
Originally posted by rjmcgee
The TH200 torque arm and driveline were about 3 inches longer than the 700R4 or T5 pieces.
The TH200 torque arm and driveline were about 3 inches longer than the 700R4 or T5 pieces.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,964
Likes: 4
From: Norfolk, VA. USA
Car: 86 Trans Am, 88 Formula
Engine: 95LT4, 305TPI
Transmission: T56, T5
Originally posted by rbjones
Thanks, Zepher--is that a hard plastic bushing or a rubber one? JMD has me thinking I should get back under there and measure stuff--he said "Don't do it!" Because the rest of the rear end has the hard plastic bushings throughout and the interior is out, getting ready for a roll bar, I get a lot of road noise, hard to tell if any of it shouldn't be there. The car has about 2,000 miles in the last couple of months, probably time for a close inspection of everything under there.
Thanks, Zepher--is that a hard plastic bushing or a rubber one? JMD has me thinking I should get back under there and measure stuff--he said "Don't do it!" Because the rest of the rear end has the hard plastic bushings throughout and the interior is out, getting ready for a roll bar, I get a lot of road noise, hard to tell if any of it shouldn't be there. The car has about 2,000 miles in the last couple of months, probably time for a close inspection of everything under there.
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
From: West Texas
Car: '82 Camaro
Engine: 305
Transmission: wc T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi
OK, I'll get the Energy Suspension bushing--that'll finish the set of bushings in the rear. I guess because I'm using the original 3-speed automatic (200) torque arm that extra 3" is why I had to chop it a bit for the speedometer cable. Being too short wouldn't be wise, maybe that's why I heard "Don't do it!" But I looked back under there Sunday afternoon and it looks solid and safe.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mickeyruder
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
3
Sep 2, 2015 02:45 PM
FireBirdKnight
Transmissions and Drivetrain
2
Feb 6, 2008 05:53 PM









